Upload
Login or register
x

internetexplain

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/03/2014
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7911
Comment Ranking:#898
Highest Content Rank:#631
Highest Comment Rank:#13
Content Thumbs: 5318 total,  5992 ,  674
Comment Thumbs: 88874 total,  99619 ,  10745
Content Level Progress: 49% (49/100)
Level 141 Content: Faptastic → Level 142 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 32.6% (326/1000)
Level 365 Comments: FJ Noble → Level 366 Comments: FJ Noble
Subscribers:15
Content Views:299351
Times Content Favorited:446 times
Total Comments Made:10294
FJ Points:69482
Favorite Tags: niggers (17) | OC (11) | Pokemon (11)

latest user's comments

#15 - you mean WHO is Earnest Appreciation.  [+] (4 new replies) 12/18/2015 on Dad joke killer +2
#18 - selfdenyingbeggar (12/18/2015) [-]
Ok. Go!
User avatar
#19 - internetexplain (12/18/2015) [-]
It's a guy called Earnest , who was born into the family of Appreciation.

Earnest didn't appreciate his name , because people kept summoning him , even though they didn't mean to.
eventually Mr.Appreciation went insane and committed sudoku.
Legend has it that he still hasn't solved a single one in over 400 years.
#28 - selfdenyingbeggar (12/18/2015) [-]
k... I'm jnot confused at all.
#26 - imjared (12/18/2015) [-]
i have an earnest appreciation for this
#28 - **internetexplain used "*roll 1, 0-9*"** **internetexplain … 12/18/2015 on Old shit. 0
#27 - Comment deleted 12/18/2015 on Old shit. 0
#26 - Comment deleted 12/18/2015 on Old shit. 0
#118 - actually it's pronounced Jai-gan-tick  [+] (2 new replies) 12/18/2015 on gif Jraphics Interchange... +1
#139 - erawrozar (12/18/2015) [-]
Probably didn't explain it well, but that was my point lol, according to their logic, it'd be "Guy-gan-tick".
User avatar
#169 - MRGIR (12/18/2015) [-]
that doesn't fall under "our" logic. it would be if you said gigantic was pronounced "GIG-Gantic" since a gigabyte is pronoucned "GIG-AH-BITE".
But in all honesty who cares i personally was just making a joke. it's a tom-ay-to tom-ah-to situation to me
#46 - he traced **** like 2 times or something and now it's a meme. 12/18/2015 on That should do it +2
#5 - doesn't make the post less edgy m8  [+] (1 new reply) 12/17/2015 on The feels... -4
User avatar
#6 - thefates (12/17/2015) [-]
It really does. It's clearly satirically making fun of posts that follow that mamby pamby set-up.
#3 - be careful not to cut yourself on that edge  [+] (4 new replies) 12/17/2015 on The feels... -4
#8 - deadbottle (12/17/2015) [-]
Not that edgy seeing as though all of the attributes they put in the post are addressed in the show.
User avatar
#4 - thefates (12/17/2015) [-]
Read the last one.
User avatar
#5 - internetexplain (12/17/2015) [-]
doesn't make the post less edgy m8
User avatar
#6 - thefates (12/17/2015) [-]
It really does. It's clearly satirically making fun of posts that follow that mamby pamby set-up.
#54 - I can pee pee robot no can pee pee checkm8  [+] (1 new reply) 12/17/2015 on Fallout 4 in a nutshell +17
#192 - anon (12/17/2015) [-]
There was no indication that synths don't pee. Actual spoilers: Danse has been a member of the Brotherhood of Steel long for a while. You'd think he'd notice if he doesn't sleep/pee/eat for months. At least someone would notice.
#91 - just gotta wait til you can afford a plane to paint your weeb … 12/16/2015 on now go bomb somethin +1
#11 - 14 , the number you're looking for is 14 , it was 14 years ago. 12/15/2015 on Cartman on 9/11 +65
#5 - I (sa)cri(fice) every time 12/15/2015 on Review for the steam... +1
#46 - there's nothing in the red circle, what are you trying to show us m8? 12/15/2015 on Burger King +10
#29 - at least it's not a cispit 12/15/2015 on Wow +4
#121 - I don't see why someone WOULDN'T want that 12/15/2015 on comment here if you want a... 0
#89 - Too bad that I don't know what sarcasm is.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/14/2015 on well played, my liege +1
User avatar
#90 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
such a shame
#87 - let's just speculate on how long it's NOT going to take an…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/14/2015 on well played, my liege 0
User avatar
#88 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
you are a genius
User avatar
#89 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
Too bad that I don't know what sarcasm is.
User avatar
#90 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
such a shame
#85 - idk , aren't we theorizing on how long it would take black to …  [+] (5 new replies) 12/14/2015 on well played, my liege 0
User avatar
#86 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
it's what it's basically come to, yeah. at this point though, there are infinite numbers of combinations and patterns, so i don't think we could state with accuracy how long it'll take to finish.
User avatar
#87 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
let's just speculate on how long it's NOT going to take
and I'll just throw this out there, that this will not take 13 billion years.
User avatar
#88 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
you are a genius
User avatar
#89 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
Too bad that I don't know what sarcasm is.
User avatar
#90 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
such a shame
#83 - yes and assuming the black army is only 1 tile away from the w…  [+] (7 new replies) 12/14/2015 on well played, my liege 0
User avatar
#84 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
"assuming the black army is only 1 tile away from the whites"

