It's probably more like two.
I've been responsible for at least two of the comment streams (You can click "Hide all" on an anon to find out what posts are theirs).

Thats why you shouldnt fight a war on multiple fronts! Certainly not when you have bad intel.

Oh, here it is, the My Lai massacre.
[url deleted]
In case the url is deletes, wikipedia "my lai massacre" or just "United States war crimes" for a more general look.

And true, I can't give you a hundred individual cases because they are covered up. Look at the WWII section of the war crimes page,
"Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed 400 sexual offences in Europe"
2006, it took over 40 years for us to have solid evidence.

Sorry, 60 years, 60, I was thinking 19-40.

Wow, I said nothing about about rape, I was talking about women being 'incapacitated' instead of killed. But yes there has being cases but its a very small minority of soldiers commiting the rapes.

It's probably more like two.
I've been responsible for at least two of the comment streams (You can click "Hide all" on an anon to find out what posts are theirs).

Thats why you shouldnt fight a war on multiple fronts! Certainly not when you have bad intel.

I never claimed you were stubborn, I just think you havent a clue about ANYTHING you have talked about here.

Wow, I said nothing about about rape, I was talking about women being 'incapacitated' instead of killed. But yes there has being cases but its a very small minority of soldiers commiting the rapes.

It's probably more like two.
I've been responsible for at least two of the comment streams (You can click "Hide all" on an anon to find out what posts are theirs).

Thats why you shouldnt fight a war on multiple fronts! Certainly not when you have bad intel.

"True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy? "

As I said above, the military isn't about to admit to wrong-doing. If you will rape an ally, why not rape an enemy? You can get more solid stats on American troops because they can live and tell a psychiatrist. But if some soldiers decided to corner and rape a civilian, no one is every going to find out (especially since rape could result in stoning of the victim in Afghanistan even if she was left alive).

I can't remember the proper names to find an example at the moment, but the military justice system (tribunals) exists to cover things up and allow soldiers to get off easy for horrific crimes.

Oh, here it is, the My Lai massacre.
[url deleted]
In case the url is deletes, wikipedia "my lai massacre" or just "United States war crimes" for a more general look.

And true, I can't give you a hundred individual cases because they are covered up. Look at the WWII section of the war crimes page,
"Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed 400 sexual offences in Europe"
2006, it took over 40 years for us to have solid evidence.

Sorry, 60 years, 60, I was thinking 19-40.

See, you're exaggerating points CONSTANTLY in your responses.

No where did I say anything about the whole military.
My two comments were criticizing dashgamer for having the same mentality as the Taliban (I am fighting the righteous war against absolute evil, blaming an entire population for actions of a few), and sarcastically explaining that a SINGLE event of rape would nullify your claim that "no soldier has raped or killed women."

You do know that if you wound an enemy and find them you have to treat them, right? Which ties up man power and resourses. Wounding someone still uses ammo. And regrets come later when you're home or alone, not when someone is shooting at you!

I never claimed you were stubborn, I just think you havent a clue about ANYTHING you have talked about here.

Wow, I said nothing about about rape, I was talking about women being 'incapacitated' instead of killed. But yes there has being cases but its a very small minority of soldiers commiting the rapes.

It's probably more like two.
I've been responsible for at least two of the comment streams (You can click "Hide all" on an anon to find out what posts are theirs).

Thats why you shouldnt fight a war on multiple fronts! Certainly not when you have bad intel.

I was going to post a single article, but I found too many, so just search "statistics of rape in us military."

True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy?

Just remember future member of the America Can Do No Wrong party. Each and every US solider has the morality of Captain America.

"True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy? "

As I said above, the military isn't about to admit to wrong-doing. If you will rape an ally, why not rape an enemy? You can get more solid stats on American troops because they can live and tell a psychiatrist. But if some soldiers decided to corner and rape a civilian, no one is every going to find out (especially since rape could result in stoning of the victim in Afghanistan even if she was left alive).

I can't remember the proper names to find an example at the moment, but the military justice system (tribunals) exists to cover things up and allow soldiers to get off easy for horrific crimes.

Oh, here it is, the My Lai massacre.
[url deleted]
In case the url is deletes, wikipedia "my lai massacre" or just "United States war crimes" for a more general look.

