On a side note, imthepunkkid, do you feel like your point of him being wrong is more valid if you thumb down all of his comments without reading them?
But then idkwhatiexpected.jpeg
I mean dat name, you go girl.

And on what premise do you assume i did not read his comments?

Im assuming because assumptions are great.
Look now i have a new friend to talk to, thanks to assumptions.

good job avoiding the question you pleb
I remember game breaking glitches in GTA 3, Vice City, and San Andreas
a shit ton

My main problem with watchdogs is the main character is boring.
I think most of the bad reviews came from the fact that they promised and showed everyone a game that they did not deliver when it was announced at E3.
Rockstar never promised anything they did not deliver on in gta 5, and people expected the glitchy things because rockstar make sure to add or more leave things like the swingset of doom as easter eggs, because things like that are fun.

No one ever said GTA was flawless, no one ever said it has BEAM NG driving physics either.
Really GTA just is what it is, and that is a great game, most games can not offer you 100+ hours of game play without an online mode, and GTA manages to do it without side quests simply by making shit like this fun to do.

Oh people said GTA is flawless.... a lot...

I see your points and I am not saying GTA is not a great game, but I still have my own opinion on the thing and I respect yours.

that's all I gotta say about it

On a side note, imthepunkkid, do you feel like your point of him being wrong is more valid if you thumb down all of his comments without reading them?
But then idkwhatiexpected.jpeg
I mean dat name, you go girl.

And on what premise do you assume i did not read his comments?

Im assuming because assumptions are great.
Look now i have a new friend to talk to, thanks to assumptions.

I kinda expected that, the comment is an unpopular opinion, how else would it go?

If i had gta 5 when i first played gta 3 Which i thought was fucking amazing i think i would have literally shit a chicken out of pure excitement that such a thing could ever exist.

Seriously though, what the fuck do people expect from games at the moment?
GTA was pushing the consoles it was made to play on to its very limit, Heck God of war ascension nearly killed the PS3 with rendering quality and that was a 10 hour long game, given the scope of the game it is extremely well polished and i am in awe of rockstars accomplishment.

But go on, what is so wrong with GTA 5, give me 10 reason why it was worse than number 4 which was also a great game.
Heck give me 5 ways GTA 5 is worse than sanandreas, there is a tough one.
You come across as the kind of person tat would not play a game if it had terrible graphics, which is sad for you, some of the best stories are locked away in shitty graphics.

1. No jetpack
2. No dildo whacking
3. No fat nigger on your back when chasing train
4. No driving school
5. Annoying stunt jumps

My problem with GTA 5 is entirely the direction they went with the multiplayer. In 4, me and my friends would just dick around in free mode, sometimes we would get tons of cops, sometimes we would kill each other, sometimes we would race, sometimes we would hit civilians, it was fun. Now you can't really do that in multiplayer, you can't just steal a car without getting cops constantly unless you paint it, you have to grind robbing convenience stores just to afford that, if you want a nice car, you have to buy it and then you have to be careful not to destroy it. You can't just get a rocket launcher, you have to grind to level up and buy ammo for it.

You can't just mess around and blow shit up anymore, if they just had a free mode where everything was unlocked and you wouldn't have to deal with other people like they did in GTA 4 it would be fine, but we don't even play 5 anymore because it doesn't have a fun multiplayer.

I really don't give a single fuck about graphics, that's not where I'm coming from. If the game is good (story or mechanics) I will play it.

The point where I am coming from is more of a comparison. Let's say....watch dogs for example. If you put a similar video like this one, but from watch dogs, it would be burned to hell, because the physics are so bad and the game is bad because of this

But not GTA, no. When it comes to GTA, it has no mistakes. At all. Ever. And if you think so, you are wrong, no question.

Don't get me wrong, Watch_Dogs is far from perfect, but it's also far from unplayably terrible. GTA 5 is a good game, but it's not a "perfect gift from the gods, oh my god look at this flawless game"

good job avoiding the question you pleb
I remember game breaking glitches in GTA 3, Vice City, and San Andreas
a shit ton

My main problem with watchdogs is the main character is boring.
I think most of the bad reviews came from the fact that they promised and showed everyone a game that they did not deliver when it was announced at E3.
Rockstar never promised anything they did not deliver on in gta 5, and people expected the glitchy things because rockstar make sure to add or more leave things like the swingset of doom as easter eggs, because things like that are fun.

No one ever said GTA was flawless, no one ever said it has BEAM NG driving physics either.
Really GTA just is what it is, and that is a great game, most games can not offer you 100+ hours of game play without an online mode, and GTA manages to do it without side quests simply by making shit like this fun to do.

