Haha they even used the exact same number of friend requests, messages and notifications.

You sneaky bastard.
Instead of posting the article, you post each individual image, reaping in the thumbs.
The final kick in the teeth is the fact that you posted the link to the article after posting the images.
You sly bastard; I like you.

damn, son, you a real-ass nigga layin' down some cold honkey!

Im pretty sure that these are all taken from a wikihow article.

Here's a link to where just about all of these can be found
hihearts.com/20-hilarious-but-true-differences-between-men-and-women/

This is actually surprising. No matter where I look, I keep finding this shitty compressed version of the image. Where's the full res?

It looks like this took a lot of determination to do

+14 thumbs for u from me

Haha they even used the exact same number of friend requests, messages and notifications.

So those nutty Brits knew what they were doing after all.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

He wrote: "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

You wrote: "Wait, did you just say that your cum seeps out gradually?"

I was informing you that you misread what he wrote. You apparently do not understand this.

You tried explaining that he was talking about it seeping out of a vag.

This is obviously not the case, since he also said he's a virgin.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion can be that he was talking about when he ejaculates, barring any issues in his writing that can lead to confusion.

My point stands. I didn't misread what he wrote. You were simply arguing a point that wasn't there.

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

You are hung up on the "inside" bit. It doesnt matter where you cum in this case. When you jerk it, does it dribble out of your dick?

And that was my original point, that if it's dribbling out of your dick, you're either holding back or there's something wrong with your dick. Cum is supposed to shoot out of the dick.

He wrote: "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

You wrote: "Wait, did you just say that your cum seeps out gradually?"

I was informing you that you misread what he wrote. You apparently do not understand this.

You tried explaining that he was talking about it seeping out of a vag.

This is obviously not the case, since he also said he's a virgin.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion can be that he was talking about when he ejaculates, barring any issues in his writing that can lead to confusion.

My point stands. I didn't misread what he wrote. You were simply arguing a point that wasn't there.

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

Are you trolling me? You dont have to cum inside someone to know whether or not your cum dribbles out.

How else would you know, from an experiential standpoint?

You are hung up on the "inside" bit. It doesnt matter where you cum in this case. When you jerk it, does it dribble out of your dick?

And that was my original point, that if it's dribbling out of your dick, you're either holding back or there's something wrong with your dick. Cum is supposed to shoot out of the dick.

He wrote: "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

You wrote: "Wait, did you just say that your cum seeps out gradually?"

I was informing you that you misread what he wrote. You apparently do not understand this.

You tried explaining that he was talking about it seeping out of a vag.

This is obviously not the case, since he also said he's a virgin.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion can be that he was talking about when he ejaculates, barring any issues in his writing that can lead to confusion.

My point stands. I didn't misread what he wrote. You were simply arguing a point that wasn't there.

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

Not really, he said the opposite of what you asked, namely that his cum DOESNT seep out, and wondering if everyone elses does.

But he said he's a virgin, so he would have no experience with cumming in someone

Are you trolling me? You dont have to cum inside someone to know whether or not your cum dribbles out.

How else would you know, from an experiential standpoint?

You are hung up on the "inside" bit. It doesnt matter where you cum in this case. When you jerk it, does it dribble out of your dick?

And that was my original point, that if it's dribbling out of your dick, you're either holding back or there's something wrong with your dick. Cum is supposed to shoot out of the dick.

He wrote: "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

You wrote: "Wait, did you just say that your cum seeps out gradually?"

I was informing you that you misread what he wrote. You apparently do not understand this.

You tried explaining that he was talking about it seeping out of a vag.

This is obviously not the case, since he also said he's a virgin.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion can be that he was talking about when he ejaculates, barring any issues in his writing that can lead to confusion.

My point stands. I didn't misread what he wrote. You were simply arguing a point that wasn't there.

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

"unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

Hes basically saying the opposite of himself.

So you can see the confusion

Not really, he said the opposite of what you asked, namely that his cum DOESNT seep out, and wondering if everyone elses does.

But he said he's a virgin, so he would have no experience with cumming in someone

Are you trolling me? You dont have to cum inside someone to know whether or not your cum dribbles out.

How else would you know, from an experiential standpoint?

You are hung up on the "inside" bit. It doesnt matter where you cum in this case. When you jerk it, does it dribble out of your dick?

And that was my original point, that if it's dribbling out of your dick, you're either holding back or there's something wrong with your dick. Cum is supposed to shoot out of the dick.

He wrote: "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

You wrote: "Wait, did you just say that your cum seeps out gradually?"

I was informing you that you misread what he wrote. You apparently do not understand this.

You tried explaining that he was talking about it seeping out of a vag.

This is obviously not the case, since he also said he's a virgin.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion can be that he was talking about when he ejaculates, barring any issues in his writing that can lead to confusion.

My point stands. I didn't misread what he wrote. You were simply arguing a point that wasn't there.

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

I think he is talking about it seeping out of the vag, not the dick.

I thought the same thing, but it didn't make sense since he said he's a virgin

"unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

Hes basically saying the opposite of himself.

So you can see the confusion

Not really, he said the opposite of what you asked, namely that his cum DOESNT seep out, and wondering if everyone elses does.

But he said he's a virgin, so he would have no experience with cumming in someone

Are you trolling me? You dont have to cum inside someone to know whether or not your cum dribbles out.

How else would you know, from an experiential standpoint?

You are hung up on the "inside" bit. It doesnt matter where you cum in this case. When you jerk it, does it dribble out of your dick?

And that was my original point, that if it's dribbling out of your dick, you're either holding back or there's something wrong with your dick. Cum is supposed to shoot out of the dick.

He wrote: "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out gradually."

You wrote: "Wait, did you just say that your cum seeps out gradually?"

I was informing you that you misread what he wrote. You apparently do not understand this.

You tried explaining that he was talking about it seeping out of a vag.

This is obviously not the case, since he also said he's a virgin.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion can be that he was talking about when he ejaculates, barring any issues in his writing that can lead to confusion.

My point stands. I didn't misread what he wrote. You were simply arguing a point that wasn't there.

What he wrote was basically "Are you saying that everyone else's sperm is room temperature and seeps out slowly, because mine isnt and doesnt".

You took this to mean the opposite.

Because that's not what he said. You're adding words. What he said was "unless I am the only one who's cum isn't room temperature and seeps out slowly." If you break that down, grammatically, it turns into this: whose cum isn't room temperature, and whose cum seeps out gradually.

ISNT!!

Ffs man, "only one whose cum ISNT"

"ISNT room temperature and seeps out slowly"

In other words, he is basically saying his cum IS body temperature and DOES shoot out.

isn't room temperature.
isn't seeps out slowly.

one of these is not like the other

So do you have a point? Do you have a counter argument at all?

And if your argument is that you somehow think the "seeps out slowly" bit is separate from the temperature bit, that makes no sense in the context. He is talking about the girl being able to feel when you cum. Now that makes no sense with "seeping" but very much sense with shooting out with force.

Reached limit with replies.

I can see the point, but my comment was utilizing his mistake for the express purpose of pointing out the misconception it causes

My point is and has been the entire time that what he wrote made it seem like he was saying his cum seeps out slowly from his dick. I was never really arguing that he was wrong about the girl being able to feel it, nor was I arguing that the temperature bit and the seeps out slowly bit were exclusive. The argument with you, however, is over your interpretation versus my own.

Well do you agree, that given what he wrote about being able to feel it shoot out that his intended meaning was to include "seeping out" with the temperature bit in the things that didnt apply to himself?

Yes...it seeps out and there is nothing you can do about it. Just clean it up afterwards with some towels.