innocentbabies
Rank #247 on Comments
Level 312 Comments: Wizard Online
Send mail to innocentbabies Block innocentbabies Invite innocentbabies to be your friend 
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 1/11/2014 |
| Last Login: | 1/12/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #247 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #172 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 17256 total,
18461 ,
1205 |
| Content Level Progress: | 6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 55.3% (553/1000) Level 312 Comments: Wizard → Level 313 Comments: Wizard |
| Subscribers: | 1 |
| Total Comments Made: | 3116 |
| FJ Points: | 12552 |
user favorites
#jewlivesmatter
i just look...
If you order...
25 Killer...
Cool Psychology...
Pakalu Papito comp
Hits home
links to help you...
Replacing...
Last Year in Sciencelatest user's comments
| #94 - Those're cassowaries, not emus. Cassowaries are much nastier. | 4 minutes ago on No more dead dinosaurs | 0 |
| #112 - Oy, evilhomer, sticky this **** . | 11 hours ago on Don't stick your dick in crazy | +1 |
| #40 - Totally busted. Blowing stuff up makes you way more … | 11 hours ago on 'Murica | +14 |
| #36 - And soon, we may have real life, cool dinosaurs, too. | 11 hours ago on No more dead dinosaurs | +1 |
| #32 - Sharks are fish, dinosaurs are a clade of Archosaurs. | 11 hours ago on No more dead dinosaurs | +5 |
| #47 - Hey, that's us! | 11 hours ago on ARE YOU READY TO FUCKING LEARN | +7 |
| #171 - Yo dawg, I'll check it out. | 11 hours ago on Gus n' Al | 0 |
| #135 - 203, and the post will be on the front page for another 8 hours. | 11 hours ago on Western Rape Culture | +1 |
| #52 - Wow, dude, that was, ummm, pretty dark. You alright, buddy? [+] (1 new reply) | 12 hours ago on naw..but maybe | +1 |
| | ||
| #146 - Oh **** , me too, like, today apparently. | 12 hours ago on when you wait 2 years for a... | 0 |
user's friends
hackerpi
jonnyfrosty
mrmojito
watshisface Latest users (1): innocentbabies, anonymous(2).
Anonymous comments allowed.
7 comments displayed.
#3
-
anon (12/18/2015) [-]
You asked me "Yes, there is more than likely a historical figure who is the basis for the Biblical Jesus, what the hell does that have to do with anything right now?"
It was relevant to the thread an
It was relevant to the thread an
#4 to #3
-
innocentbabies ONLINE (12/18/2015) [-]
Right, I can see how a joke thread about Jesus and Star Wars really needed a discussion about the historicity of Jesus.
#5 to #4
-
anon (12/19/2015) [-]
(Pardon my poor sense of deciphering sarcastic statements from regular ones online.)
How can one confront the question of Jesus's humanity or divinity if one doesn't even think Jesus ever existed?
This may not imply for you, but most people I've met and a good portion of the population will ignore such evidence/discussions at the drop of a hat. So, being ambiguous, but relevant is very important.
Plus, the style of just stating facts is rather popular these days. from image compilations, YouTube, blogs and comments in general.
How can one confront the question of Jesus's humanity or divinity if one doesn't even think Jesus ever existed?
This may not imply for you, but most people I've met and a good portion of the population will ignore such evidence/discussions at the drop of a hat. So, being ambiguous, but relevant is very important.
Plus, the style of just stating facts is rather popular these days. from image compilations, YouTube, blogs and comments in general.
#6 to #5
-
innocentbabies ONLINE (12/21/2015) [-]
The problem is that nobody was posing the question of Jesus's humanity or divinity, and bringing it up at any chance you get just makes you look like an ass.
