Upload
Login or register
x

infinitereaper

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Youtube Channel: UltimateReaperStudio
Date Signed Up:2/18/2012
Last Login:1/14/2016
Location:United States
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#13
Comment Ranking:#255
Highest Content Rank:#5
Highest Comment Rank:#4
Content Thumbs: 978411 total,  1082938 ,  104527
Comment Thumbs: 211053 total,  248061 ,  37008
Content Level Progress: 55.47% (5547/10000)
Level 374 Content: Immortal → Level 375 Content: Immortal
Comment Level Progress: 14.05% (281/2000)
Level 435 Comments: There is no Escape → Level 436 Comments: There is no Escape
Subscribers:329
Content Views:50115582
Times Content Favorited:76030 times
Total Comments Made:33806
FJ Points:1582293
Favorite Tags: Anime (381) | manga (200) | the (184) | a (93) | of (87) | You (74) | funny (69) | to (65) | Girl (64) | i (59) | is (56) | best (53) | Pokemon (52) | Love (50) | on (50) | FUNNYJUNK (39) | and (38) | in (38) | attack (37) | Life (34)
Personality Type: INTJ
Dream: World Domination
Hobby: Energy Conservation

Rewards

latest user's comments

#89 - I was under the impression of the opposite in Japan actually, …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/21/2015 on The susepence must be... +3
User avatar
#96 - vladi (12/21/2015) [-]
One person once told me that in Japan, if you're drunk, you're not legally responsible for your actions. Dunno if it's true or not, but that's fucked up man.
#144 - Don't we have to wait another year for second cour tho?  [+] (1 new reply) 12/21/2015 on It Has The Power 0
User avatar
#145 - seamusmcmaximus (12/21/2015) [-]
I was pretty sure that they were just gonna delay the release of the continued series by one season.. Unless you're talking about Kizumono... then who knows
#142 - That last episode tho...  [+] (3 new replies) 12/21/2015 on It Has The Power +1
User avatar
#143 - seamusmcmaximus (12/21/2015) [-]
I know. I can't wait for the next one, Mayoi Hell
User avatar
#144 - infinitereaper (12/21/2015) [-]
Don't we have to wait another year for second cour tho?
User avatar
#145 - seamusmcmaximus (12/21/2015) [-]
I was pretty sure that they were just gonna delay the release of the continued series by one season.. Unless you're talking about Kizumono... then who knows
#242 - Kill yourself tumblr fag 12/21/2015 on Honest sexuality flags 0
#200 - anon you ******** , it literally means you can be attrac…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/20/2015 on Honest sexuality flags -2
#206 - anon (12/20/2015) [-]
Oh, christ, the biggest retard of Fj just HAD to show up.

No, it doesn't mean that at all. I guess that means heterosexual means you're attracted to your exact opposite. Homosexuals are attracted to their clones. Bisexuals are attracted to the number two.

Realise how dumb you sound yet?
User avatar
#242 - infinitereaper (12/21/2015) [-]
Kill yourself tumblr fag
#59 - This is exactly what I'm talking about. The "God of Gaps&… 12/20/2015 on Tony Stark asks the right... 0
#112 - hate this faggot but boy is he right 12/20/2015 on Congress to give NASA $19.3... 0
#93 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 12/20/2015 on (untitled) +4
#122 - anon Comment deleted by infinitereaper
#57 - That isn't evidence, it's false pattern recognition and wishfu…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/20/2015 on Tony Stark asks the right... 0
User avatar
#58 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
You accuse me of making huge leaps of logic, when science has no tenable explanation for how life began. Not only that, but all observed genetic mutations, even beneficial ones, have resulted in a loss, not a gain, of information.

Look, I'm not asking you to convert to my point of view or anything. I'm simply stating that if you want to take a truly scientific stance on this, you need to consider all the evidence before you draw your own conclusions. You're dismissing my points out of hand instead of taking an honest look. Alternatively, you're pointing to ignorant people who share my beliefs and claiming that therefore I must be ignorant too. I'm simply asking you to consider the evidence put forth by educated, well-reasoned people before you write off my entire viewpoint.

And here's one final point to consider: your claim that "Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions" is simply incorrect. If the universe was indeed created, it has profound implications. It means we aren't the ultimate authority in the universe, that there may be a purpose to our world, it may even mean there are morals or a way of life we should hold to. At the very least, it leads us to the discomforting conclusion that there are beings (or a being) in this universe vastly more powerful than us. I would submit to you that, in a way, you are just as biased on this topic as I, because if it does turn out a god does exist, it throws your entire way of life into question.

