Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

kilotech    

Rank #1110 on Comments
kilotech Avatar Level 227 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to kilotech Block kilotech Invite kilotech to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Facebook Profile: why would I want facebook?
Steam Profile: dps524
Consoles Owned: PC, Xbox360
Video Games Played: far too many
X-box Gamertag: dps524
Interests: History, Military, Weapons, Computers, Reading, Mythology
Date Signed Up:7/22/2013
Last Login:7/22/2014
Location:Earth
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4928
Comment Ranking:#1110
Highest Content Rank:#2781
Highest Comment Rank:#813
Content Thumbs: 863 total,  963 ,  100
Comment Thumbs: 3329 total,  3644 ,  315
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 67 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 68 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 227 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 228 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:48677
Times Content Favorited:36 times
Total Comments Made:1117
FJ Points:3474
Favorite Tags: help (2)

latest user's comments

#593 - many more shootings are stopped by armed civilians they just n… 06/12/2014 on don't be a pleb +11
#92 - I mean the girl is a no BTW I suck at formatting 06/12/2014 on How to parent correctly 0
#1 - this **** makes me sick. I support our troops but…  [+] (29 new replies) 06/12/2014 on I like this guy +85
User avatar #26 - shrinkzz (06/12/2014) [-]
why would you even support your troops? Not like they do anything usefull...
User avatar #34 - byobgraffpro (06/12/2014) [-]
fuck off. lay back and bitch about America and homework on the internet a little bit more, while half away around the world there are soldiers dying so other people can bitch on the internet without a car bomb going off in their driveway. Yeah war is bad, but there are actually really shitty people in power that need to get bent over by our "useless troops". spoiled, fat, ungrateful, ignorant little brat is what you are. unplug your modem, you've lost your right to internet
User avatar #88 - shrinkzz (06/19/2014) [-]
calling someone you've never seen before fat, eh? I think it's already clear who has more sense here.
User avatar #87 - shrinkzz (06/19/2014) [-]
Stop eating your government's words like they're chocolates, please. The reason terrorism exists is BECAUSE of American military actions in the middle-east. PLEASE think for yourself.
User avatar #14 - assyria (06/12/2014) [-]
It was not necessarily completely the men's fault.
The whole thing was a giant cluster fuck of fuck from beginning to end.
The men were told to raze the entire village and kill everyone inside because they had been told that all civvies were cleared out and the only ones that were left were Charlie.
Again, they were ordered to kill everyone inside (since they did not know there were civvies), and some men just simply followed orders, and the rest joined.
It went way too far--I am not trying to justify it--but the whole thing was a huge mess from start to finish.
User avatar #25 - noooooooooo (06/12/2014) [-]
You also have to remember the unit was described by other officers as "Organized thugs" well before the massacre, so something was bound to happen.
User avatar #4 - bananarchy (06/12/2014) [-]
We don't need more Hugh Thompsons
We need less war
#60 - jippythebandit (06/13/2014) [-]
Hear ya bro, violence is the language of tha man
#51 - mayoroftownsville (06/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #37 - whimwhamwaffle (06/12/2014) [-]
We need more people like him willing to stand up for what is right.
and less war.
User avatar #18 - Lambda (06/12/2014) [-]
I think that's too much to ask for. War existed before man, and will exist long after we've gone.
User avatar #19 - bananarchy (06/12/2014) [-]
>War existed before man
Hwut
Animals don't go to war
User avatar #20 - Lambda (06/12/2014) [-]
Not on the grandiose scale that we do, but indeed they do. Ants have been known to wage wars over territory, wasps and honeybees fight on large scales as well. Chimps fight as well, but not on the large scale that humans and ants do.
User avatar #21 - bananarchy (06/12/2014) [-]
I did not know that
Pretty cool Tiny driver ants Vs red ants - Ant  Attack - BBC wildlife
User avatar #22 - Lambda (06/12/2014) [-]
I think that out of all the other species, ants are the most like us in that they develop large sophisticated societies. Bees too, maybe.
I think that any species that develops such large societies would eventually develop warfare as well.
User avatar #9 - PVTDickStryker (06/12/2014) [-]
The psychos would just find another way to be inhuman.
#8 - iscrewbabies (06/12/2014) [-]
Sadly enough, I disagree.
We need more far.
It's either diseases, war, or over-population.
#10 - silentwarrior (06/12/2014) [-]
Overpopulation is not really an issue. Look at all industrialized countries, the population curve is stablilizing at a certain point, meaning it dosen't go down or up anymore. This is starting to happen all over, soon population will halt at about 20 billions. It just seems like an issue because there has been such a heightened increace in populaation because fo the industrial revolution. Just read any article on the subject.
#13 - iscrewbabies (06/12/2014) [-]
Also, I just realized I wrote "far" instead of "war". I am sorry.
#11 - iscrewbabies (06/12/2014) [-]
I've actually read at least over 20 articles on the subject.
Most of them have said that overpopulation will indeed be an issue, but there have been some that have said what you did right now. But I myself do believe that we will have the problem of overpopulation soon. Even 20 billion is too much, to be honest.
So I just hope for a nuclear war that will wipe out about 80% of people or something.
User avatar #16 - bananarchy (06/12/2014) [-]
>So I just hope for a nuclear war that will wipe out about 80% of people or something.
That would create much more problems than just overpopulation
#17 - iscrewbabies (06/12/2014) [-]
I disagree.
I have different views on this whole subject.
User avatar #29 - shrinkzz (06/12/2014) [-]
You can't simply disagree on this. A good part of all children would be born with genetic mutations, afterwards.
#30 - iscrewbabies (06/12/2014) [-]
Meh, I'd be fine with 7 eyes, 3 arms, and 15 tentacles.
User avatar #85 - bananarchy (06/13/2014) [-]
Also cancer
#86 - iscrewbabies (06/14/2014) [-]
Massive chance that I might get cancer already, so meh, wouldn't change much for me.
#5 - captfuckhead (06/12/2014) [-]
If there were more people like him in this world, maybe we'd have less war...

