Login or register
Login or register
Login / Create Account
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Click to Create Account
Login to FJ
Stay logged in
Click to Login
Log in/Sign with Facebook.
Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
Rank #23477 on Subscribers
Level 322 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Send mail to ishalltroll
Invite ishalltroll to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Content Level Progress:
Level 108 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 109 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress:
Level 322 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 323 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
****** aint **** but bitches n' hoes
What people say about ishalltroll
latest user's comments
- I seriously hope this is bait
- "Women can usually handle more pain." A ********…
- Not really underestimating them, women are proven to ******* s…
No true look up the Russian women snipers of WWII. They were better then the men.
Ehh that's not fact, just stories and legends.
Take the Sandinista revolution of Nicaragua then.
Before the revolution began, the Somoza regime was going around in houses, and killing would-be uprisers and their sons Best Korea style. Out of vengeance for their sons, brothers, and fathers, most of the women of these incidents decided to join the Sandino revolutionaries. The fighting force was comprised of somewhere around 30% women in it I believe, as opposed to the better-armed and probably all-male national guards. Spoiler Alert, the Sandies won.
No its not
This bitch had 309 confirmed kills. I even remeber watching a doco where this chick had her FUCKING JAW shot off and just picked up her gun and killed the guy.
Also that link didnt lead to anything
take the full stop off the end.
Yeah but thats one chick
There were plenty more then one. Just because women are weaker when it comes to strength doesn't mean anything about combat (not today). Women can usually handle more pain.
"Women can usually handle more pain."
A bullshit myth drawn up because women keep boasting about "muh birth-pains"
- But what's the point? You can still park like a ****** normal …
I'm just saying there's no need to throw a fit if there's plenty of spots
has deleted their comment.
- Exactly how long have you ******* even known this guy? I s…
Rest In Peace Satoru Iwata
- >Implying anybody gives half a **** about Nintendo anymore
Rest In Peace Satoru Iwata
damn troll, get the fuck off the road.
Yeah? I'm implying nobody gives a fuck about you either, quit shit posting during your computer time at the orphanage you asshole.
Exactly how long have you niggers even known this guy?
I swear at least 80% of the people who are going full weeaboo right now haven't heard of this guy til yesterday, yet because it's the hip thing to do everybody is jumping on the bandwagon as if crying about this dude will transport them into the fantastic world of anime waifus
>implying this has to do with Nintendo
- Holy **** it actually works
Playing GTA in real life
- Like most strong weapons tanks are at the foremost a deterrent…
german Selfie Stick
I was thinking that tanks looked rather vulnerable and move too slowly to have practical use in today's era of warfare.
The Leopard 2 (the MBT for Canada, and Germany, in the gif above) can reach speeds of up to (and sometimes over) 72 km/h (45 mph). Her gun is a 120 mm smoothbore which has an effective firing range of up to 8 km's (5 miles) away. Which is actually further than the eye can see (on flat ground) due to the circumference of the earth. The engine puts out just shy of 1500 hp and has an operational range of roughly 550 km (340 mi) with 1,200 liters (317 US gallons) of fuel. (Granted, that's pretty bad fuel economy, at less than 1mpg. But hey, it's a tank.) The armor is VERY strong. So vulnerability is only called into question against specialist 'tank killer' troops. Such as a Javalin, or another tank with a bigger gun.
The US have their Abrams, the British have the Challenger 2. All tanks are very similar in specs. Almost balancing each other out. (Challenger 2; slow, but well supplied and armored. Abrams; Fast, but a little thinner on the armor. Also, very customizable. Leopard; As fast as the Abrams, if not moreso. The Leopard has a slight advantage over all aspects, with it being a multi-national project. On paper, in price, and in specs, it's the superior tank. But, it hasn't had nearly the same amount of field experience/testing as the others.)
Are they practical? Oh hell yeah. Each one of these tanks can be modified for a HUGE variety of uses. From shooting things you cant even see, laying down bridges, demolition work, and even clearing minefields. They are awesome machines. In the literal sense of the word.
One of my favourite haiku's;
last drop of oil
will be burnt by a tank, in
a war over it.
These beasts are definitely here to stay! And I'm damn proud to be in a position to run one.
Remember, comerades, we are tank!
They take out treads, we artillery!
They take out cannon, we pillbox!
They take out turret, we bunker!
They take out armor, we heroes!
- Maisie Williams likely takes hard drugs on a semi-regular leve…
it happens one chapter...
- Germany, you know the poster-child country of the EU, still ha…
Shit, really? So you can make more porn of people shitting on eachother than the rest of the world combined, but gays being legally together is bad...
Show Comments (29)