Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

kerplunking

Rank #48126 on Subscribers
no avatar Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to kerplunking Block kerplunking Invite kerplunking to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/11/2011
Last Login:12/27/2014
Location:The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 18 total,  46 ,  28
Comment Thumbs: 1611 total,  2280 ,  669
Content Level Progress: 35.59% (21/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:4382
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:481
FJ Points:1715

latest user's comments

#49 - For a second, I thought it had been decapitated. 02/03/2013 on Cute! +1
#70 - Picture 02/03/2013 on chapter of my life +22
#291 - That's a socialist principle, not a liberal one.  [+] (2 new replies) 02/03/2013 on This guy knows his shit. -4
#1099 - gedesnegl (02/03/2013) [-]
There is a difference between equal wealth and equal opportunity ;)
User avatar #769 - teoferrazzi (02/03/2013) [-]
you're right. but americans use the word liberal [wrongly of course] meaning 'leftwing'.
#67 - Marriage existed before Christianity.  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2013 on Texas Gun Control +8
User avatar #87 - Onemanretardpack (02/03/2013) [-]
That's what I'm saying. You don't have to be married under christianity, it's not your right to be married by a christian church. There are plenty of churches who don't care if you're gay. Hell, you could start your own. I don't even get why people want to be married under a church that hates them and says they're abominations for being what they are
#65 - You are a ******* retard. I'm glad there aren't p…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2013 on Texas Gun Control +2
User avatar #213 - backupclover (02/03/2013) [-]
I agree with you chap.
#206 - There's nothing wrong with pointing out hypocrisy. 02/02/2013 on Deep atheist 2 -5
#727 - "i'll assume because the one in the bottom is easier and …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/01/2013 on Will delete profile -- see... 0
User avatar #732 - admiralshepard (02/01/2013) [-]
Except a Mini 14 is just as easy to reload as an M4, and both can utilize "high capacity" magazines . . . it really makes no difference, and while the weapons operate differently, for all practical purposes they perform identically. Both weapons fire the Remington .223 cartridge, they are both semi-automatic, and accuracy at range is comparable between the weapons.
#722 - Perhaps you should open a dictionary at some point in your lif… 02/01/2013 on Will delete profile -- see... 0
#717 - Therefore they are not functionally identical. 02/01/2013 on Will delete profile -- see... +1
#707 - If they're functionally identical, why don't the military use …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/01/2013 on Will delete profile -- see... -2
User avatar #734 - DrBobsPatient (02/01/2013) [-]
ergonomics, more compact, doesn't jam as easily, easier to disassemble on the field, pick up and go sight (the back sight is a handle for picking up and running), more durable.
#726 - anonymous (02/01/2013) [-]
The military does not use AR-15's
#693 - You'd rather be killed by a gun than stabbed (and probably liv…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/01/2013 on Will delete profile -- see... 0
#761 - aussiestig (02/02/2013) [-]
Your problem is that you have no idea what you're talking about. Come back to me when you understand that when someone has intent on killing someone, whether it's with a gun, a knife, an explosive or a baseball bat, chances are they are going to kill you.

America's problem at the moment is that they don't care about gun violence, they just care about mass shootings and taking away your rights. 5 people a day die to gun violence in Detroit, that's on average, 35 people a week. Out of those shootings, around 90% are committed standard semi-auto handguns (ie, glock17, M1911, CZ), and around 3% with semi automatic Assault Rifle clones (AR-15's aren't assault rifles, only clones), yet for some reason, you want to ban all 'assault weapons'? How many bullets in a magazine, or how many rounds a minute the gun can fire has nothing to do with the people dying, so why is the American government, media, and people convinced that 'assault weapons' are the heart of gun violence? It's just beyond me.

I'd like to point out that gun crimes in america are a joke, and I agree that something needs to be done, but the laws that Americans are trying to pass will do nothing. Licenses for all firearms are a step in the right direction in my opinion. Banning guns that play a 3% role in gun violence will do nothing.
#711 - I left open and went to have a shower. This is what I came back to... 01/30/2013 on this kept me entertained... 0
#246 - I have no problem with your average, lower-class, cockney lad …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/29/2013 on Stereotypes 0
#248 - jizzmeista (01/29/2013) [-]
Fair enough. Most people refer to chavs as being someone from a council estate. It is a little annoying when you come from there and are actually a valuable member of society.
#51 - Comment deleted 01/28/2013 on trolly 0
#89 - You would have a point if chavs actually worked.  [+] (3 new replies) 01/28/2013 on Stereotypes +1
User avatar #215 - jizzmeista (01/28/2013) [-]
I don't think you realize you people, regardless of class, are the real scum. You stereotype people when and where they are born. There is nothing wrong with the people you refer to as the ones that "settle to the bottom of the pot". The problem lies in the gap of money that's already in place which distances them so far from the class above, there seems no point in trying. But you'd be surprised in the amount that do get off their asses and put in a good 40 hours a week.
#246 - kerplunking (01/29/2013) [-]
I have no problem with your average, lower-class, cockney lad as long as he's still a bang-up geezer. (ExtremelyBritishModeOff). I have quite an East-London voice myself, so I don't judge people based on their accents.

When I call someone a chav, I'm referring to the scum who hang about on street corners drinking cheap alcohol and seem to have nothing better to do than make everyone else's life a misery.

I get that it's not their own fault most of the time, but rather the fact that they were born in the post-Thatcher era with very little opportunity, but I still hate them nonetheless.
#248 - jizzmeista (01/29/2013) [-]
Fair enough. Most people refer to chavs as being someone from a council estate. It is a little annoying when you come from there and are actually a valuable member of society.
#60 - I AM LE SO DONE XD! 01/28/2013 on Can't stop laughing -1
#77 - More crimes constitute "violent crimes" in the UK th…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/26/2013 on Makes sense. +1
#321 - kmichel (01/27/2013) [-]
There might be a similar problem in the UK, but that problem is not anywhere near the same scale as the problem in the US. While the subcultures between the two countries might have overlap in the sense that they're both aggressive and violent, I don't think that you can make them equal because the US is simply not the UK. It's too simple to say that violent groups in one country are the same as violent groups in another.
#71 - Wherein nobody died. 01/26/2013 on Makes sense. +2
#67 - There are no ******* "Muslim Sharia Law Zone… 01/26/2013 on Makes sense. +2
#19 - Dude, have you not seen Somalia? There's literally no crime there.  [+] (1 new reply) 01/26/2013 on kinda made my day +3
User avatar #22 - Zarke (01/26/2013) [-]
Exactly! No pesky rules to break, either.
#46 - The power of grunge was so great that this guy got permanently… 01/24/2013 on he's honest +5
#71 - Because the economy was SO GOOD before 1936, amirite?  [+] (2 new replies) 01/24/2013 on Taxes +12
User avatar #101 - dabombmanater (01/24/2013) [-]
To be fair, before the government had a say in economics it took 250 years for the first economic collapse. after they were given power it only took 75 years for the first recession. most markets can regulate themselves fine, its the banks who can't seem to take care of themselves.
#97 - gjah (01/24/2013) [-]
Because economy is so good now, right?
#91 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 01/24/2013 on That Reaction 0
#93 - garymotherfinoak (01/24/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#103 - It's not funny. It's only getting thumbed-up by bandwagonning … 01/23/2013 on Geckos and Cheerios 0
#28 - I'm glad you posted this. There's been a real scarcity of cere… 01/23/2013 on Just Water +4
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1200

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)