Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

ixcarnifexxi    

Rank #20219 on Comments
ixcarnifexxi Avatar Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to ixcarnifexxi Block ixcarnifexxi Invite ixcarnifexxi to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/23/2011
Last Login:10/24/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#20219
Highest Content Rank:#3709
Highest Comment Rank:#972
Content Thumbs: 1194 total,  1503 ,  309
Comment Thumbs: 5011 total,  7684 ,  2673
Content Level Progress: 86% (43/50)
Level 111 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 98% (98/100)
Level 249 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 250 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:76868
Times Content Favorited:78 times
Total Comments Made:3067
FJ Points:6341

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 22092
    Thumbs Up 473 Thumbs Down 33 Total: +440
    Comments: 20
    Favorites: 19
    Uploaded: 10/13/13
    Everyone Anon on FJ. Everyone Anon on FJ.
  • Views: 3471
    Thumbs Up 112 Thumbs Down 11 Total: +101
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 02/12/13
    Superglue. Superglue.
  • Views: 2143
    Thumbs Up 51 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +49
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/13/11
    Generalizations Generalizations
  • Views: 977
    Thumbs Up 26 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +22
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/09/11
    Cleverbot is mean. Cleverbot is mean.
  • Views: 2762
    Thumbs Up 24 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +20
    Comments: 7
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 04/11/13
    My teacher is hilarious My teacher is hilarious
  • Views: 773
    Thumbs Up 23 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +19
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 01/13/12
    Touched by a butterfly Touched by a butterfly
1 2 3 4 > [ 24 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

  • Views: 19925
    Thumbs Up 519 Thumbs Down 66 Total: +453
    Comments: 17
    Favorites: 42
    Uploaded: 12/07/12
    I don't even I don't even
  • Views: 4883
    Thumbs Up 50 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +42
    Comments: 18
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/01/13
    No Shave November Has Come No Shave November Has Come
  • Views: 1036
    Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 10 Total: +1
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/09/11
    Godspeed kitty. Godspeed kitty.

latest user's comments

#343 - It sucks too much that stereotypes always seem to push through… 09/10/2014 on Boogie2988 has a message. -1
#96 - they blow up errthing. including canada 09/05/2014 on I played with your heart, -1
#27 - Exactry 09/05/2014 on I played with your heart, +3
#25 - If Canada had nukes, and you guys declared war on us; we would…  [+] (13 new replies) 09/05/2014 on I played with your heart, -14
User avatar #95 - morelazors (09/05/2014) [-]
I don't think you know how nukes work.
User avatar #96 - ixcarnifexxi (09/05/2014) [-]
they blow up errthing. including canada
User avatar #35 - azumeow (09/05/2014) [-]
Someone has CLEARLY never heard of M.A.D. No sane human being in the modern world would use a nuclear weapon.
User avatar #40 - PetroleumPinecone (09/05/2014) [-]
Go read "On Thermonuclear War" by Herman Kahn. Written in the 60s if memory serves, it basically details a load of statistical calculations that demonstrate that the theory of MAD is actually largely inaccurate. The principle of deterrence is sound, but if shit actually did hit the fan then there are a lot of variables to consider like duration, readiness, post-war preparation...the list goes on and on.

Basically he says that while nuclear war would suck majorly for all concerned, it bloody well is winnable with the right kind of preparation, and that wishfully thinking "well it would be so bad that noone in their right mind would actually do it" isn't contructive.

His job was to think of how to do the following (paraphrasing a bit):
1) Avoid nuclear war
2) If it can't be avoided, win it
3) If it can't be won, survive it.

