Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

itsdige    

no avatar Level 144 Content: Faptastic
Offline
Send mail to itsdige Block itsdige Invite itsdige to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:8/22/2011
Last Login:5/21/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 4459 total,  5336 ,  877
Comment Thumbs: 385 total,  439 ,  54
Content Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 144 Content: Faptastic → Level 145 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 138 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 139 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:124398
Times Content Favorited:175 times
Total Comments Made:105
FJ Points:4890
Favorite Tags: i (6) | is (5) | Hate (3) | Not (3) | tags (3) | You (3) | doctor (2) | Dog (2) | for (2) | kids (2) | like (2) | me (2) | no (2) | tell (2) | this (2) | why (2) | will (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 24843
    Thumbs Up 1168 Thumbs Down 40 Total: +1128
    Comments: 88
    Favorites: 39
    Uploaded: 09/22/11
    My to do list My to do list
  • Views: 20637
    Thumbs Up 1042 Thumbs Down 102 Total: +940
    Comments: 161
    Favorites: 70
    Uploaded: 08/30/11
    the legend the legend
  • Views: 26490
    Thumbs Up 1177 Thumbs Down 300 Total: +877
    Comments: 131
    Favorites: 17
    Uploaded: 04/11/12
    A life-saver A life-saver
  • Views: 19481
    Thumbs Up 465 Thumbs Down 61 Total: +404
    Comments: 10
    Favorites: 14
    Uploaded: 11/07/12
    TinyHole.com TinyHole.com
  • Views: 11640
    Thumbs Up 313 Thumbs Down 18 Total: +295
    Comments: 11
    Favorites: 9
    Uploaded: 11/20/12
    Comic Con Comic Con
  • Views: 14610
    Thumbs Up 323 Thumbs Down 40 Total: +283
    Comments: 10
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 10/02/12
    MFW MFW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > [ 46 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

  • Views: 536
    Thumbs Up 8 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +7
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 10/03/11
    This is Awesome This is Awesome
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#15 - What if the bird decides to take a **** while he'… 06/19/2013 on Meanwhile in Russia 0
#17 - 0:40 03/04/2013 on Hamster Trolls Policeman +56
#58 - Comment deleted 02/19/2013 on Actor Trivia Part 2 0
#4 - "I'll make my own goddamn rules" - that statement ju…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/21/2012 on Comic Con -1
#5 - Onemanretardpack (11/21/2012) [-]
You're an idiot, please stop posting now. If I took a bunch of stuff thats patented by different tech companies and used it in my phone, and called them my own creation, or "OC", I'd be sued for theft and copyright infringement. Please just accept that you're in the wrong here, and the more vehemently you try and defend yourself, the stupider you look
#2 - OC - stands for original content, and that is what this is, it…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/21/2012 on Comic Con -1
User avatar #3 - fuzzyballs (11/21/2012) [-]
I don't need your set of "oc" rules man, I'll make my own goddamn rules
and that means if you didn't create it, it's not OC
but whatever dude, I'm too mellow to care
#4 - itsdige (11/21/2012) [-]
"I'll make my own goddamn rules" - that statement just describes perfectly why you shouldn't critizise other's content. Thank you, thank you very much
#5 - Onemanretardpack (11/21/2012) [-]
You're an idiot, please stop posting now. If I took a bunch of stuff thats patented by different tech companies and used it in my phone, and called them my own creation, or "OC", I'd be sued for theft and copyright infringement. Please just accept that you're in the wrong here, and the more vehemently you try and defend yourself, the stupider you look
#18 - TwinChin: Breaking Down part 1 11/18/2012 on youtube +1
#8 - Yeah he gets a new screwdriver, you can see that if you watch … 11/08/2012 on TinyHole.com 0
#2 - Nobody cares about that anymore... where've you been the last … 10/17/2012 on Read Desc. -7
#429 - 37. Is wrong, because if we assume the universe was created wi…  [+] (35 new replies) 10/02/2012 on Can You Make It? (Part Two) 0
#475 - goosbee has deleted their comment.
User avatar #487 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
It's just as likely to be false, though. Because you don't know the details of the expansion of the universe (no one does). You don't know when that star was born, or how close it was when it formed, etc.
#557 - goosbee has deleted their comment.
#519 - goosbee has deleted their comment.
#470 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
#485 - goosbee has deleted their comment.
#501 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
User avatar #482 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
The reason everything is compressed is because everything in the physical universe started smashed together in the Planck Epoch. Secondly, as the galaxies moved apart the light would still be streaming in, but with a "shift" in their light that would give it a red or blue hue depending on the orientation.
#497 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
User avatar #506 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
I don't think you understand the idea of expansion. Everything in the universe started out exponentially closer to each other. So 2000 years ago, various celestial bodies were closer to us by a factor of billions. And even closer 2000 years before that. Shorter distance = less time it takes to travel. The light you are seeing may not be nearly as old as you believe it to be because of this. I understand we wont see shit that is happening today. But it doesn't mean we're seeing light from millions of years ago.
#577 - goosbee has deleted their comment.
#515 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
#512 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
User avatar #530 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
...the fuck? That is not at all what I just said. '

