x
Click to expand

johnnycuntsticks

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Steam Profile: ElClintonio
Consoles Owned: PC, 3DS, WiiU
Date Signed Up:3/04/2012
Last Login:3/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#11357
Highest Comment Rank:#11350
Comment Thumbs: 475 total,  561 ,  86
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 144 Comments: Faptastic → Level 145 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1
Total Comments Made:336
FJ Points:469

latest user's comments

#206 - It isn't from a legal perspective as much as it is from a mora…  [+] (17 new replies) 01/27/2015 on Iceland 0
User avatar #219 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
The people distributing the tickets didn't only give them to people who didn't want to go. There was no attempt to stop people who wanted to go from going, they still had the opportunity to get a ticket when they were available.
User avatar #234 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
I guess you missed the part where the arena was fucking empty.
User avatar #237 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
If I was there and wanted to go, I could have got a ticket, no one was stopping anyone who wanted to go getting a ticket. People weren't just giving tickets out to people who wouldn't show up.

It would have been censorship if the tickets were specifically ONLY for people who didn't want to go.
User avatar #238 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
Do you not know how reservations work?
User avatar #241 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
I do. Do you know that anyone can reserve a ticket.
User avatar #243 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
And did you know that once all the tickets are reserved, no more people can reserve a ticket?
User avatar #245 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
Of course, but before that happens you are perfectly able to reserve a ticket.
User avatar #247 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
And so when a hate mob gets there before you and reserves all the tickets just so they can not go, you're shit out of luck.
User avatar #248 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
Yes. Just like if you can't get a ticket to any concert. It's your fault for not getting a ticket earlier.
User avatar #251 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
So basically it's okay to censor people if the people that want to hear what's being censored didn't hear about it as soon as it was announced and immediately bought tickets.

Gr8 defense m80 that'll really protect the gays from evil negative opinions.
User avatar #255 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
Yes, it is okay. I'm all for suppressing hate mongers from promoting harmful messages.
User avatar #256 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
Remember, anything that disagrees with you is hate speech! That makes it easy to censor them!
User avatar #258 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
But that's not what hate speech is, not even close.
User avatar #260 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
So you agree that someone having a different opinion isn't hate speech.
So why is censoring a different opinion okay?
User avatar #223 - johnnycuntsticks (01/27/2015) [-]
The way that I understood it is that when the event was announced the people that participated in this immediately reserved all of the tickets before anyone had a chance to get them. If this was the case then I think of it as an obstruction of free speech. If this wasn't the case and no one wanted to go then that's great. But that's not how I understood it.
User avatar #210 - mads (01/27/2015) [-]
I get your point I just see that if you don't agree with someone yeah you can't necessarily stop them from saying what they are saying but if what they are saying can lead to someone innocent getting hurt then you take an active role in stopping it. Anti-gay speeches are normally echo tunnels of 'hate' and that hate is repeated in the real world and can cause actions. That preacher is essentially trying to stop an innocent person from being what they are.
If the person isn't doing anything that can hurt anyone and they are just ranting, let them rant but if you get enougn people together who share the same venomous opinion without any form of the apposing opinion it isnt going to end well.
User avatar #214 - johnnycuntsticks (01/27/2015) [-]
Now if there were examples of "fighting words" then it would be a different story. But there was no evidence that fighting words (words that directly incite violence) were present. Fighting words are different than hateful words, hateful words, especially in a private venue that is rented for a speech, is protected as long as they don't incite violence. And what that preacher would be saying is hateful and terrible and trying to stop people from being who they are but in a government that recognizes free speech, he is allowed to say it. I totally get what you are getting at, his stance is horrible and that attitude has touched people in my life. However first and foremost if it doesn't directly incite violence then it should be allowed especially in an event that must be reserved to attend.
#200 - I did include a bit in there stating my ignorance of Icelandic… 01/27/2015 on Iceland 0
#195 - Now hear me out, I am fine with gay people and all that …  [+] (21 new replies) 01/27/2015 on Iceland 0
User avatar #205 - mads (01/27/2015) [-]
But the government didn't get involved. It's only an infringement of freedom of speech if the Government censors someone, citizens can do whatever the hell they want. Isn't it the people freedom to buy those tickets? Isn't it their freedom to take an active stance against what the preacher is saying?
It's all about freedom.
The Anti-gay preacher was probably preaching that a certain type of person shouldn't have the freedom of their sexuality (I'm assuming that's what they were preaching about because 'Anti-gay').
User avatar #206 - johnnycuntsticks (01/27/2015) [-]
It isn't from a legal perspective as much as it is from a moral perspective. What the people did was effectively made it impossible for anyone who may have wanted to attend to do so. Now, do I agree with the preacher? No. But what people that did this did was effectively censor the message this man would have legal delivered which is against the spirit of freedom of speech. In a city as big as Reykjavik there a lot of opinions, and for these people to reserve all the tickets is anti free speech.
TL;DR legal but anti free speech. Also I respect your opinion but this is how I see things.
User avatar #219 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
The people distributing the tickets didn't only give them to people who didn't want to go. There was no attempt to stop people who wanted to go from going, they still had the opportunity to get a ticket when they were available.
User avatar #234 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
I guess you missed the part where the arena was fucking empty.
User avatar #237 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
If I was there and wanted to go, I could have got a ticket, no one was stopping anyone who wanted to go getting a ticket. People weren't just giving tickets out to people who wouldn't show up.