but you can SEE they aren't. with that many spaces, i'd have enough room to deal with a massive chain of pawns. That shit isn't too difficult if it's just pawns, but you're thinking so close to the end that you've forgotten that it isn't there yet. either way, my original point was right that he wouldn't be in check, and you were right that the black side had more than just pawns. why are we arguing?
User avatar
#85 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
idk , aren't we theorizing on how long it would take black to take out white at this point?
User avatar
#86 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
it's what it's basically come to, yeah. at this point though, there are infinite numbers of combinations and patterns, so i don't think we could state with accuracy how long it'll take to finish.
User avatar
#87 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
let's just speculate on how long it's NOT going to take
and I'll just throw this out there, that this will not take 13 billion years.
User avatar
#88 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
you are a genius
User avatar
#89 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
Too bad that I don't know what sarcasm is.
User avatar
#90 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
such a shame
#81 - the black rook is right at the front , in a position where he …  [+] (9 new replies) 12/14/2015 on well played, my liege 0
User avatar
#82 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
The rook cannot move diagonally, only an unspecified number of spaces in one straight direction. Therefore, if the rook happened to take the piece defending the king's side on his left, the king could take that rook piece anyways. Either way you look at it, the rook is too weak on it's own to put the king in check, because it needs to be one space away from the king, at which point it can take the rook.
User avatar
#83 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
yes and assuming the black army is only 1 tile away from the whites , merely sending 1 peasant forward is gonna put him in check, because you lured him out prior by sacrificing your rook.

White would then be forced to either move the king or attack the black peasant , which in either case is going to open white up to even more attacks from black.

soon after, it's checkmate.
User avatar
#84 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
"assuming the black army is only 1 tile away from the whites"

but you can SEE they aren't. with that many spaces, i'd have enough room to deal with a massive chain of pawns. That shit isn't too difficult if it's just pawns, but you're thinking so close to the end that you've forgotten that it isn't there yet. either way, my original point was right that he wouldn't be in check, and you were right that the black side had more than just pawns. why are we arguing?
User avatar
#85 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
idk , aren't we theorizing on how long it would take black to take out white at this point?
User avatar
#86 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
it's what it's basically come to, yeah. at this point though, there are infinite numbers of combinations and patterns, so i don't think we could state with accuracy how long it'll take to finish.
User avatar
#87 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
let's just speculate on how long it's NOT going to take
and I'll just throw this out there, that this will not take 13 billion years.
User avatar
#88 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
you are a genius
User avatar
#89 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
Too bad that I don't know what sarcasm is.
User avatar
#90 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
such a shame
#77 - actually m8 the black army has a rook and a bishop with them ,…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/14/2015 on well played, my liege 0
User avatar
#80 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
They aren't positioned in the right areas to put him in check, so it's still not relevant.
User avatar
#81 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
the black rook is right at the front , in a position where he could take out the far-right (left from white's view point) peasant , breaking the white king's defense.

