Funnyjunk logo
Funnyjunk logo


jambre  

no avatar Level 103 Content: Funny Junkie
Offline
Send mail to jambre Block jambre Invite jambre to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:1/04/2010
Last Login:9/12/2011
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 1031 total,  1157 ,  126
Comment Thumbs: 89 total,  111 ,  22
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 103 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 104 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 39 Comments: Peasant → Level 40 Comments: Sammich eater
Subscribers:0
Content Views:2847
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:33
FJ Points:66
Favorite Tags: funny (5) | FUNNYJUNK (2) | greatness (2) | motivational (2) | omegle (2) | The Game (2)
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 666
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +2
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/19/11
    title RAB
  • Views: 797
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 3 Total: 0
    Comments: 7
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/20/10
    title Omegle motivation
  • Views: 584
    Thumbs Up 0 Thumbs Down 1 Total: -1
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/20/10
    title Motivational Omegle
  • Views: 24626
    Thumbs Up 1092 Thumbs Down 109 Total: +983
    Comments: 178
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 05/13/10
    title Darwin's Theory of Comic Evolution
  • Views: 672
    Thumbs Up 6 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +5
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/16/10
    title Mind Blown
  • Views: 3270
    Thumbs Up 22 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +21
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 03/21/10
    title It's a trap!
1 2 > [ 9 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#1682 - should of just tried to kiss her after the present. Asking som… 08/16/2011 on Love Tale (Continuation) +3
#26 - Neutron stars don't emit visible light... The problem with … 07/20/2011 on Bill Nye Trolling +2
#439 - The point is, the more you know about one, the less you know a…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/06/2011 on Fry vs. Xzibit 0
#440 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
I'm not dismissing the concept as useless, I dismissing the concept of 0 uncertainty as useless. "the more you know about one, the less you know about the other" is pretty much exactly what I was saying... Not, you can only know one of them which is quite misleading.
#86 - You cannot know both, to say you know one with certainty means…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/06/2011 on Fry vs. Xzibit 0
#92 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
That definition of certainty is completely useless because 0 uncertainty doesn't exist... That equation is a physics equation. As far as reality is concerned, you know both to at least some degree. To say you can't know both is misleading to anyone who doesn't define "know" as infinite certainty...
#439 - jambre (07/06/2011) [-]
The point is, the more you know about one, the less you know about the other. It is not completely useless, it helps us to understand the uncertainty principle. To dismiss a concept as useless as it is not possible in reality is foolish. The underlining reason why you cannot know the position and momentum of a particle with absolute certainty is the uncertainty principle.
#440 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
I'm not dismissing the concept as useless, I dismissing the concept of 0 uncertainty as useless. "the more you know about one, the less you know about the other" is pretty much exactly what I was saying... Not, you can only know one of them which is quite misleading.
#27 - yes, that comes from it. If you know either x or p then the re…  [+] (7 new replies) 07/06/2011 on Fry vs. Xzibit +1
#29 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
no... you can know both up to h-bar/2. As in, if your uncertainty in position is as low as h-bar, your certainty in momentum will be valued 1/2
#31 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
as in the lowest value of your momentum uncertainty will be 1/2
#86 - jambre (07/06/2011) [-]
You cannot know both, to say you know one with certainty means that the uncertainty = 0, which doesn't satisfy the equation.

