Upload
Login or register

isenseven

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:1/11/2011
Last Login:4/08/2016
Location:Toronto Ontario
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 34719 total,  38216 ,  3497
Comment Thumbs: 2805 total,  3618 ,  813
Content Level Progress: 80.4% (804/1000)
Level 233 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 234 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz
Comment Level Progress: 65% (65/100)
Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:25
Content Views:420993
Times Content Favorited:528 times
Total Comments Made:766
FJ Points:4427

Rewards

latest user's comments

#58 - The reason why I think it's a terrible idea is because it's so…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/20/2015 on 'Trust Issues' the game +1
#70 - anon (07/20/2015) [-]
What if it's all dudes and only one is gay?

Seems to depend on the people involved, like usual.
User avatar
#76 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
No one would play a game like this if it was all guys. The point of a game like this is to get some action.
#510 - Ah, yes. You're right. Mentally disabled people have never con…  [+] (8 new replies) 07/20/2015 on Unpopular Opinion Puffin -1
User avatar
#514 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
There's a difference between "disabled" and "psychological disorders".
So don't try to play that game.
User avatar
#515 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
Whoops, sorry I forgot that people like to pick and choose when it comes to "mentally disabled" because it doesn't fit with their agenda.

So how do you determine we go about doing this? We wait until someone becomes 18 to find out if they're able to develop into a functioning adult? Or we kill them when they're 12?
User avatar
#517 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
>Agenda

And waiting until someone's 18 to test how they can fare on their own has been a thing for quite some time now.
User avatar
#577 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
In what first world country do we kill people after they turn 18?
User avatar
#578 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
"We wait until someone becomes 18 to find out if they're able to develop into a functioning adult"

If they're not ready, they'll die sooner rather than later.
User avatar
#592 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
This logic is so flawed.

So you will let someone live their lives for 18 years, and then if they can't do something to benefit society, then we kill them? They would still be a "burden" for 18 years, the people that care for them and know them will gain attachment. All this is going to do is make people who want to keep their children (because of this weird thing called love) into criminals because they will obviously try to find a way to hide them.

Even assuming everyone was willing to kill these 18 year olds. What about other people that require assistance to live their lives? What about people without limbs? Surely they, too, are "burdens" on society.

We should also murder people who aren't tall, because they ruin the gene pool. I'm 6'0, so I'm good. I'm not so sure about you.
User avatar
#593 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
It's not.
I didn't say anything about killing anyone, euthanizing something is different (also this is supposed to happen in the future-to-come, excluding our own lifetimes, respectively).
Also remember when you cherry-picked earlier and instead of you taking away the fact that I said don't contribute anything to society, you went on with a list about famous people that have obviously contributed something that had mental disorders?
User avatar
#610 - isenseven (07/21/2015) [-]
Haha what? Are YOU disabled?

It's not cherry picking when you say "Mentally challenged people haven't contributed anything to society" and I give you a list of people that have contributed to society and are mentally disabled. That is called proving you wrong.

>I didn't say anything about killing anyone, euthanizing something is different

No, it's not different. Euthanasia is a fancy word for killing something. You are suggesting that we take someone who has already lived for 18 years and we end their lives. That is murder.
#53 - This is a terrible idea.  [+] (4 new replies) 07/20/2015 on 'Trust Issues' the game -1
#57 - anon (07/20/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**Well you're fun at parties.
User avatar
#58 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
The reason why I think it's a terrible idea is because it's so obvious what the questions are, and they aren't even original.

All the questions could easily be replaced with the question: "Who do you want to hook up with?"


Very boring game.
#70 - anon (07/20/2015) [-]
What if it's all dudes and only one is gay?

Seems to depend on the people involved, like usual.
User avatar
#76 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
No one would play a game like this if it was all guys. The point of a game like this is to get some action.
#492 - OP, are you 15, or do you just not know how the world works? …  [+] (10 new replies) 07/20/2015 on Unpopular Opinion Puffin -2
User avatar
#500 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
You forgot to mention what mentally disabled people contribute to society.
oh wait
that's right
they don't
User avatar
#510 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
Ah, yes. You're right. Mentally disabled people have never contributed anything to society.

