Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

kerplunking    

Rank #46627 on Subscribers
no avatar Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to kerplunking Block kerplunking Invite kerplunking to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:3/11/2011
Last Login:6/21/2014
Location:The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 17 total,  45 ,  28
Comment Thumbs: 1608 total,  2276 ,  668
Content Level Progress: 35.59% (21/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:1
Content Views:4278
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:481
FJ Points:1715

latest user's comments

#471 - And some little girls deserve to be raped, of course.  [+] (6 new replies) 02/19/2013 on yup 0
User avatar #475 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
I guess you wouldn't understand where I'm coming from if you come from a different side than me. Some people believe God doesn't interfere at all, I believe he does little this's and that's.
#501 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
Of course.

When you find $20 on the floor, "It's a miracle!"

When millions are starving in Africa, "God works in mysterious ways".
User avatar #690 - maturityFAIL (02/19/2013) [-]
I think believers will always find a way to defend their religion because it's so vague to begin with. They twist it and pick and choose and rationalize until it works with their argument. I really don't care if they do believe or not, but what I hate is when they give this sense that they think they're better than you. Same goes to atheists that think that way, even though I completely agree with them.
User avatar #507 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
Oh my, this isn't your average everyday athiest.

This is, an internet athiest.

I don't praise God when I find $20 mate, and I don't call it God's work that children starve in Africa. Quit being a stereotypical dicksqueeze.
#526 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I'm glad you acknowledge that most of my fellow atheists are not like me, I wouldn't want them to get blamed for my jimmyrustlin'.

But seriously, you have no argument. An omnipotent deity could help everyone that needed help, and don't say that he only helps those that "deserve it" because that's blatant bullshit.

We can keep arguing in circles and you can keep making fallacies, but at the end of the day we're both wasting our time. Good day sir.
User avatar #732 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
Whatever floats your boat.
#468 - I strongly doubt that making fun of religion is illegal in Can…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/19/2013 on yup -1
User avatar #500 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
And being a douchebag is illegal in most countries, it's called harrassment
#508 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I'd like to see "Someone made fun of my religion on teh interwebs ;(" be the grounds for a harassment case and get anywhere in court.
User avatar #488 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
Making fun of religion isn't a crime in itself, but it is grounds for detainment and is one of the grounds for breaking up a protest.
#442 - So if a policeman comes across a person being ******** …  [+] (8 new replies) 02/19/2013 on yup 0
User avatar #449 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
For starters, you said the government and legality.

Secondly, I believe that God does save some people some of the time in exceptional situations. However, a policeman isn't always on the spot, and he can't always act.

We'll find out one day.

(Before you say, "well then God favors people hurr durr." Some people are more innocent than others, some people just truly deserve to be protected, despite free will)
#471 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
And some little girls deserve to be raped, of course.
User avatar #475 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
I guess you wouldn't understand where I'm coming from if you come from a different side than me. Some people believe God doesn't interfere at all, I believe he does little this's and that's.
#501 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
Of course.

When you find $20 on the floor, "It's a miracle!"

When millions are starving in Africa, "God works in mysterious ways".
User avatar #690 - maturityFAIL (02/19/2013) [-]
I think believers will always find a way to defend their religion because it's so vague to begin with. They twist it and pick and choose and rationalize until it works with their argument. I really don't care if they do believe or not, but what I hate is when they give this sense that they think they're better than you. Same goes to atheists that think that way, even though I completely agree with them.
User avatar #507 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
Oh my, this isn't your average everyday athiest.

This is, an internet athiest.

I don't praise God when I find $20 mate, and I don't call it God's work that children starve in Africa. Quit being a stereotypical dicksqueeze.
#526 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I'm glad you acknowledge that most of my fellow atheists are not like me, I wouldn't want them to get blamed for my jimmyrustlin'.

But seriously, you have no argument. An omnipotent deity could help everyone that needed help, and don't say that he only helps those that "deserve it" because that's blatant bullshit.

