What isenseven said. Persistence and determination have nothing to do with getting in bed with a certain girl, and that should not be your definition of success. You're the sentimental boy who believes the nice guy should always get the girl. You completely misinterpret the picture based on this fantasy.
True, hard work and determination do not always lead to success, but don't equate this to something as childish as the 'friend zone'

"You're the sentimental boy who believes the nice guy should always get the girl."

I do not believe this at all, in fact my original post was pointing out to futility of them trying to do so. This retard above is just trying to paint me as a "friend zone sympathizer" or something because he needs an argument fix and is more interested in listening to himself talk than actual reading what I'm saying. In reality the friend zone thing was just a TERM that I used to describe a situation as a SINGULAR EXAMPLE, and you've both missed the point of what I was originally saying, which was that sometimes, persistence and determination get you nowhere.

You did equate success to getting the girl, since your argument is that persistence does not lead to success.
Your singular example is utter bullshit, since getting in bed with a girl is not success, and you should have chosen a more significant and less pathetic example to iterate your point.

Fine, so you think the example is bad. Don't really care, not the point, and your interpretation of what I think of the idea of "friendzoning" is still wrong.

ok, so, if I'm not mistaken, what you're saying is that persistence and determination do not equate to success. which, forgetting the whole "friend zone" thing, basically means that you don't think you should try hard at anything and have everything handed to you on a silver platter right? Well good luck getting anywhere in life with that belief.

Equally stupid interpretation. The original comic says that persistence and determination are "omnipotent", implying that they always work and you never need anything else. That's completely wrong for obvious reasons. But of course just because persistence doesn't work 100% of the time doesn't mean you should never try at anything. Not everyone is so braindead as to think of "trying" as black and white like that.

You are totally missing the point arguing about these useless semantics. I could really care less what you call what's commonly referred to as friend zoned. What I said was about persistence, not about your retarded 12-year-old labels.

So defensive. You really need to take a step back and review the person you are, if you're getting this upset with someone who's not upset at all, you must be a very unpleasant person to be around.

Okay, so you don't believe persistence and determination is the key to success? Let me put this in the terms of this friend zoned situation then.

When a guy meets a girl that he knows he liked, doesn't act upon his feelings, and tries to manipulate her into a friendship that he hopes will lead into a relationship, that's not determination.

When a guy then gets upset that she doesn't want to date him because he made her believe that he just wanted to be her friend, when in reality he wanted to trick her into a relationship, that's not persistence.

Voila.

What isenseven said. Persistence and determination have nothing to do with getting in bed with a certain girl, and that should not be your definition of success. You're the sentimental boy who believes the nice guy should always get the girl. You completely misinterpret the picture based on this fantasy.
True, hard work and determination do not always lead to success, but don't equate this to something as childish as the 'friend zone'

"You're the sentimental boy who believes the nice guy should always get the girl."

I do not believe this at all, in fact my original post was pointing out to futility of them trying to do so. This retard above is just trying to paint me as a "friend zone sympathizer" or something because he needs an argument fix and is more interested in listening to himself talk than actual reading what I'm saying. In reality the friend zone thing was just a TERM that I used to describe a situation as a SINGULAR EXAMPLE, and you've both missed the point of what I was originally saying, which was that sometimes, persistence and determination get you nowhere.

You did equate success to getting the girl, since your argument is that persistence does not lead to success.
Your singular example is utter bullshit, since getting in bed with a girl is not success, and you should have chosen a more significant and less pathetic example to iterate your point.

Fine, so you think the example is bad. Don't really care, not the point, and your interpretation of what I think of the idea of "friendzoning" is still wrong.

ok, so, if I'm not mistaken, what you're saying is that persistence and determination do not equate to success. which, forgetting the whole "friend zone" thing, basically means that you don't think you should try hard at anything and have everything handed to you on a silver platter right? Well good luck getting anywhere in life with that belief.

Equally stupid interpretation. The original comic says that persistence and determination are "omnipotent", implying that they always work and you never need anything else. That's completely wrong for obvious reasons. But of course just because persistence doesn't work 100% of the time doesn't mean you should never try at anything. Not everyone is so braindead as to think of "trying" as black and white like that.

Also, don't try to greentext on funnyjunk, it just makes you look like a tool.

> implying all you have to do is try with a girl and she will always like you

You're exactly the kind of gullible moron that this comic is geared towards. Sometimes she just isn't interested, just like sometimes you're just not smart enough, or just not "people-oriented" (manipulative) enough, or just not fit enough, or just not educated enough, and other than the first one, I'm not just talking about girls.

