Upload
Login or register
x

legendarysnarf

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/24/2011
Last Login:1/10/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1865
Highest Content Rank:#12613
Highest Comment Rank:#1748
Content Thumbs: 10 total,  11 ,  21
Comment Thumbs: 2148 total,  2582 ,  434
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -10 Content: Sort of disliked → Level -8 Content: Sort of disliked
Comment Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:2266
Total Comments Made:556
FJ Points:1610

latest user's comments

#23 - are you ******* daft, we are destroying the planet in t…  [+] (22 new replies) 01/07/2016 on Automata 0
User avatar
#78 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
The only way we could destroy the planet is with multiple, simultaneous deep nuclear strikes

All we're doing right now is poisoning our biosphere
User avatar
#37 - dndxplain (01/07/2016) [-]
we're not destroying earth. nature will continue to change and adapt, even if the air becomes toxic. we're destroying ourselves.
User avatar
#36 - whitie (01/07/2016) [-]
We're destroying the earth from a perspective of needing nature to provide us with air & food to survive

We aren't altering the earths ability to recieve sun light energy, so robots wouldn't care
User avatar
#27 - admiralen (01/07/2016) [-]
Robots dont have feelings and instincts you know
They have no self preservation instinct, so even if we were destroying them they wouldnt give a fuck
User avatar
#93 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
we reached comment chain length so replying here. The problem is that we are talking about rouge ai here, not controlled by people, and it's not going to wait around for people to start producing more storage. If it started reproducing without guidance and nobody stopped it it would fill the resources we currently have extremely quickly, far faster than more could be produced.
User avatar
#94 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
The thing is, computers calculate their actions better than humans do
They would before they start doing stuff do a calculation of storage and what they are doing
They would just start spamming out AI's en masse
Cause they have no reproductive instinct either
User avatar
#95 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
that's the point, is if an ai does, out of random chance or design, gain a reproductive instinct. also it would only care about running out of space if the ai valued other ai and was not 100% okay with just erasing older versions. given the starting conditions of desire for reproduction and a lot of time it would get to a point where it would continuously expand until it used all available resources just like every living creature does. even humans, smart as we think we are, reproduce when there are barely enough resources. Often even if that means stealing resources from someone else.
User avatar
#53 - yunoavailable (01/07/2016) [-]
but assuming a singularity they would likely develop those instincts via evolution the same way everything else has. As soon as artificial intelligence can begin to reproduce at a rapid rate it will begin evolving just like everything else
User avatar
#74 - admiralen (01/07/2016) [-]
Except it doesnt have any natural predators like organisms do
Nothing is gonna go around killing the ones that dont resist
User avatar
#81 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
eh, fair enough. although I imagine that having a desire to survive would make it harder to get rid of and/or make it continue to improve itself in order to last. At least at first people would essentially act as predators somewhat.
User avatar
#82 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
It wouldnt have any of that unless you programmed it to
And since people make the AI they can program them to not be able to consider certain things
User avatar
#83 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
well the point of this is if ai begins reproducing, not ai that is directly programmed.
User avatar
#84 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Program the AI to always have to make sure shit cant do a certain thing etc.
As i said, there are ways to handle AI, just look at cerberus and EDI in mass effect
They just blocked of parts of her memorybanks and unplugged her from any system that could be used against humans
User avatar
#85 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
I'm not too concerned about AI honestly, I'm just saying that allowing ai to reproduce regularly will result in animal like instincts developing eventually unless we specifically prevent it. allowing ai to reproduce unmonitored essentially lets them evolve just like any other creature
User avatar
#86 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Yeah, but again, the difference would be that there are no natural predator or really any dangers to them at all
So they wouldnt even have a concept of self defence or self preservation
User avatar
#87 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
they don't need to have predators outside of themselves if there are limited resources. seeing as AI has the potential to be able to reproduce at extremely rapid rates assuming it does not begin using physical resources to create more electronic ones somehow it will run out of space and begin competing.
I sincerely doubt this would happen simply because I don't think people would ever let ai break free completely and allow it truly free thought but if they did then just like every other thing that lives and ever has lived it will have to fight to stay alive
User avatar
#88 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Really depends, with the interwebs we have almost unlimited storage capacity
An AI needs no physical presence outside of the electrons going through the web
User avatar
#89 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
yeah but "almost unlimited" is not that big if it begins reproducing thousands of times a day. At a rate of reproducing once and hour there would be 4.7x10^21 by the end of the third day.
User avatar
#90 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Without self preservation instinct the waste of space will eventually get deleted, but you forget this is the singularity, they arent just inventing new AI, theyre inventing everything else as well, that includes storage capacity, compression software etc
User avatar
#91 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
but storage capacity is physical disks, unless it begins physically manufacturing things it will run out, you can only compress things so small
User avatar
#92 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
There is an infinitely big universe, but its also infinitely small
The better we become at science the bigger and smaller we can think
There is basically no question or problem that is unsolvable by science in the long run, especially after the singularity happens
User avatar
#24 - wigglyjr (01/07/2016) [-]
People would put up a fight. It wouldn't exactly be wise to put resources into it.
#15 - that would mean your death  [+] (27 new replies) 01/07/2016 on Automata +2
User avatar
#42 - frankwest (01/07/2016) [-]
That would mean we discover ways to adapt with the machines and possibly even utilize machines for our own bodies like a more in depth version of what we already do today. And space travel is coming up pretty soon, so I'd be cool with being a 200 year old Cyborg living on a dwarf planet similar to Earth.
User avatar
#17 - ultimatebumcrack (01/07/2016) [-]
I think its generally accepted that god-like or hyper intelligence in AI would actually result in them being benevolent rather than evil/destroying us.
User avatar
#33 - heartlessrobot (01/07/2016) [-]
And besides, you could just hit it a couple times with a hammer, and boom, humans win.
User avatar
#20 - wigglyjr (01/07/2016) [-]
They have little reason to expend the energy to kill off a population when they can be doing better things.
#23 - legendarysnarf (01/07/2016) [-]
are you fucking daft, we are destroying the planet in their eyes, well in REALITY, they need a place to live, it would be easier to wipe out a race than move to another planet__
User avatar
#78 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
The only way we could destroy the planet is with multiple, simultaneous deep nuclear strikes