So I'd say it is relevant.
User avatar
#82 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
The rook cannot move diagonally, only an unspecified number of spaces in one straight direction. Therefore, if the rook happened to take the piece defending the king's side on his left, the king could take that rook piece anyways. Either way you look at it, the rook is too weak on it's own to put the king in check, because it needs to be one space away from the king, at which point it can take the rook.
User avatar
#83 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
yes and assuming the black army is only 1 tile away from the whites , merely sending 1 peasant forward is gonna put him in check, because you lured him out prior by sacrificing your rook.

White would then be forced to either move the king or attack the black peasant , which in either case is going to open white up to even more attacks from black.

soon after, it's checkmate.
User avatar
#84 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
"assuming the black army is only 1 tile away from the whites"

but you can SEE they aren't. with that many spaces, i'd have enough room to deal with a massive chain of pawns. That shit isn't too difficult if it's just pawns, but you're thinking so close to the end that you've forgotten that it isn't there yet. either way, my original point was right that he wouldn't be in check, and you were right that the black side had more than just pawns. why are we arguing?
User avatar
#85 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
idk , aren't we theorizing on how long it would take black to take out white at this point?
User avatar
#86 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
it's what it's basically come to, yeah. at this point though, there are infinite numbers of combinations and patterns, so i don't think we could state with accuracy how long it'll take to finish.
User avatar
#87 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
let's just speculate on how long it's NOT going to take
and I'll just throw this out there, that this will not take 13 billion years.
User avatar
#88 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
you are a genius
User avatar
#89 - internetexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
Too bad that I don't know what sarcasm is.
User avatar
#90 - sciencexplain (12/14/2015) [-]
such a shame
#252 - gold 12/14/2015 on Make Christmas Hats +1
#4 - **internetexplain used "*roll picture*"** **internetexplain… 12/14/2015 on oblivion is love +1
#9 - CRAWLING IN MY SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN 12/13/2015 on Fucking cringeworthy +2
#8 - Pearl harbour.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/13/2015 on You guys really need Trump +7
#10 - htmm (12/14/2015) [-]
The more you attack us the stronger we get.

Comments(278):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 278 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
77 comments displayed.
#336 - anon (10/18/2015) [-]
Nazi German faggot
User avatar #335 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/08/2015) [-]
tot
aufwiedersehen
#334 - theoldfritz (09/24/2015) [-]
Deus Vult
User avatar #332 - systemattic (09/15/2015) [-]
You´re not even na original themed account

You're just a leech on someone's else idea

You're pathetic

******* faggot
#333 to #332 - internetexplain (09/15/2015) [-]
**internetexplain used "*roll picture*"**
**internetexplain rolled image**

