It's even more retarded when you realize they aren't drinking it because they actually like it. They're drinking to get drunk just like everyone else, but think they are better because it costs thousands of dollars instead of less than a hundred to get white girl wasted. And I'm sure that's the type of drunk they all are

Holy fuck, Russians don't tolerate shit from anyone

I never did fully get what that game/etc was

Hey mixing vodka with sriracha is pretty fucking good

It really isn't though. The best vodkas are barely tolerable in a straight shot. The process of distillation and filtration removes the head and tail off the vat right from the still. These components contain the flavorants in whiskey and rum. This clean process leaves you with a "clean" spirit. Hitting that 40% ABV mark is tricky. Higher end bands will have near this right from the still, usually resulting in a less caustic burn on the palate. Cheap vodkas buy distilled ethanol at 98% ABV and cut it with water, thus the harsh chemical smell and burn.

TLDR vodka is made to taste like simply alcohol, where other liquors like rum and whiskey use aging and whole body distillation to create unique blends of flavors.

That's champagne.

Stoli is the only vodka worth drinking

Tequila in any place that isn't mexico will all taste the same.

You cant get microbial diseases from an alcoholic drink (or at least it'd be really fucking hard for them to do so).

Well then they are doubly dumb for comparing smirnoff russian champagne to champagne.

welp, I've drank some expensive as fuck champagne and it tasted like shit. I'd rather drink 2$ russian carbonated wine.

I'll take an 11$ bottle of Freixenet Brut over a 160$ bottle of dom perignon

I would too, but that's because dom finishes like bitter salt, and I like a fruitier taste without the sickly sweetness.

Even Vodka connoisseurs have admitted that its very difficult to tell the difference between high and low end vodka.


Hence how a bunch of cheap Russian manufacturers were able to water down their vodka with antifreeze for a few years before anyone noticed.

Thats actually more of a wine thing specifically chianti .... Ethylene Glycol is actually very sweet its out of place in vodka. Thats why they put the massive warning labels on it because kids will drink it.

Also your first part is very very true for mid shelf to high self, cheap vodka tastes like cheap vodka, but you can dramaticly improve it with just a simple filtration (theres a myth busters episode on it me thinks didn't become a high end but became much much better)

All luxury items are bullshit. It's paying 40 times as much for roughly equivalent products. Alcohol in particular has issues with this: wine tasters named a $5 bottle of night train wine to be the best from amongst a blind sampling that included incredibly valuable French wines. Either way, these all seem incredibly like forced jokes, so I don't think almost any of these are real.

i completely agree but also paying more for something means that you perceive it to taste nicer

so he will just become a meme that is popular right now?

i prefer vodka but ok i can agree a fish house is nice

Vodka is best drink

successful pepe, duh

so he will just become a meme that is popular right now?

I didn't realize someone had already posted this song. Your pain is all too real when strangers can feel it through a computer screen.

Damn dude thats fate i wouldnt want to live either, but i guess everyone has his own package. some heavier ones some ligher ones

some of these time travel meeting things were created by extremely famous scientists or celebrities...i think mark twain held a couple of parties themed like this.

What if you're female and have an anime profile pick, how big is your vote then?

No no, that's a perfect score, too good for this.

and black and a midget?

no your order of operations is off, you always do the largest calculation first and round down.

2/250

THIS IS WHAT I WAS TRYING TO TELL YOU YOU MEXICAN CONGLOMERATE PHYTOPLANKTON

If you wish, but the idea of using taxpayer funding on large businesses as per the examples in the previous article is antithetical to classical liberal ideology. Thomas Malthus' theory states that poor urbanization is inevitable. Redistribution of wealth at any magnitude is dissipated among the poorest orders (this has been thus far proven by application in the welfare state). The solution to lift the poor is by allowing them to work for the highest paying employer, and to encourage lassaiz- faire. Government involvement should be as minimal as possible especially concerning the unequal bargaining power of big corporations.

Well then I'd make myself the latter. But when you say liberal you must understand the root of that word.

Yeah, it got stolen. That's my whole point. The Progressive movement emerged in the 1890s and included intellectual reformers typified by sociologist Lester Frank Ward and economist Richard T. Ely. They transformed Victorian liberalism, retaining its commitment to civil liberties and individual rights while casting off its advocacy of laissez-faire economics.