We can keep arguing in circles and you can keep making fallacies, but at the end of the day we're both wasting our time. Good day sir.
User avatar #732 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
Whatever floats your boat.
#403 - Then they should respect my right to take the piss out of what…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/19/2013 on yup -1
User avatar #454 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
I don't know where you are, but the one great thing about free speech in Canada is that you can't do that because that is called "being a douchebag"

Free speech in Canada is basically "You are allowed to do or say whatever you want, as long as what you say or do does not infringe upon the rights of others" Which is basically what you are doing.
You can say why you disagree with him, but you shouldn't insult his beliefs unless you are OK with people doing the same to you, you intolerant bastard
#468 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I strongly doubt that making fun of religion is illegal in Canada.

In fact, I haven't heard of one country where "being a douchebag" is a crime.
User avatar #500 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
And being a douchebag is illegal in most countries, it's called harrassment
#508 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I'd like to see "Someone made fun of my religion on teh interwebs ;(" be the grounds for a harassment case and get anywhere in court.
User avatar #488 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
Making fun of religion isn't a crime in itself, but it is grounds for detainment and is one of the grounds for breaking up a protest.
#361 - Not all opinions are equal.  [+] (7 new replies) 02/19/2013 on yup -2
User avatar #398 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
You don't have to respect their religion, but you should respect their right to believe what they want.
#403 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
Then they should respect my right to take the piss out of what they believe.
User avatar #454 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
I don't know where you are, but the one great thing about free speech in Canada is that you can't do that because that is called "being a douchebag"

Free speech in Canada is basically "You are allowed to do or say whatever you want, as long as what you say or do does not infringe upon the rights of others" Which is basically what you are doing.
You can say why you disagree with him, but you shouldn't insult his beliefs unless you are OK with people doing the same to you, you intolerant bastard
#468 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I strongly doubt that making fun of religion is illegal in Canada.

In fact, I haven't heard of one country where "being a douchebag" is a crime.
User avatar #500 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
And being a douchebag is illegal in most countries, it's called harrassment
#508 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I'd like to see "Someone made fun of my religion on teh interwebs ;(" be the grounds for a harassment case and get anywhere in court.
User avatar #488 - Crusader (02/19/2013) [-]
Making fun of religion isn't a crime in itself, but it is grounds for detainment and is one of the grounds for breaking up a protest.
#345 - The OP is not insulting Christians, he's pointing out a fallac… 02/19/2013 on yup 0
#334 - Imagine if a government made rape legal because, HEY! "Fr…  [+] (10 new replies) 02/19/2013 on yup -2
User avatar #437 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
You seem to be assuming there's no punishment for doing wrong. The government isn't going to stop somebody from murdering you, because they aren't there to control everyone, that's not their duty. God will punish the wrongdoers, but will not stop them because everyone has free will.

At least, that's my (and other Christians') beliefs.
#442 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
So if a policeman comes across a person being murdered, he doesn't have to stop it, he just has to make sure the murderer is arrested afterwards?
User avatar #449 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
For starters, you said the government and legality.

Secondly, I believe that God does save some people some of the time in exceptional situations. However, a policeman isn't always on the spot, and he can't always act.

We'll find out one day.

(Before you say, "well then God favors people hurr durr." Some people are more innocent than others, some people just truly deserve to be protected, despite free will)
#471 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
And some little girls deserve to be raped, of course.
User avatar #475 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
I guess you wouldn't understand where I'm coming from if you come from a different side than me. Some people believe God doesn't interfere at all, I believe he does little this's and that's.
#501 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
Of course.

When you find $20 on the floor, "It's a miracle!"

When millions are starving in Africa, "God works in mysterious ways".
User avatar #690 - maturityFAIL (02/19/2013) [-]
I think believers will always find a way to defend their religion because it's so vague to begin with. They twist it and pick and choose and rationalize until it works with their argument. I really don't care if they do believe or not, but what I hate is when they give this sense that they think they're better than you. Same goes to atheists that think that way, even though I completely agree with them.
User avatar #507 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
Oh my, this isn't your average everyday athiest.

