I said prove me wrong, you failed. If your argument here was a boat it would be sinking. If a tree was 100 ft tall, allowing for spread of branches, at a MAXIMUM lets say a branch sprouting from the top, outwards 50 ft, and back to the ground, makes it 150 ft branch. Regardless, it isn't possible to prove it as accurate or false because the tree is not described in any specific detail in the books, much like itxDitto's "facts".

Flamel was 665 as last noted in the book. Dumbledore only did other forms of alchemy with him, was a friend of Flamel, and offered to protect the stone. Please tell me how he lived to be 500 with no help from the stone. I disagree with your arguments.

True, but who is to say that Flamel didn't give Dumbledore a few bottles here and there? I am not trying to flame you, or Harry Potter(seen the last twice already in theaters). Just saying you have some facts that have an unfounded basis in the books, and I would like citations.

I said prove me wrong, you failed. If your argument here was a boat it would be sinking. If a tree was 100 ft tall, allowing for spread of branches, at a MAXIMUM lets say a branch sprouting from the top, outwards 50 ft, and back to the ground, makes it 150 ft branch. Regardless, it isn't possible to prove it as accurate or false because the tree is not described in any specific detail in the books, much like itxDitto's "facts".

I'm 14