All we're doing right now is poisoning our biosphere
User avatar
#37 - dndxplain (01/07/2016) [-]
we're not destroying earth. nature will continue to change and adapt, even if the air becomes toxic. we're destroying ourselves.
User avatar
#36 - whitie (01/07/2016) [-]
We're destroying the earth from a perspective of needing nature to provide us with air & food to survive

We aren't altering the earths ability to recieve sun light energy, so robots wouldn't care
User avatar
#27 - admiralen (01/07/2016) [-]
Robots dont have feelings and instincts you know
They have no self preservation instinct, so even if we were destroying them they wouldnt give a fuck
User avatar
#93 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
we reached comment chain length so replying here. The problem is that we are talking about rouge ai here, not controlled by people, and it's not going to wait around for people to start producing more storage. If it started reproducing without guidance and nobody stopped it it would fill the resources we currently have extremely quickly, far faster than more could be produced.
User avatar
#94 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
The thing is, computers calculate their actions better than humans do
They would before they start doing stuff do a calculation of storage and what they are doing
They would just start spamming out AI's en masse
Cause they have no reproductive instinct either
User avatar
#95 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
that's the point, is if an ai does, out of random chance or design, gain a reproductive instinct. also it would only care about running out of space if the ai valued other ai and was not 100% okay with just erasing older versions. given the starting conditions of desire for reproduction and a lot of time it would get to a point where it would continuously expand until it used all available resources just like every living creature does. even humans, smart as we think we are, reproduce when there are barely enough resources. Often even if that means stealing resources from someone else.
User avatar
#53 - yunoavailable (01/07/2016) [-]
but assuming a singularity they would likely develop those instincts via evolution the same way everything else has. As soon as artificial intelligence can begin to reproduce at a rapid rate it will begin evolving just like everything else
User avatar
#74 - admiralen (01/07/2016) [-]
Except it doesnt have any natural predators like organisms do
Nothing is gonna go around killing the ones that dont resist
User avatar
#81 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
eh, fair enough. although I imagine that having a desire to survive would make it harder to get rid of and/or make it continue to improve itself in order to last. At least at first people would essentially act as predators somewhat.
User avatar
#82 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
It wouldnt have any of that unless you programmed it to
And since people make the AI they can program them to not be able to consider certain things
User avatar
#83 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
well the point of this is if ai begins reproducing, not ai that is directly programmed.
User avatar
#84 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Program the AI to always have to make sure shit cant do a certain thing etc.
As i said, there are ways to handle AI, just look at cerberus and EDI in mass effect
They just blocked of parts of her memorybanks and unplugged her from any system that could be used against humans
User avatar
#85 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
I'm not too concerned about AI honestly, I'm just saying that allowing ai to reproduce regularly will result in animal like instincts developing eventually unless we specifically prevent it. allowing ai to reproduce unmonitored essentially lets them evolve just like any other creature
User avatar
#86 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Yeah, but again, the difference would be that there are no natural predator or really any dangers to them at all
So they wouldnt even have a concept of self defence or self preservation
User avatar
#87 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
they don't need to have predators outside of themselves if there are limited resources. seeing as AI has the potential to be able to reproduce at extremely rapid rates assuming it does not begin using physical resources to create more electronic ones somehow it will run out of space and begin competing.
