Upload
Login or register
x

larknok

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/02/2011
Last Login:1/12/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#7369
Highest Content Rank:#1236
Highest Comment Rank:#1569
Content Thumbs: 1370 total,  1630 ,  260
Comment Thumbs: 4516 total,  5553 ,  1037
Content Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 101 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 102 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 54% (54/100)
Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 238 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:65059
Times Content Favorited:65 times
Total Comments Made:1130
FJ Points:4777

Text Posts

  • Views: 44627
    Thumbs Up 1424 Thumbs Down 180 Total: +1244
    Comments: 230
    Favorites: 61
    Uploaded: 06/09/15
    Graph Reading Skillz Graph Reading Skillz
  • Views: 11542
    Thumbs Up 152 Thumbs Down 47 Total: +105
    Comments: 24
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 08/02/14
    Is this kid even real Is this kid even real
  • Views: 897
    Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +6
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 08/09/11
    HE IS MY SON HE IS MY SON
  • Views: 1538
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +5
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 08/28/13
    I are real super sand I are real super sand
  • Views: 1042
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 7 Total: -1
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 07/21/13
    Way2soon Way2soon
  • Views: 3275
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +11
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/25/14
    The Dare The Dare
  • Views: 692
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 9 Total: -6
    Comments: 15
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/22/14
    SAFETY DANCE SAFETY DANCE

latest user's comments

#74 - Alternatively, read bubble (1) in the graphic, which sites the…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +4
#136 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]
this is where you need to know some basic economics and a term that applies in this situation is the gini coeffecient. this formula describes the inequality in terms of the difference between the poorest and richest. The US has the highest inequality in the whole of the western world.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality
User avatar
#134 - lieutenantderp (01/06/2016) [-]
>most Americans wouldn't know it

All Americans live in luxury compared to those living in almost any other country. Please don't tell me that a middle class family living in socialist France is in any way better off than a middle class American family. In their economic system social mobility is all but halted. Also most Americans are ignorant of the outside world, thus they don't know the true definition of poverty.
#72 - Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. …  [+] (2 new replies) 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +3
User avatar
#135 - lieutenantderp (01/06/2016) [-]
The reason American medical costs are so high is because the huge amounts of lawsuits hospitals receive all the time. To cover the legal losses hospitals have no choice but to jack up the prices. The problem is not with capitalism, but an attitude that modern Americans have with the legal system; we take our right to go to court for granted, without realizing that the money have to come out of someone's pockets, and that someone is ourselves.
#124 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
What if you don't want health care?
#69 - You know, not being a brash idiot does not entail weakness. … 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +4
#48 - I'm not sure what you're suggesting. On the left, a b…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +11
#68 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
trump is a pimp, sanders is whipped

if that was the clinton's doing, they may have dealt his campaign a death blow right there. voters don't respect weakness.
#69 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
You know, not being a brash idiot does not entail weakness.

I won't call Trump an idiot because it's not relevant -- but it's very clear to me that what you're suggesting Bernie should have done (physically detain emotionally unstable black women in the wake of a supremely politically charged race protest) is not "strong" -- it's utterly idiotic.
#41 - That's 100% true. It would come out of taxes. In the specific …  [+] (3 new replies) 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +13
#65 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
Just because someone can afford to pay, doesn't mean they should have to pay. I'm all for ending tax breaks on the rich, but increasing percentages just because they are rich (how dare they) makes me uncomfortable. A rich person paying 18% next to a middle class paying 18%, rich guy is still paying far, far more and the majority of the country's tax income. Raising the rich guys percentage borders on socialist wealth redistribution.
User avatar
#98 - meganinja (01/05/2016) [-]
Let's say you make $10,000 a year. Your expenses are $7,000 a year.
Your friend makes $100,000 a year. His expenses are $20,000 a year.

You put taxes at 30 percent flat rate. You make literally no money after expenses, but your friend still makes $50,000 after expenses.

It's because the wealthy can afford to be taxed more than the poor and middle class can without starving to death.
User avatar
#82 - thesecretbear (01/05/2016) [-]
Welcome to society, where we should all work together. Unfortunately many people do not. For that there is government.
#39 - It's honestly not as bad as most people make it ou… 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +20
#32 - I'm a huge supporter of Bernie Sanders for economic and enviro…  [+] (21 new replies) 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress +29
User avatar
#83 - thesecretbear (01/05/2016) [-]
Alright i'm a bernie supporter too, but the idea of a carbon tax sorta worries me. Companies have a tendency to work hard to increase profits, even if it means charging the consumer more. Considering our dependancy on carbon based fuel sources for energy, I can see them easily just raising the price of things to pay for it.
Explain the plan in some more detail I guess. Environmental policy is a pretty tricky mine field.
User avatar
#71 - lieutenantderp (01/05/2016) [-]
You do realize his economic policies will destroy the US economy right? Not saying Trump's is much better.
#74 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
Alternatively, read bubble (1) in the graphic, which sites the difference between the two to be 2,500 billion. Either way, Bernie would be saving the American people nearly double what we intents on spending.