Haha, right to the insults. Classy.

Most guys who are "friend zoned" are guys who have always intended on dating a girl, but thought that their chances would increase if they were really good friends to them first. They think "oh, they'll see how nice of a person I am and for sure date me."

If you ask a girl out and she just isn't interested, and you don't meet her standard, that's not being "friend zoned," my friend, that's called being rejected.

You are totally missing the point arguing about these useless semantics. I could really care less what you call what's commonly referred to as friend zoned. What I said was about persistence, not about your retarded 12-year-old labels.

So defensive. You really need to take a step back and review the person you are, if you're getting this upset with someone who's not upset at all, you must be a very unpleasant person to be around.

Okay, so you don't believe persistence and determination is the key to success? Let me put this in the terms of this friend zoned situation then.

When a guy meets a girl that he knows he liked, doesn't act upon his feelings, and tries to manipulate her into a friendship that he hopes will lead into a relationship, that's not determination.

When a guy then gets upset that she doesn't want to date him because he made her believe that he just wanted to be her friend, when in reality he wanted to trick her into a relationship, that's not persistence.

Voila.

What isenseven said. Persistence and determination have nothing to do with getting in bed with a certain girl, and that should not be your definition of success. You're the sentimental boy who believes the nice guy should always get the girl. You completely misinterpret the picture based on this fantasy.
True, hard work and determination do not always lead to success, but don't equate this to something as childish as the 'friend zone'

"You're the sentimental boy who believes the nice guy should always get the girl."

I do not believe this at all, in fact my original post was pointing out to futility of them trying to do so. This retard above is just trying to paint me as a "friend zone sympathizer" or something because he needs an argument fix and is more interested in listening to himself talk than actual reading what I'm saying. In reality the friend zone thing was just a TERM that I used to describe a situation as a SINGULAR EXAMPLE, and you've both missed the point of what I was originally saying, which was that sometimes, persistence and determination get you nowhere.

You did equate success to getting the girl, since your argument is that persistence does not lead to success.
Your singular example is utter bullshit, since getting in bed with a girl is not success, and you should have chosen a more significant and less pathetic example to iterate your point.

Fine, so you think the example is bad. Don't really care, not the point, and your interpretation of what I think of the idea of "friendzoning" is still wrong.

ok, so, if I'm not mistaken, what you're saying is that persistence and determination do not equate to success. which, forgetting the whole "friend zone" thing, basically means that you don't think you should try hard at anything and have everything handed to you on a silver platter right? Well good luck getting anywhere in life with that belief.

Equally stupid interpretation. The original comic says that persistence and determination are "omnipotent", implying that they always work and you never need anything else. That's completely wrong for obvious reasons. But of course just because persistence doesn't work 100% of the time doesn't mean you should never try at anything. Not everyone is so braindead as to think of "trying" as black and white like that.

Also, don't try to greentext on funnyjunk, it just makes you look like a tool.

Yep, you fucked me right in the ass with that one.

Next time at least have the courtesy to use lube.

Congrats?

That's right, you're my bitch now.

Yep, you fucked me right in the ass with that one.

Next time at least have the courtesy to use lube.

Someone sounds a little butt hurt.

...Oh okay, I guess I was mistaken.

Well, someone's a little upset there. What's got you so angry little guy?

Boy that escalated quickly.

No it didn't.

...Oh okay, I guess I was mistaken.

Ya don't say?

Fucking retard

Well, someone's a little upset there. What's got you so angry little guy?

Boy that escalated quickly.

No it didn't.

...Oh okay, I guess I was mistaken.

Everyone's focused on O'reilly, not trump.

What I was attempting to say was that the games didn't feel linear. They didn't feel like an extension of story, like they should have been, but rather the same game over and over. I used the endings as a small example. You can look through all three games and find the exact same events occurring with simply different people. They even occur at roughly the same time they occurred in the games before. It's not like other saga's where they use the same style to keep consistency, it's liking reading a book then reading the sequel, only to realize you're actually reading the same thing almost word for word, but with a different title.

have you not read the dozens and dozens of comments on your picture from people saying that these pictures WERE, in fact, funny and clever

what is more horrible then women's logic is when the said woman think you are gay...

the shit they say to me... I don't even know sometimes... I've heard shit so dumb I think it killed my brain a little.

it may sound a bit sexciest but, that shit wasn't funny at all... I mean like even if I didn't have a dick that wouldn't have been funny

women logic, man.

what is more horrible then women's logic is when the said woman think you are gay...

the shit they say to me... I don't even know sometimes... I've heard shit so dumb I think it killed my brain a little.