Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

leanonwut    

Rank #9319 on Comments
leanonwut Avatar Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to leanonwut Block leanonwut Invite leanonwut to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Facebook Profile: w
Youtube Channel: t
Steam Profile: f
Consoles Owned: i
Video Games Played: s
X-box Gamertag: d
PSN: i
Interests: s
Date Signed Up:7/12/2012
Last Login:6/23/2014
Location:hurr
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9319
Highest Content Rank:#404
Highest Comment Rank:#2451
Content Thumbs: 15008 total,  16322 ,  1314
Comment Thumbs: 2460 total,  2962 ,  502
Content Level Progress: 0.6% (6/1000)
Level 215 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 216 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 30% (30/100)
Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:489830
Times Content Favorited:585 times
Total Comments Made:938
FJ Points:17526
Favorite Tags: a (3) | i (2) | sex (2)
durr

latest user's comments

#44 - You're logic is ridiculous. I'm not even gonna argue with you.  [+] (17 new replies) 04/22/2013 on yep -3
User avatar #46 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
I said that wrong i mean

If you ban guns people wont be able to buy them and they cant use them

If you restrict guns people cant buy them....but can still use them :/ what is wrong with this logic
User avatar #49 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
Restrictions would just make it harder for criminals and those likely to lose their minds. Banning firearms would only leave law enforcement and military with weapons. Civilians who are perfectly safe with firearms would be stripped of all weapons. But criminals with firearms will still have their firearms. There are enough guns on the black market for crooks to acquire. It won't really make it harder for criminals to find guns. It'll just take longer for them to acquire them.
User avatar #58 - dinkcool (04/22/2013) [-]
The is no such thing as a person who is safe with a weapon.
User avatar #62 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
You must be one of those people who are afraid of everything.
User avatar #116 - haseotakaeda (04/22/2013) [-]
Are you fucking retarded?
If a mechanism can kill you with a pull of a trigger you're damn right to be scared of it
User avatar #64 - dinkcool (04/22/2013) [-]
No but i dont trust random people to walk around with firearms on the streets. For me that is pretty much the same thing as walking around on the streets in a warzone.
User avatar #57 - haseotakaeda (04/22/2013) [-]
I don't know why you fuckers complain about being able to arm yourselves
Like christ, the amendment was written in a time when people needed guns,
and don't give me the "it's part of our history" bs, you dont see japanese people walking around with swords
User avatar #807 - Onemanretardpack (04/23/2013) [-]
It was also written in a time when people needed free speech. They had no idea about the internet or texting, so maybe your rights don't extend to those things
User avatar #61 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
I live in an area where crime is high and guns on the street illegally is very common. It is actually recommended to those who buy house in this area that they take classes/training for firearms and that they also buy(legally) a home defense weapon. Sure if I lived in some high-class gated community that was safe and secure, I wouldn't feel the need for a gun. But in this city, it's a must have. This is an area where you are very likely to find yourself thinking "It's me or them." Thankfully the local law enforcement offices have made it possible for civilians to take proper training.
User avatar #52 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
Ok so by Your logic if someone else can Illegaly aquire guns (from which the police with this new law will try to stop) you must have them to becuase fuck it I GON PROTEC MA FREEDUMS

where i lived in england it was pretty ruff but the chances of being shot was very very low police dont fuck around with that shit.
There was more fear of being stabbed if someone wants to harm you or break in they fucking will but without laws you just make it easier you cant stop this shit no but why not make it harder to do so less do it?


#65 - ogloko (04/22/2013) [-]
by putting more bans you restrict lawful people. in comparison to america, the UK has 20% of the population as the USA but the crime only drops to 50% of the USA's. the UK has a firearms ban and there are still around 50 or more gun murders year. this shows that this policy fails on a national level.
all cities where such policy has been enacted in the USA have shown no significant drop in gun crime. these policies fail on a municipal level.
americans love our guns and they are a right guaranteed by the constitution, the supreme law of our land.
User avatar #72 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
Americans who want guns to stay always use the ITS MA RIT AS MERICAN MAN TO PROTECT MA FAMILYSS

but banning guns is not just about that think of all those retarded christian rednecks with there inbred son who wants to go shoot up a school cause he hates life and uncle freedum keeps touching him where does he go to get that gun thats right from good ol daddy he goes into school kills some kids then gets killed by someone else with a gun who thinks he did good.
Now if that kids dad did not have a gun he would most likely hang himself.

