| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
lcarnage
| Rank #11681 on Comments Offline Send mail to lcarnage Block lcarnage Invite lcarnage to be your friend flag avatar |
|
latest user's comments
| #36 - That isn't guarantee, that's a possibility. In russian roulett… [+] (14 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -2 |
| It is a possibility that the individual dies, but the guarantee that someone will fall and die in both. Whether you are killed by the kinetic energy of a metal slug or your own impacting the ground doesn't make a difference. It's a gamble with death itself, and a completely unnecessary one in both cases. That changes nothing if you think about it. This is a debate about attitude and safety reasoning, not practice. Ok, let me get this straight. If someone's life was under my responsibility I wouldn't think twice about strapping them up with a helmet, shoes and life jacket before going out. I do not think for a moment that companies such as Jersey Adventures (A local company who takes groups out kayaking and such) is unnecessarily preparing the people who are participating. I completely agree with their methods. If I was in the same situation, I'd take the same pre-cautions. But it's the trust in my friends and myself that stops me from putting all the advised safety gear on. It's the same reason people choose not to wear a seatbelt: Comfort and trust. #273
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Not to wear seatbelts just because you trust your friend's driving skills is idiotic. No matter how good he would be at driving, there's people in the traffic that aren't so good or just don't care and may hit you. There can always be surprising conditions that you have no control over and wich can injure you or even kill you. This is why safety gear was invented, to prevent injuries from conditions you can't control. Not to use the safety gear is stupid and irresponsible, always. Just because you enjoy the adrenaline rush you get from doing stupid things, doesn't make them right or acceptable, nor does it really make your life any better. That's complacent, idiotic and completely irresponsible. You might think it's your personal decision because it's only affecting you, but it isn't because it doesn't. Don't be the weak link in the chain. #59
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Oh dear God. Comfort and trust is more important than safety? You are stupider than I first thought. In the same logic, if someone else is driving like a nutter you can crash. It's not always the driver's fault. Same with you. Even if you know what you're doing, you could always misplace your foot when you jump and land on rocks and die. And if you were really their friend you would wear a lifejacket. It makes it much easier to save you, and imagine how they'd feel if you died because of your stupidity and ignorance? #38
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Mathematically, you're wrong. Sorry. With Russian Roulette, you can't say someone WILL die. It's wrong. Yes, if you had an infinite amount of time, someone would, but not in reality. There is a 1/6 probability that somone will die first time. A 1/6 the next game too. So there's a 1/36 someone will die in the first two rounds. And a 1/216 by round 3. Mathematically the chances will increase every time, but nobody HAS TO die. Same in anything you say you're doing. Chances may be incredible low that you may get stung by a box jellyfish, but there's always a chance, and you can't say there isn't. Also just to throw in, I completely disagree with everything you're saying. Little kids like you that think they know everything piss me off. Hate to attack your argument, but you're wrong. The revolvers cylinder is only spun once, meaning the maximum number of possible turns is 6. Russian roulette ends with a corpse. Always. I never said I know everything. I worded one of my comments badly which made it seem like I think I'm invincible, which is highly false. I am aware that there is always the CHANCE of something going wrong, but I can't put it into words why I choose to do these things. #44
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] That's not why everyone hates you. You didn't word anything badly, you're stupid, you think you know everything (eg trying to disprove everyone with flawed arguments) and you were wrong about that jellyfish thing that the other guy corrected you on. | ||
| #32 - They aren't irrelevant but the unlikelihood of it's happening … [+] (1 new reply) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -2 |
| #30 - How can I whistle for help if I have a heart attack? I've had … [+] (9 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -2 |
| That's good for you. Really, I'm glad. But making him have to haul you out of the water as difficult as possible if someone happens to you is kind of an asshole move if you think about it, isn't it? This isn't just about you, actually. In a group and a potentially dangerous situation, you have responsibility to the others. Dude, I've been inside burning buildings knowing there's a buddy trusting me blindly. I fuck up, he might die. I'm careless and injure myself and I'm putting the others in danger having to get me out. Putting up warning signs on the road while the others are there cutting people out of the wrecks isn't glorious work, but if I fuck up I might get all of them killed. Therefore reflective vest and careful walking instead of running. Same thing with you. Imagine someone gets hurt because of having to help you. You don't wanna do that to anyone. " But the other half wants me to push my boundaries." Fuck that half. It's not worth it if someone else has to pay for it. "If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee Where is the point you should stop pushing your boundaries? If you never did you would be ordinary, not extraordinary. I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made. The point is when you affect and endanger others. Just like Bruce Lee would have never made a lethal blow against a training partner. That's what Darth Vader would do, if you excuse that fictional example. "I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made." Neither would I. I couldn't live with someone suffering for my mistakes. But you know what? My buddies could never live with letting anyone behind either, hell, that's why we did what we did in the first place. And I fucking know they wouldn't have hesitated. If I wasn't atheist I'd praise the lord and give thanks push never came to shove. If you've got a bunch of heartless assholes, then you may be able to pull it off, but don't count on good people being selfish and heartless. Won't work. #33
