Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

leightonsolomon    

Rank #4327 on Subscribers
leightonsolomon Avatar Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to leightonsolomon Block leightonsolomon Invite leightonsolomon to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 19
Youtube Channel: LSolomon13
X-box Gamertag: LSolomon13
Date Signed Up:3/01/2010
Last Login:11/23/2014
Location:United States
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9860
Highest Content Rank:#1803
Highest Comment Rank:#5383
Content Thumbs: 6862 total,  7546 ,  684
Comment Thumbs: 3239 total,  4150 ,  911
Content Level Progress: 99% (99/100)
Level 167 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 168 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 87% (87/100)
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:18
Content Views:210860
Times Content Favorited:562 times
Total Comments Made:1692
FJ Points:9907
Favorite Tags: collab (6) | gifs (5) | lawl poor kid ye (5) | mind the gap (5) | this is not a ta (5) | epic (4) | lol (4) | FUNNYJUNK (3) | i (3) | Love (3) | hard (2) | Party (2)
US
Guitarist, Pianist, Drummer, DJ
https://soundcloud.com/l13s

latest user's comments

#58604 - ...intelligent people? There is no bias in the show. Just cold…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/25/2014 on Religion Board +1
User avatar #58650 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/25/2014) [-]
dehumanizer doesn't know what those are.
#58660 - dehumanizer (03/25/2014) [-]
#58622 - dehumanizer (03/25/2014) [-]
yes..intellligent...
User avatar #58688 - leightonsolomon (03/25/2014) [-]
As nerdy and annoying as those people may be, you do realize that most of them are autistic? Generally that means socially inept but pretty damn smart. If those smart people don't believe in religion (and also Steven Hawking, Albert Einstein, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, etc) then I don't see why I should. Also, there are direct correlations with intelligence and religiosity. So there may be something to it.
#32 - True 03/25/2014 on Emo Girls Give Good Head +2
#28 - I remember explaining this to people when I had hair in front …  [+] (2 new replies) 03/25/2014 on Emo Girls Give Good Head +2
#31 - ddylann (03/25/2014) [-]
ya maybe when you have a normal hairstyle. i used to have long hair i know what you mean, but when they purposely try to get as much hair as possible in front of their eyes i think it would actually start to limit your vision pretty bad.
#32 - leightonsolomon (03/25/2014) [-]
True
#97 - I hope you guys realize that the only reason you're parents se… 03/21/2014 on TITLE 0
#57874 - Idk, it made me question my religion. and religion is addresse…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/20/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #57886 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/20/2014) [-]
Fair enough.
#212 - Sauce 03/19/2014 on Just got a bigger bed 0
#211 - Source - If you watch you see the dog does this as s… 03/19/2014 on Just got a bigger bed +1
#57430 - Yeah that might not be the word I'm looking for. Im just tryin… 03/19/2014 on Religion Board 0
#1156 - In case anyone hasn't seen it yet Everyone … 03/19/2014 on /science/ board +1
#57235 - In case anyone hasn't seen it yet I think every …  [+] (4 new replies) 03/19/2014 on Religion Board -2
User avatar #57440 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/20/2014) [-]
Wrong board mang.
User avatar #57874 - leightonsolomon (03/20/2014) [-]
Idk, it made me question my religion. and religion is addressed multiple times in this.
User avatar #57886 - nigeltheoutlaw (03/20/2014) [-]
Fair enough.
User avatar #57236 - teoberry (03/19/2014) [-]
DAE le cosmos?!!1!1!1!
#56968 - Upon further research it looks like he was referring to the ge…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/18/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56999 - thebritishguy (03/18/2014) [-]
oh right, thanks I learnt something out of this
#56961 - I think one of the most supportive facts I have found that sho…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/18/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #57243 - KINGOFTHESTARS (03/19/2014) [-]
doesnt superstition come from occurence?

