x
Click to expand

jedimindaugas

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/03/2012
Last Login:3/27/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#35466
Highest Comment Rank:#21266
Comment Thumbs: 37 total,  119 ,  82
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 85.45% (47/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:146
FJ Points:44

latest user's comments

#78 - How is it obvious? That wouldn't even be the dumbest thing… 03/23/2015 on How to Science. Feminism... 0
#264 - People like you are part of the problem. You hide the ideology…  [+] (15 new replies) 02/20/2015 on Perspective -9
User avatar #292 - tarekmig (02/21/2015) [-]
" I hate all religions."
I found your problem, your fedora is outdated.
#376 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
Why shouldn't we hate outdated problematic ideologies with no evidence of their validity?
User avatar #522 - tarekmig (02/21/2015) [-]
Because there is no evidence of their invalidity.
#529 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
If you make a truth claim you have to bring the evidence to support it. There is no evidence for these claims so they can be dismissed.
User avatar #536 - tarekmig (02/21/2015) [-]
I don't see you bringing any evidence that god doesn't exist.
#538 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
I don't have to. The person who makes the positive truth claim, ie- that a god exists- is the one who needs to brings the evidence. If I said a pink unicorn exists with out any evidence, you can reject that claim. The same thing with any god.
User avatar #540 - tarekmig (02/21/2015) [-]
And where did you learn that at? By your logic I would need evidence that what you are saying is right, and not made up by you. You literally did the same thing, by saying that god doesn't exist, you need some claim to prove your point, and again, by your logic, I can reject your claim.
#541 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
Where did I say that a god doesn't exist? The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim. If you have to evidence your claim is dismissed. Simple.
#266 - amanster (02/20/2015) [-]
Id be more than glad to talk about those other parts. Bring a verse and we can discuss it.

But again, thats why I asked that last question. Did these Quranic verses come before or after all these horrible things happened to Muhammad and the Muslim community. Again Islam teaches retaliation, not provocation.
User avatar #289 - SognaVetr (02/21/2015) [-]
I agree that Islam is a religion of peace, but salafism is growing rapidly and you can't deny it's a "subgenre" of islam. They do represent islam, though in a very bad way. I also do know that most muslims are okay people, but islam has a problem and doesn't know how to deal with it. Some, i could even say a lot, even support it.

Take Nabil-Al-Awadi for example. He was the principal of an islamic school in the UK where he spread extremist ideology amongst the the pupils. Many of them are now part of IS, other are convicted for rape and other crimes in the UK. Nabil is now president of The Kuwait Scholar's Union, a union with a lot of influence and theological influence. But that union also financed ISIS with then of millions of dollars. I have countless of examples like him, countless.
#378 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"
User avatar #275 - kibuza (02/20/2015) [-]
I'd actually be more interested in what constitutes an 'innocent' person according to the Qur'an.
#283 - amanster (02/21/2015) [-]
I dont know... I dont think there is a specific verse or hadith that gives an explicit definition, but generally its me and you(I assume). People who go about their day, not doing anything too wrong. You know, not stealing, not killing, that kind of stuff.
User avatar #290 - kibuza (02/21/2015) [-]
I dunno man.

I think it's fair to say if Buddhists were mutilating people and flying planes into buildings and all that other shit we'd all be pretty pissed and suspicious of Buddhists.

Shitty deal bro. I'm strictly atheist but I have nothing against religions as long as you keep it to yourself or your respective groups.
#380 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
Oh, but there are violent Buddhists mate.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Burma_anti-Muslim_riots
#132 - 1. Emma lost all respect when she appeared as a tool at the UN… 12/08/2014 on Would you rather +1
#183 - And where does that equality show up in anything feminism ev… 12/08/2014 on Femmefatale 0
#182 - Why do you think so? Just because the movement called femi… 12/08/2014 on Femmefatale 0
#74 - No, not really. Feminism is not a good thing. It was alway…  [+] (6 new replies) 12/07/2014 on Femmefatale -5
User avatar #178 - sportsmaniac (12/07/2014) [-]
Holy shit, you're so wrong I don't even know where to begin.

Feminism is about equality between men and women. Most feminists are level-headed people who want that equality in the world. It started with women's right to vote, and now it's more about equal pay between the sexes. Once again, you're confusing feminism with femnazism, and those two words need to stop being intertwined. Especially on Funnyjunk.
User avatar #183 - jedimindaugas (12/08/2014) [-]
And where does that equality show up in anything feminism ever did?

Thou bring up the vote. Everyone always does. I though it was great injustice myself not that very long ago. But the story is different. Rights always came with obligations, and the right to vote came with the obligation to be drafted when needed. Men were actually drafted since the age of 18, but got the vote at 21! The movement for the women's vote soon divided into two groups - one of which wanted the rights with no strings attached and the ones who were wiling to take up the burdens that came along with it. The former ones won, score one for feminism! Equal rights, but not the obligations.

Equal pay..? You actually believe this bullshit?? It has been debunked time and time again! Google pay gap and get rid of this stupidity in two minutes! Think about it - if the employers could get away with paying women less for the EXACT SAME JOB, why the f*** would anyone hire more expensive men?? So either a) this pay gap has far more underlying factors or b) women suck at their jobs. Choose wisely.