It would have been censorship if the tickets were specifically ONLY for people who didn't want to go.
User avatar #238 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
Do you not know how reservations work?
User avatar #241 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
I do. Do you know that anyone can reserve a ticket.
User avatar #243 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
And did you know that once all the tickets are reserved, no more people can reserve a ticket?
User avatar #245 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
Of course, but before that happens you are perfectly able to reserve a ticket.
User avatar #247 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
And so when a hate mob gets there before you and reserves all the tickets just so they can not go, you're shit out of luck.
User avatar #248 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
Yes. Just like if you can't get a ticket to any concert. It's your fault for not getting a ticket earlier.
User avatar #251 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
So basically it's okay to censor people if the people that want to hear what's being censored didn't hear about it as soon as it was announced and immediately bought tickets.

Gr8 defense m80 that'll really protect the gays from evil negative opinions.
User avatar #255 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
Yes, it is okay. I'm all for suppressing hate mongers from promoting harmful messages.
User avatar #256 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
Remember, anything that disagrees with you is hate speech! That makes it easy to censor them!
User avatar #258 - anonymoose (01/27/2015) [-]
But that's not what hate speech is, not even close.
User avatar #260 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
So you agree that someone having a different opinion isn't hate speech.
So why is censoring a different opinion okay?
User avatar #223 - johnnycuntsticks (01/27/2015) [-]
The way that I understood it is that when the event was announced the people that participated in this immediately reserved all of the tickets before anyone had a chance to get them. If this was the case then I think of it as an obstruction of free speech. If this wasn't the case and no one wanted to go then that's great. But that's not how I understood it.
User avatar #210 - mads (01/27/2015) [-]
I get your point I just see that if you don't agree with someone yeah you can't necessarily stop them from saying what they are saying but if what they are saying can lead to someone innocent getting hurt then you take an active role in stopping it. Anti-gay speeches are normally echo tunnels of 'hate' and that hate is repeated in the real world and can cause actions. That preacher is essentially trying to stop an innocent person from being what they are.
If the person isn't doing anything that can hurt anyone and they are just ranting, let them rant but if you get enougn people together who share the same venomous opinion without any form of the apposing opinion it isnt going to end well.
User avatar #214 - johnnycuntsticks (01/27/2015) [-]
Now if there were examples of "fighting words" then it would be a different story. But there was no evidence that fighting words (words that directly incite violence) were present. Fighting words are different than hateful words, hateful words, especially in a private venue that is rented for a speech, is protected as long as they don't incite violence. And what that preacher would be saying is hateful and terrible and trying to stop people from being who they are but in a government that recognizes free speech, he is allowed to say it. I totally get what you are getting at, his stance is horrible and that attitude has touched people in my life. However first and foremost if it doesn't directly incite violence then it should be allowed especially in an event that must be reserved to attend.
User avatar #199 - leonhardt (01/27/2015) [-]
Keep in mind this was Iceland, where such freedoms do not exist, apparently.
User avatar #200 - johnnycuntsticks (01/27/2015) [-]
I did include a bit in there stating my ignorance of Icelandic law. Though I would assume, as with most developed nations that it would have some sort of free speech clause.
#65 - here you go 01/24/2015 on Self Esteem +3
#262 - bbbbbut.. im not funny 01/23/2015 on daily FJ feedback/sticky 0
#25 - I usually like to wear pants but not shoes or socks or a shirt. 01/14/2015 on Wisdom +1
#31 - From my point of view this is about how that show belongs in t… 01/03/2015 on animu +1
#189 - Just the other day i bought gas at $1.99 12/23/2014 on Obama is good 0
#30 - **** yes 12/17/2014 on My Favourite Home Alone Movie +21
#2216 - **johnnycuntsticks used "*roll gender*"** **johnnycuntstick… 12/16/2014 on Fun roll types 0
#54 - Problem Children are Coming From Another World Aren't They?  [+] (1 new reply) 12/04/2014 on Just in case you haven't... +7
User avatar #87 - infinitereaper (12/04/2014) [-]
I recommend this anime.
#1398 - **johnnycuntsticks rolls 842,829,642** 11/28/2014 on Firefuel gives thanks 0
#116 - Just have fun with it. As long as you are following the basic …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/17/2014 on RPG funnies 0
User avatar #227 - lurifax (11/18/2014) [-]
alright, thanks
#141 - **johnnycuntsticks rolls 96** 11/14/2014 on More give aways 0
#6045 - **johnnycuntsticks rolls 380,062,434** 10/24/2014 on Free Steam +1
#269 - It was still a threat that had to be taken seriously due to pr… 10/16/2014 on I suspect 4chin 0
#244 - Exactly, although people are "proponents of free speech,&… 10/16/2014 on I suspect 4chin +1
#237 - sarcasm I love it when these kinds of things happen. E…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/16/2014 on I suspect 4chin +2
User avatar #248 - heraske (10/16/2014) [-]
OOORRRRRR