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Seriously dude? Google shit. Pro swimmers have gone into the sea and drowned because of cramps. Shut up now. | ||
| #27 - No, Russian roulette someone is guaranteed to die. It is a dif… [+] (18 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -3 |
| #35
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] "what do you do on a daily basis" u sound like an arrogant twat mate think your so high and mighty sit down and shut up Freeclimbing someone is guaranteed to die as well. Gravity is always in effect, grip strength or balance can fail. That's your guarantee right there. Hell yeah I'm not used to putting myself in danger to no avail. Why the hell would I? Doesn't mean I have a boring life, if that's what you're playing at. Years in the firebrigade, military service, now sporadic weightlifting, climbing and archery while I wait for university to start next month. That's kind of what I do at the moment. Still, safety is always highest concern. I'd hate to cripple myself or injure others through neglect. It is a possibility that the individual dies, but the guarantee that someone will fall and die in both. Whether you are killed by the kinetic energy of a metal slug or your own impacting the ground doesn't make a difference. It's a gamble with death itself, and a completely unnecessary one in both cases. That changes nothing if you think about it. This is a debate about attitude and safety reasoning, not practice. Ok, let me get this straight. If someone's life was under my responsibility I wouldn't think twice about strapping them up with a helmet, shoes and life jacket before going out. I do not think for a moment that companies such as Jersey Adventures (A local company who takes groups out kayaking and such) is unnecessarily preparing the people who are participating. I completely agree with their methods. If I was in the same situation, I'd take the same pre-cautions. But it's the trust in my friends and myself that stops me from putting all the advised safety gear on. It's the same reason people choose not to wear a seatbelt: Comfort and trust. #273
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Not to wear seatbelts just because you trust your friend's driving skills is idiotic. No matter how good he would be at driving, there's people in the traffic that aren't so good or just don't care and may hit you. There can always be surprising conditions that you have no control over and wich can injure you or even kill you. This is why safety gear was invented, to prevent injuries from conditions you can't control. Not to use the safety gear is stupid and irresponsible, always. Just because you enjoy the adrenaline rush you get from doing stupid things, doesn't make them right or acceptable, nor does it really make your life any better. That's complacent, idiotic and completely irresponsible. You might think it's your personal decision because it's only affecting you, but it isn't because it doesn't. Don't be the weak link in the chain. #59
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Oh dear God. Comfort and trust is more important than safety? You are stupider than I first thought. In the same logic, if someone else is driving like a nutter you can crash. It's not always the driver's fault. Same with you. Even if you know what you're doing, you could always misplace your foot when you jump and land on rocks and die. And if you were really their friend you would wear a lifejacket. It makes it much easier to save you, and imagine how they'd feel if you died because of your stupidity and ignorance? #38
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Mathematically, you're wrong. Sorry. With Russian Roulette, you can't say someone WILL die. It's wrong. Yes, if you had an infinite amount of time, someone would, but not in reality. There is a 1/6 probability that somone will die first time. A 1/6 the next game too. So there's a 1/36 someone will die in the first two rounds. And a 1/216 by round 3. Mathematically the chances will increase every time, but nobody HAS TO die. Same in anything you say you're doing. Chances may be incredible low that you may get stung by a box jellyfish, but there's always a chance, and you can't say there isn't. Also just to throw in, I completely disagree with everything you're saying. Little kids like you that think they know everything piss me off. Hate to attack your argument, but you're wrong. The revolvers cylinder is only spun once, meaning the maximum number of possible turns is 6. Russian roulette ends with a corpse. Always. I never said I know everything. I worded one of my comments badly which made it seem like I think I'm invincible, which is highly false. I am aware that there is always the CHANCE of something going wrong, but I can't put it into words why I choose to do these things. #44
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] That's not why everyone hates you. You didn't word anything badly, you're stupid, you think you know everything (eg trying to disprove everyone with flawed arguments) and you were wrong about that jellyfish thing that the other guy corrected you on. | ||
| #25 - And regarding the dangerous jellyfish, if all my vital organs … [+] (11 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -3 |
| #28
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Yeah if your vital organs did, but not if your muscles cramped or you had a heart attack? If you can float and whistle for help, you at least have a chance of survival. How can I whistle for help if I have a heart attack? I've had leg cramp while swimming and you know what I did? Tread water. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I'm ALWAYS with someone, of which are qualified in beach lifeguarding, same as me. Knowledgeable of how to handle a situation such as this. That's good for you. Really, I'm glad. But making him have to haul you out of the water as difficult as possible if someone happens to you is kind of an asshole move if you think about it, isn't it? This isn't just about you, actually. In a group and a potentially dangerous situation, you have responsibility to the others. Dude, I've been inside burning buildings knowing there's a buddy trusting me blindly. I fuck up, he might die. I'm careless and injure myself and I'm putting the others in danger having to get me out. Putting up warning signs on the road while the others are there cutting people out of the wrecks isn't glorious work, but if I fuck up I might get all of them killed. Therefore reflective vest and careful walking instead of running. Same thing with you. Imagine someone gets hurt because of having to help you. You don't wanna do that to anyone. " But the other half wants me to push my boundaries." Fuck that half. It's not worth it if someone else has to pay for it. "If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee Where is the point you should stop pushing your boundaries? If you never did you would be ordinary, not extraordinary. I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made. The point is when you affect and endanger others. Just like Bruce Lee would have never made a lethal blow against a training partner. That's what Darth Vader would do, if you excuse that fictional example. "I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made." Neither would I. I couldn't live with someone suffering for my mistakes. But you know what? My buddies could never live with letting anyone behind either, hell, that's why we did what we did in the first place. And I fucking know they wouldn't have hesitated. If I wasn't atheist I'd praise the lord and give thanks push never came to shove. If you've got a bunch of heartless assholes, then you may be able to pull it off, but don't count on good people being selfish and heartless. Won't work. #33
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Seriously dude? Google shit. Pro swimmers have gone into the sea and drowned because of cramps. Shut up now. | ||
| #24 - I didn't mention them because they were irrelevant to the subj… [+] (3 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -3 |
| #29
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] How are some jellyfish relevant and others not? You started by saying that the only danger is the weak jellyfish. It got pointed out that there are more dangerous ones. The subject is life jackets, wear them or not. It's clear they would help in said situations. You're wrong. Plus, jellyfish float along the surface. They get carried with winds and currents. So you're telling me there's never wind coming towards the place where you go tombstoning? Nor currents? Bullshit. Do you think washed up jellyfish teleport to the beach? No. They get taken there. And with the swells and tides of Jersey, you never can know. Ps… red thumbs mean stop. | ||
| #22 - I assume you're 'iidonteven' so just refer to comment #17. … | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -3 |
| #20 - When you take it out of context it sounds idiotic, but take fr… [+] (20 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -3 |
| It's not even out of context, what are you talking about? They are idiots as well for needlessly putting themselves in danger. As are people playing Russian roulette, same principle. Sorry, but that's kind of a definition. #35
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] "what do you do on a daily basis" u sound like an arrogant twat mate think your so high and mighty sit down and shut up Freeclimbing someone is guaranteed to die as well. Gravity is always in effect, grip strength or balance can fail. That's your guarantee right there. Hell yeah I'm not used to putting myself in danger to no avail. Why the hell would I? Doesn't mean I have a boring life, if that's what you're playing at. Years in the firebrigade, military service, now sporadic weightlifting, climbing and archery while I wait for university to start next month. That's kind of what I do at the moment. Still, safety is always highest concern. I'd hate to cripple myself or injure others through neglect. It is a possibility that the individual dies, but the guarantee that someone will fall and die in both. Whether you are killed by the kinetic energy of a metal slug or your own impacting the ground doesn't make a difference. It's a gamble with death itself, and a completely unnecessary one in both cases. That changes nothing if you think about it. This is a debate about attitude and safety reasoning, not practice. Ok, let me get this straight. If someone's life was under my responsibility I wouldn't think twice about strapping them up with a helmet, shoes and life jacket before going out. I do not think for a moment that companies such as Jersey Adventures (A local company who takes groups out kayaking and such) is unnecessarily preparing the people who are participating. I completely agree with their methods. If I was in the same situation, I'd take the same pre-cautions. But it's the trust in my friends and myself that stops me from putting all the advised safety gear on. It's the same reason people choose not to wear a seatbelt: Comfort and trust. #273
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Not to wear seatbelts just because you trust your friend's driving skills is idiotic. No matter how good he would be at driving, there's people in the traffic that aren't so good or just don't care and may hit you. There can always be surprising conditions that you have no control over and wich can injure you or even kill you. This is why safety gear was invented, to prevent injuries from conditions you can't control. Not to use the safety gear is stupid and irresponsible, always. Just because you enjoy the adrenaline rush you get from doing stupid things, doesn't make them right or acceptable, nor does it really make your life any better. That's complacent, idiotic and completely irresponsible. You might think it's your personal decision because it's only affecting you, but it isn't because it doesn't. Don't be the weak link in the chain. #59
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Oh dear God. Comfort and trust is more important than safety? You are stupider than I first thought. In the same logic, if someone else is driving like a nutter you can crash. It's not always the driver's fault. Same with you. Even if you know what you're doing, you could always misplace your foot when you jump and land on rocks and die. And if you were really their friend you would wear a lifejacket. It makes it much easier to save you, and imagine how they'd feel if you died because of your stupidity and ignorance? #38