#83 - ogloko (04/22/2013) [-]
so because of the minority, the majority should loose rights? if daddy recalls his NRA safety course, he should have his guns secured in a safe or other equivalent. the easier, cheaper, and legal solution, is education. you cant legislate common sense, but you CAN educate people.
User avatar #94 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
80% of america are religious the main people who are retarded and have guns and misuse them are redneck dumb Christians almost all rednecks are religious.

When i use the term religoius i think dumb.
Religous people to me are ignorant people who are hypercrites and if you dont agree with them then your opinoin is wrong that is stupid right?

Im not being funny but Americans lack common sense and the education system is not that good in america.

And what you said because of the minority, the majority should loose rights with america it should be because of the majority, the minority should loose rights


Forgive english i russia
#120 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure that you've never been to America. Even if we only outnumber the idiots 2/1, we still outnumber them. America is still a land of people who can be reasoned with. I am religious, but i LOVE science as well, I'm a reasonable person and you should have been one too. I also come from Texas, which happens to be known as the most weak minded state in America. Please don't use the internet as a source of viable information, it will only make you stupid. Smart anon away.
User avatar #197 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
How does that make you smart?

You love the positive things you get from science to benifit you then you disregard all our theory's and proof of everything.

And yes i have been to america and where else am i going to get statistics?
did you go around all of america and ask each person there IQ to make a statement of 2/1 see with statistics i could say 7/10 americans are fat now if you counter this as if it was a real fact or statement you therefor think it is possible so me saying my statistics and people countering them shows they also think its a possibility.
#114 - ogloko (04/22/2013) [-]
gun owners in america are not a radical, fringe element as you have described. but those are probably the stereotypes that reach russia. the "80%" is the people who say they are religious. only about 36% actually attend regular services.

gun owners make up around 47% of of the american population. i dont care what you think about religious people, it has no place in this dialogue
#39 - That would make it gun restrictions, not gun bans.  [+] (32 new replies) 04/22/2013 on yep +1
User avatar #47 - haseotakaeda (04/22/2013) [-]
Well i'm assuming via either a ban or restriction, you still couldn't buy it at a walmart
User avatar #76 - Onemanretardpack (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, that would be great if these people that committed these crimes actually BOUGHT them, let alone at wal mart. 3/4ths of gun crimes are committed with illegal guns, and James Holmes bought his from a licensed FFL
User avatar #250 - haseotakaeda (04/22/2013) [-]
>Implying it wouldn't be a good thing to reduce these crimes by 1/4th
User avatar #803 - Onemanretardpack (04/23/2013) [-]
>Implying you wouldn't raise violent crime by denying people the right to low cost guns
You don't cut off your nose to spite your face, why would you want more violence to happen just so you can have these feel good measures that would do absolutely nothing?

BTW, if you want to know my position, I'm all for restrictions where it actually matters. People with mental disorders that could lead to violence shouldn't have guns. Period. Do you think these shooters are at all like normal gun owners? These people are fucking insane, and shouldn't have had guns in the first place. But you know what? They didn't use their own guns, except for james holmes, who was a fucking nutjob and should've been denied his guns ASAP.

PS: The magazines they're trying to demonize and ban? STANDARD capacity magazines? You know where they got that from? James Holmes used a 100 round beta c magazine THAT JAMMED. Yeah, that magazine saved peoples lives. If he actually had the standard capacity magazines that have a much higher reliability, people might be dead. Politicians know this shit, so instead of going after the ACTUAL high capacity magazines, they're going after regular magazines. They just want to ban SOMETHING, and they'll lie and manipulate polls and public opinion and stand on the graves of dead children to do it
#354 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
>implying that if somebody decided to break the law with a gun they would observe the laws that keep them from buying guns.
User avatar #392 - haseotakaeda (04/23/2013) [-]
>implying that crime rates wouldn't go down if not everyone had a walmart gun in their broom closet
User avatar #801 - Onemanretardpack (04/23/2013) [-]
Please tell me how law abiding citizens with no criminal backgrounds are doing all the crime. The last three shooters would have passed a background check, but stole their weapons instead. Nothing you or anyone has proposed would do anything but limit the people who would obey the laws, IE: The people not doing the killing
User avatar #804 - haseotakaeda (04/23/2013) [-]
Again, that is an ignorant and stupid statement
What happens if a "law abiding citizen" who owns a gun he bought from his local walmart decides one day he wants to kill someone? Who the fuck will stop him? He already HAS the gun. The point is not to let people have weapons in the first place.
And no, a gun is not a form of defense,
a sword isn't a fucking shield
User avatar #806 - Onemanretardpack (04/23/2013) [-]
What happens if someone decides to plants a couple bombs in the middle of a crowd? Oh wait, that already happened. Do you want to ban pressure cookers and nails now? No? But they already did more damage than guns have this year. Still no? What if I told you that the best deterrent for these things was someone with a gun? These people want easy targets, so they can achieve their high score. That's why they're not going after embassies or government buildings. As soon as they realize this shit isn't going to be easy for them, the dream dies
User avatar #805 - Onemanretardpack (04/23/2013) [-]
What's to stop them? Are you kidding me? Are you really this stupid? You can't ban guns and hope nobody uses them. Guns are the best defense against guns. And yes, guns are a form of defense. You use it to do defend yourself, just as you can kill someone with your shield. Your wildly ignorant and all encompassing statements tell me that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, so this little discussion is done. Come back when you have something better than "Banning gurnz will save lives, even though statistics and prior experience says they won't"
#611 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
Crime went down after states moved over to shall issue permit states where anyone who passed a background check could get a gun.
User avatar #50 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
I wouldn't mind having to go to a licensed gun seller to buy guns. Leave the paintball and bb guns for stores like that.
User avatar #42 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
You ban a gun = You cant buy a gun/use a gun