It's not just the fact he was a soldier, it's the fact he stood up to stop an unwarranted massacre of innocent civilians.
#12 - testaburger has deleted their comment.
#3 - devout feminist (06/12/2014) [-]
That would make paperwork really fucking difficult.

Totally agree with you, though. That or we need to stop fighting other people's wars.
#26 - Comment deleted 06/12/2014 on apocalypse roll game 0
#2 - NO NO NO! why I just forgot about this 06/12/2014 on MFW waiting for the message... 0
#79 - Tau or Tech-preist if he wasn't a fag him nothing…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/12/2014 on How to parent correctly 0
User avatar #92 - kilotech (06/12/2014) [-]
I mean the girl is a no BTW I suck at formatting
#289 - same ones here 06/12/2014 on Beets by schrute alternatives +1
#1 - Comment deleted 06/11/2014 on someone forgot to photoshop... +1
#11 - albert mcswaggerton the III or mitch 06/10/2014 on Just got a Ferret 0
#9 - I already have it so **** you and your games op *… 06/10/2014 on Civ Dubs 0
#1 - "retarded" that's actually kind of smart  [+] (2 new replies) 06/10/2014 on Would this actually work? 0
#8 - devout feminist (06/11/2014) [-]
I can't agree with you there, mate...
User avatar #5 - collateraldamageco (06/11/2014) [-]
except when you accidentally stab yourself in the wrong spot because you're drunk as fuck and end up bleeding to death in 5 min
#177 - American I just expect more from my country why dont I learn 06/09/2014 on This is the anti-gun side... +1
#43 - they made political propaganda without even reading the …  [+] (3 new replies) 06/09/2014 on This is the anti-gun side... +1
User avatar #175 - sgrave (06/09/2014) [-]
This was published by the Brady Campaign, they aren't the brightest bunch.
User avatar #157 - catslap (06/09/2014) [-]
this surprises you? what are you, european?
User avatar #177 - kilotech (06/09/2014) [-]
American I just expect more from my country why dont I learn
#15 - how many golf balls can op substitute for admin or phanac…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/08/2014 on The Magic Ball #2 +1
#19 - alexandrz (06/08/2014) [-]
The Crystal swirls with an ominous energy...
#344 - I could spend a day in my garage with some scrap metal and hav… 06/08/2014 on (untitled) 0
#343 - works better than asking politely or whatever **** … 06/08/2014 on (untitled) 0
#165 - but 7/10 of those are WWII see my point? WWII had more tanks m… 06/07/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
#162 - but nowhere near WWII scale and it's lots of IEDs and guerrill…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/07/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
User avatar #163 - tkfourtwoone (06/07/2014) [-]
on the "lots of IEDs and guerrillas not so many tanks"...