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Mathematically, you're wrong. Sorry. With Russian Roulette, you can't say someone WILL die. It's wrong. Yes, if you had an infinite amount of time, someone would, but not in reality. There is a 1/6 probability that somone will die first time. A 1/6 the next game too. So there's a 1/36 someone will die in the first two rounds. And a 1/216 by round 3. Mathematically the chances will increase every time, but nobody HAS TO die. Same in anything you say you're doing. Chances may be incredible low that you may get stung by a box jellyfish, but there's always a chance, and you can't say there isn't. Also just to throw in, I completely disagree with everything you're saying. Little kids like you that think they know everything piss me off. Hate to attack your argument, but you're wrong. The revolvers cylinder is only spun once, meaning the maximum number of possible turns is 6. Russian roulette ends with a corpse. Always. I never said I know everything. I worded one of my comments badly which made it seem like I think I'm invincible, which is highly false. I am aware that there is always the CHANCE of something going wrong, but I can't put it into words why I choose to do these things. #44
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] That's not why everyone hates you. You didn't word anything badly, you're stupid, you think you know everything (eg trying to disprove everyone with flawed arguments) and you were wrong about that jellyfish thing that the other guy corrected you on. | ||
| #17 - I've lived on this island for all 16 years of my life, I'm awa… [+] (17 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -3 |
| #21
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] If you're aware why did you say that the only dangerous animal was a jelly with bee sting then? And if you knew anything you'd know that dangerous jellyfish can shut down your nervous system. Your heart can stop, muscles, breathing, everything. So if that happens without a life jacket you're in deep shit. At least with one you can float and whistle for help. #28
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Yeah if your vital organs did, but not if your muscles cramped or you had a heart attack? If you can float and whistle for help, you at least have a chance of survival. How can I whistle for help if I have a heart attack? I've had leg cramp while swimming and you know what I did? Tread water. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I'm ALWAYS with someone, of which are qualified in beach lifeguarding, same as me. Knowledgeable of how to handle a situation such as this. That's good for you. Really, I'm glad. But making him have to haul you out of the water as difficult as possible if someone happens to you is kind of an asshole move if you think about it, isn't it? This isn't just about you, actually. In a group and a potentially dangerous situation, you have responsibility to the others. Dude, I've been inside burning buildings knowing there's a buddy trusting me blindly. I fuck up, he might die. I'm careless and injure myself and I'm putting the others in danger having to get me out. Putting up warning signs on the road while the others are there cutting people out of the wrecks isn't glorious work, but if I fuck up I might get all of them killed. Therefore reflective vest and careful walking instead of running. Same thing with you. Imagine someone gets hurt because of having to help you. You don't wanna do that to anyone. " But the other half wants me to push my boundaries." Fuck that half. It's not worth it if someone else has to pay for it. "If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee Where is the point you should stop pushing your boundaries? If you never did you would be ordinary, not extraordinary. I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made. The point is when you affect and endanger others. Just like Bruce Lee would have never made a lethal blow against a training partner. That's what Darth Vader would do, if you excuse that fictional example. "I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made." Neither would I. I couldn't live with someone suffering for my mistakes. But you know what? My buddies could never live with letting anyone behind either, hell, that's why we did what we did in the first place. And I fucking know they wouldn't have hesitated. If I wasn't atheist I'd praise the lord and give thanks push never came to shove. If you've got a bunch of heartless assholes, then you may be able to pull it off, but don't count on good people being selfish and heartless. Won't work. #33
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Seriously dude? Google shit. Pro swimmers have gone into the sea and drowned because of cramps. Shut up now. #29
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] How are some jellyfish relevant and others not? You started by saying that the only danger is the weak jellyfish. It got pointed out that there are more dangerous ones. The subject is life jackets, wear them or not. It's clear they would help in said situations. You're wrong. Plus, jellyfish float along the surface. They get carried with winds and currents. So you're telling me there's never wind coming towards the place where you go tombstoning? Nor currents? Bullshit. Do you think washed up jellyfish teleport to the beach? No. They get taken there. And with the swells and tides of Jersey, you never can know. Ps… red thumbs mean stop. | ||
| #16 - I'm only 16, the stereotype of teenagers thinking they are inv… [+] (22 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -6 |
| Are you telling me you willingly embrace your irrationality and needlessly endanger your life for fun? You are a complete idiot if that is so. It's not even out of context, what are you talking about? They are idiots as well for needlessly putting themselves in danger. As are people playing Russian roulette, same principle. Sorry, but that's kind of a definition. #35
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] "what do you do on a daily basis" u sound like an arrogant twat mate think your so high and mighty sit down and shut up Freeclimbing someone is guaranteed to die as well. Gravity is always in effect, grip strength or balance can fail. That's your guarantee right there. Hell yeah I'm not used to putting myself in danger to no avail. Why the hell would I? Doesn't mean I have a boring life, if that's what you're playing at. Years in the firebrigade, military service, now sporadic weightlifting, climbing and archery while I wait for university to start next month. That's kind of what I do at the moment. Still, safety is always highest concern. I'd hate to cripple myself or injure others through neglect. It is a possibility that the individual dies, but the guarantee that someone will fall and die in both. Whether you are killed by the kinetic energy of a metal slug or your own impacting the ground doesn't make a difference. It's a gamble with death itself, and a completely unnecessary one in both cases. That changes nothing if you think about it. This is a debate about attitude and safety reasoning, not practice. Ok, let me get this straight. If someone's life was under my responsibility I wouldn't think twice about strapping them up with a helmet, shoes and life jacket before going out. I do not think for a moment that companies such as Jersey Adventures (A local company who takes groups out kayaking and such) is unnecessarily preparing the people who are participating. I completely agree with their methods. If I was in the same situation, I'd take the same pre-cautions. But it's the trust in my friends and myself that stops me from putting all the advised safety gear on. It's the same reason people choose not to wear a seatbelt: Comfort and trust. #273