When people say things like "libtard" they are referring to US left wing.

Here is a not idiotic US left-winger's summary of the terms: www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/whats-the-difference-betw_b_9140.html

THIS IS WHAT I WAS TRYING TO TELL YOU YOU MEXICAN CONGLOMERATE PHYTOPLANKTON

If you wish, but the idea of using taxpayer funding on large businesses as per the examples in the previous article is antithetical to classical liberal ideology. Thomas Malthus' theory states that poor urbanization is inevitable. Redistribution of wealth at any magnitude is dissipated among the poorest orders (this has been thus far proven by application in the welfare state). The solution to lift the poor is by allowing them to work for the highest paying employer, and to encourage lassaiz- faire. Government involvement should be as minimal as possible especially concerning the unequal bargaining power of big corporations.

And no matter how many times you cite this I will remind you that:
a) The natural progression of ideologies is to the left
b) You continuously use the word "liberal" when you mean to say "progressive", which aside from being incorrect makes you look like an idiot.
c) Seriously, I actually am the thing, so I reckon I know what the thing is.

Except I'm right

No, that's not how it works. Saying you're right with no solid supporting evidence doesn't make you right. All you've shown me is you can make half-assed statements that are either logical fallacies or have very very little substance to them.

Gee get a load of this guy. Surely you know what the word liberty means.

I'll give you my load slut

I think you're getting liberal and libertarian confused.

Libertarian- a person who believes that people should be allowed to do and say what they want without any interference from the government, a person who upholds the principles of individual liberty especially of thought and action

Liberal- believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change, relating to or supporting political liberalism,not opposed to new ideas or ways of behaving that are not traditional or widely accepted

So a libertarian believes it's ok if you wanna be a gay weed farmer with a huge stockpile of guns and ammo without help from the government, a liberal wants their ideas pushed to the general population so there's more national conformity and government control in everyone's lives so we can be micro managed and support by the government not ourselves. You were probably just trying to be bait but it hurts when I serve in the United States military and see people who are to stupid to have an opinion of their own, read a book, get a job and hopefully go to college and get a useful degree. Our country needs more hard workers and less uneducated vocal welfare cunts.

His Grandfather never read him "The little red hen". I wish there were more bright / rational people like you online.

Recon, but I'm a reserve bitch

But I had to start out as infantry

0321 if you want the number...I'm a Marine

That is massively oversimplified.

Your MIND is overly-simplified dumbass

So do you actually have an argument or are you just here to shitpost as usual

Of course it is, you're on a humor website not fucking c-span

You have to differentiate between US liberalism and classical liberalism. European politics views US conservatism as a variety of classical liberalism, whereas only the social values represent liberal ideologies in the US left wing.

The meanings are different depending on your political entity. I'm not saying that it is correct, but that is the reality. US liberalism means liberal application of government programs. Classical liberalism is rooted in liberty.

Well then I'd make myself the latter. But when you say liberal you must understand the root of that word.

Yeah, it got stolen. That's my whole point. The Progressive movement emerged in the 1890s and included intellectual reformers typified by sociologist Lester Frank Ward and economist Richard T. Ely. They transformed Victorian liberalism, retaining its commitment to civil liberties and individual rights while casting off its advocacy of laissez-faire economics.

When people say things like "libtard" they are referring to US left wing.

Here is a not idiotic US left-winger's summary of the terms: www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/whats-the-difference-betw_b_9140.html

THIS IS WHAT I WAS TRYING TO TELL YOU YOU MEXICAN CONGLOMERATE PHYTOPLANKTON

If you wish, but the idea of using taxpayer funding on large businesses as per the examples in the previous article is antithetical to classical liberal ideology. Thomas Malthus' theory states that poor urbanization is inevitable. Redistribution of wealth at any magnitude is dissipated among the poorest orders (this has been thus far proven by application in the welfare state). The solution to lift the poor is by allowing them to work for the highest paying employer, and to encourage lassaiz- faire. Government involvement should be as minimal as possible especially concerning the unequal bargaining power of big corporations.