Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

laxitup

no avatar Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to laxitup Block laxitup Invite laxitup to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:3/29/2010
Last Login:8/03/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 186 total,  233 ,  47
Comment Thumbs: 2094 total,  2624 ,  530
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 18 Content: New Here → Level 19 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 94% (94/100)
Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:2185
Times Content Favorited:10 times
Total Comments Made:878
FJ Points:2648

latest user's comments

#32 - I dont really understand this post. After being together livin…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/19/2013 on So I is KOREAN -1
#69 - recio has deleted their comment.
#64 - Vanquix (02/19/2013) [-]
Im pretty sure that youre all missing the point that merle and daryl did like a parallel thing.
User avatar #39 - lolollo (02/19/2013) [-]
Humor gets better with repetition.
#33 - anonymous (02/19/2013) [-]
He used to be a racist now he's less so. Progress.
#35 - laxitup (02/19/2013) [-]
Wow so there is nothing else in this post. Yeah when people have to fight zombies together it kind of makes their race a little less important
User avatar #46 - bigfriendlyginger (02/19/2013) [-]
The point is that Daryl has gone through important character development and we can see him changeing as the series goes on, that he's become his own person rather than just a clone of his brother. not really a funny post but nice for walking dead fans.
#57 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 02/19/2013 on I love this woman 0
#572 - kashin Comment deleted by laxitup
#193 - Obviously you are retarded, the only time "le" shoul… 02/17/2013 on Thanks FunnyJunk -1
#9 - Was gonna thumb up, till I saw you claimed it as OC. I really … 02/16/2013 on Am I doing it right? -1
#32 - God the kids in these videos are such ******* los… 02/16/2013 on Falling in public 0
#15 - A, not so, witty comment is not a burn 02/16/2013 on Single girls on their... +2
#83 - BEFORE YOU COMMENT LOOK AT DESCRIPTION. No one thinks this… 02/14/2013 on New species of crabs... +1
#33 - Put one lock in upside down, and always lock that one 02/14/2013 on Brilliant! 0
#32 - I didn't find it difficult at all, this **** real… 02/14/2013 on Brilliant! +6
#42 - My life would be better if I had fairies when I was little 02/14/2013 on Mindfuck 0
#69 - You forgot background, you always gotta look in the spots you … 02/14/2013 on Spot the Difference +2
#71 - I could not help but notice one of the tags is aids, now I hav… 02/14/2013 on DYELB 0
#129 - The bediator? Am I the only one that is always hot as hell whe… 02/14/2013 on Amazing inventions +5
#150 - could possibly bean? What could that possibly mean? I have no …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2013 on U WOT M8? -1
User avatar #157 - DrSalvador (02/12/2013) [-]
I didn't catch myself there...lol
#25 - HIV postive 02/08/2013 on WDTIT +2
#233 - You implied by leaving your comment, "Still it should be … 02/08/2013 on Double standards 0
#230 - If my comment has no relevance to what you posted, then your c…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/08/2013 on Double standards 0
#232 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/08/2013) [-]
What is your point exactly? If this kid was up for sex with her, would that be okay? If so then we'll have to agree to disagree. If not then what the fuck is your point?
#233 - laxitup (02/08/2013) [-]
You implied by leaving your comment, "Still it should be obvious to anyone that a kid this age can't consent to a sexual relationship in an adult sense" on THIS picture that you thought the kiss was a sexual relationship. If your comment was not about this kiss, then it has no relevance to the picture just as my comment was "Not really relevant to [your] comment ."
#227 - I was never a little girl, so I cant really say whether I woul… 02/08/2013 on Double standards +4
#225 - Look at the kids hand, yeah he is totally hating it  [+] (4 new replies) 02/08/2013 on Double standards -1
#228 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/08/2013) [-]
Not really relevant to my comment as I'm speaking very generally, and the one remark I did make about this specific kid was a hypothetical since this doesn't constitute a "sexual relationship" in my book.
#230 - laxitup (02/08/2013) [-]
If my comment has no relevance to what you posted, then your comment has no relevance to the original picture.
"Still it should be obvious to anyone that a kid this age can't consent to a sexual relationship in an adult sense." You left this comment on this picture, so you can see why I assumed you were talking about this picture
#232 - fuckyosixtyminutes (02/08/2013) [-]
What is your point exactly? If this kid was up for sex with her, would that be okay? If so then we'll have to agree to disagree. If not then what the fuck is your point?
#233 - laxitup (02/08/2013) [-]
You implied by leaving your comment, "Still it should be obvious to anyone that a kid this age can't consent to a sexual relationship in an adult sense" on THIS picture that you thought the kiss was a sexual relationship. If your comment was not about this kiss, then it has no relevance to the picture just as my comment was "Not really relevant to [your] comment ."
#621 - >implying to be deserving of being adopted is a bad thing 02/08/2013 on fucking science +3
#16 - Comment deleted 02/04/2013 on Damon is Family... 0
#44 - Dude learn peeing ethics. That **** is not okay  [+] (1 new reply) 02/04/2013 on Why 0
#45 - barehype (02/04/2013) [-]
Well it is because the people I'm talking to will carry on talking to me
#76 - Oh, well I guess that one didn't stick with me forever 02/01/2013 on fix'd +4
#75 - Comment deleted 02/01/2013 on fix'd 0
#73 - what is the last one?  [+] (3 new replies) 01/31/2013 on fix'd +1
#75 - laxitup has deleted their comment.
User avatar #74 - victoryismine (01/31/2013) [-]
Narnia.
#76 - laxitup (02/01/2013) [-]
Oh, well I guess that one didn't stick with me forever
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)