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Not to wear seatbelts just because you trust your friend's driving skills is idiotic. No matter how good he would be at driving, there's people in the traffic that aren't so good or just don't care and may hit you. There can always be surprising conditions that you have no control over and wich can injure you or even kill you. This is why safety gear was invented, to prevent injuries from conditions you can't control. Not to use the safety gear is stupid and irresponsible, always. Just because you enjoy the adrenaline rush you get from doing stupid things, doesn't make them right or acceptable, nor does it really make your life any better. That's complacent, idiotic and completely irresponsible. You might think it's your personal decision because it's only affecting you, but it isn't because it doesn't. Don't be the weak link in the chain. #59
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Oh dear God. Comfort and trust is more important than safety? You are stupider than I first thought. In the same logic, if someone else is driving like a nutter you can crash. It's not always the driver's fault. Same with you. Even if you know what you're doing, you could always misplace your foot when you jump and land on rocks and die. And if you were really their friend you would wear a lifejacket. It makes it much easier to save you, and imagine how they'd feel if you died because of your stupidity and ignorance? #38
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Mathematically, you're wrong. Sorry. With Russian Roulette, you can't say someone WILL die. It's wrong. Yes, if you had an infinite amount of time, someone would, but not in reality. There is a 1/6 probability that somone will die first time. A 1/6 the next game too. So there's a 1/36 someone will die in the first two rounds. And a 1/216 by round 3. Mathematically the chances will increase every time, but nobody HAS TO die. Same in anything you say you're doing. Chances may be incredible low that you may get stung by a box jellyfish, but there's always a chance, and you can't say there isn't. Also just to throw in, I completely disagree with everything you're saying. Little kids like you that think they know everything piss me off. Hate to attack your argument, but you're wrong. The revolvers cylinder is only spun once, meaning the maximum number of possible turns is 6. Russian roulette ends with a corpse. Always. I never said I know everything. I worded one of my comments badly which made it seem like I think I'm invincible, which is highly false. I am aware that there is always the CHANCE of something going wrong, but I can't put it into words why I choose to do these things. #44
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] That's not why everyone hates you. You didn't word anything badly, you're stupid, you think you know everything (eg trying to disprove everyone with flawed arguments) and you were wrong about that jellyfish thing that the other guy corrected you on. | ||
| #15 - There are 12 inches in a foot, an inch is roughly 2.5 centimet… | 09/03/2012 on People's first thought when... | 0 |
| #1 - Picture | 09/03/2012 on Just some Exam | 0 |
| #2 - Picture | 09/03/2012 on Goofed | 0 |
| #12 - If I was alone, fair enough, but I never do potentially danger… [+] (45 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -4 |
| #19
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] You still have risk of cramp and shit? And jersey is south of the English coast, you still get jellyfish there that can cause strong irritating rashes lasting up to 72h, and occasionally box jellyfish and Portuguese man of war are spotted in that sea, and they can do serious damage. You can find conga eels, up to 2ft long that could take your fingers off. Also you have strong currents there and big swell. If you go into the sea you'll find more than you think. I've lived on this island for all 16 years of my life, I'm aware there are conga eels, box jelly fish and PMWs. The thing is, PMWs are incredibly easy to spot, box jelly fish are only real dangers when diving, same as PMWs really; and conga eels? Well personally I've never seen one and regardless if I had a life jacket or not I'd be in pretty deep shit. #21
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] If you're aware why did you say that the only dangerous animal was a jelly with bee sting then? And if you knew anything you'd know that dangerous jellyfish can shut down your nervous system. Your heart can stop, muscles, breathing, everything. So if that happens without a life jacket you're in deep shit. At least with one you can float and whistle for help. #28
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Yeah if your vital organs did, but not if your muscles cramped or you had a heart attack? If you can float and whistle for help, you at least have a chance of survival. How can I whistle for help if I have a heart attack? I've had leg cramp while swimming and you know what I did? Tread water. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I'm ALWAYS with someone, of which are qualified in beach lifeguarding, same as me. Knowledgeable of how to handle a situation such as this. That's good for you. Really, I'm glad. But making him have to haul you out of the water as difficult as possible if someone happens to you is kind of an asshole move if you think about it, isn't it? This isn't just about you, actually. In a group and a potentially dangerous situation, you have responsibility to the others. Dude, I've been inside burning buildings knowing there's a buddy trusting me blindly. I fuck up, he might die. I'm careless and injure myself and I'm putting the others in danger having to get me out. Putting up warning signs on the road while the others are there cutting people out of the wrecks isn't glorious work, but if I fuck up I might get all of them killed. Therefore reflective vest and careful walking instead of running. Same thing with you. Imagine someone gets hurt because of having