Agreed, I feel kinda the same, it's far from being the best album ever made for me, but it's a great fucking album, full with insight and feelings I can relate, I think it's a mix of selling out and growing too old, like green day or blink or many other bands from the 90's.
I prefer hard rock and metal to any other genere, and they usually sell out instead of growing too old, but still it's a damn shame, like I started listening to metallica around the time the black album came out and I listened to the old stuff and I was in awe kill 'em all is a masterpiece of anger and adrenaline, then you get to black album and after listening to their previous stuff you kinda feel a little sellout, like they made great songs, but they target a broader audience they are trying to sell this album, but the material they used was good so you could accept it (unless you're a die hard fan) but every single album after that one is just a sellout and an insult to what they had produced before.
That being said my favourite band is guns and roses and altho I don't believe them to be near the best band in the world (which to me is pink floyd btw) I think appetite for destruction is a masterpiece and could be consider the best album of at least the genere.
Dark side of the moon or led zep 4 could be the best albums in all of history.

Nah, the premise of Anarchy is nothing more than "No rules"
Basically, everyone does whatever the hell they want
I'm not saying it's a good system, I'm just explaining what it is

Anarchy means no rules too..

Sure, there may be rules. But your choice to not follow them is what causes Anarchy to come alive.

Thats the beauty of Anarchy. Everyone has the power to engage in it whenever they want. Countries fall into Anarchy when mass groups of people decide to engage in it at the same time. Usually because the value of the currency is gone, so everyone is mad and will engage in destroying buildings and robbing stores.

No society can have anarchy for a long peroid of time. There needs to be stability for growth, anarchy is the opposite of stability. Youre just an animal feeding off prey you find in the wild. Thats anarchy.

Yup, he should have checked that before posting it.
spanish here

it's a fact

it's a fact

You have more important things to worry about then roads getting plowed

Not at all - it took years of training from childhood to develop the strong back muscles and to be able to fire without thinking about aiming (as you wouldn't be able to hold the bow at full draw for anything more than a second or so). The reason only England deployed them on mass is that a craze amongst the peasantry caught on with the longbow.

Everywhere else the crossbow was used as you could train people to use it effectively in a few days, but crossbowman suffered greatly when pitted against longbowman, as in the time it took to cock or wind back the quarrel, aim then fire, a longbowman could release anywhere between 4 to 10 arrows (depending on crossbow mechanism).

It...kind of did require practice, in fact - it did.

War bows require a more than average strength to operate properly, which is why the "average serf" couldn't "just do it." You do train archers, don't see where you got the idea you don't need to.

I wouldn't say that you got your asses handed to us. Even with almost every advantage imaginable, many battles were won by our southern brothers.