i live in a box!

i dont have a room!

.... What? You don't have a room?! Then where the hell do you fap? ... And sleep and eat?

i live in a box!

its a tire

... A tire is a ring...

i dont have a room!

.... What? You don't have a room?! Then where the hell do you fap? ... And sleep and eat?

i live in a box!

I guess not :(

I've had it in my folder for like 6 years, so, a while. Haven't found anything relevant since I saved it -.-

You too. A thumb of courtesy.

What? A third of 1 is .3-repeating. .3-repeating times 3 is .9-repeating. Therefore, (and I can spell therefore, unlike you), .9-repeating equals one.

Read my arguments I've listed below, I see no reason to write it all again.

You are wrong and you should feel wrong - even after repeated mathematical and empirical demonstrations you still refuse to believe reality.
>"practical math"
>mfw

As I tried to explain above, I get your point and if we deal with the infinite mathmatical world, then you are right. However we don't. We ude math as being finite, because if we didn't then we wouldn't be able to use math in the first place.
- I get your point, and you are just as right as I am. I've given all my arguments, and I'm therefore done with this discussion. Have a good day sir.

You too. A thumb of courtesy.

e^(ipi) = -1 where i = imaginary unit and pi = the irrational ratio of a circle's diameter to its circumference (pi=c/d)

there are several transformations that take numbers from one "category" to the next.

truth is .9... (.9 continuous) exactly equals .1.

math is the real world.

This is however true, but if we deal with math, as you say it is now, then the number one simply doesn't exist. It doesn't because there wouldn't be anything that would, in the real world, be 1 unit long, since you will always be able to put on more and more decimals on.
So in theory, 1 = 0.999...
However in the real world, the finite world, 1 > 0.999.. and 0.999... Will end at some point. This is what we use in the real world. Of course math is a theory, and this problem is known as a mathmatical paradox, however at some point you have to make a decission, and look at whether or not it's 1 or < than one. At some point, 0.999... Will get so close to one, that there would quite litteraly be nothing in between other than theory. If you look at it from the perspective of the real world, of us right now, you would at some point get so close to 1, even atoms would be too big to be there.
Therefor it is in practical math, that 0.999... < 1 so it is the only sensible thing to have accordingly to what is both logical, and what it is practical.
To end off, the infinite world, really doesn't exist, becuase we don't use it. I know my logic here is flawed, but math it self would litteraly be impossible to deal with in any way, shape or form, if we used the infinite world.

You are wrong and you should feel wrong - even after repeated mathematical and empirical demonstrations you still refuse to believe reality.
>"practical math"
>mfw

As I tried to explain above, I get your point and if we deal with the infinite mathmatical world, then you are right. However we don't. We ude math as being finite, because if we didn't then we wouldn't be able to use math in the first place.
- I get your point, and you are just as right as I am. I've given all my arguments, and I'm therefore done with this discussion. Have a good day sir.

You too. A thumb of courtesy.

no there will NOT be a 4 you idiot. 3 rounds DOWN. Did you take fucking third grade math?

Yes, but this is a third of one, therefor that 0.00001 difference adds up to the other making that 0.999999 a 1 instead.

What? A third of 1 is .3-repeating. .3-repeating times 3 is .9-repeating. Therefore, (and I can spell therefore, unlike you), .9-repeating equals one.

Read my arguments I've listed below, I see no reason to write it all again.

Technically not true...
When you subtract the numbers, x will have one more decimal place beyond 10x at every given extent. The limitation is how many decimal points to you consider significant, but no mater where that is. So really you are left with an infinitely small remainder which you ignore.
9.9999999999999999999999...
-0.99999999999999999999999...
=9.0000000000000000000000...1
Just how you would expect it to...

butbutbut... why would x have one more decimal place? They both have the same number of decimal places, because they both have infinite decimal places. And why would ANYONE expect 0.9-0.9 to be 0.01? Because even though there are more 9's and more 0's, that's basically what it comes out to.

Another explanation worth menitioning, is that 0.9999999 is a number in the infinite world, while 1 is the number in the finite world thus prooving they are not the same number, they aren't even in the same categories of number. 0.99999... Is not even an existing number in that sense.

e^(ipi) = -1 where i = imaginary unit and pi = the irrational ratio of a circle's diameter to its circumference (pi=c/d)

there are several transformations that take numbers from one "category" to the next.

truth is .9... (.9 continuous) exactly equals .1.

math is the real world.

This is however true, but if we deal with math, as you say it is now, then the number one simply doesn't exist. It doesn't because there wouldn't be anything that would, in the real world, be 1 unit long, since you will always be able to put on more and more decimals on.
So in theory, 1 = 0.999...
However in the real world, the finite world, 1 > 0.999.. and 0.999... Will end at some point. This is what we use in the real world. Of course math is a theory, and this problem is known as a mathmatical paradox, however at some point you have to make a decission, and look at whether or not it's 1 or < than one. At some point, 0.999... Will get so close to one, that there would quite litteraly be nothing in between other than theory. If you look at it from the perspective of the real world, of us right now, you would at some point get so close to 1, even atoms would be too big to be there.
Therefor it is in practical math, that 0.999... < 1 so it is the only sensible thing to have accordingly to what is both logical, and what it is practical.
To end off, the infinite world, really doesn't exist, becuase we don't use it. I know my logic here is flawed, but math it self would litteraly be impossible to deal with in any way, shape or form, if we used the infinite world.

