larknok
Rank #7369 on Comments
Offline
Send mail to larknok Block larknok Invite larknok to be your friend | Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 7/02/2011 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #7369 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #1236 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #1569 |
| Content Thumbs: | 1370 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 4516 |
| Content Level Progress: | 30% (3/10) Level 101 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 102 Content: Funny Junkie |
| Comment Level Progress: | 54% (54/100) Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 238 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz |
| Subscribers: | 1 |
| Content Views: | 65059 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 65 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 1130 |
| FJ Points: | 4777 |
Text Posts
- Views: 1138
8
2
Total: +6
Comments: 9
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 07/16/13
Waht a Tweest
Pictures
- Views: 44627
1424
180
Total: +1244
Comments: 230
Favorites: 61
Uploaded: 06/09/15
Graph Reading Skillz - Views: 11542
152
47
Total: +105
Comments: 24
Favorites: 3
Uploaded: 08/02/14
Is this kid even real - Views: 897
11
5
Total: +6
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 08/09/11
HE IS MY SON - Views: 1538
8
3
Total: +5
Comments: 3
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 08/28/13
I are real super sand - Views: 1042
6
7
Total: -1
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 07/21/13
Way2soon
YouTube
- Views: 3275
18
7
Total: +11
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 06/25/14
The Dare - Views: 692
3
9
Total: -6
Comments: 15
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 02/22/14
SAFETY DANCE
user favorites
latest user's comments
| #74 - Alternatively, read bubble (1) in the graphic, which sites the… [+] (2 new replies) | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +4 |
| #136 -
anon (01/06/2016) [-] this is where you need to know some basic economics and a term that applies in this situation is the gini coeffecient. this formula describes the inequality in terms of the difference between the poorest and richest. The US has the highest inequality in the whole of the western world. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality >most Americans wouldn't know it All Americans live in luxury compared to those living in almost any other country. Please don't tell me that a middle class family living in socialist France is in any way better off than a middle class American family. In their economic system social mobility is all but halted. Also most Americans are ignorant of the outside world, thus they don't know the true definition of poverty. | ||
| #72 - Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. … [+] (2 new replies) | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +3 |
| The reason American medical costs are so high is because the huge amounts of lawsuits hospitals receive all the time. To cover the legal losses hospitals have no choice but to jack up the prices. The problem is not with capitalism, but an attitude that modern Americans have with the legal system; we take our right to go to court for granted, without realizing that the money have to come out of someone's pockets, and that someone is ourselves. | ||
| #69 - You know, not being a brash idiot does not entail weakness. … | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +4 |
| #48 - I'm not sure what you're suggesting. On the left, a b… [+] (2 new replies) | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +11 |
| #68 -
anon (01/05/2016) [-] trump is a pimp, sanders is whipped if that was the clinton's doing, they may have dealt his campaign a death blow right there. voters don't respect weakness. #69 -
larknok (01/05/2016) [-] You know, not being a brash idiot does not entail weakness. I won't call Trump an idiot because it's not relevant -- but it's very clear to me that what you're suggesting Bernie should have done (physically detain emotionally unstable black women in the wake of a supremely politically charged race protest) is not "strong" -- it's utterly idiotic. | ||
| #41 - That's 100% true. It would come out of taxes. In the specific … [+] (3 new replies) | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +13 |
| #65 -
anon (01/05/2016) [-] Just because someone can afford to pay, doesn't mean they should have to pay. I'm all for ending tax breaks on the rich, but increasing percentages just because they are rich (how dare they) makes me uncomfortable. A rich person paying 18% next to a middle class paying 18%, rich guy is still paying far, far more and the majority of the country's tax income. Raising the rich guys percentage borders on socialist wealth redistribution. Let's say you make $10,000 a year. Your expenses are $7,000 a year. Your friend makes $100,000 a year. His expenses are $20,000 a year. You put taxes at 30 percent flat rate. You make literally no money after expenses, but your friend still makes $50,000 after expenses. It's because the wealthy can afford to be taxed more than the poor and middle class can without starving to death. Welcome to society, where we should all work together. Unfortunately many people do not. For that there is government. | ||
| #39 - It's honestly not as bad as most people make it ou… | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +20 |
| #32 - I'm a huge supporter of Bernie Sanders for economic and enviro… [+] (21 new replies) | 01/05/2016 on team 4chantress | +29 |
| Alright i'm a bernie supporter too, but the idea of a carbon tax sorta worries me. Companies have a tendency to work hard to increase profits, even if it means charging the consumer more. Considering our dependancy on carbon based fuel sources for energy, I can see them easily just raising the price of things to pay for it. Explain the plan in some more detail I guess. Environmental policy is a pretty tricky mine field. You do realize his economic policies will destroy the US economy right? Not saying Trump's is much better. #74 -
larknok (01/05/2016) [-] Alternatively, read bubble (1) in the graphic, which sites the difference between the two to be 2,500 billion. Either way, Bernie would be saving the American people nearly double what we intents on spending. He's saying something very fucking legitimate when he says that "America is the richest country in the history of the world, but most Americans wouldn't know it." #136 -
anon (01/06/2016) [-] this is where you need to know some basic economics and a term that applies in this situation is the gini coeffecient. this formula describes the inequality in terms of the difference between the poorest and richest. The US has the highest inequality in the whole of the western world. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality >most Americans wouldn't know it All Americans live in luxury compared to those living in almost any other country. Please don't tell me that a middle class family living in socialist France is in any way better off than a middle class American family. In their economic system social mobility is all but halted. Also most Americans are ignorant of the outside world, thus they don't know the true definition of poverty. #72 -