This is, an internet athiest.

I don't praise God when I find $20 mate, and I don't call it God's work that children starve in Africa. Quit being a stereotypical dicksqueeze.
#526 - kerplunking (02/19/2013) [-]
I'm glad you acknowledge that most of my fellow atheists are not like me, I wouldn't want them to get blamed for my jimmyrustlin'.

But seriously, you have no argument. An omnipotent deity could help everyone that needed help, and don't say that he only helps those that "deserve it" because that's blatant bullshit.

We can keep arguing in circles and you can keep making fallacies, but at the end of the day we're both wasting our time. Good day sir.
User avatar #732 - brettyoke (02/19/2013) [-]
Whatever floats your boat.
#310 - Britain had no minimum wage until 1999. There was no significa… 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit 0
#248 - That makes the assumption that companies employee people becau…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit 0
User avatar #278 - Ruspanic (02/18/2013) [-]
Companies don't necessarily aim to hire the smallest number of people, but rather seek to minimize costs and maximize profit. Otherwise they'd just hire a few people to do many different jobs, which would be less productive than dividing labor among more employees.

Profit is the difference between revenue and costs. More employees = more cost, but they also mean more revenue and more productivity, provided there are enough jobs for them to do.

Think of it this way: if a low-skill employee brings in $8/hr of revenue, then if he is paid a $7/hr minimum wage he remains profitable and it's worth keeping him. However, if the minimum wage is raised to $9, that employee is now a liability and will be fired (of course productivity is estimated, but I'm using exact numbers for clarity).
More productive employees will benefit because their salaries will now be raised. However, more productive employees had a higher chance of getting raises or promotions anyway.
#310 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
Britain had no minimum wage until 1999. There was no significant corresponding rise in unemployment afterwards.

That's not to say that a minimum wage which is too high won't have an affect on jobs, but I think that a minimum wage equal to a "living wage" would be fine.
#188 - Just because most welfare recipients are black, doesn't mean t…  [+] (7 new replies) 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit +2
User avatar #190 - konradkurze (02/18/2013) [-]
yeah but blacks hold majority on the scrounging
#219 - jujuface (02/18/2013) [-]
www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
That's correct. Blacks hold majority. By 1%. Followed by *drumroll* whites, which easily double hispanics in number of people on welfare. That sure is a lot of bitching you're doing over 1%
User avatar #315 - konradkurze (02/19/2013) [-]
right
whites on welfare because they cant get jobs, or at least well-paying ones, blacks on welfare because they dont want jobs

then again i dont know the full story of american welfare....blacks might get race-base 'pity welfare' that gives them more than white people....i know the blacks in australia get twice as much as any white does on welfare (like $600 a week just because theyre black)
does usa do likewise?
#259 - Dlsqueak (02/18/2013) [-]
Can't get this damn link to work for the life of me, but here I can link wepages with statistics too!!

sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2012/12/statistics-on-race-and-welfar e.html
#252 - Dlsqueak has deleted their comment.
#249 - Dlsqueak (02/18/2013) [-]
Interestingly enough, do you know you can get varied forms of assistance? So for instance one person could get $120 a month in food stamps, while another could get $400 a month. Now I would like to see a breakdown of that by race. Or how about duration based on race? How long do whites stay on welfare vs blacks? How many blacks are employed by SS that handle these cases vs whites? You are naturally predisposed to help those of your race more than others, so that could have a lot to do with it (also...racism, yes I know astounding implication...blacks can be racist too!!). I do have to agree with konrad for the most part...black people do get it a bit easier when it comes to welfare. When my wife went in for assistance way back when we needed it, she was hassled to the point of almost crying, yet all the blacks were well taken care of, no questions asked. Sure I'm making a generalization based on a segmented observation, however, I feel that the generalization would find justification based on the stats I asked for above.
#254 - Dlsqueak has deleted their comment.
#183 - If people can not live off of minimum wage, then the minimum w…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit 0
User avatar #235 - Ruspanic (02/18/2013) [-]
It's a problem that minimum wage is so much lower than the cost of living, but consider on the other hand that raising the minimum wage would increase unemployment and hurt low-skilled workers, many of whom would be laid off or have more trouble getting hired because their labor is not worth the added cost.
#248 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
That makes the assumption that companies employee people because they really love giving people jobs.

