kbvskoolaid
Rank #7971 on Subscribers
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz Offline
Send mail to kbvskoolaid Block kbvskoolaid Invite kbvskoolaid to be your friend flag avatar
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Date Signed Up: | 3/25/2010 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| Location: | Fairhaven Massachusetts |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #9269 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #681 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #1776 |
| Content Thumbs: | 7509 total,
8139 ,
630 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 4033 total,
4424 ,
391 |
| Content Level Progress: | 0% (0/100) Level 164 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 165 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk |
| Comment Level Progress: | 0% (0/100) Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz |
| Subscribers: | 10 |
| Content Views: | 213393 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 695 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 711 |
| FJ Points: | 5393 |
latest user's comments
| #10 - add salt to the milk and drink it while staring at the semen, … | 03/11/2015 on Hope you're not eating... | +13 |
| #5 - I work at dunkin donuts and we dont sell them anymore where i … | 03/10/2015 on Untitled | +27 |
| #17 - So the cute owl Pepsi ;_; | 03/09/2015 on Fuck this guy | +9 |
| #13 - Fkn Ruthless | 03/09/2015 on FJ is popular now I guess | +11 |
| #17 - <This generation will be the end of us. | 03/09/2015 on Freaky People of Walmart -... | +13 |
| #16 - I'll take anal beads please and thanks. | 03/09/2015 on Wallpapers. Round 3 | +5 |
| #9 - i have used this atleast 3 times and i will not stop [+] (2 new replies) | 03/09/2015 on FJ is popular now I guess | +38 |
| | ||
| #13 - I would not want one of these done for me as i fear i will lik… [+] (1 new reply) | 03/07/2015 on Robert Dejesus comp | 0 |
| #15 - > Be me about age 14 > Went to local icecream shop … [+] (1 new reply) | 03/07/2015 on 4chan comp | +5 |
| #12 - Picture | 03/07/2015 on Your favorite cosplayer comp | +1 |
| #11 - Box Box's Riven cosplay, i aint gay but i'd **** this dude. [+] (5 new replies) | 03/07/2015 on Your favorite cosplayer comp | +19 |
| #37 -
confusedasian (03/07/2015) [-]  Then I found out how old he was and I felt ashamed. Thought he was 19 when I first saw him. | ||
| #14 - that's as bout as dangerous as driving a car with a license pl… | 03/07/2015 on \[T]/ | +16 |
| #18 - And he misses his daughters. [+] (3 new replies) | 03/06/2015 on Cartoon Network | +62 |
| | ||
| #6 - I didn't know eeyore lived in New England. Source: some p… | 03/06/2015 on Livin’ it up in the city | 0 |
| #4 - Do you think he sang the Indiana Jones theme song the entire t… | 03/06/2015 on He's no good to me dead | 0 |
| #44 - ^^ this | 03/04/2015 on Smart Car | -2 |
| #37 - thats exactly how it works, hate to break it to you. the law w… [+] (9 new replies) | 03/04/2015 on Smart Car | -12 |
| #117 -
anon (03/05/2015) [-] Uh, no. That implies if they're changing lanes while you're both driving in the same direction, not if they're cutting a perpendicular line through traffic. It was ALSO illegal for him to try to go that way in the first place--he appears to want to turn left, which would mean he intends to use the shared turn lane as a merge lane (which is also illegal.) Dear god I hope you don't have a driver's license.  It is true in the US and any European country as well, the smart car would always be at fault. You are wrong and stupid. I apologize. It looked like you were replying to the other guy. kbvskoolaid, read my other comment.  In Minnesota, most insurance can't blame just one party. For example, I was hit on my bicycle by a driver that had just started to move but hadn't seen me. If I hadn't been there, there would have been no accident. If he hadn't been there, there also would have been no accident. Meaning we were both to blame even though I was technically the victim. | ||
| #17 - you dont have to check rear mirrors before you break incase of… | 03/04/2015 on Smart Car | 0 |
| #11 - Not true, In most places if you hit someone with your car then… [+] (23 new replies) | 03/04/2015 on Smart Car | -17 |
| #93 -
anon (03/04/2015) [-] Your example is a REAR END collision, and the car behind is always at fault in a REAR END collision only. If I were at a 4-way stop and started to go, a car ignoring the stop sign and flooring it would be struck by my car in their driver side door. It would also be their fault for ignoring the stop sign.  In the UK if someone rear ends you 99% of the time they are to blame, this is because you should always drive with a large enough distance between you and the car in front to break. If a car breaks and you crash into them you are tailgating or not showing due attention. thats exactly how it works, hate to break it to you. the law would say you should have been cautious when he swapped into your lane and been prepared to stop. #117 -
anon (03/05/2015) [-] Uh, no. That implies if they're changing lanes while you're both driving in the same direction, not if they're cutting a perpendicular line through traffic. It was ALSO illegal for him to try to go that way in the first place--he appears to want to turn left, which would mean he intends to use the shared turn lane as a merge lane (which is also illegal.) Dear god I hope you don't have a driver's license. It is true in the US and any European country as well, the smart car would always be at fault. You are wrong and stupid. I apologize. It looked like you were replying to the other guy. kbvskoolaid, read my other comment. In Minnesota, most insurance can't blame just one party. For example, I was hit on my bicycle by a driver that had just started to move but hadn't seen me. If I hadn't been there, there would have been no accident. If he hadn't been there, there also would have been no accident. Meaning we were both to blame even though I was technically the victim.  No its not true (your example is but pls look at hamplanet and his comments) If you take someones right of way and slamm inot his care, YOU are the one to blame and are fully liable. But if someone rear-ends you and you hit the brakes, you are semi-liable and are treated likewise in court. its allmost in every country that way.  But that's because the car behind is required by law to maintain a safe following distance. In the case shown above the person inching out into traffic and expecting everyone in the world to get out of their way is at fault because they failed to yield the right of way to the cars currently in the road. #13 -
hamplanet (03/04/2015) [-] No. In most countries, you would also be at fault because you have to check the rear mirror before slamming ylour breaks. If you break too sudden and someone crashes into you, you are to blame as much as them. And here, it's the same. He just drove into the street without being able to see if it's free, so he is to blame for the crash. Don't make up shit. #25 -
anon (03/04/2015) [-] So wrong, it's legally the person who hits you in the back who's at fault in all countries. #18 -
drahkreher (03/04/2015) [-] almost all the time LEGALLY the person who rear-ends someone is at fault, even if they did nothing wrong you dont have to check rear mirrors before you break incase of unexpected scenarios. such as a deer jumping infront of your car or a tree falling. You make up what ever reason you want for breaking. | ||
| #24 - i am not proud i clicked that link, or the fact that i spent 1… [+] (1 new reply) | 03/04/2015 on sick pic dump 3 | +3 |
| | ||
| #23 - This ***** , complaining about always gettin handjobs [+] (14 new replies) | 03/04/2015 on sick pic dump 3 | +79 |
| | ||
| #15 - poor Mcbird :c | 03/04/2015 on Birds are so majestic | 0 |
| #6 - This kills the girl | 03/04/2015 on (untitled) | +24 |
| #1 - Watch out for that girl bro, I heard she had Crab grass. | 03/03/2015 on Graffiti Comp | +23 |
| #17 - Comment deleted | 03/03/2015 on No need gun | +2 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
7 comments displayed.
#6 to #5
-
kbvskoolaid (04/19/2015) [-] Something about that bird winking. Makes me feel like i just let it do things to me that i don't let my girlfriend do.
