Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

kazuni

no avatar Level 154 Comments: Faptastic
Offline
Send mail to kazuni Block kazuni Invite kazuni to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/18/2011
Last Login:4/17/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 543 total,  795 ,  252
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (2/10)
Level 154 Comments: Faptastic → Level 155 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:141
FJ Points:487

latest user's comments

#47 - I'm just saying that we have faith in different things. Yo… 10/12/2012 on Read it in a book 0
#44 - That's for sure, but scientific discovery has never disproved …  [+] (2 new replies) 10/12/2012 on Read it in a book 0
User avatar #45 - ronyx (10/12/2012) [-]
yet
#47 - kazuni (10/12/2012) [-]
I'm just saying that we have faith in different things.
You have faith in science, which constantly changes and is inconsistent.
I have faith in God, which is compatible with all the observed world.
#43 - Fascinating. I feel bad asking this since I didn't give an… 10/12/2012 on Read it in a book 0
#23 - Great point. There are several cases of evidence for …  [+] (9 new replies) 10/11/2012 on Read it in a book +1
User avatar #31 - ronyx (10/11/2012) [-]
I wouldn't be so quick to rule out the "impossibility of our universe" we may not understand it now, nor have the technology to prove it or help us understand it. But that does not mean we won't be able to do so in the future, keep in mind we have only had computers for less than 100 years and look at all we have learned and proved.
#44 - kazuni (10/12/2012) [-]
That's for sure, but scientific discovery has never disproved the necessity of God, and the idea of God has never been compromised (and, according to most theists, has been around forever).
People act as though theism is crazy, but naturalism has its own set of improbabilities.

I can't make you believe in God, but I can explain why it makes sense if you want.
User avatar #45 - ronyx (10/12/2012) [-]
yet
#47 - kazuni (10/12/2012) [-]
I'm just saying that we have faith in different things.
You have faith in science, which constantly changes and is inconsistent.
I have faith in God, which is compatible with all the observed world.
#30 - sacrilegious (10/11/2012) [-]
Of course evolution doesn't account for the original organism. That's not what it does. That's like saying that any theory of gravity is inherently false because it doesn't account for the original matter.
#29 - tommythek (10/11/2012) [-]
Actually, there's more evidence for an original life form (known as LUCA, Last Universal Common Ancestor) than you think. Scientists have recreated many organic molecules (such as amino acids and nucleobases) in the lab, which are the precursors for life. There were a few ways they could have been created through inorganic substances here on Earth which have all been recreated in a lab, done under all the possible circumstances of what the early Earth was like.

In addition, comets and other similar space debris could have deposited the amino acids along with many other organic precursors to life such as fatty acids, ammonia, and even nucleobases to early Earth. This has not just speculation either, the contents of asteroids and comets have been analyzed, and there have been tests to see if those types of molecules could survive impact (which they not only could, but the force actually caused amino acids to form peptide bonds making them into longer chains).

Membranes which surround cells is easily explained, as when the phospholipids that make up membranes are placed in water, hydrophobic and hydrophillic reactions cause them to spontaneously form a spherical shape.

As far as DNA goes, you in one sense are correct, it is implausible that it could have formed from such simple materials on its own, and most scientists don't believe it did. This does not call for a need for intelligent design though, as RNA would be a simpler molecule that would be a precursor. Within clay minerals, the nucleobases that were present were concentrated and would have been able to form short simple pieces of RNA about 2-40 nucleotides long (recreated in a lab under not-as-early Earth conditions). Of the RNA that was created, there would have been some that coded for catalyzation of its own replication (like rybozymes still do today).

Any questions?
#43 - kazuni (10/12/2012) [-]
Fascinating.
I feel bad asking this since I didn't give any, but do you have citations?
#32 - yeahguy (10/11/2012) [-]
FUCK I WANT TO LAUGH, WHY AM I LEARNING?!
#35 - tommythek (10/11/2012) [-]
#133 - It all depends on how you're defining Hell. many different… 10/11/2012 on heaven is for pussies +1
#503 - May I introduce Aeneas, probably the most renowned demigod, es… 09/10/2012 on greek +16
#129 - Terrorism is for political or religious reasons of causing ter… 07/24/2012 on Too Soon? +7
#3411 - "kelpie" 05/24/2012 on Wat. +1
#526 - "For the space of nine years we lived seduced and seducin… 05/21/2012 on Wat. 0
#88 - "Oh no, my brother doesn't know as much as I did at his a… 05/20/2012 on Fix That Shit 0
[ 141 Total ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#13 to #12 - kazuni (05/16/2012) [-]
No thanks, I'm busy right now.

Maybe when you grow a pair?
#14 to #13 - twodollarbill (05/16/2012) [-]
Sorry, what was that? Your butt-hurt's too loud.
User avatar #2 - DrBobsPatient (04/13/2012) [-]
you can reply, but i have to go to lecture, so i won't be able to reply soon. feel free to send a message.
#3 to #2 - kazuni (04/13/2012) [-]
Sure thing, have a good one!
By the way, is your sexuality disclosed? >_<
User avatar #4 to #3 - DrBobsPatient (04/13/2012) [-]
like what? gender?
I'm a straight male.
I have gay friends, and they know i don't/will never support them getting married and they're fine with that. what i can't see is why people on FJ and other straight people make such a big deal about it.
#5 to #4 - kazuni (04/13/2012) [-]
Yeah, ok.
Sometimes when I discuss homosexuality on the internet, I'll eventually stop and think, "So am I using the right words if they are homosexual?"

So you're a Christian, then?
User avatar #7 to #5 - DrBobsPatient (04/13/2012) [-]
what about you? do you believe in anything?
#8 to #7 - kazuni (04/13/2012) [-]
Yeah, I believe in the verbal plenary inspiration of scripture, the autographs anyway.
That means I believe every word of the Bible was inspired by God, although written by different authors. Of course, this only applies to the originals.
So far I figure the conventional canon of the Bible contains all the surviving scripture, but I haven't read every single apocryphal book yet (although the ones I have read seem... off).

So, looking through the Bible, this entails a lot of things, and I've built my worldview upon that foundation.
User avatar #10 to #8 - DrBobsPatient (04/13/2012) [-]
well that's cool. so i'm curious, is it primariily the old testament/torah or do you also read stuff from the new with Jesus and the apostles and that stuff?
#11 to #10 - kazuni (04/17/2012) [-]
All of the Old Testament and New according to the canon of the Bible. That's just the average Bible, but I believe the original texts were inspired by God like it says they were.

Have you felt like there are contradictions in it or anything?
User avatar #6 to #5 - DrBobsPatient (04/13/2012) [-]
yep. not even a hard core one (actually a very relaxed one), just hate it when people don't know squat and act like they do simply because of what they see on comedy shows on TV. I think it depends on the people and situation for when to use homosexual and gay. like in general if it's gays and lesbians you could easily say homosexuals, but my friends are gay and i call them that.. it's not demeaning it's just what they are. gay = ok, faggot = hurtful, and i just don't really associate faggot being gay. it's kinda like what louis c.k. talks about. people are faggots if they're acting like a faggot, but that doesn't mean that's what gay people are.
#9 to #6 - kazuni (04/13/2012) [-]
Yeah, I can't stand the way people just accept whatever the media tells them.
I usually go with dictionary definitions, sorry.haha

I may not be online for a few days, but thanks for the discussion.
#1 - DrBobsPatient has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)