to help you. You don't wanna do that to anyone. " But the other half wants me to push my boundaries." Fuck that half. It's not worth it if someone else has to pay for it. "If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee Where is the point you should stop pushing your boundaries? If you never did you would be ordinary, not extraordinary. I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made. The point is when you affect and endanger others. Just like Bruce Lee would have never made a lethal blow against a training partner. That's what Darth Vader would do, if you excuse that fictional example. "I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made." Neither would I. I couldn't live with someone suffering for my mistakes. But you know what? My buddies could never live with letting anyone behind either, hell, that's why we did what we did in the first place. And I fucking know they wouldn't have hesitated. If I wasn't atheist I'd praise the lord and give thanks push never came to shove. If you've got a bunch of heartless assholes, then you may be able to pull it off, but don't count on good people being selfish and heartless. Won't work. #33
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Seriously dude? Google shit. Pro swimmers have gone into the sea and drowned because of cramps. Shut up now. #29
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] How are some jellyfish relevant and others not? You started by saying that the only danger is the weak jellyfish. It got pointed out that there are more dangerous ones. The subject is life jackets, wear them or not. It's clear they would help in said situations. You're wrong. Plus, jellyfish float along the surface. They get carried with winds and currents. So you're telling me there's never wind coming towards the place where you go tombstoning? Nor currents? Bullshit. Do you think washed up jellyfish teleport to the beach? No. They get taken there. And with the swells and tides of Jersey, you never can know. Ps… red thumbs mean stop. Why would you deprive yourself of options when it come to something so crucial as safety? I don't understand. Are you telling me you willingly embrace your irrationality and needlessly endanger your life for fun? You are a complete idiot if that is so. It's not even out of context, what are you talking about? They are idiots as well for needlessly putting themselves in danger. As are people playing Russian roulette, same principle. Sorry, but that's kind of a definition. #35
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] "what do you do on a daily basis" u sound like an arrogant twat mate think your so high and mighty sit down and shut up Freeclimbing someone is guaranteed to die as well. Gravity is always in effect, grip strength or balance can fail. That's your guarantee right there. Hell yeah I'm not used to putting myself in danger to no avail. Why the hell would I? Doesn't mean I have a boring life, if that's what you're playing at. Years in the firebrigade, military service, now sporadic weightlifting, climbing and archery while I wait for university to start next month. That's kind of what I do at the moment. Still, safety is always highest concern. I'd hate to cripple myself or injure others through neglect. It is a possibility that the individual dies, but the guarantee that someone will fall and die in both. Whether you are killed by the kinetic energy of a metal slug or your own impacting the ground doesn't make a difference. It's a gamble with death itself, and a completely unnecessary one in both cases. That changes nothing if you think about it. This is a debate about attitude and safety reasoning, not practice. Ok, let me get this straight. If someone's life was under my responsibility I wouldn't think twice about strapping them up with a helmet, shoes and life jacket before going out. I do not think for a moment that companies such as Jersey Adventures (A local company who takes groups out kayaking and such) is unnecessarily preparing the people who are participating. I completely agree with their methods. If I was in the same situation, I'd take the same pre-cautions. But it's the trust in my friends and myself that stops me from putting all the advised safety gear on. It's the same reason people choose not to wear a seatbelt: Comfort and trust. #273
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Not to wear seatbelts just because you trust your friend's driving skills is idiotic. No matter how good he would be at driving, there's people in the traffic that aren't so good or just don't care and may hit you. There can always be surprising conditions that you have no control over and wich can injure you or even kill you. This is why safety gear was invented, to prevent injuries from conditions you can't control. Not to use the safety gear is stupid and irresponsible, always. Just because you enjoy the adrenaline rush you get from doing stupid things, doesn't make them right or acceptable, nor does it really make your life any better. That's complacent, idiotic and completely irresponsible. You might think it's your personal decision because it's only affecting you, but it isn't because it doesn't. Don't be the weak link in the chain. #59
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Oh dear God. Comfort and trust is more important than safety? You are stupider than I first thought. In the same logic, if someone else is driving like a nutter you can crash. It's not always the driver's fault. Same with you. Even if you know what you're doing, you could always misplace your foot when you jump and land on rocks and die. And if you were really their friend you would wear a lifejacket. It makes it much easier to save you, and imagine how they'd feel if you died because of your stupidity and ignorance? #38
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Mathematically, you're wrong. Sorry. With Russian Roulette, you can't say someone WILL die. It's wrong. Yes, if you had an infinite amount of time, someone would, but not in reality. There is a 1/6 probability that somone will die first time. A 1/6 the next game too. So there's a 1/36 someone will die in the first two rounds. And a 1/216 by round 3. Mathematically the chances will increase every time, but nobody HAS TO die. Same in anything you say you're doing. Chances may be incredible low that you may get stung by a box jellyfish, but there's always a chance, and you can't say there isn't. Also just to throw in, I completely disagree with everything you're saying. Little kids like you that think they know everything piss me off. Hate to attack your argument, but you're wrong. The revolvers cylinder is only spun once, meaning the maximum number of possible turns is 6. Russian roulette ends with a corpse. Always. I never said I know everything. I worded one of my comments badly which made it seem like I think I'm invincible, which is highly false. I am aware that there is always the CHANCE of something going wrong, but I can't put it into words why I choose to do these things. #44