He's saying something very fucking legitimate when he says that "America is the richest country in the history of the world, but most Americans wouldn't know it."
#136 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]
this is where you need to know some basic economics and a term that applies in this situation is the gini coeffecient. this formula describes the inequality in terms of the difference between the poorest and richest. The US has the highest inequality in the whole of the western world.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality
User avatar
#134 - lieutenantderp (01/06/2016) [-]
>most Americans wouldn't know it

All Americans live in luxury compared to those living in almost any other country. Please don't tell me that a middle class family living in socialist France is in any way better off than a middle class American family. In their economic system social mobility is all but halted. Also most Americans are ignorant of the outside world, thus they don't know the true definition of poverty.
#72 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Here's the uncharitable, no context version of Bernie's budget plan:

blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/files/2015/10/SandersBudgetBV.jpg

The thing to notice here is that the single-payer healthcare system is being treated here as if it is an addition to the total amount of money the US citizen needs to spend on taxes, rather than a substitute for the existing, FAR more expensive privatized healthcare system.

The truth of the matter is that the single-payer system will save Americans 5000 billion over the next 10 years: www.huffingtonpost.com/gerald-friedman/the-wall-street-journal-k_b_8143062.html

So basically, just imagine the "single payer" bar in expenditures completely gone, replaced with an additional bar half its size (5000) in revenues.
User avatar
#135 - lieutenantderp (01/06/2016) [-]
The reason American medical costs are so high is because the huge amounts of lawsuits hospitals receive all the time. To cover the legal losses hospitals have no choice but to jack up the prices. The problem is not with capitalism, but an attitude that modern Americans have with the legal system; we take our right to go to court for granted, without realizing that the money have to come out of someone's pockets, and that someone is ourselves.
#124 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
What if you don't want health care?
#44 - trumpenfuhrer (01/05/2016) [-]
Have you not been paying attention to him?
User avatar
#66 - talldumbdork (01/05/2016) [-]
Oh god.....that smug look on the BLM protestor faces..... Raging internally....
#111 - xif (01/05/2016) [-]
#48 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
I'm not sure what you're suggesting.

On the left, a bunch of supposed BLM supporters with questionable ties to the Clinton campaign stormed Bernie's platform and threatened to shut down his event unless they got to take the mic and say whatever they want. The crowd boo'd them, but Sanders properly understood that if he wants the African American vote, obviously he can't fucking have security physically detain a bunch of uncooperative black women in the wake of massive protests of white-on-black cop violence.

On the right, Trump clearly bought out a bunch of black women to speak against their own self-interest.

#68 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
trump is a pimp, sanders is whipped

if that was the clinton's doing, they may have dealt his campaign a death blow right there. voters don't respect weakness.
#69 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
You know, not being a brash idiot does not entail weakness.

I won't call Trump an idiot because it's not relevant -- but it's very clear to me that what you're suggesting Bernie should have done (physically detain emotionally unstable black women in the wake of a supremely politically charged race protest) is not "strong" -- it's utterly idiotic.
#40 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH
O
S
U
C
H
T
H
I
N
G
A
S
A
F
R
E
E
L
U
N
C
H
#41 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
That's 100% true. It would come out of taxes. In the specific case of free tuition, he's proposed for it to come from a tax on Wall street speculation. So while it's not technically a free lunch, it's a tax on millionaires and billionaires who can spare to give back and educate our youth, which is arguably the most important use of public money.
#65 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
Just because someone can afford to pay, doesn't mean they should have to pay. I'm all for ending tax breaks on the rich, but increasing percentages just because they are rich (how dare they) makes me uncomfortable. A rich person paying 18% next to a middle class paying 18%, rich guy is still paying far, far more and the majority of the country's tax income. Raising the rich guys percentage borders on socialist wealth redistribution.
User avatar
#98 - meganinja (01/05/2016) [-]
Let's say you make $10,000 a year. Your expenses are $7,000 a year.
Your friend makes $100,000 a year. His expenses are $20,000 a year.

You put taxes at 30 percent flat rate. You make literally no money after expenses, but your friend still makes $50,000 after expenses.