You restrict guns = you can buy a gun / but use it.

Banning guns seems more logical but if someone really wanted to shoot a school up they would but why not make it harder for them to do so?
User avatar #44 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
You're logic is ridiculous. I'm not even gonna argue with you.
User avatar #46 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
I said that wrong i mean

If you ban guns people wont be able to buy them and they cant use them

If you restrict guns people cant buy them....but can still use them :/ what is wrong with this logic
User avatar #49 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
Restrictions would just make it harder for criminals and those likely to lose their minds. Banning firearms would only leave law enforcement and military with weapons. Civilians who are perfectly safe with firearms would be stripped of all weapons. But criminals with firearms will still have their firearms. There are enough guns on the black market for crooks to acquire. It won't really make it harder for criminals to find guns. It'll just take longer for them to acquire them.
User avatar #58 - dinkcool (04/22/2013) [-]
The is no such thing as a person who is safe with a weapon.
User avatar #62 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
You must be one of those people who are afraid of everything.
User avatar #116 - haseotakaeda (04/22/2013) [-]
Are you fucking retarded?
If a mechanism can kill you with a pull of a trigger you're damn right to be scared of it
User avatar #64 - dinkcool (04/22/2013) [-]
No but i dont trust random people to walk around with firearms on the streets. For me that is pretty much the same thing as walking around on the streets in a warzone.
User avatar #57 - haseotakaeda (04/22/2013) [-]
I don't know why you fuckers complain about being able to arm yourselves
Like christ, the amendment was written in a time when people needed guns,
and don't give me the "it's part of our history" bs, you dont see japanese people walking around with swords
User avatar #807 - Onemanretardpack (04/23/2013) [-]
It was also written in a time when people needed free speech. They had no idea about the internet or texting, so maybe your rights don't extend to those things
User avatar #61 - leanonwut (04/22/2013) [-]
I live in an area where crime is high and guns on the street illegally is very common. It is actually recommended to those who buy house in this area that they take classes/training for firearms and that they also buy(legally) a home defense weapon. Sure if I lived in some high-class gated community that was safe and secure, I wouldn't feel the need for a gun. But in this city, it's a must have. This is an area where you are very likely to find yourself thinking "It's me or them." Thankfully the local law enforcement offices have made it possible for civilians to take proper training.
User avatar #52 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
Ok so by Your logic if someone else can Illegaly aquire guns (from which the police with this new law will try to stop) you must have them to becuase fuck it I GON PROTEC MA FREEDUMS

where i lived in england it was pretty ruff but the chances of being shot was very very low police dont fuck around with that shit.
There was more fear of being stabbed if someone wants to harm you or break in they fucking will but without laws you just make it easier you cant stop this shit no but why not make it harder to do so less do it?


#65 - ogloko (04/22/2013) [-]
by putting more bans you restrict lawful people. in comparison to america, the UK has 20% of the population as the USA but the crime only drops to 50% of the USA's. the UK has a firearms ban and there are still around 50 or more gun murders year. this shows that this policy fails on a national level.
all cities where such policy has been enacted in the USA have shown no significant drop in gun crime. these policies fail on a municipal level.
americans love our guns and they are a right guaranteed by the constitution, the supreme law of our land.
User avatar #72 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
Americans who want guns to stay always use the ITS MA RIT AS MERICAN MAN TO PROTECT MA FAMILYSS

but banning guns is not just about that think of all those retarded christian rednecks with there inbred son who wants to go shoot up a school cause he hates life and uncle freedum keeps touching him where does he go to get that gun thats right from good ol daddy he goes into school kills some kids then gets killed by someone else with a gun who thinks he did good.
Now if that kids dad did not have a gun he would most likely hang himself.