Some guy/lady didn't like her opinion because it shat on his/her preference on video games and decided to pull a practical prank threat to cancel it - and it was effective.
User avatar #269 - johnnycuntsticks (10/16/2014) [-]
It was still a threat that had to be taken seriously due to precedent (Virginia Tech etc.) that was made in response to a differing opinion. (however shit tier that opinion may be). I see what you are getting at but it definitely flies in the face of free speech.
User avatar #262 - fables (10/16/2014) [-]
"practical"
User avatar #238 - fables (10/16/2014) [-]
those people who are all for freedom of speech also don't realize it's only there to protect you from your government
not to protect you from any consequences of your actions
-such as breaking rules on a site and being banned for them
or getting kicked out of a store for swearing or shit like that
User avatar #244 - johnnycuntsticks (10/16/2014) [-]
Exactly, although people are "proponents of free speech," it seems not that many people even know what that means.
#80 - I was not prepared... 09/28/2014 on Mantis fly swatter -1
#11 - eh its fine its kind of easy to miss, great gif by the way.  [+] (1 new reply) 09/27/2014 on Why does a giant duck own a... 0
#12 - adrenalinegiraffe (09/27/2014) [-]
Thanks, made it myself. I've gotten sort of attached to Tvmaxwell and I haven't seen that part of the video as a gif. I've actually made quite a few.
#9 - if you look at the bottom its form a comic strip called fowl l…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/27/2014 on Why does a giant duck own a... 0
#10 - adrenalinegiraffe (09/27/2014) [-]
So it seems instead of missing a metaphor I missed an obvious pun. Fuck
User avatar #11 - johnnycuntsticks (09/27/2014) [-]
eh its fine its kind of easy to miss, great gif by the way.
#12 - adrenalinegiraffe (09/27/2014) [-]
Thanks, made it myself. I've gotten sort of attached to Tvmaxwell and I haven't seen that part of the video as a gif. I've actually made quite a few.
#64 - Demo senpai... 09/26/2014 on Jinx Comp +1
#36 - ...but its implied that ET was a pretty good guy, so its not r… 09/01/2014 on okay then -1
#94 - I can confirm that this is a legitimate concern. There was a w… 09/01/2014 on Triggering intensifies +12
#1216 - **johnnycuntsticks rolls 631,224,167** 08/14/2014 on Win a $50 visa card -1
[ 332 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)