User avatar #57430 - leightonsolomon (03/19/2014) [-]
Yeah that might not be the word I'm looking for. Im just trying to say that it's innate for humans to attribute something happening to something supernatural. For example, a day where everything goes wrong would make many people wonder if theyre being punished or if everything was good that God was rewarding them.
#56959 - Hmmm I believe that was an error. Everywhere I look I see beli… 03/18/2014 on Religion Board 0
#28 - Picture 03/17/2014 on I Was Awesome In High School +33
#192 - I mean Texans are doing something right considering their econ… 03/17/2014 on booo +1
#56329 - Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution i… 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
#56327 - Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tal…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#56325 - I have my facts straight, and you don't, because what you beli…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56326 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
No, you really don't. I fully believe in evolution with the torch being lit by God. And if you think the creation story is anything but a way to explain the origins on the universe in simple terms to ancient tribes, you're retarded
User avatar #56327 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tales? I mean why even believe part of the bible if we've established that you dont believe some of the key points.
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#56322 - Well if he is omnipotent then he can watch over the whole frea…  [+] (6 new replies) 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56324 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
That first part has nothing to do with anything. You're saying that because the universe is so humagous beeg, that it's stupid for Him to look over just us, but if He's omnipotent, He can watch over any other intelligent life. Also, guided evolution is fully accepted by me and the Church, so get your facts straight
User avatar #56325 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
I have my facts straight, and you don't, because what you believe literally conflicts with science. Since you believe in guided evolution, does this mean you refute certain parts of the bible? Like Adam and Eve? They are a clear cut first two people ever, whereas evolution shows us it was billions of years. (Also another error, considering literal interpretations of the bible say the earth is 6,000 years old)
User avatar #56326 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
No, you really don't. I fully believe in evolution with the torch being lit by God. And if you think the creation story is anything but a way to explain the origins on the universe in simple terms to ancient tribes, you're retarded
User avatar #56327 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tales? I mean why even believe part of the bible if we've established that you dont believe some of the key points.
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#56320 - They're unlikely to be anything like us, so I don't know why t…  [+] (8 new replies) 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56321 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Your argument was that the universe is too big for God to be focusing on us. But if there's other life, who says He isn't watching over them? This has nothing to do with the origins of Christianity, stop bringing that in
User avatar #56322 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Well if he is omnipotent then he can watch over the whole freakin universe at once if he wants, but at the same time, he knows everything, including what will happen in the future. This means it's impossible for him to be surprised, to wonder anything. He'll know what we're praying before we ever did. That's also a problem I have. Also earlier you said, "evolved, intelligent species" so you accept macro evolution. Are you not aware that it conflicts with your view of our creation?
User avatar #56324 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
That first part has nothing to do with anything. You're saying that because the universe is so humagous beeg, that it's stupid for Him to look over just us, but if He's omnipotent, He can watch over any other intelligent life. Also, guided evolution is fully accepted by me and the Church, so get your facts straight
User avatar #56325 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
I have my facts straight, and you don't, because what you believe literally conflicts with science. Since you believe in guided evolution, does this mean you refute certain parts of the bible? Like Adam and Eve? They are a clear cut first two people ever, whereas evolution shows us it was billions of years. (Also another error, considering literal interpretations of the bible say the earth is 6,000 years old)
User avatar #56326 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
No, you really don't. I fully believe in evolution with the torch being lit by God. And if you think the creation story is anything but a way to explain the origins on the universe in simple terms to ancient tribes, you're retarded
User avatar #56327 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tales? I mean why even believe part of the bible if we've established that you dont believe some of the key points.
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#56316 - Considering that we've already found many planets that are ver…  [+] (10 new replies) 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56317 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
And who says God wouldn't watch over them?
User avatar #56320 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
They're unlikely to be anything like us, so I don't know why they would worship a God of another planet millions of miles away. They'll likely make their own religions, just as every culture does. Just like how Christianity was made.
User avatar #56321 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Your argument was that the universe is too big for God to be focusing on us. But if there's other life, who says He isn't watching over them? This has nothing to do with the origins of Christianity, stop bringing that in
User avatar #56322 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Well if he is omnipotent then he can watch over the whole freakin universe at once if he wants, but at the same time, he knows everything, including what will happen in the future. This means it's impossible for him to be surprised, to wonder anything. He'll know what we're praying before we ever did. That's also a problem I have. Also earlier you said, "evolved, intelligent species" so you accept macro evolution. Are you not aware that it conflicts with your view of our creation?
User avatar #56324 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
That first part has nothing to do with anything. You're saying that because the universe is so humagous beeg, that it's stupid for Him to look over just us, but if He's omnipotent, He can watch over any other intelligent life. Also, guided evolution is fully accepted by me and the Church, so get your facts straight
User avatar #56325 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
I have my facts straight, and you don't, because what you believe literally conflicts with science. Since you believe in guided evolution, does this mean you refute certain parts of the bible? Like Adam and Eve? They are a clear cut first two people ever, whereas evolution shows us it was billions of years. (Also another error, considering literal interpretations of the bible say the earth is 6,000 years old)
User avatar #56326 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
No, you really don't. I fully believe in evolution with the torch being lit by God. And if you think the creation story is anything but a way to explain the origins on the universe in simple terms to ancient tribes, you're retarded
User avatar #56327 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tales? I mean why even believe part of the bible if we've established that you dont believe some of the key points.
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#56314 - The universe is ridiculously big. The argument is that it make…  [+] (12 new replies) 03/16/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #56315 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Because we're more than likely the only evolved, intelligent species that's worthy a lot of attention? Face it, the chances of a species at our level in the universe is slim
User avatar #56316 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Considering that we've already found many planets that are very similar to earth and the universe to super big, I wouldn't be surprised if the universe was teeming with intelligent life.
User avatar #56317 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
And who says God wouldn't watch over them?
User avatar #56320 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
They're unlikely to be anything like us, so I don't know why they would worship a God of another planet millions of miles away. They'll likely make their own religions, just as every culture does. Just like how Christianity was made.
User avatar #56321 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Your argument was that the universe is too big for God to be focusing on us. But if there's other life, who says He isn't watching over them? This has nothing to do with the origins of Christianity, stop bringing that in
User avatar #56322 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Well if he is omnipotent then he can watch over the whole freakin universe at once if he wants, but at the same time, he knows everything, including what will happen in the future. This means it's impossible for him to be surprised, to wonder anything. He'll know what we're praying before we ever did. That's also a problem I have. Also earlier you said, "evolved, intelligent species" so you accept macro evolution. Are you not aware that it conflicts with your view of our creation?
User avatar #56324 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
That first part has nothing to do with anything. You're saying that because the universe is so humagous beeg, that it's stupid for Him to look over just us, but if He's omnipotent, He can watch over any other intelligent life. Also, guided evolution is fully accepted by me and the Church, so get your facts straight
User avatar #56325 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
I have my facts straight, and you don't, because what you believe literally conflicts with science. Since you believe in guided evolution, does this mean you refute certain parts of the bible? Like Adam and Eve? They are a clear cut first two people ever, whereas evolution shows us it was billions of years. (Also another error, considering literal interpretations of the bible say the earth is 6,000 years old)
User avatar #56326 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
No, you really don't. I fully believe in evolution with the torch being lit by God. And if you think the creation story is anything but a way to explain the origins on the universe in simple terms to ancient tribes, you're retarded
User avatar #56327 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tales? I mean why even believe part of the bible if we've established that you dont believe some of the key points.
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#56220 - Well its not a meme, and It's a legitimate argument.  [+] (15 new replies) 03/15/2014 on Religion Board -1
User avatar #56304 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
'because the universe is big, it makes no sense for God to watch us'