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] That's not why everyone hates you. You didn't word anything badly, you're stupid, you think you know everything (eg trying to disprove everyone with flawed arguments) and you were wrong about that jellyfish thing that the other guy corrected you on. | ||
| #9 - I never wear a life jacket when sea kayaking or tombstoning, t… [+] (47 new replies) | 09/03/2012 on Drowning | -12 |
| #11
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] They can save you from unpredictable situations like leg cramp or getting tired or panicing because something touched your leg in water. Don't be a dumb shit and wear it if you're on deep water and there's no solid ground you can swim too anywhere near hand reach. #12
-
lcarnage (09/03/2012) [-] If I was alone, fair enough, but I never do potentially dangerous activities alone. I live on the channel islands, Jersey specifically and the most dangerous sea animal out there is probably a jelly fish. And I'm not talking box jellyfish, I'm talking about the type which hurts less than a bee sting. I'm also aware of the risk I take not wearing a life jacket, and that shit does happen; to me it's just an inconvenience. #19
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] You still have risk of cramp and shit? And jersey is south of the English coast, you still get jellyfish there that can cause strong irritating rashes lasting up to 72h, and occasionally box jellyfish and Portuguese man of war are spotted in that sea, and they can do serious damage. You can find conga eels, up to 2ft long that could take your fingers off. Also you have strong currents there and big swell. If you go into the sea you'll find more than you think. I've lived on this island for all 16 years of my life, I'm aware there are conga eels, box jelly fish and PMWs. The thing is, PMWs are incredibly easy to spot, box jelly fish are only real dangers when diving, same as PMWs really; and conga eels? Well personally I've never seen one and regardless if I had a life jacket or not I'd be in pretty deep shit. #21
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] If you're aware why did you say that the only dangerous animal was a jelly with bee sting then? And if you knew anything you'd know that dangerous jellyfish can shut down your nervous system. Your heart can stop, muscles, breathing, everything. So if that happens without a life jacket you're in deep shit. At least with one you can float and whistle for help. #28
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Yeah if your vital organs did, but not if your muscles cramped or you had a heart attack? If you can float and whistle for help, you at least have a chance of survival. How can I whistle for help if I have a heart attack? I've had leg cramp while swimming and you know what I did? Tread water. I've said this before and I'll say it again, I'm ALWAYS with someone, of which are qualified in beach lifeguarding, same as me. Knowledgeable of how to handle a situation such as this. That's good for you. Really, I'm glad. But making him have to haul you out of the water as difficult as possible if someone happens to you is kind of an asshole move if you think about it, isn't it? This isn't just about you, actually. In a group and a potentially dangerous situation, you have responsibility to the others. Dude, I've been inside burning buildings knowing there's a buddy trusting me blindly. I fuck up, he might die. I'm careless and injure myself and I'm putting the others in danger having to get me out. Putting up warning signs on the road while the others are there cutting people out of the wrecks isn't glorious work, but if I fuck up I might get all of them killed. Therefore reflective vest and careful walking instead of running. Same thing with you. Imagine someone gets hurt because of having to help you. You don't wanna do that to anyone. " But the other half wants me to push my boundaries." Fuck that half. It's not worth it if someone else has to pay for it. "If you always put limit on everything you do, physical or anything else. It will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee Where is the point you should stop pushing your boundaries? If you never did you would be ordinary, not extraordinary. I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made. The point is when you affect and endanger others. Just like Bruce Lee would have never made a lethal blow against a training partner. That's what Darth Vader would do, if you excuse that fictional example. "I would not wish for someone to risk themselves to save me due to a mistake I made." Neither would I. I couldn't live with someone suffering for my mistakes. But you know what? My buddies could never live with letting anyone behind either, hell, that's why we did what we did in the first place. And I fucking know they wouldn't have hesitated. If I wasn't atheist I'd praise the lord and give thanks push never came to shove. If you've got a bunch of heartless assholes, then you may be able to pull it off, but don't count on good people being selfish and heartless. Won't work. #33
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Seriously dude? Google shit. Pro swimmers have gone into the sea and drowned because of cramps. Shut up now. #29
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] How are some jellyfish relevant and others not? You started by saying that the only danger is the weak jellyfish. It got pointed out that there are more dangerous ones. The subject is life jackets, wear them or not. It's clear they would help in said situations. You're wrong. Plus, jellyfish float along the surface. They get carried with winds and currents. So you're telling me there's never wind coming towards the place where you go tombstoning? Nor currents? Bullshit. Do you think washed up jellyfish teleport to the beach? No. They get taken there. And with the swells and tides of Jersey, you never can know. Ps… red thumbs mean stop. Why would you deprive yourself of options when it come to something so crucial as safety? I don't understand. Are you telling me you willingly embrace your irrationality and needlessly endanger your life for fun? You are a complete idiot if that is so. It's not even out of context, what are you talking about? They are idiots as well for needlessly putting themselves in danger. As are people playing Russian roulette, same principle. Sorry, but that's kind of a definition. #35