You are wrong and you should feel wrong - even after repeated mathematical and empirical demonstrations you still refuse to believe reality.
>"practical math"
>mfw

As I tried to explain above, I get your point and if we deal with the infinite mathmatical world, then you are right. However we don't. We ude math as being finite, because if we didn't then we wouldn't be able to use math in the first place.
- I get your point, and you are just as right as I am. I've given all my arguments, and I'm therefore done with this discussion. Have a good day sir.

You too. A thumb of courtesy.

1 = 0.999... periodical
proof:
1/3 = 0.333... periodical
3/3 = 1 = 0.333... periodical * 3 = 0.999... periodical
do you even brain

You're wrong, what y ou are dealing with to get one, is 0.3333333 ... (this will continue you on for infinity, but at the ''end'' there will be a 4) ... 3333333334

The third of 0.999 is 0.333 which is correct, but not 0,333333334 .
I hope you get what I'm saying here, otherwise I'll send you a more detailed explanation.

no there will NOT be a 4 you idiot. 3 rounds DOWN. Did you take fucking third grade math?

Yes, but this is a third of one, therefor that 0.00001 difference adds up to the other making that 0.999999 a 1 instead.

What? A third of 1 is .3-repeating. .3-repeating times 3 is .9-repeating. Therefore, (and I can spell therefore, unlike you), .9-repeating equals one.

Read my arguments I've listed below, I see no reason to write it all again.

Technically not true...
When you subtract the numbers, x will have one more decimal place beyond 10x at every given extent. The limitation is how many decimal points to you consider significant, but no mater where that is. So really you are left with an infinitely small remainder which you ignore.
9.9999999999999999999999...
-0.99999999999999999999999...
=9.0000000000000000000000...1
Just how you would expect it to...

butbutbut... why would x have one more decimal place? They both have the same number of decimal places, because they both have infinite decimal places. And why would ANYONE expect 0.9-0.9 to be 0.01? Because even though there are more 9's and more 0's, that's basically what it comes out to.

Another explanation worth menitioning, is that 0.9999999 is a number in the infinite world, while 1 is the number in the finite world thus prooving they are not the same number, they aren't even in the same categories of number. 0.99999... Is not even an existing number in that sense.

e^(ipi) = -1 where i = imaginary unit and pi = the irrational ratio of a circle's diameter to its circumference (pi=c/d)

there are several transformations that take numbers from one "category" to the next.

truth is .9... (.9 continuous) exactly equals .1.

math is the real world.

This is however true, but if we deal with math, as you say it is now, then the number one simply doesn't exist. It doesn't because there wouldn't be anything that would, in the real world, be 1 unit long, since you will always be able to put on more and more decimals on.
So in theory, 1 = 0.999...
However in the real world, the finite world, 1 > 0.999.. and 0.999... Will end at some point. This is what we use in the real world. Of course math is a theory, and this problem is known as a mathmatical paradox, however at some point you have to make a decission, and look at whether or not it's 1 or < than one. At some point, 0.999... Will get so close to one, that there would quite litteraly be nothing in between other than theory. If you look at it from the perspective of the real world, of us right now, you would at some point get so close to 1, even atoms would be too big to be there.
Therefor it is in practical math, that 0.999... < 1 so it is the only sensible thing to have accordingly to what is both logical, and what it is practical.
To end off, the infinite world, really doesn't exist, becuase we don't use it. I know my logic here is flawed, but math it self would litteraly be impossible to deal with in any way, shape or form, if we used the infinite world.

You are wrong and you should feel wrong - even after repeated mathematical and empirical demonstrations you still refuse to believe reality.
>"practical math"
>mfw

As I tried to explain above, I get your point and if we deal with the infinite mathmatical world, then you are right. However we don't. We ude math as being finite, because if we didn't then we wouldn't be able to use math in the first place.
- I get your point, and you are just as right as I am. I've given all my arguments, and I'm therefore done with this discussion. Have a good day sir.

You too. A thumb of courtesy.

http:// www.youtube. com/watch?v=TINfzxSnnIE

dude, it does. watch this shit. its magical
[url deleted]

It really isn't... It's a math trick, however it doesn't apply for the real world at all. 1=1 and 0.999 = 0.999 simple as that. If you can even brain, then just by giving a good hard think, you will realize this as well. Look through the video, and think hard

1 = 0.999... periodical
proof:
1/3 = 0.333... periodical
3/3 = 1 = 0.333... periodical * 3 = 0.999... periodical
do you even brain

You're wrong, what y ou are dealing with to get one, is 0.3333333 ... (this will continue you on for infinity, but at the ''end'' there will be a 4) ... 3333333334

The third of 0.999 is 0.333 which is correct, but not 0,333333334 .
I hope you get what I'm saying here, otherwise I'll send you a more detailed explanation.

no there will NOT be a 4 you idiot. 3 rounds DOWN. Did you take fucking third grade math?