solid argument there, bud
User avatar #56305 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
that was, admittedly, a strawman, but I don't see a good argument there
User avatar #56314 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
The universe is ridiculously big. The argument is that it makes no sense for a divine and omnipotent creator to care for small creatures in one section of the space so small its not even on the radar.
User avatar #56315 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Because we're more than likely the only evolved, intelligent species that's worthy a lot of attention? Face it, the chances of a species at our level in the universe is slim
User avatar #56316 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Considering that we've already found many planets that are very similar to earth and the universe to super big, I wouldn't be surprised if the universe was teeming with intelligent life.
User avatar #56317 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
And who says God wouldn't watch over them?
User avatar #56320 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
They're unlikely to be anything like us, so I don't know why they would worship a God of another planet millions of miles away. They'll likely make their own religions, just as every culture does. Just like how Christianity was made.
User avatar #56321 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Your argument was that the universe is too big for God to be focusing on us. But if there's other life, who says He isn't watching over them? This has nothing to do with the origins of Christianity, stop bringing that in
User avatar #56322 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Well if he is omnipotent then he can watch over the whole freakin universe at once if he wants, but at the same time, he knows everything, including what will happen in the future. This means it's impossible for him to be surprised, to wonder anything. He'll know what we're praying before we ever did. That's also a problem I have. Also earlier you said, "evolved, intelligent species" so you accept macro evolution. Are you not aware that it conflicts with your view of our creation?
User avatar #56324 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
That first part has nothing to do with anything. You're saying that because the universe is so humagous beeg, that it's stupid for Him to look over just us, but if He's omnipotent, He can watch over any other intelligent life. Also, guided evolution is fully accepted by me and the Church, so get your facts straight
User avatar #56325 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
I have my facts straight, and you don't, because what you believe literally conflicts with science. Since you believe in guided evolution, does this mean you refute certain parts of the bible? Like Adam and Eve? They are a clear cut first two people ever, whereas evolution shows us it was billions of years. (Also another error, considering literal interpretations of the bible say the earth is 6,000 years old)
User avatar #56326 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
No, you really don't. I fully believe in evolution with the torch being lit by God. And if you think the creation story is anything but a way to explain the origins on the universe in simple terms to ancient tribes, you're retarded
User avatar #56327 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ok I can accept that. But you're saying the bible is fairy tales? I mean why even believe part of the bible if we've established that you dont believe some of the key points.
User avatar #56328 - teoberry (03/16/2014) [-]
Did I say that? No. I'm saying that parts of the bibles were just to explain things in simpler terms to people who lived a loooooooooooooong time ago. And the Old Testament is hardly key to Catholics.
User avatar #56329 - leightonsolomon (03/16/2014) [-]
Ah I see. In my opinion, they could have explained evolution in a way that didnt make it seem like we came from two people, but thats just me.
#3012 - I would check to make sure you have the latest drivers for it.…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/15/2014 on Technology Board 0
User avatar #3018 - sonnypistol (03/15/2014) [-]
yeah i heard about the drivers but i cant find the rigjht ones to download! and i honestly dont know any other progtams that run easycap
#3011 - I've been having a lot of problems with Windows Explorer latel…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/15/2014 on Technology Board 0
User avatar #3046 - billybong (03/15/2014) [-]
What kind of crash?

