I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one who noticed and disliked that aspect of Snoke...

But then again, I think we only notice CGI when that's all we can focus on. When the character interactions/development, plot, etc. are all great, we tend to not notice things like CGI. But when we're not invested in the character or the scene, we have too much time to notice stuff like that, and Snoke really wasn't given much more than just a few short appearances, so picking at the CGI is the little amount we can focus on. Idk, that's just my guess.

I'd say that about sums it up. It'll be interesting to see his backstory, because JJ has confirmed that he's new to both the canon and non-canon star wars universe, so hopefully he has more full development in 8 and 9

Oh yeah, that was his name!

...I don't know if I want him to be that size in person or not (since those were just holograms). It might be cool to see a giant using the force and just being imposing like that, but it could also look really silly. I guess I'll just have to wait until 2017 to find out.

Can't wait for Rogue One!

And the only thing I disliked about Snoke, was the all-CGI. In a film where Abrams has gone back to the way the originals were made with puppets and animatronics, why in the hell does Snoke need CGI? Some makeup could have the same effect as his facial scarring, and then just blow up a hologram of him.

I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one who noticed and disliked that aspect of Snoke...

But then again, I think we only notice CGI when that's all we can focus on. When the character interactions/development, plot, etc. are all great, we tend to not notice things like CGI. But when we're not invested in the character or the scene, we have too much time to notice stuff like that, and Snoke really wasn't given much more than just a few short appearances, so picking at the CGI is the little amount we can focus on. Idk, that's just my guess.

I'd say that about sums it up. It'll be interesting to see his backstory, because JJ has confirmed that he's new to both the canon and non-canon star wars universe, so hopefully he has more full development in 8 and 9

Yeah, I know why it would make sense on all those levels, but it still just seemed a bit too silly. Like, Vader crushed the entire room around him with the force when he first got in the suit because he was emotional, and that falls in line with the sith and what not.
And when I'm calling Kylo a sith, it's because he's training under the new sith master (I can't even remember his name it's so forgettable...) who stated at the end of the movie that it was time to complete his training. So I get that he's going to be emotional because of what he is; that doesn't mean that it won't seem silly.

No shit any force user could do that. I was pointing out how even Vader would become destructive and take out his anger when he'd become emotional. It's just instead of swinging his lightsaber around, he'd crush things or choke/kill his subordinates.

And really, what's even the fundamental difference? They're force users who give in to their emotions to use the dark side of the force and the new ones are directly trying to accomplish what the sith tried and failed to do.

Yeah, you just pointed out how retarded Vader was.
Kylo Ren better(as in smarter) alone for not killing random people unnecessarily.

He hasn't started doing that yet, you mean. He seems pretty new at it, especially compared to Vader. He also seemed to be struggling on whether or not to fully go to the dark side, and if he does fully embrace it he may become completely ruthless.

No he isnt.
He is already a better force user than Vader ever was.

And going full dark side isnt not equal to being completely raging faggot.

What has he done to show that he's better than Vader? Because I think pinpointing and force choking a person from who knows how far away is pretty fucking impressive... www.youtube.com/watch?v=aV2DLkDPwM8&ab_channel=StarJedi951

I haven't seen Kylo show that level of fine control or range. Nor do I remember seeing him use the sheer amount of force that Vader has used.

"Swinging one's lightsaber around, causing a lot of damage is perfectly fine but crushing rooms and killing people that you don't trust makes you a raging faggot."

All Vader ever did was force choke.
Which is pretty lame compared to completely freezing people, even laser shots mid-flight.

You see, Vader never shown this level of control and power.

Fair enough, I do think his tantrums are a little overdone, but yeah I get what you mean

Oh and you're thinking of Supreme Leader Snoke

Oh yeah, that was his name!

...I don't know if I want him to be that size in person or not (since those were just holograms). It might be cool to see a giant using the force and just being imposing like that, but it could also look really silly. I guess I'll just have to wait until 2017 to find out.

Can't wait for Rogue One!

And the only thing I disliked about Snoke, was the all-CGI. In a film where Abrams has gone back to the way the originals were made with puppets and animatronics, why in the hell does Snoke need CGI? Some makeup could have the same effect as his facial scarring, and then just blow up a hologram of him.

I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one who noticed and disliked that aspect of Snoke...

But then again, I think we only notice CGI when that's all we can focus on. When the character interactions/development, plot, etc. are all great, we tend to not notice things like CGI. But when we're not invested in the character or the scene, we have too much time to notice stuff like that, and Snoke really wasn't given much more than just a few short appearances, so picking at the CGI is the little amount we can focus on. Idk, that's just my guess.

I'd say that about sums it up. It'll be interesting to see his backstory, because JJ has confirmed that he's new to both the canon and non-canon star wars universe, so hopefully he has more full development in 8 and 9

I love you
no homo
full homo

I'm sorry I can't express myself properly in this language.

What I meant is that fat still doesn't turn into pure energy. The mass must stay. Right?

Yeah. When we say "energy" in biological terms, it means it is a metabolized product that is available to be used, and is the resultant of chemical reactions.

there is of course chemical energy taking place in the form of chemical reactions, but there are also unused substances that are removed, and the breakdown and end product of reabsorption is what becomes the feces. So yeah most is converted into a useable energy source, some is repurposed, some is turned into feces.

btw your english is damn good, don't worry about it.