Click to expand
Rank #18820 on CommentsLevel 0 Comments: Untouched account
OfflineSend mail to japanesekid Block japanesekid Invite japanesekid to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||4/27/2010|
|Location:||In a Cryogenic Chamber|
|Funnyjunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#19349|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#18059|
|Content Thumbs:||46 total, 161 , 115|
|Comment Thumbs:||24 total, 449 , 425|
|Content Level Progress:|| 84.74% (50/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 38.18% (21/55) |
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
|Times Content Favorited:||1 times|
|Total Comments Made:||200|
Full blooded Japanese but US citizen because I was born here.
- Views: 1594Google, make it happen.
28 8 Total: +20
- Views: 1113Mexican drug lord's home
4 2 Total: +2
- Views: 1050wut
8 10 Total: -2
- Views: 726Facebook weirdness
5 12 Total: -7
- Views: 802Fairly Oddparents roll
4 13 Total: -9
- Views: 691OH GAWD
5 3 Total: +2
latest user's comments
|#27 - Because the upper body attracts girls more, it shows off a lot… [+] (13 new replies)||02/06/2015 on Never skip leg day comp||+19|
#252 - ciacheczko (02/06/2015) [-]
Never skip leg and booty day.
#277 - ciacheczko (02/06/2015) [-]
Nah, actually the first guy wasn't entirely wrong. Since people evolved into walking on two legs, chests became more important since now they were more in the line of sight, than the butts. That's why females started having nice, bouncy tits along the way of evolution. To "make up" for the butt that was too low in the area of vision.
In theory, men having nice chests are also appealing, but still it's proven that butts are the #1 when it comes to sexual preference, for both genders.
If it's such bullshit, prove me wrong, go on.
inb4 "im too good, i don't have to prove you anything, you prove me ur right instead blah blah"
#351 - ciacheczko (02/06/2015) [-]
On a serious note though, about that image, I think that both sides of "give proof" and "no you give anti-proof" are stupid. There is this concept, it's called "the unknown". Think Shrodinger's cat. Until you can have proof for either assumption, none is entirely true or false.
For my case, anyone can look up some shit on google and read about multiple surveys and researches proving that butts rule our instincts, but I'm too lazy to do it since I literally know I am right, and don't consider this important or questionable enough to search for sauces. I am already flabbergasted that anyone would question something so commonly-known and rational
#38 - Bacabed (02/06/2015) [-]
Pretty much this, people don't associate strong legs with being fit and in shape. Unless a person has a reason to try and get strong (typically athletics or if you have an intensive hobby like rock climbing or mountain climbing) they just focus on what will make them look better.
Whatever, their choice. I will say this, I've yet to meet someone who focuses on the glamour muscles that actually outlifts me with them (although that may have more to do with that fact that I'm much larger than them).
#155 - pokemonstheshiz (02/06/2015) [-]
you're supposed to have off days though, most people alternate between legs and upper so that they work out everyday. Plus, doing it everyday makes it easier to keep doing.
I understand focusing more on glamour muscles, but to skip legs entirely seems pretty silly.
#291 - anonymous (02/06/2015) [-]
UB/Legs/UB/legs is not usual.
Most common is a P/P/L (Push, pull, legs) Which gives 4(or2) UB days. and 2 (or 1) leg days.
#164 - Bacabed (02/06/2015) [-]
Yeah you're right, I guess my last comment has more to do with how I view lifting. I've always worked out to build strength rather than get a ripped body. I'm a big guy (overweight but working on it, but that's not even what I mean. I'm tall, broad shoulders, thick muscles albeit covered with fat in some places.) and so I've never bothered trying to go high reps, low weight it's just always been lifting for strength and bulk so it's kind of hard for me to look at others and understand why they wouldn't want to gain those things. I mean I sort of understand not wanting bulk it isn't for everyone but I can never understanding not wanting to push your strength as much as you can, even if you just want to lift for looks (what point are the looks if you don't have the strength to match?).
#172 - magicalan (02/06/2015) [-]
there is a lot of people who feel the same way as you, i've always lifted for strength but ive recently started doing 4x12 on my lifts and my maxes have dropped but i have a more "swole" feeling, but hey do what ever you want, a good base strength is great for someone shifting into looks
|#102 - **japanesekid used "*roll 6, LOL*"** **japanesekid rolls As…||12/28/2014 on Funnyjunk Rolling Guide||0|
|#101 - Comment deleted||12/28/2014 on Funnyjunk Rolling Guide||0|
|#40 - **japanesekid used "*roll 1, cah answer*"** **japanesekid r…||12/28/2014 on mfw||0|
|#39 - **japanesekid used "*roll 1, cah question*"** **japanesekid… [+] (1 new reply)||12/28/2014 on mfw||0|
|#56 - Oh... He's an angry little elf...||12/23/2014 on They see me rollin||0|
|#51 - Japanesekid15 Silver IV NA Top, Jungle, ADC, Suppo…||08/10/2014 on FJ LoL team(s)||0|
|#2916 - **japanesekid rolled image **||05/29/2014 on Your future wife/hubby||0|
|#63 - Is that a fawking emoji?||01/23/2014 on Follow your dreams||0|
|#101 - Looks like a bingo board to me....||04/08/2013 on Typical Airplane||0|