nice thumbnail

Ya got me, but funny enough mimics tend to lower the effectiveness of warning coloration of other sneks. :/ So it does ONE snek no good to be confused for another.... the venomous one anyways.

Basically some young dumbass animal attacks a snake.... and usually learns his lesson about attacking snakes of that color because of the memory associated with that snake...... a predator that attacks a mimic learns nothing.

What you say is partly true. According to NASA all the different colours of light do indeed scatter across the sky, but the blue wavelengths scatter much more than than the others, which is why the sky is blue. Apparently a girl, who had never been taught the colour of the sky, only the colour of other things (including blue things) was asked what the colour of the sky was. Apparently she didn't at first realize that the sky was "a thing", but she ended up saying white. She later changed he opinion to blue, and the white again, until she ended up on blue as her final answer. I have yet to hear of anyone saying the sky is green (though it may have happened without my knowledge as I am not omnipotent).

Then they are of a blue hue or something along those line (pardon my lack of vocabulary, english is not my main language). This has more or less become an argument of semantics. All the wavelengths coming from the sky (that the human eye can observe anyway) are from the blue spectrum of visible light, therefore i would say the sky is blue. whether it has different tinges of blue i do not care, as they are still blue.

What you say is partly true. According to NASA all the different colours of light do indeed scatter across the sky, but the blue wavelengths scatter much more than than the others, which is why the sky is blue. Apparently a girl, who had never been taught the colour of the sky, only the colour of other things (including blue things) was asked what the colour of the sky was. Apparently she didn't at first realize that the sky was "a thing", but she ended up saying white. She later changed he opinion to blue, and the white again, until she ended up on blue as her final answer. I have yet to hear of anyone saying the sky is green (though it may have happened without my knowledge as I am not omnipotent).

All the things you say are true, but we also define light as electromagnetic waves. I dont recall what the wavelength of visible light is, but green and blue is definitely within there. It is generally accepted within most communities that certain wavelengths correspond to certain ranges of colour. Therefore the sky has only one colour, no matter what you may try to argue. The only difference is what we name that colour, and as most people call the wavelengths of the sky blue, the sky is blue.

Then they are of a blue hue or something along those line (pardon my lack of vocabulary, english is not my main language). This has more or less become an argument of semantics. All the wavelengths coming from the sky (that the human eye can observe anyway) are from the blue spectrum of visible light, therefore i would say the sky is blue. whether it has different tinges of blue i do not care, as they are still blue.

What you say is partly true. According to NASA all the different colours of light do indeed scatter across the sky, but the blue wavelengths scatter much more than than the others, which is why the sky is blue. Apparently a girl, who had never been taught the colour of the sky, only the colour of other things (including blue things) was asked what the colour of the sky was. Apparently she didn't at first realize that the sky was "a thing", but she ended up saying white. She later changed he opinion to blue, and the white again, until she ended up on blue as her final answer. I have yet to hear of anyone saying the sky is green (though it may have happened without my knowledge as I am not omnipotent).

That's the thing though, it doesn't matter whether you think it's shitty or not, he used it to the advantage of him and the rest of his company which, by definition, is the opposite of what your argument is when someone starts screaming "but he went bankrupt!"

The entire point is that the argument is trash, not whether you agree or disagree with the ethics behind it.

My argument is that he's an unethical piece of shit.
New argument cause you didn't like the other argument.
Suck it.

>Implying ethics matter

Yeah but since when has ethics mattered?

But a valid and widely used business tactic nonetheless.

That's the thing though, it doesn't matter whether you think it's shitty or not, he used it to the advantage of him and the rest of his company which, by definition, is the opposite of what your argument is when someone starts screaming "but he went bankrupt!"

The entire point is that the argument is trash, not whether you agree or disagree with the ethics behind it.

My argument is that he's an unethical piece of shit.
New argument cause you didn't like the other argument.
Suck it.

>Implying ethics matter

Where else would you find a burger with chips in it. <.<

You seem to have gotten the wrong idea.

I don't hold this opinion because i am bitter i cant get women, I simply have no interest in women, none.
I find their bodies attractive but beyond that i see no pleasure in coming in contact with them in anyway.

99% of the time, It isn't worth it, believe me.

Then it depends on the natural level of hormones their bodies produce. As for transgenders having different hormonal levels naturally, that's not really a good indicator since it's prenatal hormone exposure that is believed to be the primary cause and shouldn't, in theory, affect hormone levels in a healthy individual once they hit puberty.

It would indicate the gender that the person transitioned to (assuming they are on hormones). They are detecting chemicals in the sweat and oils on the skin, which would be dictated by the levels of estrogen or testosterone in there person's body.

Then it depends on the natural level of hormones their bodies produce. As for transgenders having different hormonal levels naturally, that's not really a good indicator since it's prenatal hormone exposure that is believed to be the primary cause and shouldn't, in theory, affect hormone levels in a healthy individual once they hit puberty.

>No almonds
not californian enough but still 10/10

Remember to activate those almonds.