Does it BSOD? It could be heat, drivers, bad disk sectors, bad ram

Does explorer.exe stop working? Open the run dialogue box and type in sft /scannow It does an integrity check on the windows files. You'll need a windows disk inserted or mounted in a virtual drive

Does the entire system just lock up without a BSOD? Usually a memory controller problem, either heating up or just dieing.

I'm going to guess either a buggered install, or a driver issue
User avatar #3015 - Mortuus (03/15/2014) [-]
Do you still have your Windows installation/recovery disks?

If so, I'd give them a shot. It sounds like Windows itself is damaged.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#35 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
is that really you playing minecraft in that youtube channel
User avatar #36 to #35 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
why do you ask?
#37 to #36 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
let me join your server
User avatar #38 to #37 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
nah, its closed now
#39 to #38 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
which means no fun now
User avatar #40 to #39 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
how many jew reaction pictures do you have
#41 to #40 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
i have allot. want some?
User avatar #42 to #41 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
im good. do you troll on the religion board or are you serious?
#43 to #42 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
im really nice for the good people and only troll when i see idiots in there.

im the nicest person for the nice people

and harshest person for the bad people.

i know i might be an asshole to you (maybe). but i want to open a big discussion in that board.

it just need some cleanup, now you see some of those filth are gone, and there are little some left and must be gone.

you can talk to me on my profile anytime you want. but on that board no
User avatar #44 to #43 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
ah I see. thats good to know, that board is all kinds of crazy lately
User avatar #45 to #44 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
im just pissing them off, yourgaylol is just doing same as i (just for the lulz).

and the board is crazy even before i came, they turned me to a massive successful troll.

anyway, your own belief is?
User avatar #46 to #45 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
I see. I'm agnostic, you?
#47 to #46 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
im Muslim tolerant to all except new atheism and satanism. which they are the same (and those atheist fags cry when i say this to them hehe). or anyone insult me i will go total barbarian against him. in a trolling system.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Atheism
new atheism by simple explanation, be a total asshole against everything have belief.

something gonna make you laugh:


Get off the fence faggot. You're just scared of making a decision; faith or facts.


—Atheist responding to an agnostic
User avatar #48 to #47 - leightonsolomon (07/03/2014) [-]
Makes sense. I try not to be a dick to super religious people. I don't know which religion is correct, or if any of them are, but if science proves part of it wrong, I'll be less likely to take its followers seriously.
User avatar #51 to #48 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (07/13/2014) [-]
That's not actually what new atheism means... new atheism is best portrayed with a cartoon I saw... "Old atheism: PRiest: Be quiet! Atheist: Yes yes... New atheism: Priest: Be quiet! Atheist: No, you be quiet!"
User avatar #49 to #48 - syrianassassin (07/03/2014) [-]
you cant justify religion by science.

it is like trying to say the scientific method is approved by philosophy.

science is a branch and religion is another far branch. religion can give clues for science. like in the quran when god says : have not the disbelievers considered the heavens and the earth was once joined entity, then we separated them and made from water-every living thing. will they not believe? al-Anbiya` 21:30

if religion is going to give us all the science, the sea will not be enough and there will be more to say.