Yes, but this is a third of one, therefor that 0.00001 difference adds up to the other making that 0.999999 a 1 instead.

What? A third of 1 is .3-repeating. .3-repeating times 3 is .9-repeating. Therefore, (and I can spell therefore, unlike you), .9-repeating equals one.

Read my arguments I've listed below, I see no reason to write it all again.

Technically not true...
When you subtract the numbers, x will have one more decimal place beyond 10x at every given extent. The limitation is how many decimal points to you consider significant, but no mater where that is. So really you are left with an infinitely small remainder which you ignore.
9.9999999999999999999999...
-0.99999999999999999999999...
=9.0000000000000000000000...1
Just how you would expect it to...

butbutbut... why would x have one more decimal place? They both have the same number of decimal places, because they both have infinite decimal places. And why would ANYONE expect 0.9-0.9 to be 0.01? Because even though there are more 9's and more 0's, that's basically what it comes out to.

Another explanation worth menitioning, is that 0.9999999 is a number in the infinite world, while 1 is the number in the finite world thus prooving they are not the same number, they aren't even in the same categories of number. 0.99999... Is not even an existing number in that sense.

e^(ipi) = -1 where i = imaginary unit and pi = the irrational ratio of a circle's diameter to its circumference (pi=c/d)

there are several transformations that take numbers from one "category" to the next.

truth is .9... (.9 continuous) exactly equals .1.

math is the real world.

This is however true, but if we deal with math, as you say it is now, then the number one simply doesn't exist. It doesn't because there wouldn't be anything that would, in the real world, be 1 unit long, since you will always be able to put on more and more decimals on.
So in theory, 1 = 0.999...
However in the real world, the finite world, 1 > 0.999.. and 0.999... Will end at some point. This is what we use in the real world. Of course math is a theory, and this problem is known as a mathmatical paradox, however at some point you have to make a decission, and look at whether or not it's 1 or < than one. At some point, 0.999... Will get so close to one, that there would quite litteraly be nothing in between other than theory. If you look at it from the perspective of the real world, of us right now, you would at some point get so close to 1, even atoms would be too big to be there.
Therefor it is in practical math, that 0.999... < 1 so it is the only sensible thing to have accordingly to what is both logical, and what it is practical.
To end off, the infinite world, really doesn't exist, becuase we don't use it. I know my logic here is flawed, but math it self would litteraly be impossible to deal with in any way, shape or form, if we used the infinite world.

You are wrong and you should feel wrong - even after repeated mathematical and empirical demonstrations you still refuse to believe reality.
>"practical math"
>mfw

As I tried to explain above, I get your point and if we deal with the infinite mathmatical world, then you are right. However we don't. We ude math as being finite, because if we didn't then we wouldn't be able to use math in the first place.
- I get your point, and you are just as right as I am. I've given all my arguments, and I'm therefore done with this discussion. Have a good day sir.

You too. A thumb of courtesy.

Well my objection was that most of them are illegally here.

All the barbed wire and the armed guards that are on the border and all the inmigrants that come here and are either "imprisoned" (not exactly but like if they were) or deported tell me you're wrong.

I think you're misunderstanding my point.
I know Spain has one of the largest immigration % in EU. However, the way I understood your objection, with you not calling the immigrants, is ireleavent to whether or not they should be allowed there, because for you to be a part of EU, you have to accept the EU immigration policy, which is divided by several EU cards. For an example the EU blue card, which gives skilled immigrants easier entrance to a country. Therefor you have agreed, that the immigrants should be allowed in your country. Of course there will always be some exceptions with illegal immegrants, but that is a whole other discussion.

tl;dr
You have accepted the immigrant policy by beeing in EU. There will always be exceptions and illegal immigrants.

Well my objection was that most of them are illegally here.

Dude, we have "fairly open borders" to other EU countries. Not to others. Do you see USA-Mexico border? We have something like that on Morocco-Spain border.

Get your facts straight mate ^^ ... Every EU country has accept x amount of non European citizen each year ^^ (I don't remember the exact number, but you get the picture)

All the barbed wire and the armed guards that are on the border and all the inmigrants that come here and are either "imprisoned" (not exactly but like if they were) or deported tell me you're wrong.

I think you're misunderstanding my point.
I know Spain has one of the largest immigration % in EU. However, the way I understood your objection, with you not calling the immigrants, is ireleavent to whether or not they should be allowed there, because for you to be a part of EU, you have to accept the EU immigration policy, which is divided by several EU cards. For an example the EU blue card, which gives skilled immigrants easier entrance to a country. Therefor you have agreed, that the immigrants should be allowed in your country. Of course there will always be some exceptions with illegal immegrants, but that is a whole other discussion.

tl;dr
You have accepted the immigrant policy by beeing in EU. There will always be exceptions and illegal immigrants.

Well my objection was that most of them are illegally here.