How the fuck is this even the least bit unbelievable?

There's always this fucking comment on almost every funny post.
Just say something original. Use your brain. Type something that you thought of.__
It's not that hard.

C'mon dude, take all the fun out of life why don't you.

you're autistic

oh come on,
i have heard and seen shit equal to or worse than this in my schools.

yes

Johnny was a disappointment to his dad, so Dr. Frankiln Storm adopted a white girl who would be successful.

True story.

Ah, so they introduce a black version of a character just for him to be a disappointment. Also apparently his father didn't like him.

yes

Rather.

Idk why you got a red pinkie but i gave your a green one to counter it.

It's just the nature of anons to be salty.

Rather.

/Sexy+voice+request+comp/text/5409085/

no

clyp.it/x1wyqzxd hankhillofthe

clyp.it/fvkih5mi

Damn hank, first you show us your dick, and now this? Are you trying to become some kind of FJ sex symbol? Which is kind of an oxymoron.

/Sexy+voice+request+comp/text/5409085/

no

clyp.it/lkb5ew4b

Okay, he sounds like a prepubescent you.
Also that audio is extremely erotic.

clyp.it/x1wyqzxd hankhillofthe

clyp.it/fvkih5mi

Damn hank, first you show us your dick, and now this? Are you trying to become some kind of FJ sex symbol? Which is kind of an oxymoron.

/Sexy+voice+request+comp/text/5409085/

no

People will unit against a common enemy. That's been proven with Athens and Sparta against the Persians, the Allies and Soviets against the Axis, and your own example of two parties trying to eradicate a disease.
But what if those parties worked against each other? The disease would be cured much faster; if they were at war, and they both needed their soldiers to stop dying off, they wouldn't come to terms to stop the disease, not in the middle of a war, no. Even if they did, competition is much more efficient: evolution, natural selection, it is not cooperation, and it is the most efficient at producing superior organisms.

Economic and scientific competition is much more productive than military competition. And no, they aren't synonymous.

Competition has always yielded better results than cooperation, simply because 'cooperation' between the allies/axis/soviets would have never happened. WWII and the Cold-War were motivation to be superior.

I'm sure it would be better if every single nation was cooperating, and in the end I think it's better for people to be dying from diseases that we're all working together to prevent than from soldiers being forced to kill one another.

People will unit against a common enemy. That's been proven with Athens and Sparta against the Persians, the Allies and Soviets against the Axis, and your own example of two parties trying to eradicate a disease.
But what if those parties worked against each other? The disease would be cured much faster; if they were at war, and they both needed their soldiers to stop dying off, they wouldn't come to terms to stop the disease, not in the middle of a war, no. Even if they did, competition is much more efficient: evolution, natural selection, it is not cooperation, and it is the most efficient at producing superior organisms.

Economic and scientific competition is much more productive than military competition. And no, they aren't synonymous.

I refuse to believe someone can sleep through a patch being applied and removed though.

Applied, probably. Removed, I can't imagine that really works.

The increased production and technological advancements have always been worth it.

I would think that if every nation worked together we could yield similar results.

Competition has always yielded better results than cooperation, simply because 'cooperation' between the allies/axis/soviets would have never happened. WWII and the Cold-War were motivation to be superior.

I'm sure it would be better if every single nation was cooperating, and in the end I think it's better for people to be dying from diseases that we're all working together to prevent than from soldiers being forced to kill one another.

People will unit against a common enemy. That's been proven with Athens and Sparta against the Persians, the Allies and Soviets against the Axis, and your own example of two parties trying to eradicate a disease.
But what if those parties worked against each other? The disease would be cured much faster; if they were at war, and they both needed their soldiers to stop dying off, they wouldn't come to terms to stop the disease, not in the middle of a war, no. Even if they did, competition is much more efficient: evolution, natural selection, it is not cooperation, and it is the most efficient at producing superior organisms.

Economic and scientific competition is much more productive than military competition. And no, they aren't synonymous.

I mean, without a confession it seems nearly impossible to prove that he got her addicted to nicotine while thinking she was addicted to sex with him.

Well the entire situation of someone finding out is all hypothetical, so who really knows how it would play out?

I refuse to believe someone can sleep through a patch being applied and removed though.

Applied, probably. Removed, I can't imagine that really works.

Take a syringe, fill it, jam it in his balls.