Say, "If the sea were ink for [writing] the words of my Lord, the sea would be exhausted before the words of my Lord were exhausted, even if We brought the like of it as a supplement." Surat Al-Kahf 109

imagine all the science is written in the quran, it will be impossible to read!
User avatar #25 - revengeforfreeze (02/03/2014) [-]
pls respond
User avatar #27 to #26 - revengeforfreeze (02/04/2014) [-]
#24 - revengeforfreeze (11/26/2013)
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3915475/Look+who+I+met+today/99#99

I don't understand this guy, what does he mean by "class of 2015"?
User avatar #28 to #27 - leightonsolomon (02/04/2014) [-]
That means the year I graduate.
User avatar #31 to #30 - revengeforfreeze (02/04/2014) [-]
ahic = ah i c = ah i see
User avatar #33 to #32 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
Could you... change your avatar? :| I like your comments, but it burns my eyes... I don't want to put you on hide all...
User avatar #34 to #33 - leightonsolomon (06/18/2014) [-]
bahaha yeah hold on. I like your comments too btw
User avatar #50 to #34 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (07/13/2014) [-]
Yay! Yeah, that was the old me. Rather cynical and angry. So much has changed. Thanks for changing avatar. I'd rather not have an avatar considering I will most likely just change and I'd rather be faceless, ever changing, you know? Oh well one thing.

I think you're question about if we would change if aliens came is very interesting. There would be ONE change as far as I see it: we would unite, if only momentrarily
Another change I can imagine is mass panick... at least with the masses... I mean, c'mon. These people who just walk around .. late job, home, tv, sleep, eat, and so on. Pffff.

Although I can imagine Stephen Hawking being only interested, given that they are peaceful.
User avatar #24 - revengeforfreeze (11/26/2013) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3915475/Look+who+I+met+today/99#99

I don't understand this guy, what does he mean by "class of 2015"?
#19 - MatthewsGauss (08/13/2012) [-]
STAY THE **** AWAY FROM MY EYEBALLS
User avatar #20 to #19 - leightonsolomon (08/13/2012) [-]
O_o hokay. I still don''t get this item **** .
User avatar #21 to #20 - MatthewsGauss (08/13/2012) [-]
i just collect eyeballs for no reason plus I have about 40K points to spend anyway
User avatar #22 to #21 - leightonsolomon (08/13/2012) [-]
Ah I see
#18 - swinefluvictim (07/18/2012) [-]
You're from Denton? That's cool, I'm from Benbrook/Crowley myself.
#17 to #16 - leightonsolomon (02/21/2011) [-]
YEAH I DID IT!
YEAH I DID IT!
User avatar #23 to #17 - kajenkajon (08/25/2012) [-]
Nope.
#13 - leightonsolomon (12/21/2010) [-]
HELL YEAH
HELL YEAH
User avatar #10 - soraisrox (08/27/2010) [-]
Your videos are lost in the time warp!
However, I was able to recover one.

http://www.funnyjunk.com/movies/6430/Epic+Funnyjunk+Collab+2/
User avatar #11 to #10 - leightonsolomon (08/29/2010) [-]
I know right. like wtf happened? should i reupload them?
#9 - PatrickDelaney **User deleted account** (07/25/2010) [-]
hey leighton look a a profile named prestigousturd he has master chief as a bannana
#7 - Intoxication **User deleted account** (07/13/2010) [-]
You have the best ******* taste in music I have ever heard. Also if you're sick of hearing people asking for the songs, wouldn't you just name the song in the comments or some **** ?
User avatar #8 to #7 - leightonsolomon (07/13/2010) [-]
lol your right. and thanks. I love techno. The collab Im working on right now has a techno song and I should finish it in a couple of days :)
User avatar #6 - Duststorm (06/11/2010) [-]
It's a me! Dustin!
User avatar #2 - Jakolantern (05/24/2010) [-]
so are you going to make a 3rd?
User avatar #3 to #2 - leightonsolomon (05/24/2010) [-]
probably. any music suggestions?
User avatar #4 to #3 - Jakolantern (05/24/2010) [-]
skindred-nobody
#1 - Womens Study Major (05/23/2010) [-]
I ******* love your second collab.

Possibly the funniest thing I've ever seen.
 Friends (0)