jujuface at Funnyjunk

. Logout
My Profile
Account Settings
Items ( 0 )
Subs (0)
Favorites ( 0 )
Friends ( 0 )
Login or register
Username:
Password:
Keep me logged in

Forgot your password? New user? Sign up!
Inbox ( 0 )

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

fucking-science

|

|

|

|

|

|

oc-comic-makers

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

jujuface Banned

Rank #48095 on Comments

Level 0 Comments: Untouched account

Offline

Send mail to jujuface Block jujuface Invite jujuface to be your friend

Last status update:	-

Personal Info
Gender:	male
Age:	33
Date Signed Up:	11/27/2010
Last Login:	4/24/2013
Location:	virginia
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:	#48095
Highest Content Rank:	#31543
Highest Comment Rank:	#24028
Content Thumbs:	7 total, 4 , 11
Comment Thumbs:	39 total, 112 , 73
Content Level Progress:	22.5% (18/80) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:	84.21% (64/76) Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:	0
Total Comments Made:	67
FJ Points:	35

What people say about jujuface

Show:

Sort by:

Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#950 - >implies police have to monitor anyone with a restraining o…	04/22/2013 on Muricaaaa	0
#877 - Their job is to uphold the law. Guess whats against the law? M… [+] (2 new replies)	04/22/2013 on Muricaaaa	-1
#886 - pebar (04/22/2013) [-] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=displayarch&ar ticleid=341&issue_id=72004 #950 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] >implies police have to monitor anyone with a restraining order 24/7 >Warren v. Columbia...I see your point. Doesn't support the legality of assault rifles but I do see how one could argue the need for self defense with a weapon
#873 - Also if you don't still don't accept that your statement conta…	04/22/2013 on Muricaaaa	0
#864 - If legal obligation means anything to you, then people aren't … [+] (4 new replies)	04/22/2013 on Muricaaaa	0
#870 - pebar (04/22/2013) [-] it's not their job to protect people #877 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] Their job is to uphold the law. Guess whats against the law? Murder/Assault. #886 - pebar (04/22/2013) [-] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=displayarch&ar ticleid=341&issue_id=72004 #950 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] >implies police have to monitor anyone with a restraining order 24/7 >Warren v. Columbia...I see your point. Doesn't support the legality of assault rifles but I do see how one could argue the need for self defense with a weapon
#843 - The only reason the police here have them is to protect us aga… [+] (7 new replies)	04/22/2013 on Muricaaaa	-4
#847 - pebar (04/22/2013) [-] 'cept police aren't legally obligated to protect people so why should people trust them to? #873 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] Also if you don't still don't accept that your statement contains a fallacy, then consider this: You can protect your own damn self just fine with a pistol, or a shotgun. #864 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] If legal obligation means anything to you, then people aren't legally obligated to hurt you either, inf fact they're legally obligated not to do so. So you've got nothing to worry about :) #870 - pebar (04/22/2013) [-] it's not their job to protect people #877 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] Their job is to uphold the law. Guess whats against the law? Murder/Assault. #886 - pebar (04/22/2013) [-] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=displayarch&ar ticleid=341&issue_id=72004 #950 - jujuface (04/22/2013) [-] >implies police have to monitor anyone with a restraining order 24/7 >Warren v. Columbia...I see your point. Doesn't support the legality of assault rifles but I do see how one could argue the need for self defense with a weapon
#166 - Thank you for being so concerned about me! Why don't you rant …	04/20/2013 on 4/20 plz	0
#163 - Great..you don't need weed to have fun, more power to ya. Now … [+] (2 new replies)	04/20/2013 on 4/20 plz	0
#164 - N. Korean citizen (04/20/2013) [-] I will never respect your choice to smoke because you're making terrible life decisions. #166 - jujuface (04/20/2013) [-] Thank you for being so concerned about me! Why don't you rant on the internet about it, that'll make ya feel better :)
#29 - ^ mfw I realize the 3.1416 hex nut is pi	03/17/2013 on Ikea	0
#13 - Or this. www.youtube .com/ watch?v=kPZ6pgBIuC8 Basically…	03/16/2013 on god damn it jeff	0
#48 - This	03/14/2013 on i was told to chose who i...	0

1 2 3 > [ 39 Total ]

Comments(0):

Refresh Comments

Per page:

Order:

Show All Replies Show Anonymous Comments

No comments!

Leave a comment

<

>

Friends (0)