They don't. Minimum wage or not, they'll employee the smallest number of people they can possibly run a business with, in order to maximise profits.

In addition, a higher minimum wage means that poorer people spend more (which is good for everyone).
User avatar #278 - Ruspanic (02/18/2013) [-]
Companies don't necessarily aim to hire the smallest number of people, but rather seek to minimize costs and maximize profit. Otherwise they'd just hire a few people to do many different jobs, which would be less productive than dividing labor among more employees.

Profit is the difference between revenue and costs. More employees = more cost, but they also mean more revenue and more productivity, provided there are enough jobs for them to do.

Think of it this way: if a low-skill employee brings in $8/hr of revenue, then if he is paid a $7/hr minimum wage he remains profitable and it's worth keeping him. However, if the minimum wage is raised to $9, that employee is now a liability and will be fired (of course productivity is estimated, but I'm using exact numbers for clarity).
More productive employees will benefit because their salaries will now be raised. However, more productive employees had a higher chance of getting raises or promotions anyway.
#310 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
Britain had no minimum wage until 1999. There was no significant corresponding rise in unemployment afterwards.

That's not to say that a minimum wage which is too high won't have an affect on jobs, but I think that a minimum wage equal to a "living wage" would be fine.
User avatar #201 - heartlessrobot (02/18/2013) [-]
They can, but given the choice between a couple hundred a week or twice that, what would you choose?
#157 - You actually think Obama is a socialist? Holy … 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit -2
#156 - No they're not, you racist **** .  [+] (9 new replies) 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit -1
User avatar #184 - konradkurze (02/18/2013) [-]
right
have you ever been inside a welfare office to see who most of the clients are?
#188 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
Just because most welfare recipients are black, doesn't mean they all want to stay on welfare while other people work.

Sure, some black people are benefit scroungers, but then so are some white people.
User avatar #190 - konradkurze (02/18/2013) [-]
yeah but blacks hold majority on the scrounging
#219 - jujuface (02/18/2013) [-]
www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
That's correct. Blacks hold majority. By 1%. Followed by *drumroll* whites, which easily double hispanics in number of people on welfare. That sure is a lot of bitching you're doing over 1%
User avatar #315 - konradkurze (02/19/2013) [-]
right
whites on welfare because they cant get jobs, or at least well-paying ones, blacks on welfare because they dont want jobs

then again i dont know the full story of american welfare....blacks might get race-base 'pity welfare' that gives them more than white people....i know the blacks in australia get twice as much as any white does on welfare (like $600 a week just because theyre black)
does usa do likewise?
#259 - Dlsqueak (02/18/2013) [-]
Can't get this damn link to work for the life of me, but here I can link wepages with statistics too!!

sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2012/12/statistics-on-race-and-welfar e.html
#252 - Dlsqueak has deleted their comment.
#249 - Dlsqueak (02/18/2013) [-]
Interestingly enough, do you know you can get varied forms of assistance? So for instance one person could get $120 a month in food stamps, while another could get $400 a month. Now I would like to see a breakdown of that by race. Or how about duration based on race? How long do whites stay on welfare vs blacks? How many blacks are employed by SS that handle these cases vs whites? You are naturally predisposed to help those of your race more than others, so that could have a lot to do with it (also...racism, yes I know astounding implication...blacks can be racist too!!). I do have to agree with konrad for the most part...black people do get it a bit easier when it comes to welfare. When my wife went in for assistance way back when we needed it, she was hassled to the point of almost crying, yet all the blacks were well taken care of, no questions asked. Sure I'm making a generalization based on a segmented observation, however, I feel that the generalization would find justification based on the stats I asked for above.
#254 - Dlsqueak has deleted their comment.
#154 - Which shows that the minimum wage is too low.  [+] (7 new replies) 02/18/2013 on Getting tired of your shit -2
User avatar #181 - heartlessrobot (02/18/2013) [-]
Actually, it shows the handouts are too high.
#183 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
If people can not live off of minimum wage, then the minimum wage is too low.
User avatar #235 - Ruspanic (02/18/2013) [-]
It's a problem that minimum wage is so much lower than the cost of living, but consider on the other hand that raising the minimum wage would increase unemployment and hurt low-skilled workers, many of whom would be laid off or have more trouble getting hired because their labor is not worth the added cost.
#248 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
That makes the assumption that companies employee people because they really love giving people jobs.

They don't. Minimum wage or not, they'll employee the smallest number of people they can possibly run a business with, in order to maximise profits.

In addition, a higher minimum wage means that poorer people spend more (which is good for everyone).
User avatar #278 - Ruspanic (02/18/2013) [-]
Companies don't necessarily aim to hire the smallest number of people, but rather seek to minimize costs and maximize profit. Otherwise they'd just hire a few people to do many different jobs, which would be less productive than dividing labor among more employees.

Profit is the difference between revenue and costs. More employees = more cost, but they also mean more revenue and more productivity, provided there are enough jobs for them to do.

Think of it this way: if a low-skill employee brings in $8/hr of revenue, then if he is paid a $7/hr minimum wage he remains profitable and it's worth keeping him. However, if the minimum wage is raised to $9, that employee is now a liability and will be fired (of course productivity is estimated, but I'm using exact numbers for clarity).
More productive employees will benefit because their salaries will now be raised. However, more productive employees had a higher chance of getting raises or promotions anyway.
#310 - kerplunking (02/18/2013) [-]
Britain had no minimum wage until 1999. There was no significant corresponding rise in unemployment afterwards.

That's not to say that a minimum wage which is too high won't have an affect on jobs, but I think that a minimum wage equal to a "living wage" would be fine.
User avatar #201 - heartlessrobot (02/18/2013) [-]
They can, but given the choice between a couple hundred a week or twice that, what would you choose?
#107 - Don't watch the new ones, they're all **** . … 02/17/2013 on It's been a while? 0
#105 - Comment deleted 02/17/2013 on It's been a while? 0
#107 - The other one can't breathe. 02/15/2013 on Sadistic romance 0
#33 - Picture 02/12/2013 on The Count +9
#68 - Ok, that's enough. From now on I'm thumbing down every single … 02/12/2013 on thunderbolt -1
#121 - The problem is that if supermarkets are incapable of even know… 02/10/2013 on Dear British Food... 0
#116 - Let's all live in glorious ignorance instead! 02/10/2013 on Op wants the d...eGrasse -1
#115 - +the less it will affect you. 02/10/2013 on Politics +1
#22 - How can you find ********* disgusting when they a…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/09/2013 on whole new meaning to boston... +2
#31 - anonymous (02/09/2013) [-]
How can you find gay sex disgusting when it is just natural aswell?
User avatar #35 - goodguygary (02/09/2013) [-]
anon you are retarded.
#35 - Maybe you would, but we're not all a bunch of randy ***… 02/04/2013 on c,: +3
#45 - gay marriage is legal in Scotland. Everywhere else in Britai…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2013 on The French just approved... 0
User avatar #104 - odonnell (02/03/2013) [-]
Actually its not legal in Scotland.
The Scottish Government doesn't have that kind of power within the UK, gay Marriage is still illegal here because Westminster doesn't give a shit about Scottish views.
Scottish people, although stereotypically prejudice, were more in favour of gay Marriage, Religious equality (Excluding Burkas/ Veils, since that goes against removing you're hood when entering a bank etc) than anywhere else in the UK.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1200

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
No comments!
 Friends (0)