Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

lean    

Rank #450 on Comments
lean Avatar Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to lean Block lean Invite lean to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/21/2011
Last Login:9/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9739
Comment Ranking:#450
Highest Content Rank:#3435
Highest Comment Rank:#116
Content Thumbs: 751 total,  878 ,  127
Comment Thumbs: 18192 total,  19685 ,  1493
Content Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 65 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 66 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 78% (780/1000)
Level 314 Comments: Wizard → Level 315 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:0
Content Views:45863
Times Content Favorited:61 times
Total Comments Made:2059
FJ Points:14448

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 28065
    Thumbs Up 582 Thumbs Down 34 Total: +548
    Comments: 55
    Favorites: 51
    Uploaded: 12/06/13
    Our planet is neat sometimes Our planet is neat sometimes
  • Views: 3726
    Thumbs Up 118 Thumbs Down 14 Total: +104
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 8
    Uploaded: 04/16/12
    Badwolf Badwolf
  • Views: 2394
    Thumbs Up 33 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +25
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 02/06/12
    Reposters Reposters
  • Views: 1533
    Thumbs Up 31 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +22
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/05/12
    Transit of venus Transit of venus
  • Views: 1132
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +13
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 04/06/12
    Evolution? Evolution?
  • Views: 654
    Thumbs Up 17 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +11
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/11/11
    An oddity An oddity
1 2 3 > [ 14 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#153 - 2,400 years. Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a consp… 23 hours ago on DYK Comp #54 0
#152 - 10,000 years  [+] (1 new reply) 23 hours ago on DYK Comp #54 0
#153 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
2,400 years.

Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a conspiracy theorist, the government wants whats best for the planet, and the data isn't skewed to alarm and dismay people into spending more money on going green. The facts speak for themselves.
#151 - So you are saying that our modern global warming was started b…  [+] (3 new replies) 23 hours ago on DYK Comp #54 0
User avatar #154 - nigeltheoutlaw (22 hours ago) [-]
"But the foundation for thinking that human effects will cause warming is substantial. Even if the recent rise in temperature is natural, human caused effects have a high probability of dominating in the near future, and within our lifetimes the temperature of the Earth could go higher than has ever seen previously by Homo sapiens."

From the link you just sent me. Not to mention that this is one scientist operating off of data from a single core sample from 1993. This is interesting, but what he said is still in line with what I said. Also, are you planning to respond to my other response at all? It addresses the point you are trying to address with these graphs in more detail.
#152 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
10,000 years
#153 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
2,400 years.

Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a conspiracy theorist, the government wants whats best for the planet, and the data isn't skewed to alarm and dismay people into spending more money on going green. The facts speak for themselves.
#148 - This shows the last 100,000 years, and is far more informative…  [+] (5 new replies) 09/18/2014 on DYK Comp #54 0
User avatar #150 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
Your own unsourced graph just reinforces what I said: that this period of anthropomorphic climate change is ludicrously and unnaturally fast compared to previous periods of natural climate change.
#151 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
So you are saying that our modern global warming was started by us 12,000 years ago? That first red dot is the Quaternary extinction event. (wooly Mammoth).

All these charts come direct from Berkely University's independent study of climate change. Here muller.lbl.gov/pages/iceagebook/history_of_climate.html

How about the last 400,000 years?
Sorry for the GIFs. Visit the page
User avatar #154 - nigeltheoutlaw (22 hours ago) [-]
"But the foundation for thinking that human effects will cause warming is substantial. Even if the recent rise in temperature is natural, human caused effects have a high probability of dominating in the near future, and within our lifetimes the temperature of the Earth could go higher than has ever seen previously by Homo sapiens."

From the link you just sent me. Not to mention that this is one scientist operating off of data from a single core sample from 1993. This is interesting, but what he said is still in line with what I said. Also, are you planning to respond to my other response at all? It addresses the point you are trying to address with these graphs in more detail.
#152 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
10,000 years
#153 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
2,400 years.

Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a conspiracy theorist, the government wants whats best for the planet, and the data isn't skewed to alarm and dismay people into spending more money on going green. The facts speak for themselves.
#147 - 140 years. .6 degrees. That's what the graph shows, but if y…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/18/2014 on DYK Comp #54 0
#148 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
This shows the last 100,000 years, and is far more informative. Let me tell you, if the average temperatures from 40-60 thousand years ago were what we experience today, I would be buried under miles of ice (MN). Thank global warming that I only have to deal with that in the winter now.
User avatar #150 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
Your own unsourced graph just reinforces what I said: that this period of anthropomorphic climate change is ludicrously and unnaturally fast compared to previous periods of natural climate change.
#151 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
So you are saying that our modern global warming was started by us 12,000 years ago? That first red dot is the Quaternary extinction event. (wooly Mammoth).

All these charts come direct from Berkely University's independent study of climate change. Here muller.lbl.gov/pages/iceagebook/history_of_climate.html

How about the last 400,000 years?
Sorry for the GIFs. Visit the page
User avatar #154 - nigeltheoutlaw (22 hours ago) [-]
"But the foundation for thinking that human effects will cause warming is substantial. Even if the recent rise in temperature is natural, human caused effects have a high probability of dominating in the near future, and within our lifetimes the temperature of the Earth could go higher than has ever seen previously by Homo sapiens."

From the link you just sent me. Not to mention that this is one scientist operating off of data from a single core sample from 1993. This is interesting, but what he said is still in line with what I said. Also, are you planning to respond to my other response at all? It addresses the point you are trying to address with these graphs in more detail.
#152 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
10,000 years
#153 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
2,400 years.

Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a conspiracy theorist, the government wants whats best for the planet, and the data isn't skewed to alarm and dismay people into spending more money on going green. The facts speak for themselves.
#146 - What is really mind blowing to me is you accept what a group l…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/18/2014 on DYK Comp #54 0
#149 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
It's not that I accept what NASA says immediately; every major science organization on the planet agrees with anthropomorphic climate change, the greenhouse effect from gasses is a well documented phenomenon that you can prove through simple experiments that you do yourself (I did an experiment on it as an 8th grader), and the only scientists that dispute anthropomorphic climate change either A) are not trained in anything even tangentially related to climate, or B) are on oil or coal companies' payrolls. Nothing you said changes that.

It won't destroy the planet, and I can't think of a single scientists who has claimed as such, though you're welcome to list some. It will, however, cause severe problems with ecosystems and weather patterns, cause widespread famine due to these issues with the weather patterns and ecosystems, cause large scale extinctions, especially in marine life due to ocean acidification, and lower the quality of life for billions of people on the planet. It's definitely the largest immediate issue that we face close seconds of the die-off of honey bees and the possibility of nuclear annihilation, and also coincidentally is directly due to our own actions just like the other two.

I'll address your other comment here as well: 140 years is an extremely fast rate of climate change. Natural climate change takes anywhere from tens of thousands of years to millions of years to occur, but we have sped it up to a small fraction of the time. This means that the planet's biosphere can not adapt to the slow change as it normally does, and that will have global negative consequences. The only thing you've proved here is that you don't understand that time frames apply differently to the planet than they do to us. Additionally, an increase of .5 *C translates to about 2-3 *C increase on land since that is a global average that factors in the ocean's ability as a heat sink. That means that the estimated global temp increases will be equal to 4-10 *C.
#144 - Do you know of another agency that has satellite imaging and w…  [+] (8 new replies) 09/18/2014 on DYK Comp #54 0
#145 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
>lie about what it means

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh noes, da ebul gubmint and science is lying to us!!!!11 Goood job, you found da conspuracy! All the world's scientists came together just to lie about this one bit. But you still missed out on the lizard people so you failed in the end.
#147 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
140 years. .6 degrees. That's what the graph shows, but if you take away the numbers, jeez that thing is rocketing upwards! We need to panic!
Why do they design the graph to look like extreme temperature increase when it simply isn't extreme?
#148 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
This shows the last 100,000 years, and is far more informative. Let me tell you, if the average temperatures from 40-60 thousand years ago were what we experience today, I would be buried under miles of ice (MN). Thank global warming that I only have to deal with that in the winter now.
User avatar #150 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
Your own unsourced graph just reinforces what I said: that this period of anthropomorphic climate change is ludicrously and unnaturally fast compared to previous periods of natural climate change.
#151 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
So you are saying that our modern global warming was started by us 12,000 years ago? That first red dot is the Quaternary extinction event. (wooly Mammoth).

All these charts come direct from Berkely University's independent study of climate change. Here muller.lbl.gov/pages/iceagebook/history_of_climate.html

How about the last 400,000 years?
Sorry for the GIFs. Visit the page
User avatar #154 - nigeltheoutlaw (22 hours ago) [-]
"But the foundation for thinking that human effects will cause warming is substantial. Even if the recent rise in temperature is natural, human caused effects have a high probability of dominating in the near future, and within our lifetimes the temperature of the Earth could go higher than has ever seen previously by Homo sapiens."

From the link you just sent me. Not to mention that this is one scientist operating off of data from a single core sample from 1993. This is interesting, but what he said is still in line with what I said. Also, are you planning to respond to my other response at all? It addresses the point you are trying to address with these graphs in more detail.
#152 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
10,000 years
#153 - lean (23 hours ago) [-]
2,400 years.

Go ahead and keep telling me I'm a conspiracy theorist, the government wants whats best for the planet, and the data isn't skewed to alarm and dismay people into spending more money on going green. The facts speak for themselves.
#143 - Nasa is undoubtedly skewing information to make it look worse … 09/18/2014 on DYK Comp #54 0
#70 - Every single major headline on that page is in dispute or has …  [+] (3 new replies) 09/17/2014 on DYK Comp #54 +1
#105 - nigeltheoutlaw (09/18/2014) [-]
You figured out the great conspiracy, but you didn't realize that the lizard people were behind it the whole time. I give you a B overall.
User avatar #71 - ojollie (09/17/2014) [-]
What are you suggesting? That there's a huge conspiracy and NASA and over 95% of the worlds scientific institutions are lying? Or that your interweb sleuthing has uncovered scientific data previously unavailable to said institutions?
User avatar #143 - lean (09/18/2014) [-]
Nasa is undoubtedly skewing information to make it look worse than it actually is. I am not denying climate change by any means, but it is not the apocalyptic eminent disaster that some would have you believe. Nasa is funded by the US gov, who by their own admission have stated that the hundreds of billions they spend on climate change control every year have an insignificant effect, but they still push it forward. What's the point?
#40 - yeah but mirroring someone who is attacking you with a sword i…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/17/2014 on Onward to victory 0
User avatar #45 - valarofcookies (09/17/2014) [-]
I would agree that right handers are better at training other right handers. And lefties would be better at training lefties. But learning something in reverse isn't as hard as you might perceive it to be either. When you learn in reverse your whole life, you get pretty good at it. But that isn't what I left that comment in the first place. The point that I was trying to get across was that lefties aren't lesser swordsmen just for being left-handed. Back then they just may not have had as much opportunity to be trained as right handed people and its too bad the culture they were immersed in saw them as lesser for it.

user's channels

Join Subscribe doctor-who
Join Subscribe fucking-olympics
Join Subscribe fucking-science
Join Subscribe funny
Join Subscribe turtles
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2810 / Total items point value: 3110
[ 21 items Total ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
 Friends (0)