Rage harder faggot.
#329 - jonnyfrosty (08/02/2015) [-]
He, Sie! Ja, Sie! Was denken Sie was Sie da tun, so ganz ohne Hosen, hm? Erklären Sie sich
User avatar #330 to #329 - internetexplain (08/02/2015) [-]
it's midnight , I'm about to go to sleep to take a break from work.
I sweat a lot in the summer-sun , enough for it to seep through my pants , so while I sleep I wash my pants , thus I can't wear them until they are dry.
User avatar #331 to #330 - jonnyfrosty (08/03/2015) [-]
Wenn du so schwitzt solltest du dir vielleicht eine Alternative zu deiner hautengen Lack- und Lederkleidung suchen, die du normalerweise trägst. Ich mein ja nur
#328 - syrianassassinsoul (07/20/2015) [-]
Hitler died for THIS!
User avatar #327 to #322 - internetexplain (06/08/2015) [-]
top lel m8
User avatar #311 - damping (05/27/2015) [-]
I told you America is a force of good.
#312 to #311 - rageblade (05/28/2015) [-]
no no
America is good at using force
User avatar #306 - posttwo (05/26/2015) [-]
I love you
User avatar #310 to #306 - internetexplain (05/27/2015) [-]
lol wat
what's going on in this thread?
#307 to #306 - administrator (05/26/2015) [-]
I love him too
User avatar #308 to #307 - admonistratur (05/26/2015) [-]
So do I
User avatar #295 - sciencexplain (05/24/2015) [-]
bro i need ur Skype username, it's super important
User avatar #296 to #295 - internetexplain (05/24/2015) [-]
King_Europe
location : antarctica
#301 to #300 - europe (05/24/2015) [-]
But what am I resisting
#303 to #302 - europe (05/24/2015) [-]
Well maybe if you'd take me to a nice restaurant for once
#304 to #303 - internetexplain (05/24/2015) [-]
but all the fancy restaurants are IN you, there aren't any decent ones in the rest of the world , and I can't afford any of them to begin with.
User avatar #265 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
Do you like Merkel?
User avatar #266 to #265 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
no , but as a german comedian put it

" as long as this woman is alive , let's just stop voting and let her pick her coalition partner "
User avatar #267 to #266 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
She's got a 70% approval rating. That is unheard of in the US.
User avatar #270 to #267 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
and frankly , if she's doing nothing , she can't do anything wrong.
that and her antics of " we must find a solution together " on every issue
User avatar #271 to #270 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
Nothing get's done in the US either, and we aren't exactly happy about it.
User avatar #268 to #267 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Well here is the thing , I don't like her , but I can't say she's making bad decisions , in fact , as I see it and most people as well , she isn't doing **** and becomes exceedingly efficient at it.
User avatar #269 to #268 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
She is a bigger flip-flopper than Mitt Romney. That is why she always seems like she is on the right side.
User avatar #272 to #269 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
yes , exactly.

another quote from the same comedian :

" When an angry mob stands in front of Merkel , raging and yelling at her , she just turns around and goes like ' hehe they're backing me ' "
User avatar #273 to #272 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
Which angry mobs? All this stuff about the BND, and the Fourteen Eyes, and Germany and Merkel begging to be in the 5 Eyes. Merkel knew all along, and acted outraged when she found out her phone was being tapped. If you recall Germans in particular were the harshest when the whole Snowden thing came out towards the US. Claiming we are an evil empire and a 3rd world nation and whatever.

Then the whole thing with dropping Nuclear Power and moving to bituminous coal and acting like it is good for environment. Because the Earthqauke+Tsunami thing that happened in Japan is totally going to happen in Bavaria. And the German people eat it up.
User avatar #274 to #273 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Hypothetical angry mob , because metaphors bruh
User avatar #275 to #274 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
Germans remind me of a hivemind. Like a bunch of worker ants. They love doing work, don't question authority, are every efficient and society oriented. Like the perfect culture for communism ironically.

Unlike the US which is based on ruthless competition.
User avatar #277 to #275 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
ironically , because the Weimar Republic was established as opposed to the Spartacist Republic the rise of Hitler was even possible , because the Weimar republic had some really ****** laws regarding the Imperial President , like , you can see whose position he's replacing just by looking at his title , and he wielded a similar amount of power.
User avatar #279 to #277 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
If only Frederick Wilhelm the dumbass listened to Bismark and didn't piss off England. Or even asked for peace with Britain and France after you defeated the Russians.
User avatar #282 to #279 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
The real Problem here was actually Belgium's lack of cooperation.

Emperor Wilhelm II didn't want to face France at the maginot line , requested trespassing rights from the King of Belgium , was denied , and obsessed with Prestige as he was , attacked Belgium to get his way regardless , which forced Belgium's ally - the British Empire - who was formerly a supporter of Germany (despite the Navy issue) , into the war.
User avatar #276 to #275 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Well remember mein jude , germans invented communism , the only thing that stopped us from being communist after we exiled the emperor was just a single hour time difference between 2 guys calling out 2 different Republics , 1 being a capitalist democracy , the other a socialist democracy
User avatar #278 to #276 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
Too bad communism doesn't work though, because you will always have people taking advantage of the system for their own gain Merkel and her cronies. . Now of course, you will say that happens in capitalism too. But the difference is, that is an outright goal of capitalism, and everyone knows it is being done.