You have the Internet at your disposal. Really, educate yourself.
Here's an example after a 2 seconds search:
www.militaryeducation.org/10-most-epic-tank-battles-in-military-history/
User avatar #165 - kilotech (06/07/2014) [-]
but 7/10 of those are WWII see my point? WWII had more tanks more tank=more kill
#16 - it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
#14 - sorry for raging I was just trying to make obvious what I was saying  [+] (2 new replies) 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
User avatar #15 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
It's okay. I understood you the last time. If it makes you feel better my English isn't perfect so I could just be a derp
User avatar #16 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good
#11 - IF NO WARS HAPPEN HOW DO THEY GET KILLS thats what I'm asking …  [+] (4 new replies) 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
User avatar #13 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, I understand. Sorry for my ignorance. In ratio yes, they have the advantage there but they were devastating and took so many lives it's uncountable.

I'm also unsure if the number I know are put into a ration with how many were in operation or just pure numbers.
User avatar #14 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
sorry for raging I was just trying to make obvious what I was saying
User avatar #15 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
It's okay. I understood you the last time. If it makes you feel better my English isn't perfect so I could just be a derp
User avatar #16 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good
#9 - but the Tiger is one of few tanks fielded during a major war e…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
User avatar #10 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, now I have absolutely no fucking idea what you're even talking about. There were opposing tanks to the Tiger on both Russian and US/England's side in WWII and it was far from 'one of few'

My advice is drop this now. I'm basically saying the Tiger tank was the AK-47 of tanks
User avatar #11 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
IF NO WARS HAPPEN HOW DO THEY GET KILLS thats what I'm asking here you can't say they have more kills than any tank ever if far less tanks fought in the wars after WWII
User avatar #13 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, I understand. Sorry for my ignorance. In ratio yes, they have the advantage there but they were devastating and took so many lives it's uncountable.

I'm also unsure if the number I know are put into a ration with how many were in operation or just pure numbers.
User avatar #14 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
sorry for raging I was just trying to make obvious what I was saying
User avatar #15 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
It's okay. I understood you the last time. If it makes you feel better my English isn't perfect so I could just be a derp
User avatar #16 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good
#6 - but if no tanks are fielded then obviously they can't get kill…  [+] (8 new replies) 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
User avatar #8 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
I'm truly lost with what you're talking about. During the rein of the Tiger, it killed more people than any other model of tank ever has during their respective rein
User avatar #9 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
but the Tiger is one of few tanks fielded during a major war explain how a challenger tank would get kills if there is no one for the challenger to fight
User avatar #10 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, now I have absolutely no fucking idea what you're even talking about. There were opposing tanks to the Tiger on both Russian and US/England's side in WWII and it was far from 'one of few'

My advice is drop this now. I'm basically saying the Tiger tank was the AK-47 of tanks
User avatar #11 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
IF NO WARS HAPPEN HOW DO THEY GET KILLS thats what I'm asking here you can't say they have more kills than any tank ever if far less tanks fought in the wars after WWII
User avatar #13 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, I understand. Sorry for my ignorance. In ratio yes, they have the advantage there but they were devastating and took so many lives it's uncountable.

I'm also unsure if the number I know are put into a ration with how many were in operation or just pure numbers.
User avatar #14 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
sorry for raging I was just trying to make obvious what I was saying
User avatar #15 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
It's okay. I understood you the last time. If it makes you feel better my English isn't perfect so I could just be a derp
User avatar #16 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good
#3 - I figured you meant kills but when was the last time a major t…  [+] (14 new replies) 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp 0
User avatar #27 - tkfourtwoone (06/06/2014) [-]
Well, there's the Gulf war, the continuous war between Israel and most of its neighbours, Afghanistan... there were quite a number of armed conflicts around the world since WW2, you know
User avatar #162 - kilotech (06/07/2014) [-]
but nowhere near WWII scale and it's lots of IEDs and guerrillas not so many tanks
User avatar #163 - tkfourtwoone (06/07/2014) [-]
on the "lots of IEDs and guerrillas not so many tanks"...

You have the Internet at your disposal. Really, educate yourself.
Here's an example after a 2 seconds search:
www.militaryeducation.org/10-most-epic-tank-battles-in-military-history/
User avatar #165 - kilotech (06/07/2014) [-]
but 7/10 of those are WWII see my point? WWII had more tanks more tank=more kill
User avatar #4 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
You misunderstand.