#83 - ogloko (04/22/2013) [-]
so because of the minority, the majority should loose rights? if daddy recalls his NRA safety course, he should have his guns secured in a safe or other equivalent. the easier, cheaper, and legal solution, is education. you cant legislate common sense, but you CAN educate people.
User avatar #94 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
80% of america are religious the main people who are retarded and have guns and misuse them are redneck dumb Christians almost all rednecks are religious.

When i use the term religoius i think dumb.
Religous people to me are ignorant people who are hypercrites and if you dont agree with them then your opinoin is wrong that is stupid right?

Im not being funny but Americans lack common sense and the education system is not that good in america.

And what you said because of the minority, the majority should loose rights with america it should be because of the majority, the minority should loose rights


Forgive english i russia
#120 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure that you've never been to America. Even if we only outnumber the idiots 2/1, we still outnumber them. America is still a land of people who can be reasoned with. I am religious, but i LOVE science as well, I'm a reasonable person and you should have been one too. I also come from Texas, which happens to be known as the most weak minded state in America. Please don't use the internet as a source of viable information, it will only make you stupid. Smart anon away.
User avatar #197 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
How does that make you smart?

You love the positive things you get from science to benifit you then you disregard all our theory's and proof of everything.

And yes i have been to america and where else am i going to get statistics?
did you go around all of america and ask each person there IQ to make a statement of 2/1 see with statistics i could say 7/10 americans are fat now if you counter this as if it was a real fact or statement you therefor think it is possible so me saying my statistics and people countering them shows they also think its a possibility.
#114 - ogloko (04/22/2013) [-]
gun owners in america are not a radical, fringe element as you have described. but those are probably the stereotypes that reach russia. the "80%" is the people who say they are religious. only about 36% actually attend regular services.

gun owners make up around 47% of of the american population. i dont care what you think about religious people, it has no place in this dialogue
User avatar #43 - trojandetected (04/22/2013) [-]
Well i MCFUCKED that up

CANT*
#15 - Lots of insurance fraud 04/22/2013 on Welcome to Russia +2
#197 - That's uncle sam  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2013 on Freedum 0
User avatar #199 - lordmacflurri (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah I know, I just said that just below this comment.
#219 - Picture 04/22/2013 on The Flash +1
#53 - It's been reposted so many times the quality has reduced drama…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/21/2013 on Don't know em, wanna... +6
User avatar #54 - bkrazy (04/21/2013) [-]
OC was from another place, but quality was good, then I got it with screen cap cuz for some reason FJ didn't like the URL and computer wouldn't save then when uploading it I didn't change it from 80 quality and voila screen crap
#4132554 - but jig 04/21/2013 on retard forum 0
#4130600 - wat r u  [+] (2 new replies) 04/20/2013 on retard forum 0
#4130605 - rainbowrush (04/20/2013) [-]
Dildos
User avatar #4132554 - leanonwut (04/21/2013) [-]
but jig
#93 - Obvious troll is obvious. 0.01*10^-99/10, try harder.  [+] (1 new reply) 04/20/2013 on why male birth control is a... -3
User avatar #96 - nodaddynoo (04/20/2013) [-]
fuck you I wasn't trolling
#72 - lol'd  [+] (1 new reply) 04/20/2013 on McDisasters 10: The... +1
#74 - anonymous (04/20/2013) [-]
the amount of same feel is tremendous and fat
#32 - " **** you grandma, you win. Where did you ge… 04/20/2013 on every game of monopoly ends... +1
#89 - "sunshine" 04/20/2013 on My other one rule 0
#172 - Comment deleted 04/20/2013 on Buying games vs Buying... 0
#456 - Picture 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#451 - Picture 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#450 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#451 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#449 - Picture 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#448 - Picture 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#447 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck +1
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#446 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#447 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#445 - Picture  [+] (3 new replies) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#446 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#447 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#444 - Picture  [+] (4 new replies) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#445 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#446 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#447 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#443 - Picture  [+] (5 new replies) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#444 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#445 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#446 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#447 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#442 - Picture  [+] (6 new replies) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck 0
#443 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#444 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#445 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#446 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#447 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#440 - Picture  [+] (7 new replies) 04/20/2013 on what the actual fuck +1
#442 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#443 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#444 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#445 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#446 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#447 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]
#448 - leanonwut (04/20/2013) [-]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #6 - phanact (11/20/2012) [-]
Sorry
had to disable profile for a few hours

You should be fine
 Friends (0)