Face it, the US is the closest one can get to a Meritocracy on the planet right now.
User avatar #280 to #278 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Debatable , especially if you think about the ridiculous debt people make when they want to Study in the U.S , in Europe , specifically Germany and the Scandinavian countries , are encouraging people to study by funding their education.

Remember that , a meritocracy is a system that encourages and rewards effort and innovations , and I'd say a state that discourages higher education like you guys do , is the exact opposite of meritocracy
User avatar #287 to #280 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
My last exam of my college career is tomorrow. The US encourages and rewards efforts too. I go to a private school where the tuition is $55,000 a year. Because my parents are wealthy, I am graduating debt free. Every single one of my friends is getting tuition help from the University, in fact most don't have to pay tuition at all, just room and board.

If I went to my state University, I would only have to pay $8,000 a year. In fact, my dad said if I went there instead he would give me half the difference in cost, which would be around $80,000. But, my mom went here, and I have always loved this school and have always been a fan of the football team. I majored in Mechanical Engineering and I am going to be making $60,000 yearly plus bonus right out of school. Even if I had loans, I could pay them off easily. This system encourages useful majors.

Why should society have to pay for more English majors?
User avatar #288 to #287 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Lel , dat last one , sick burn m9

but anyway , arguing over the details aside , every industrial society is a meritocracy right now.
Sure , that can change once China becomes a 1st world country , but when that happens , there won't be enough resources left on the planet for China to sustain it for even 1 day.
User avatar #289 to #288 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
What? Are you an English Major?

And I wouldn't be so sure we are going to run out of resources.
User avatar #290 to #289 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Nah , I was serious , but any comment in way shape or form in my manner of speaking , would sound as if I was mocking you.

also , I'm pretty ******* sure we're running out of Resources.

Here is the deal with capitalism - to get more money , you need a greater production , to have a greater production you need more resources , the get more resources you need money.

fast forward 2 centuries of capitalism and industrialization

your state requires you to have infinite growth , because if you don't " muh economy is breaking down " and " recession , my god , recession , soon we will be greece "
and because of infinite growth , all industrial nations right now , require 40% of all resources just to sustain their standard of living.

Now imagine what happens when China AND India become industrial nations.
since the industrialized world amounts to about 1 billion people currently , China and India each would require another 40% of all of earth's resources to sustain a standard of living similar to our current one.

Where you gonna get dem 120% from ***** ?
User avatar #291 to #290 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
That is assuming technology doesn't reduce our consumption. I think you will find humans are very good at surviving.
User avatar #292 to #291 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
Indeed but unlike your assumption , mine isn't exactly far fetched.
Do you have any idea how often we ran out of resources in history?

Let's just say - very often.
User avatar #293 to #292 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
And yet, we are still here, consuming more and more.
User avatar #294 to #293 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
yes and since history will most likely repeat itself , we will solve that problem temporarily via another global war.
#284 to #281 - internetexplain (05/06/2015) [-]
**internetexplain used "*roll picture*"**
**internetexplain rolled image**

Wanna join in?
I'm sure you'll get more mentions in this thread soon enough.
User avatar #286 to #284 - europe (05/06/2015) [-]
I think I'll pass, thank you
User avatar #283 to #281 - damping (05/06/2015) [-]
Don't the notifications ever get old?
User avatar #285 to #283 - europe (05/06/2015) [-]
Eh, I'm used to it
User avatar #260 - xxDanvelxx (04/27/2015) [-]
Hey bby
User avatar #261 to #260 - internetexplain (04/27/2015) [-]
top ebin
User avatar #262 to #261 - xxDanvelxx (04/27/2015) [-]
you're a well butter my butt and call me a biscuit-y faggot
[ 278 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)