And true, I can't give you a hundred individual cases because they are covered up. Look at the WWII section of the war crimes page,
"Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed 400 sexual offences in Europe"
2006, it took over 40 years for us to have solid evidence.

Sorry, 60 years, 60, I was thinking 19-40.

I was going to post a single article, but I found too many, so just search "statistics of rape in us military."

True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy?

Just remember future member of the America Can Do No Wrong party. Each and every US solider has the morality of Captain America.

"True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy? "

As I said above, the military isn't about to admit to wrong-doing. If you will rape an ally, why not rape an enemy? You can get more solid stats on American troops because they can live and tell a psychiatrist. But if some soldiers decided to corner and rape a civilian, no one is every going to find out (especially since rape could result in stoning of the victim in Afghanistan even if she was left alive).

I can't remember the proper names to find an example at the moment, but the military justice system (tribunals) exists to cover things up and allow soldiers to get off easy for horrific crimes.

Oh, here it is, the My Lai massacre.
[url deleted]
In case the url is deletes, wikipedia "my lai massacre" or just "United States war crimes" for a more general look.

And true, I can't give you a hundred individual cases because they are covered up. Look at the WWII section of the war crimes page,
"Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed 400 sexual offences in Europe"
2006, it took over 40 years for us to have solid evidence.

Sorry, 60 years, 60, I was thinking 19-40.

Yes...
America's military can do no wrong.
Not once has any murderous immoral psychopath joined an organization focused on killing people...
Nor have soliders ever committed rape. Nope, don't ask the military for statistics on rape within the ranks.
And if that doesn't happen (you know that right? it doesn't happen at all.) why would aforementioned horny psychopath harm a woman he views as the enemy and can do anything to with very little chance of punishment?

See, you're exaggerating points CONSTANTLY in your responses.

No where did I say anything about the whole military.
My two comments were criticizing dashgamer for having the same mentality as the Taliban (I am fighting the righteous war against absolute evil, blaming an entire population for actions of a few), and sarcastically explaining that a SINGLE event of rape would nullify your claim that "no soldier has raped or killed women."

No they'd shoot to kill, a combantant is a combatant no matter what gender or age.

You do know that if you wound an enemy and find them you have to treat them, right? Which ties up man power and resourses. Wounding someone still uses ammo. And regrets come later when you're home or alone, not when someone is shooting at you!

I never claimed you were stubborn, I just think you havent a clue about ANYTHING you have talked about here.

Wow, I said nothing about about rape, I was talking about women being 'incapacitated' instead of killed. But yes there has being cases but its a very small minority of soldiers commiting the rapes.

It's probably more like two.
I've been responsible for at least two of the comment streams (You can click "Hide all" on an anon to find out what posts are theirs).

Thats why you shouldnt fight a war on multiple fronts! Certainly not when you have bad intel.

I was going to post a single article, but I found too many, so just search "statistics of rape in us military."

True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy?

Just remember future member of the America Can Do No Wrong party. Each and every US solider has the morality of Captain America.

"True, many are internal (rape committed on Americans by Americans), but if there are enough people as immoral as that in our military, why would they not rape those they consider the enemy? "

As I said above, the military isn't about to admit to wrong-doing. If you will rape an ally, why not rape an enemy? You can get more solid stats on American troops because they can live and tell a psychiatrist. But if some soldiers decided to corner and rape a civilian, no one is every going to find out (especially since rape could result in stoning of the victim in Afghanistan even if she was left alive).

I can't remember the proper names to find an example at the moment, but the military justice system (tribunals) exists to cover things up and allow soldiers to get off easy for horrific crimes.

Oh, here it is, the My Lai massacre.
[url deleted]
In case the url is deletes, wikipedia "my lai massacre" or just "United States war crimes" for a more general look.

And true, I can't give you a hundred individual cases because they are covered up. Look at the WWII section of the war crimes page,
"Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that American GIs committed 400 sexual offences in Europe"
2006, it took over 40 years for us to have solid evidence.

Sorry, 60 years, 60, I was thinking 19-40.

Ok, you just got trolled by one obvious motherfucker.