Most who call themselves feminist are cool-headed people that want equality in the world. Most Muslims are cool-headed people that want piece. Most Christians are cool-headed who would never burn anyone who disagree. But we all have examples why these ideologies=/=the ones who proclaim to fallow them.
User avatar #85 - dilara (12/07/2014) [-]
Dude, if there was no feminism women still could not vote. This is just an example.
User avatar #182 - jedimindaugas (12/08/2014) [-]
Why do you think so?
Just because the movement called feminism first fought for this right? It was really caused mostly by the technological advances that allowed women to do the same work as men and thus, started equalizing society. What, did you think that feminism showed up and everyone was like "Oh s***, how could we all have been so ignorant all these centuries??". You know what? I used to think so too.
First of all, get one thing straight - the right to vote was never a privilege. Men always had to BUY this right by getting DRAFTED. You know who opposed the movement for the women's vote? Women, fearing of getting an equal obligation.
Now, I can not deny that among the initiators of the movement ( mostly upper-class women btw), there were women who fought for the vote and the draft attached to it, but in the end, the ones who wanted the vote without the burdens got it on a silver platter.
From the first victory, feminism was about equal rights, but never obligations. This is the reason I scoff at the idealistic view on the "true feminism".
This was just one example, dost thou have any other achievements to share or is getting the vote a century ago the only reason thou think highly of the movement?
User avatar #94 - dirtyduckling (12/07/2014) [-]
exactly, that why feminism was a bad thing.
#77 - anonymous (12/07/2014) [-]
This.
#138 - Yeah yeah, we have all these fancy descriptions of the movemen… 11/18/2014 on She's got a valid point 0
#126 - Cha, you'd wish the core tenant was about equality. It is …  [+] (2 new replies) 11/17/2014 on She's got a valid point 0
User avatar #134 - destismad (11/18/2014) [-]
Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.

I typed "definition feminism" into a search engine and got that, and it's right. A feminist wants women to be equal to men in society and, vice-versa, men to be equal to women . But these, "feminazis", as they're being called, seem to want more than that. Also, they have been targeting people who aren't even feminist to begin with. A good example is the existence of Gamergate. I don't know all about what's been happening, because I feel it's to incredibly ridiculous to bother myself with, but I do know feminazis are claiming some games to be sexist towards women. This is foolish and a waste of time, and nothing good will ever come from it. A true feminist will direct attention towards people who are actually sexist, both men and women, who think ill or lesser of the opposite gender, not gamers who buy video games because it's a fun hobby and pass-time.
User avatar #138 - jedimindaugas (11/18/2014) [-]
Yeah yeah, we have all these fancy descriptions of the movement - that must mean it's what it is all about, right? The members of the KKK claimed they were fighting for a noble cause of state stability.
I do not care how feminism tries to describe it self - I am yet to see anyone advocating for anything else than women. Even the very first wave overwhelmed those who wanted equality in rights AND obligations. All this movement is based on the bullshit that women were oppressed throughout the ages and is acting as such.
#51 - And what is this "true feminism" you speak of? Every…  [+] (4 new replies) 11/17/2014 on She's got a valid point 0
#57 - anonymous (11/17/2014) [-]
No they don't. You can only say that because you're willfully ignorant. You people constantly say "these feminizazis don't want equality... blah blah whatever."

Core tenant of feminism? Equality. Therefore, by your own definition, they are not feminists. Unless you have some other "core tenants" that exclude that one.
User avatar #126 - jedimindaugas (11/17/2014) [-]
Cha, you'd wish the core tenant was about equality.
It is about patriarchy that benefits men at the expense of women and that women had the short end of the stick throughout the ages.
You want to put equality in it? Try it and see how many people who claim to be feminists advocate for that - equality in both rights and obligations.
User avatar #134 - destismad (11/18/2014) [-]
Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.

I typed "definition feminism" into a search engine and got that, and it's right. A feminist wants women to be equal to men in society and, vice-versa, men to be equal to women . But these, "feminazis", as they're being called, seem to want more than that. Also, they have been targeting people who aren't even feminist to begin with. A good example is the existence of Gamergate. I don't know all about what's been happening, because I feel it's to incredibly ridiculous to bother myself with, but I do know feminazis are claiming some games to be sexist towards women. This is foolish and a waste of time, and nothing good will ever come from it. A true feminist will direct attention towards people who are actually sexist, both men and women, who think ill or lesser of the opposite gender, not gamers who buy video games because it's a fun hobby and pass-time.
User avatar #138 - jedimindaugas (11/18/2014) [-]
Yeah yeah, we have all these fancy descriptions of the movement - that must mean it's what it is all about, right? The members of the KKK claimed they were fighting for a noble cause of state stability.
I do not care how feminism tries to describe it self - I am yet to see anyone advocating for anything else than women. Even the very first wave overwhelmed those who wanted equality in rights AND obligations. All this movement is based on the bullshit that women were oppressed throughout the ages and is acting as such.
#1354 - **jedimindaugas rolled image ** 11/12/2014 on Let's play 0
[ 146 Total ]

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)