You have planet A and star B
They are 5 light-years away from each other, but they are moving apart from each other. As time goes on the light from star B takes longer and longer to get to planet A, but after 5 years the star is visible to the planet. Thousand of years later Star B might be hundreds of light-years away. regardless it would be visible. It's not like the star just stops emitting light.
#535 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
User avatar #542 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
Because you're seeing light from the star when it was much closer. How is that so hard to understand?
#551 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
#558 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
#566 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
User avatar #468 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
You have no idea how many times I have posted this same message. I see that picture pop up on my news feed every couple of weeks and I'm just like, dammit.
User avatar #445 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
Yeah, but the thing didn't just immediately form when the Universe was created; it took 2.5 million years after it began to form for us to see it was beginning to form (if something had been alive back then to see it)
User avatar #474 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
You don't actually know when it was formed. The stars could've erupted into existence at the beginning of time, or it could've taken it a billion years.
User avatar #486 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
The universe was too hot in the beginning for stars (and thus galaxies) to form. I know stars are hot, but when the universe was first made, it was way hotter than that. For conditions to become right for starmaking, a lot of time had to pass. Also, the ANdromeda galaxy, the one OP is talking about, is known to have formed 10 billion years ago, 4.6 billion years after the Universe was made.
User avatar #493 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
lol how do you know how hot the universe was? How do you know when the Andromeda universe was born, and how do you know exactly when the Big Bang happened?
#559 - adxminisgay has deleted their comment.
User avatar #502 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
It's not like I'm the one who figured it out. Scientists have figured it out based on the rate of expansion and by calculating the temperature based on how hot things get when compressed and the temperature of a singularity, which the big bang was before the bang.
User avatar #516 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
I'm a PA minor, and in all my physics and astronomy I haven't seen really any concrete numbers about the rate of expansion of the universe....
User avatar #549 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
Wait, doesn't PA minor stand for Performing Arts?
User avatar #552 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
Physics and Astronomy. I'm a Civil Engineering major, but my heart has always belonged to physics.
User avatar #532 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_age.html
or
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/060915/index.html
and for a different source
http://news.discovery.com/space/the-universe-is-precisely-1375-billion-years-old .html
User avatar #548 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
"Many astronomers are working hard to measure the Hubble constant using a variety of different techniques. Until recently, the best estimates ranged from 65 km/sec/Megaparsec to 80 km/sec/Megaparsec, with the best value being about 72 km/sec/Megaparsec."

They're using a "constant" that they can't even verify. As a fellow student of science, I respect their work. But I'd be a fool to consider any of that as hard fact.
User avatar #556 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
Read the first link where it talks about the Hubble Constant. They solve the crisis you talk about using WMAP, which is why that's the official thing for saying how old things are. They say "The key to this is that by knowing the composition of matter and energy density in the universe, we can use Einstein's General Relativity to compute how fast the universe has been expanding in the past" and actually have a total uncertainty of only 1%
User avatar #562 - vivapinatapro (10/02/2012) [-]
That's assuming expansion has remained constant, and that's assuming Einstein isn't missing anything (much of his work has been corrected in the past). That's a lot of assuming.
User avatar #679 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
Sois
#678 - andalitemadness has deleted their comment.
#2 - I want to be the monkey at 2:05... Looks like he is c… 09/30/2012 on All my waats? 0
[ 104 Total ]

user's channels

Join Subscribe doctor-who
Join Subscribe funny
Join Subscribe turtles

user's friends

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)