Hell of a long read, 800 pages or so, and lots of calculations about decay of isotopes correlating with cancer increases etc., but even a skim through will be very interesting for anyone who already has a grounding with the principle of MAD.
User avatar #44 - azumeow (09/05/2014) [-]
Hey, listen, even if we're not talking total nuclear holocaust, it's still become very clear that NOBODY wants to actually use nukes. Hell, I doubt Kim Jong Il would use them if he had the capabilities to hit the US.
And I'm not sure if M.A.D. implies total annihilation, just...mutual destruction. Like, to the point where it probably isn't worth it.
User avatar #46 - PetroleumPinecone (09/05/2014) [-]
Oh absolutely, it would all go to shit for both sides, but that's not to say that noone sane wants to use nukes - given the right conditions of readiness (both offensive and defensive) and with a sufficient technological edge (be it in yield or delivery mechanisms, or defensive mechanisms) you can easily win a nuclear war. Hypothetically, from a purely military standpoint, the USA could go to town on North Korea with nukes with relative impunity because their best long range missile can't hit contintental USA and isn't projected to for at least 10 more years.

I wasn't saying detterence isn't a solid principle to start off with, but the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction is a misnomer at best. Not looking for an argument, just reccomending an exceptionally well reasoned book.
User avatar #69 - azumeow (09/05/2014) [-]
I see your point.

It is pointy, and I am too tired for this, clearly.
User avatar #68 - misfitxcreepx (09/05/2014) [-]
But in your situation, only one side has the capabilities of nuking the other. The whole concept of mutually assured destruction is basically "if you nuke me I nuke you." Obviously that doesn't work if only one side can nuke.
User avatar #70 - PetroleumPinecone (09/05/2014) [-]
Well North Korea does have nuclear capabilities, just very poor delivery mechanisms. Kahn's premise revolves around the disparity between the two belligerents in terms of delivery, defense, and readiness. Even in the scenario of a nuclear war between the USSR and the USA there were a wide range of possible results contingent on these factors.

You're confusing the principle of deterrence, which is indeed "you nuke me I nuke you (and it sucks for us both)" with that of MAD, which is that "if either of us starts the nuking neither of us will be left at the end of the day". Kahn was all for deterrence (along with a ton of other things) and in fact argued that by having reasonable post-war systems in place you enhanced your deterrence - there's even less chance of the other side starting a fight if you'll still be alive and well while they're in ruins.

A large part of the book is spent debunking the idea that if nuclear war starts both sides will be annihilated. I'm not doing it much justice by trying to summarise 800 pages of strategic thinking from a brilliant analytical mind at 6:38 in the morning, but I hope the point is clear enough.
User avatar #97 - misfitxcreepx (09/05/2014) [-]
Ok I see what you're saying.

My main point I think was just that while North Korea does have nuclear capabilities, they couldn't really "hit us" so that situation seemed to not coincide with mad or the principle of deterrence. It turns into "you nuke me I can't nuke you" type of thing.

But I see what you're saying. Two nations nuking each other doesn't mean the end of the world for those nations it just really fucking sucks for both. So while no one really wants to nuke/get nuked, it still pays off to make sure that in the case that it does happen they end up having the upper hand.
#33 - mrmcput (09/05/2014) [-]
Yay!!! MAD for the Win!
#26 - gtfomylawnbish (09/05/2014) [-]
"If Canada had nukes"
User avatar #27 - ixcarnifexxi (09/05/2014) [-]
Exactry
#111 - That's how I feel when I take my watch off. 08/27/2014 on Trading my iPhone for a... 0
#198 - I kind of agree? The amount of swearing and negativity towards… 08/17/2014 on look at the funny +16
#120 - Do... Do we have the same girlfriend? My girlfriend is a femin…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/10/2014 on Ohhhhhh 0
User avatar #123 - chickenbones (08/10/2014) [-]
Prooobably not? XD I think that just means there are more feminists out there that arn't crazy, than is readily apparent.
#123 - You're not using the word "objectified" properly. Sc… 08/02/2014 on literally everybody looks... 0
#75 - People like you shouldn't use the Internet. 08/02/2014 on good doge 0
#73 - Then try to be a better person 08/02/2014 on good doge 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe stoner-humor
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2450

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - xxxsonic fanxxx (04/19/2013) [-]
ixcarnifexxi is a dick chuggin asshoile
User avatar #3 to #2 - ixcarnifexxi (04/20/2013) [-]
Thanks c:
User avatar #1 - sidnineonefourtwo (09/28/2012) [-]
Off to work. Oh and that link I gave you, use Putlocker. It seems to work the best for them.
 Friends (0)