tank camouflage is not meant to hide the tank (how the fuck can you hide a tank unless it's covered in foliage,etc) it's meant to make it harder to sight the weak points at longer ranges (an AT gun will have a harder time hitting the rear/side armour if the pattern of the chassis is broken up with a camouflage)

the flag is meant for allies to ID the tank as friendly.

on my country its backwards, public schools got amaing ppl private just douches have gone to both

Where are you from?

thats actualy a really good idea

Sounds about right.

sauce of video?

for science.

As long as it's for science.

www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1950341700

Just look for the lesbian categorie in pornhub dude, the video itself isnt good enough

I'm not a native english speaker as well, but your english is fine.

can be anywhere*

>be yesterday
>find big wasp nest under porch
>really sucks cause its under my feet
>be today
>no wasps jammin under my feet wonder why
>spider web blocks there escape
>thanks spiderbro
>

Nice, but its scary when you cant see the spider anymore, it cant be anywhere

can be anywhere*

I knew someone would say that. I just knew it.

Nope, social democrat.

OBABO

That's communism. Obama's leading towards socialism.
At least get your facts straight before you try being funny.

No. Not socialism. Fascism. His Health Care Act is the definition of fascism, where the state controls competition. Not to mention the NDAA, the Kill List, the extension of the misnamed Patriot Act.

So health care is fascism.
Then most european counties are fascist dictatorships.
Thank you, i never noticed that.

Way to make me say something that I obviously didn't say.

Health Care isn't fascism, no, but requiring people to buy health insurance (what the affordable health care act does), is.

You americans have the tendency to confund morality and politics; maybe a relic of the puritan fundaments of american society.
What if it's fascism?
Is fascism bad?
How many bad things have the US governments done?

Sorry that's unprovoked force.

The use of force is always immoral.

Then the US governments, and thus the people behind them, are deeply immoral.
How many proxy wars, how many war crimes?
How many civilians dead?

Did you think that I would disagree with that?

No, I did not.
I just don't like morality to be involved in politics.
Politics are a mean trough which society mediates economical interests.
That's it, no good/evil, fascism/democracy.
Only money.

That's economics.

What is the role of politicians?
Representing and promoting interests.
As I said, money.
You can argue my statements, not Marx's.

I love how you turned "Obama's leaning towards socialism" into an attack on the US for killing innocent civilians.

Because the two are completely related and there's a clear logical flow from one to the other.

Oh i have nothing to say about Obama.
I just question morality.

Facism is when the state holds supreme power. Health care controlled by the government and paid for by tax money is socialism.

That's not what the Affordable health care act does. It's essentially ordering people and companies to purchase health care and extends medicare benefits. It's a form of fascism, though not it's purest form. Fascism is also marked by Private profits and public losses: i.e bailouts.

Going by what it does, so is socialist healthcare. And no, that's still not facism. Go read up on your political theory before you try accusing someone of facism.

"Fascism operated from a Social Darwinist view of human relations. Their aim was to promote superior individuals and weed out the weak. In terms of economic practice, this meant promoting the interests of successful businessmen while destroying trade unions and other organizations of the working class. Historian Gaetano Salvemini argued in 1936 that fascism makes taxpayers responsible to private enterprise, because "the State pays for the blunders of private enterprise... Profit is private and individual. Loss is public and social. Fascist governments encouraged the pursuit of private profit and offered many benefits to large businesses, but they demanded in return that all economic activity should serve the national interest."

Socialism is the public ownership of the means of production, and public ownership of the good produced by said means.

Fascism has private ownership of the means of production but the government tells you what to do with it and how you could use the goods that come out of it. We have economic fascism right now, not Socialism. Fascism goes by many names, Corporatism, and Crony Capitalism just to name a few.

If you haven't noticed, several of the points in that description for facism go against Obama's policies. What you have is a transitional system from the gradual implementation of socialism.

Fascist governments have always said that it was for the good of a society. Hitler justified his action by giving the people's wealth back from the Jews, creating living space. Even though fascism is a form of social darwinism, it masquerades itself as being benign.

Fascism and Socialism does share many common features. According to Sheldon Richmen, an economist with econlib.org, "As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer."

Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_fascism

problem, wikipedia

"Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) "

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html

This... i cant even...



'Murica

Is that better?

"As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism."

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html

"The concept of "state monopoly capitalism" (MMC) describes approximately the same phenomenon as the "dirigisme" - a policy of active intervention in the management of the economy of the state" Twentieth-Century Europe" (Cambridge, 2006), Ivan T. Berend"

Nagger

Nope, social democrat.