Or: As the uncertainty in position approaches zero, the uncertainty in momentum becomes very large, so much so that you cannot have any idea of it's momentum with any real certainty.
#92 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
That definition of certainty is completely useless because 0 uncertainty doesn't exist... That equation is a physics equation. As far as reality is concerned, you know both to at least some degree. To say you can't know both is misleading to anyone who doesn't define "know" as infinite certainty...
#439 - jambre (07/06/2011) [-]
The point is, the more you know about one, the less you know about the other. It is not completely useless, it helps us to understand the uncertainty principle. To dismiss a concept as useless as it is not possible in reality is foolish. The underlining reason why you cannot know the position and momentum of a particle with absolute certainty is the uncertainty principle.
#440 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
I'm not dismissing the concept as useless, I dismissing the concept of 0 uncertainty as useless. "the more you know about one, the less you know about the other" is pretty much exactly what I was saying... Not, you can only know one of them which is quite misleading.
#30 - jitter has deleted their comment.
#23 - No, the uncertainty in position multiplied by the uncertainty …  [+] (13 new replies) 07/06/2011 on Fry vs. Xzibit +3
#26 - Rayonator (07/06/2011) [-]
planck* not plank
i'm very sorry, i can't help it :S
#25 - vncrz (07/06/2011) [-]
Isn't it like if you know the position, you can't know the momentum and if you know the momentum, you can't know the position? I'm trying to remember... :S
#28 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
What hell are you guys saying? You CAN know both the position and momentum, that equation just says the more you know about one, the less you know about the other (gives it a specific value)
#36 - vncrz (07/06/2011) [-]
Dude, I explicitly said on my comment that I was trying to remember this shit. It's been a long time since I even looked at this.
#93 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
my bad, didn't mean to single you out, my reply was kind of in response to this entire chain
#27 - jambre (07/06/2011) [-]
yes, that comes from it. If you know either x or p then the related term becomes "0", making the left hand side equal to zero, which doesn't satisfy the equation. So you cannot know both with any real certainty.
#29 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
no... you can know both up to h-bar/2. As in, if your uncertainty in position is as low as h-bar, your certainty in momentum will be valued 1/2
#31 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
as in the lowest value of your momentum uncertainty will be 1/2
#86 - jambre (07/06/2011) [-]
You cannot know both, to say you know one with certainty means that the uncertainty = 0, which doesn't satisfy the equation.

Or: As the uncertainty in position approaches zero, the uncertainty in momentum becomes very large, so much so that you cannot have any idea of it's momentum with any real certainty.
#92 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
That definition of certainty is completely useless because 0 uncertainty doesn't exist... That equation is a physics equation. As far as reality is concerned, you know both to at least some degree. To say you can't know both is misleading to anyone who doesn't define "know" as infinite certainty...
#439 - jambre (07/06/2011) [-]
The point is, the more you know about one, the less you know about the other. It is not completely useless, it helps us to understand the uncertainty principle. To dismiss a concept as useless as it is not possible in reality is foolish. The underlining reason why you cannot know the position and momentum of a particle with absolute certainty is the uncertainty principle.
#440 - jitter (07/06/2011) [-]
I'm not dismissing the concept as useless, I dismissing the concept of 0 uncertainty as useless. "the more you know about one, the less you know about the other" is pretty much exactly what I was saying... Not, you can only know one of them which is quite misleading.
#30 - jitter has deleted their comment.
#237 - If I thought I was every one of you dumbfucks i'd probably kil… 06/21/2011 on The Egg +2
#57 - Not only would the temperature change not be able to travel al…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/29/2011 on Cool Body Tricks +1
User avatar #58 - omeglepwner (04/29/2011) [-]
dont ask me how it works, but ive used it before now and it does work
#52 - You guys are retarded if you believe some of these. Especially…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/28/2011 on Cool Body Tricks -2
User avatar #56 - omeglepwner (04/29/2011) [-]
the last one is true, its an outdoor survivor tip
#57 - jambre (04/29/2011) [-]
Not only would the temperature change not be able to travel all the way to your teeth, but it's nerves not veins that cause toothache
User avatar #58 - omeglepwner (04/29/2011) [-]
dont ask me how it works, but ive used it before now and it does work
#1 - Most of them do, but nobody talks about it  [+] (1 new reply) 04/14/2011 on Just a thought +4
User avatar #2 - JVanik (04/14/2011) [-]
This
1 2 > [ 31 Total ]

Per page:
Order:
comments(0)

 
No comments!
 Friends (0)