We hit the reply limit on the comments, so I'm moving it to here.

On 22 October 2009, the assembly of the Church of Sweden (which is no longer the national church but whose assent was important for the new practice to work smoothly) voted strongly in favour of giving its blessing to same-sex marriages,[4] including the use of the term marriage. It is the first major church in Sweden to take this position on same-sex marriage.[19] Archbishop of Uppsala Anders Wejryd commented that he was pleased with the decision.[2] The second and third largest Christian denominations in the country, the Catholic Church and the Pentecostalist Movement of Sweden, commented that they were "disappointed" by the decision of the Church of Sweden.[20] The Muslim Association of Sweden had already stated that no imams will marry same-sex couples.[21]

Also, the Church of Sweden is no longer connected to the government in any way. Source: www.nytimes.com/1995/12/31/world/swedes-end-long-union-of-church-and-state.html

So you did make a mistake, and your argument is falling apart.

We hit the reply limit on the thread, so I'll continue here. Each of those spikes and dips represents about ten to forty thousand years. The larger ones represent changes of about 8 degrees, the smaller ones less than half of a degree. We have seen a rise of almost one degree in the last hundred years, and it's still accelerating. Even if you spread that chart to be kilometers long, the change we've seen would still be ******* vertical, whereas everything else would look more like sine waves.

I'm a third year Biochem major. I don't see how you having a job in marine engineering makes you any more knowledgeable than me about climate change.