It's because the wealthy can afford to be taxed more than the poor and middle class can without starving to death.
User avatar
#82 - thesecretbear (01/05/2016) [-]
Welcome to society, where we should all work together. Unfortunately many people do not. For that there is government.
#37 - anon (01/05/2016) [-]
sorry, I don't speak socialist
#39 - larknok (01/05/2016) [-]
It's honestly not as bad as most people make it out to be. Single payer healthcare systems, for example, are proven to be cheaper for the government and more effective at providing universal care.
#231 - The Long Dark is coming along swimmingly. They recently added … 01/04/2016 on Buying an indie early... 0
#35 - You are an edgy racist, go back to /pol/. That said, … 01/02/2016 on African refugees shit in... +8
#31 - You seem like you're at least coping, so I'll let you in on so… 01/02/2016 on Call of Smash +3

user's channels

Join Subscribe ponytime

Comments(25):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
25 comments displayed.
#7 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#8 to #7 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
hola
User avatar #20 to #8 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
Technology doesn't deserve to have the right to think

This is why Transhumanism is the biggest mental illness plauging the high elite.
#21 to #20 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
By the subjective ethics you subscribed to, "rights" don't really exist. Nothing has a "right" to anything in such a way that it objectively obligates you to some action.

The question is not whether or not technology has a right to be like us, but whether or not AI would destroy us or help us (towards whatever ends we have.)
User avatar #22 to #21 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
Rights are made to help make your life more comfortable

this only applies to Humans who're the dominant race.
#23 to #22 - larknok (05/29/2015) [-]
But of course -- this doesn't mean there's any authority behind them. It technically applies to anything a thinking thing sets their minds to, because there's no authority in the first place.

Also, here's another question: There is no quality that every human has, that nothing that isn't human doesn't have, (no exclusive quality to all humans) so what's the justification for human beings existing as a group at all?
User avatar #24 to #23 - murrlogic (05/29/2015) [-]
You sound like a ******* edgy teenager with these questions

Allow me to redirect you to someone who can intellectually keep up with you mrpeep
#25 to #24 - larknok (05/29/2015) [-]
lol, I'm a Philosophy and Astrophysics Major. I make questions my job.
User avatar #9 to #8 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
Evening.
#10 to #9 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
how are you doing, bud? What did I do to bring you to my abode?
User avatar #11 to #10 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
Morbid curiosity. I'm bored as ****

Ask me anything.
#12 to #11 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
Does morality exist objectively? That is, does morality exist without people in such a way that some actions are good or bad as a fact about reality? If yes, provide an unobjectionable reason for believing this. If not, provide a short description of what follows without an objective morality.
User avatar #13 to #12 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
Morality is an illusion design to comfort your brain and to judge you as an individual.
#14 to #13 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
What about other people? We often apply ethics (probably more often than we do to ourselves) to others.
User avatar #15 to #14 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
It applies to anyone with a functioning brain.
#16 to #15 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
If moral judgments are derived from values, and values are irreducibly simple (that is, no other facts not about you entail that you value what you do), why do people fear the idea of Artificial Intelligence? Self-interest is inherently a value, and because it's irreducibly simple, an AI could never find Humans to be a threat worth exterminating.

What do you think?
User avatar #18 to #16 - murrlogic (05/28/2015) [-]
>why do people fear the idea of Artificial Intelligence?

Its self aware

It learns. It thinks at a speed most normal humans can't comprehend

it no longer makes it a benefit it makes it a weapon and weapons are designed to kill
#19 to #18 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
Only if you program a military AI. That's inherently a different thing than an AI as an artificial person or something. See my qualification above for some more stuff.
#17 to #16 - larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
Forgot to qualify: It couldn't find Humans a threat unless we specifically program self-interest into the AI. The point is that because values are irreducibly simple, it doesn't matter whatever the AI knows about reality, it could at no point "learn" self-interest and self-preservation unless these values were programmed in.
#2 - dashgamer (01/22/2015) [-]
Who are you?
#3 to #2 - larknok (01/22/2015) [-]
A giant faggot who likes tiny horses, Philosophy, Astrophysics, and Sid Meier games.
#4 to #3 - dashgamer (01/22/2015) [-]
Sid Meier ******* sucks.
You should try Total War games.
#5 to #4 - larknok (01/22/2015) [-]
Doant b ghey - total war is cool, but wargame: red dragon is better.
#6 to #5 - dashgamer (01/22/2015) [-]
NOTHING IS BETTER THAN TOTAL WAR!!!
 Friends (0)