Oh people said GTA is flawless.... a lot...

I see your points and I am not saying GTA is not a great game, but I still have my own opinion on the thing and I respect yours.

that's all I gotta say about it

On a side note, imthepunkkid, do you feel like your point of him being wrong is more valid if you thumb down all of his comments without reading them?
But then idkwhatiexpected.jpeg
I mean dat name, you go girl.

And on what premise do you assume i did not read his comments?

Im assuming because assumptions are great.
Look now i have a new friend to talk to, thanks to assumptions.

I don't think a completely realistic physics engine is possible at this point in time.

I bet you shit gold and piss excellence hey?

San Andreas has a better engine than 5

Naah, I just thing GTA 5 is waaay overhyped. And even though it has shit mistakes like this for example, people don't care.

I kinda expected that, the comment is an unpopular opinion, how else would it go?

If i had gta 5 when i first played gta 3 Which i thought was fucking amazing i think i would have literally shit a chicken out of pure excitement that such a thing could ever exist.

Seriously though, what the fuck do people expect from games at the moment?
GTA was pushing the consoles it was made to play on to its very limit, Heck God of war ascension nearly killed the PS3 with rendering quality and that was a 10 hour long game, given the scope of the game it is extremely well polished and i am in awe of rockstars accomplishment.

But go on, what is so wrong with GTA 5, give me 10 reason why it was worse than number 4 which was also a great game.
Heck give me 5 ways GTA 5 is worse than sanandreas, there is a tough one.
You come across as the kind of person tat would not play a game if it had terrible graphics, which is sad for you, some of the best stories are locked away in shitty graphics.

1. No jetpack
2. No dildo whacking
3. No fat nigger on your back when chasing train
4. No driving school
5. Annoying stunt jumps

My problem with GTA 5 is entirely the direction they went with the multiplayer. In 4, me and my friends would just dick around in free mode, sometimes we would get tons of cops, sometimes we would kill each other, sometimes we would race, sometimes we would hit civilians, it was fun. Now you can't really do that in multiplayer, you can't just steal a car without getting cops constantly unless you paint it, you have to grind robbing convenience stores just to afford that, if you want a nice car, you have to buy it and then you have to be careful not to destroy it. You can't just get a rocket launcher, you have to grind to level up and buy ammo for it.

You can't just mess around and blow shit up anymore, if they just had a free mode where everything was unlocked and you wouldn't have to deal with other people like they did in GTA 4 it would be fine, but we don't even play 5 anymore because it doesn't have a fun multiplayer.

I really don't give a single fuck about graphics, that's not where I'm coming from. If the game is good (story or mechanics) I will play it.

The point where I am coming from is more of a comparison. Let's say....watch dogs for example. If you put a similar video like this one, but from watch dogs, it would be burned to hell, because the physics are so bad and the game is bad because of this

But not GTA, no. When it comes to GTA, it has no mistakes. At all. Ever. And if you think so, you are wrong, no question.

Don't get me wrong, Watch_Dogs is far from perfect, but it's also far from unplayably terrible. GTA 5 is a good game, but it's not a "perfect gift from the gods, oh my god look at this flawless game"

good job avoiding the question you pleb
I remember game breaking glitches in GTA 3, Vice City, and San Andreas
a shit ton

My main problem with watchdogs is the main character is boring.
I think most of the bad reviews came from the fact that they promised and showed everyone a game that they did not deliver when it was announced at E3.
Rockstar never promised anything they did not deliver on in gta 5, and people expected the glitchy things because rockstar make sure to add or more leave things like the swingset of doom as easter eggs, because things like that are fun.

No one ever said GTA was flawless, no one ever said it has BEAM NG driving physics either.
Really GTA just is what it is, and that is a great game, most games can not offer you 100+ hours of game play without an online mode, and GTA manages to do it without side quests simply by making shit like this fun to do.

Oh people said GTA is flawless.... a lot...

I see your points and I am not saying GTA is not a great game, but I still have my own opinion on the thing and I respect yours.

that's all I gotta say about it

On a side note, imthepunkkid, do you feel like your point of him being wrong is more valid if you thumb down all of his comments without reading them?
But then idkwhatiexpected.jpeg
I mean dat name, you go girl.

And on what premise do you assume i did not read his comments?

Im assuming because assumptions are great.
Look now i have a new friend to talk to, thanks to assumptions.

You're so unfinished

this is wat he refers to

Thank you. Itachijebest and cocainrain too.

this is wat he refers to

or it'll make you throw up, but it's fun to find out