Except for:

Albert Einstein, Amadeus Mozart - Autism

Abraham Lincoln - Melancholia

Ben Stiller, Buzz Aldrin, Drew Carey, Jim Carrey, Billy Joel, Diana Princess of Wales, Ludwig Van Beethoven, Kurt Cobain, Winston Churchill - Mood Disorders (Depression, Anxiety, Bi-polar)

David Beckham, Dr. Samuel Johnson, Howard Hughes, Tim Howard - Tourettes/OCD

Gilbert M. Gaul, Judy Woodruff, Jean Driscoll, Van Smith, Rene Kirby - Spina Bifida

Abbey Nicole Curran, Chris Fonseca, Chris Nolan, Eric Gores, Jerry Traylor, Lawrence Carter-Long, RJ Mitte, Stephen Hopkins - Cerebral Palsy

Vincent van Gogh, Sir Isaac Newton, Neil Young, Charles Dickens, Alexander the Great, Alfred Nobel, Michelangelo, Leonardo Da Vinci, Julius Caesar, Edgar Allen Poe, Aristotle, Theodore Roosevelt, George Frederick Handel - Epilepsy

Alexander Graham Bell, Tom Cruise, Walt Disney, Whoopi Goldberg - Dyslexia


I could go on for pages, this is just a very small amount of people that I picked out from a quick good search. OP says that people who are "mentally challenged" should be murdered. Well, at what point do we murder them? Before or after they make great contributions to the world?


Also, he's started backpedaling saying that he only means people who are dependent on other people to survive and take care of them. Still, that would include some of the greatest people in the world. The first that comes to mind is Stephen Hawking.
User avatar
#514 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
There's a difference between "disabled" and "psychological disorders".
So don't try to play that game.
User avatar
#515 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
Whoops, sorry I forgot that people like to pick and choose when it comes to "mentally disabled" because it doesn't fit with their agenda.

So how do you determine we go about doing this? We wait until someone becomes 18 to find out if they're able to develop into a functioning adult? Or we kill them when they're 12?
User avatar
#517 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
>Agenda

And waiting until someone's 18 to test how they can fare on their own has been a thing for quite some time now.
User avatar
#577 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
In what first world country do we kill people after they turn 18?
User avatar
#578 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
"We wait until someone becomes 18 to find out if they're able to develop into a functioning adult"

If they're not ready, they'll die sooner rather than later.
User avatar
#592 - isenseven (07/20/2015) [-]
This logic is so flawed.

So you will let someone live their lives for 18 years, and then if they can't do something to benefit society, then we kill them? They would still be a "burden" for 18 years, the people that care for them and know them will gain attachment. All this is going to do is make people who want to keep their children (because of this weird thing called love) into criminals because they will obviously try to find a way to hide them.

Even assuming everyone was willing to kill these 18 year olds. What about other people that require assistance to live their lives? What about people without limbs? Surely they, too, are "burdens" on society.

We should also murder people who aren't tall, because they ruin the gene pool. I'm 6'0, so I'm good. I'm not so sure about you.
User avatar
#593 - theugandanhero (07/20/2015) [-]
It's not.
I didn't say anything about killing anyone, euthanizing something is different (also this is supposed to happen in the future-to-come, excluding our own lifetimes, respectively).
Also remember when you cherry-picked earlier and instead of you taking away the fact that I said don't contribute anything to society, you went on with a list about famous people that have obviously contributed something that had mental disorders?
User avatar
#610 - isenseven (07/21/2015) [-]
Haha what? Are YOU disabled?

It's not cherry picking when you say "Mentally challenged people haven't contributed anything to society" and I give you a list of people that have contributed to society and are mentally disabled. That is called proving you wrong.

>I didn't say anything about killing anyone, euthanizing something is different

No, it's not different. Euthanasia is a fancy word for killing something. You are suggesting that we take someone who has already lived for 18 years and we end their lives. That is murder.
#78 - >dank >meme choose one. 07/20/2015 on Dashcon 2 +4
#270 - Yeah, OP. Let's just kill all the people that are born cripple… 07/16/2015 on Unfavorable Bird Meme +5
#34 - Hahahahaha no one cares about the comics made on this site. Th… 07/13/2015 on It was easy 0
#197 - Something tells me you don't know what the word "public&q… 07/13/2015 on AND REMEMBER IT! +1
#305 - This is incredibly misleading. A majority of the notes you see… 07/07/2015 on i wish i could play 0
#24 - I know you think people will see this as being quirky or funny…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/29/2015 on I want to do adult things... -5
#122 - anon (06/29/2015) [-]
That includes you, retard .
User avatar
#85 - lecorbi (06/29/2015) [-]
His lubricated dingoling begs to differ
User avatar
#84 - bronywiseman (06/29/2015) [-]
he peen say no
User avatar
#79 - frankstein (06/29/2015) [-]
His partially damp gentlemen's sausage finds your argument invalid.
#66 - anon (06/29/2015) [-]
The moistened genitalia of his disagrees.
User avatar
#38 - tinglyturtletaint (06/29/2015) [-]
his wet dick says otherwise
#26 - kwanzalord (06/29/2015) [-]
my wet dick says otherwise