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] "what do you do on a daily basis" u sound like an arrogant twat mate think your so high and mighty sit down and shut up Freeclimbing someone is guaranteed to die as well. Gravity is always in effect, grip strength or balance can fail. That's your guarantee right there. Hell yeah I'm not used to putting myself in danger to no avail. Why the hell would I? Doesn't mean I have a boring life, if that's what you're playing at. Years in the firebrigade, military service, now sporadic weightlifting, climbing and archery while I wait for university to start next month. That's kind of what I do at the moment. Still, safety is always highest concern. I'd hate to cripple myself or injure others through neglect. It is a possibility that the individual dies, but the guarantee that someone will fall and die in both. Whether you are killed by the kinetic energy of a metal slug or your own impacting the ground doesn't make a difference. It's a gamble with death itself, and a completely unnecessary one in both cases. That changes nothing if you think about it. This is a debate about attitude and safety reasoning, not practice. Ok, let me get this straight. If someone's life was under my responsibility I wouldn't think twice about strapping them up with a helmet, shoes and life jacket before going out. I do not think for a moment that companies such as Jersey Adventures (A local company who takes groups out kayaking and such) is unnecessarily preparing the people who are participating. I completely agree with their methods. If I was in the same situation, I'd take the same pre-cautions. But it's the trust in my friends and myself that stops me from putting all the advised safety gear on. It's the same reason people choose not to wear a seatbelt: Comfort and trust. #273
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Not to wear seatbelts just because you trust your friend's driving skills is idiotic. No matter how good he would be at driving, there's people in the traffic that aren't so good or just don't care and may hit you. There can always be surprising conditions that you have no control over and wich can injure you or even kill you. This is why safety gear was invented, to prevent injuries from conditions you can't control. Not to use the safety gear is stupid and irresponsible, always. Just because you enjoy the adrenaline rush you get from doing stupid things, doesn't make them right or acceptable, nor does it really make your life any better. That's complacent, idiotic and completely irresponsible. You might think it's your personal decision because it's only affecting you, but it isn't because it doesn't. Don't be the weak link in the chain. #59
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Oh dear God. Comfort and trust is more important than safety? You are stupider than I first thought. In the same logic, if someone else is driving like a nutter you can crash. It's not always the driver's fault. Same with you. Even if you know what you're doing, you could always misplace your foot when you jump and land on rocks and die. And if you were really their friend you would wear a lifejacket. It makes it much easier to save you, and imagine how they'd feel if you died because of your stupidity and ignorance? #38
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Mathematically, you're wrong. Sorry. With Russian Roulette, you can't say someone WILL die. It's wrong. Yes, if you had an infinite amount of time, someone would, but not in reality. There is a 1/6 probability that somone will die first time. A 1/6 the next game too. So there's a 1/36 someone will die in the first two rounds. And a 1/216 by round 3. Mathematically the chances will increase every time, but nobody HAS TO die. Same in anything you say you're doing. Chances may be incredible low that you may get stung by a box jellyfish, but there's always a chance, and you can't say there isn't. Also just to throw in, I completely disagree with everything you're saying. Little kids like you that think they know everything piss me off. Hate to attack your argument, but you're wrong. The revolvers cylinder is only spun once, meaning the maximum number of possible turns is 6. Russian roulette ends with a corpse. Always. I never said I know everything. I worded one of my comments badly which made it seem like I think I'm invincible, which is highly false. I am aware that there is always the CHANCE of something going wrong, but I can't put it into words why I choose to do these things. #44
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] That's not why everyone hates you. You didn't word anything badly, you're stupid, you think you know everything (eg trying to disprove everyone with flawed arguments) and you were wrong about that jellyfish thing that the other guy corrected you on. | ||
| #107 - That is the only way the pony love/hate shitstorm will ever co… | 09/03/2012 on Well? | +1 |
| #16 - That does not apply to guys...The metaphor of the 'Goalie' app… [+] (4 new replies) | 09/02/2012 on Scumbag Dream | +4 |
| #197
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Just because Ginny's riding that broom doesn't mean you can't cast "Accio!" #225
-
N. Korean citizen (09/03/2012) [-] Yeah it's cool and edgy to post it on Facebook to show all of your friends, but it is a major dick move to steal someone's other half, and it's even worse to be the one that they cheat with. Not cool, if they're in a relationship, you stay the fuck away. | ||
| #3 - They aren't shaking hands correctly. | 09/02/2012 on washing hands | +1 |
| #268 - Way to start a console war. [+] (1 new reply) | 08/30/2012 on WTF.. | 0 |
| #220 - I went there last summer, it was incredible. Did white water r… | 08/30/2012 on Mind=Blown | +3 |
| #492 - **lcarnage rolled a random image posted in comment #160363 … | 08/30/2012 on Eveyones getting banned | -1 |
| #330 - I really don't understand all the hate, so what, you get banne… | 08/30/2012 on HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA... | +2 |
| #20 - The images that were flashing through his head. | 08/29/2012 on Post war Pat anyone? | +19 |
| #47 - This is one of the few reposts that gets me every time. [+] (1 new reply) | 08/29/2012 on Friendship | +13 |
| | ||
| #27 - I do not have 4 heads. | 08/29/2012 on Stop looking at yourself | 0 |
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