larknok (01/05/2016) [-] Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here's the uncharitable, no context version of Bernie's budget plan: blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/files/2015/10/SandersBudgetBV.jpg The thing to notice here is that the single-payer healthcare system is being treated here as if it is an addition to the total amount of money the US citizen needs to spend on taxes, rather than a substitute for the existing, FAR more expensive privatized healthcare system. The truth of the matter is that the single-payer system will save Americans 5000 billion over the next 10 years: www.huffingtonpost.com/gerald-friedman/the-wall-street-journal-k_b_8143062.html So basically, just imagine the "single payer" bar in expenditures completely gone, replaced with an additional bar half its size (5000) in revenues. The reason American medical costs are so high is because the huge amounts of lawsuits hospitals receive all the time. To cover the legal losses hospitals have no choice but to jack up the prices. The problem is not with capitalism, but an attitude that modern Americans have with the legal system; we take our right to go to court for granted, without realizing that the money have to come out of someone's pockets, and that someone is ourselves. Oh god.....that smug look on the BLM protestor faces..... Raging internally.... #48 -
larknok (01/05/2016) [-] I'm not sure what you're suggesting. On the left, a bunch of supposed BLM supporters with questionable ties to the Clinton campaign stormed Bernie's platform and threatened to shut down his event unless they got to take the mic and say whatever they want. The crowd boo'd them, but Sanders properly understood that if he wants the African American vote, obviously he can't fucking have security physically detain a bunch of uncooperative black women in the wake of massive protests of white-on-black cop violence. On the right, Trump clearly bought out a bunch of black women to speak against their own self-interest. #68 -
anon (01/05/2016) [-] trump is a pimp, sanders is whipped if that was the clinton's doing, they may have dealt his campaign a death blow right there. voters don't respect weakness. #69 -
larknok (01/05/2016) [-] You know, not being a brash idiot does not entail weakness. I won't call Trump an idiot because it's not relevant -- but it's very clear to me that what you're suggesting Bernie should have done (physically detain emotionally unstable black women in the wake of a supremely politically charged race protest) is not "strong" -- it's utterly idiotic. #40 -
anon (01/05/2016) [-] NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH O S U C H T H I N G A S A F R E E L U N C H #41 -
larknok (01/05/2016) [-] That's 100% true. It would come out of taxes. In the specific case of free tuition, he's proposed for it to come from a tax on Wall street speculation. So while it's not technically a free lunch, it's a tax on millionaires and billionaires who can spare to give back and educate our youth, which is arguably the most important use of public money. #65 -
anon (01/05/2016) [-] Just because someone can afford to pay, doesn't mean they should have to pay. I'm all for ending tax breaks on the rich, but increasing percentages just because they are rich (how dare they) makes me uncomfortable. A rich person paying 18% next to a middle class paying 18%, rich guy is still paying far, far more and the majority of the country's tax income. Raising the rich guys percentage borders on socialist wealth redistribution. Let's say you make $10,000 a year. Your expenses are $7,000 a year. Your friend makes $100,000 a year. His expenses are $20,000 a year. You put taxes at 30 percent flat rate. You make literally no money after expenses, but your friend still makes $50,000 after expenses. It's because the wealthy can afford to be taxed more than the poor and middle class can without starving to death. Welcome to society, where we should all work together. Unfortunately many people do not. For that there is government. | ||
| #231 - The Long Dark is coming along swimmingly. They recently added … | 01/04/2016 on Buying an indie early... | 0 |
| #35 - You are an edgy racist, go back to /pol/. That said, … | 01/02/2016 on African refugees shit in... | +8 |
| #31 - You seem like you're at least coping, so I'll let you in on so… | 01/02/2016 on Call of Smash | +3 |
user's friends
Anonymous comments allowed.
25 comments displayed.
#21 to #20
-
larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
By the subjective ethics you subscribed to, "rights" don't really exist. Nothing has a "right" to anything in such a way that it objectively obligates you to some action.
The question is not whether or not technology has a right to be like us, but whether or not AI would destroy us or help us (towards whatever ends we have.)
The question is not whether or not technology has a right to be like us, but whether or not AI would destroy us or help us (towards whatever ends we have.)
#23 to #22
-
larknok (05/29/2015) [-]
But of course -- this doesn't mean there's any authority behind them. It technically applies to anything a thinking thing sets their minds to, because there's no authority in the first place.
Also, here's another question: There is no quality that every human has, that nothing that isn't human doesn't have, (no exclusive quality to all humans) so what's the justification for human beings existing as a group at all?
Also, here's another question: There is no quality that every human has, that nothing that isn't human doesn't have, (no exclusive quality to all humans) so what's the justification for human beings existing as a group at all?
#12 to #11
-
larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
Does morality exist objectively? That is, does morality exist without people in such a way that some actions are good or bad as a fact about reality? If yes, provide an unobjectionable reason for believing this. If not, provide a short description of what follows without an objective morality.
#16 to #15
-
larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
If moral judgments are derived from values, and values are irreducibly simple (that is, no other facts not about you entail that you value what you do), why do people fear the idea of Artificial Intelligence? Self-interest is inherently a value, and because it's irreducibly simple, an AI could never find Humans to be a threat worth exterminating.
What do you think?
What do you think?
#17 to #16
-
larknok (05/28/2015) [-]
Forgot to qualify: It couldn't find Humans a threat unless we specifically program self-interest into the AI. The point is that because values are irreducibly simple, it doesn't matter whatever the AI knows about reality, it could at no point "learn" self-interest and self-preservation unless these values were programmed in.
