wait wait hold on, a themed account for my only female sub in KOF

kula B)

that's enough out of you

I am.

I still fail to see the actual problem and why this causes someone to lose faith in humanity, though, even if that is an exaggeration.
I've not read the studies but I'll just assume that you're right - okay so somebody has a higher chance of their marriage failing compared to somebody else, but how does that mean it's wrong for that person to want to try at marriage? She's not keeping it a secret and lying about it, either.
If she did keep it a secret then I could agree that since studies show it increases chances of marriages failing, then it's wrong for her not to let her partner know before marriage.
But this isn't just about this one woman. You are arguing that it's wrong/immoral for any person to have sex with this amount of people, and so you can't assume that in every case the person involved will neglect to tell their partner this. The withholding of this information is a separate case, and can't be used to argue for or against whether promiscuity overall is good or bad. Withholding the information from the partner is bad, but the act of being promiscuous is not, I think.

I still disagree on the responsibility. Having sex with many people unprotected or without ensuring they're STD free and even then having them finish inside is definitely irresponsible, but just having multiple sexual partners is not. It may be a sign of irresponsibility due to many people who are promiscuous aren't protected/don't care to check if their partner is safe. The fact that with each new partner the chances of STD/unwanted pregnancy increase and out of 300+ she only ever once got pregnant and never got an STD implies that she was very responsible and kept protected. Many people get way more unwanted pregnancies with having much fewer sexual partners.
You can be very responsible and also be very promiscuous, and therefore you can't argue that promiscuity is inherently irresponsible, even if most promiscuous people are irresponsible (Idk if that's the case, but assuming it is, that's not everyone.)

So, besides social conditioning, I still don't see why somebody being promiscuous is supposed to be bad or morally wrong.

Someone who doesn't watch Prison School, explain what's going on

a load of shit happened, he ended up somehow peeing on her and other such crazy shit, and she demands that she get her revenge by dumping his pee on her. He has to distract her so his friends can break out of the jail. She's uncomfortable as heck and he tries to go in for the kill. l e w d/10

1 -
I didn't read it as her using abortion as contraception as a replacement for other contraceptive methods. To me it looked like she got pregnant because shit happens even when you're careful, then had an abortion because she didn't want a baby. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Maybe there's more to it and she did use abortion in place of whatever else, I don't see anything very wrong with that either, tbh. Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I don't believe it's a human life (assuming she aborted it early enough) and so if I don't believe it's a life, what is morally wrong about using abortion as contraception? (as long as its not coming out of tax payers money I guess?)

2 -
Switch the genders - some stud sleeps with hundreds of women, then wants to settle down. "He fucked many women when he was young now he expects that a woman marry him" I don't see a problem either way.
I don't see anything wrong with expecting somebody to marry you? If both partners consent to and want a marriage then why not? If it turns out nobody wants to marry her then that sucks for her but why is it bad for her to want marriage now?


Considering she had sex with 300+ people and didn't get any STD and only got pregnant once, she seems pretty responsible to me, she just lived a life which wasn't conventional.
What do you mean "hit the wall"? Where did her being desperate and wanting guys to give her free things come from? .-. Is this from more parts of the post not shown in this pic or what?

The fact that a person think that can live a promiscuous life and then expect that somebody will marry her / him it's pure delusion! Studies have shown that the higher the number of sexual partners the higher chance of marital dissolution and since the majority of women are living a promiscuous life expect more stories similar of this woman.

Also, she is not responsible a bit! Having sex with multiple people is not a sign of responsibility, considering the fact that a promiscuous life increases the chances of contracting STD and unwanted pregnancy (something that she had).

I still fail to see the actual problem and why this causes someone to lose faith in humanity, though, even if that is an exaggeration.
I've not read the studies but I'll just assume that you're right - okay so somebody has a higher chance of their marriage failing compared to somebody else, but how does that mean it's wrong for that person to want to try at marriage? She's not keeping it a secret and lying about it, either.
If she did keep it a secret then I could agree that since studies show it increases chances of marriages failing, then it's wrong for her not to let her partner know before marriage.
But this isn't just about this one woman. You are arguing that it's wrong/immoral for any person to have sex with this amount of people, and so you can't assume that in every case the person involved will neglect to tell their partner this. The withholding of this information is a separate case, and can't be used to argue for or against whether promiscuity overall is good or bad. Withholding the information from the partner is bad, but the act of being promiscuous is not, I think.

I still disagree on the responsibility. Having sex with many people unprotected or without ensuring they're STD free and even then having them finish inside is definitely irresponsible, but just having multiple sexual partners is not. It may be a sign of irresponsibility due to many people who are promiscuous aren't protected/don't care to check if their partner is safe. The fact that with each new partner the chances of STD/unwanted pregnancy increase and out of 300+ she only ever once got pregnant and never got an STD implies that she was very responsible and kept protected. Many people get way more unwanted pregnancies with having much fewer sexual partners.
You can be very responsible and also be very promiscuous, and therefore you can't argue that promiscuity is inherently irresponsible, even if most promiscuous people are irresponsible (Idk if that's the case, but assuming it is, that's not everyone.)

So, besides social conditioning, I still don't see why somebody being promiscuous is supposed to be bad or morally wrong.