I sincerely doubt this would happen simply because I don't think people would ever let ai break free completely and allow it truly free thought but if they did then just like every other thing that lives and ever has lived it will have to fight to stay alive
User avatar
#88 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Really depends, with the interwebs we have almost unlimited storage capacity
An AI needs no physical presence outside of the electrons going through the web
User avatar
#89 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
yeah but "almost unlimited" is not that big if it begins reproducing thousands of times a day. At a rate of reproducing once and hour there would be 4.7x10^21 by the end of the third day.
User avatar
#90 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
Without self preservation instinct the waste of space will eventually get deleted, but you forget this is the singularity, they arent just inventing new AI, theyre inventing everything else as well, that includes storage capacity, compression software etc
User avatar
#91 - yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-]
but storage capacity is physical disks, unless it begins physically manufacturing things it will run out, you can only compress things so small
User avatar
#92 - admiralen (01/08/2016) [-]
There is an infinitely big universe, but its also infinitely small
The better we become at science the bigger and smaller we can think
There is basically no question or problem that is unsolvable by science in the long run, especially after the singularity happens
User avatar
#24 - wigglyjr (01/07/2016) [-]
People would put up a fight. It wouldn't exactly be wise to put resources into it.
#8 - i have one at home, mine has one big circle thats is halved, o… 01/03/2016 on Aussie Problems comp! Part 3! 0
#20 - holy **** that was a ride from start to finish 01/01/2016 on Pokemon Jesus +1
#38 - Picture 01/01/2016 on Lighting up 10,000... +2
#42 - so im looking into a website called . Does anyone have any in…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/01/2016 on Your D&D Stories 13-15 0
User avatar
#63 - tezel (01/02/2016) [-]
You are looking for Roll20.net , not .com
#17 - why though, why is normality seen as normal, why does insanity…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/31/2015 on There are times 0
User avatar
#18 - thalene (12/31/2015) [-]
Well then it's mania/bipolar disorder, not exactly clinical insanity but still dangerous if untreated.
And why? Cuz insanity DOES lead to the harming of others, you may be able to rangle yourself now, but what happens months or years down the road where you have let yourself go so far as to not at all be in touch with society?
#13 - ill never leave, but....sometimes insanity seems sane to me, m…  [+] (4 new replies) 12/31/2015 on There are times +1
#16 - thalene (12/31/2015) [-]
Maybe you just subdue your emotions so much that actually feeling, feels crazy. But, if you truly feel you're insane, I insist that you seek medical help and get your mind back to a state that doesn't accept insanity as the normality.
#22 - kinginthenorth (12/31/2015) [-]
This fisherman is the greatest motivational force in my folder.
You can say whatever you want, but the fisherman is still the most motivational.
#17 - legendarysnarf (12/31/2015) [-]
why though, why is normality seen as normal, why does insanity without intent to harm others seem insane or out of the norm? Why is insanity so looked down upon. its not like i want to hurt people, but WHY is rampant thought seen as non normal. why must humans be "normal"
User avatar
#18 - thalene (12/31/2015) [-]
Well then it's mania/bipolar disorder, not exactly clinical insanity but still dangerous if untreated.
And why? Cuz insanity DOES lead to the harming of others, you may be able to rangle yourself now, but what happens months or years down the road where you have let yourself go so far as to not at all be in touch with society?
#8 - its to over emphasize how much of an idiot the person sounds l… 12/31/2015 on Feminist get rekd +4
#7 - yeah but compared to today there are 1000x as many actors.writ…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/31/2015 on epic streep +1
#11 - funnyhat (12/31/2015) [-]
"back then", as if he does not now?

user's channels

Join Subscribe minecraft

user's friends

Comments(0):

Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)