Overall the Tiger tank has killed and destroyed more than any other, there doesn't have to be a tank battle, I'm talking during the entire time it has been around (cumulative)
User avatar #6 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
but if no tanks are fielded then obviously they can't get kill people so of course they have more kills. that's like saying there are more kills with muskets during the war of 1812 than WWI WWII Korea Vietnam and the middle east combined
User avatar #8 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
I'm truly lost with what you're talking about. During the rein of the Tiger, it killed more people than any other model of tank ever has during their respective rein
User avatar #9 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
but the Tiger is one of few tanks fielded during a major war explain how a challenger tank would get kills if there is no one for the challenger to fight
User avatar #10 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, now I have absolutely no fucking idea what you're even talking about. There were opposing tanks to the Tiger on both Russian and US/England's side in WWII and it was far from 'one of few'

My advice is drop this now. I'm basically saying the Tiger tank was the AK-47 of tanks
User avatar #11 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
IF NO WARS HAPPEN HOW DO THEY GET KILLS thats what I'm asking here you can't say they have more kills than any tank ever if far less tanks fought in the wars after WWII
User avatar #13 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, I understand. Sorry for my ignorance. In ratio yes, they have the advantage there but they were devastating and took so many lives it's uncountable.

I'm also unsure if the number I know are put into a ration with how many were in operation or just pure numbers.
User avatar #14 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
sorry for raging I was just trying to make obvious what I was saying
User avatar #15 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
It's okay. I understood you the last time. If it makes you feel better my English isn't perfect so I could just be a derp
User avatar #16 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good
#1 - the Tiger fact is a bit misleading because no major tank v. ta…  [+] (16 new replies) 06/06/2014 on German Army WWII comp -1
User avatar #2 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
I don't mean in the terms of the strongest, most powerful or the most protected. It has destroyed more enemy tanks, buildings and lives than any other tank ever has to date.
User avatar #3 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
I figured you meant kills but when was the last time a major tank battle happened for them to get kills in?
User avatar #27 - tkfourtwoone (06/06/2014) [-]
Well, there's the Gulf war, the continuous war between Israel and most of its neighbours, Afghanistan... there were quite a number of armed conflicts around the world since WW2, you know
User avatar #162 - kilotech (06/07/2014) [-]
but nowhere near WWII scale and it's lots of IEDs and guerrillas not so many tanks
User avatar #163 - tkfourtwoone (06/07/2014) [-]
on the "lots of IEDs and guerrillas not so many tanks"...

You have the Internet at your disposal. Really, educate yourself.
Here's an example after a 2 seconds search:
www.militaryeducation.org/10-most-epic-tank-battles-in-military-history/
User avatar #165 - kilotech (06/07/2014) [-]
but 7/10 of those are WWII see my point? WWII had more tanks more tank=more kill
User avatar #4 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
You misunderstand.

Overall the Tiger tank has killed and destroyed more than any other, there doesn't have to be a tank battle, I'm talking during the entire time it has been around (cumulative)
User avatar #6 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
but if no tanks are fielded then obviously they can't get kill people so of course they have more kills. that's like saying there are more kills with muskets during the war of 1812 than WWI WWII Korea Vietnam and the middle east combined
User avatar #8 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
I'm truly lost with what you're talking about. During the rein of the Tiger, it killed more people than any other model of tank ever has during their respective rein
User avatar #9 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
but the Tiger is one of few tanks fielded during a major war explain how a challenger tank would get kills if there is no one for the challenger to fight
User avatar #10 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, now I have absolutely no fucking idea what you're even talking about. There were opposing tanks to the Tiger on both Russian and US/England's side in WWII and it was far from 'one of few'

My advice is drop this now. I'm basically saying the Tiger tank was the AK-47 of tanks
User avatar #11 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
IF NO WARS HAPPEN HOW DO THEY GET KILLS thats what I'm asking here you can't say they have more kills than any tank ever if far less tanks fought in the wars after WWII
User avatar #13 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
Okay, I understand. Sorry for my ignorance. In ratio yes, they have the advantage there but they were devastating and took so many lives it's uncountable.

I'm also unsure if the number I know are put into a ration with how many were in operation or just pure numbers.
User avatar #14 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
sorry for raging I was just trying to make obvious what I was saying
User avatar #15 - topheavymonkeyy (06/06/2014) [-]
It's okay. I understood you the last time. If it makes you feel better my English isn't perfect so I could just be a derp
User avatar #16 - kilotech (06/06/2014) [-]
it's ok for a non-native english speaker you're pretty good
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 120 / Total items point value: 120

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #26 to #19 - kilotech (09/07/2013) [-]
thats the end of my original stuff now its just the same but slightly different what server are you on?
#27 to #26 - tazze (09/07/2013) [-]
Cobalt
User avatar #24 to #19 - kilotech (09/07/2013) [-]
and maxed again how much ******* propaganda do we have
#25 to #24 - tazze (09/07/2013) [-]
I have a lot
#22 to #19 - kilotech (09/07/2013) [-]
were too far it wont let me reply anymore so doing it this way
#23 to #22 - tazze (09/07/2013) [-]
#21 to #20 - tazze (09/07/2013) [-]
 Friends (0)