TL;DR: All I'm asking you to do is look at some evidence. Heck, if you want me to, I'll buy the book and sent it to your door. You can agree with it or not, but if you refuse to even consider it I don't think you can claim to have an objective or scientific opinion.
#59 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
This is exactly what I'm talking about. The "God of Gaps" will close in a matter of time. Sure, we don't know exactly how life began-yet. But there was also a time we didn't know whether or milky way was the entire universe or actually just one galaxy in a universe full of galaxies. We do have theories, such as organic matter forming chemically, binding, it is thought that all life first began when RNA formed and could replicate itself. If that is the case it was only a matter of time before DNA and cells formed. Loss of information? Creatures evolve through natural selection, and as far as we can tell become increasingly complex. RNA, DNA, cells, branching off into fungi, plants, animals, etc. Did you know that humans have 46 pairs of chromosomes? The Ophioglossum (a fern) has 1,260 pairs. It's not even about the DNA itself, it's how it's used.

I did consider your viewpoint, when I was 12. The conclusion was the same as it was then as it is now. There is absolutely no evidence for creationism, even less for religion, and current evidence suggests the opposite. The complexity of the universe exists because it just happens to be somewhat complex. That's all their is to it. A random roll of the dice. In fact, theoretical physics suggest that our universe could have easily come from nothing, according to Stephen hawking, or it could have been a collision of two "planes" which created the universe, or the big bang model, there are several theories.

Do you even realize the big bang model is the most successful and evidence backed and proven theories around there? It successfully predicts the critical density of the universe, background radiation maps match up, even the ratio of hydrogen to helium, inflation, etc. In the beginning, the forces of nature are thought to have frozen out from each other, for example electromagnetism and the weak force were once one force, and as the model goes all forces, including gravity where once a part of a superforce. Things only got "complicated" because it split up into many pieces and moving parts. You don't need a god for that.

There statistically, are higher beings in this universe, other lifeforms, some just as stupid to think their gods are just as real as some of ours. Some perhaps, closer to being gods than anyone else.

You are not special. This planet is not unique. Life isn't anything you could attribute to human values-life just is. things just are. The universe is mostly dark, 99.99% space. According to theoretical physics I've learned about, it's highly likely that our universe only exists because we got lucky.

For example, if you think of it like a radio, reality that is, there are an endless sea of frequencies, lets say each frequency is a plane of existence, all are slightly different, but a few can support atoms and matter and shit like in our own universe. this means that we just got lucky. 1 out of 100 frequencies might support life.

This is logical. Our universe itself only has a handful of planets that can support life under the right conditions, it's just pure chance. When the universe is so big, even the rarest of events ought to occur. It doesn't mean or prove anything other than luck.

What I need you to realize is that you're utterly delusional and full of nonsense. There is even evidence for dark matter, it's literally based upon the fact that orbital velocities of stars are highly uniform throughout a galaxy, meaning that, there's actually 75% more matter than we can even detect. It's a big ass mystery, but only because evidence exist.

there's not even a lick of evidence for creationism, because it can be explained with several other hypothesizes or models, in reality, you could claim anything is proof of anything, but like philosophy concluding that "rains generate worms" you're probably just sorely mistaken. Worms after rain is not proof that rain creates worms, in reality, rain saturates the soil which makes worms come above ground.

faulty logic
#161 - I will block nothing and no one, cuz I ain't a pussy ass bitch… 12/20/2015 on Block User's Content! 0
#5 - Comment deleted 12/20/2015 on glasses 0
#4 - Comment deleted 12/20/2015 on glasses +1
#53 - Science doesn't require faith; it requires evidence, relig…  [+] (4 new replies) 12/20/2015 on Tony Stark asks the right... -1
User avatar
#56 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
But that's exactly my point. From where I stand, it looks like the evidence is more in favor of a creator than life just spontaneously evolving. If you'd really like a good, honest look at the evidence, I'd strongly suggest the book "The Case for a Creator" by Lee Strobel. He used to be an atheist and a research journalist, but then decided to look at the evidence objectively as possible and ended up coming to the conclusion that the evidence points to the existence of God. It's not perfectly objective, but nothing ever is, and it's the most objective book I've seen on the topic.
User avatar
#57 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
That isn't evidence, it's false pattern recognition and wishful thinking. You people are so lost in your delusions you've lost the ability to make simple connections and that results in huge leaps of logic. Sorry, but all modern evidence points to no grand design, just the laws and forces of nature. Everything in science has at least some evidence, no newborn religion has even a lick. Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions. I suggest you think about that.
User avatar
#58 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
You accuse me of making huge leaps of logic, when science has no tenable explanation for how life began. Not only that, but all observed genetic mutations, even beneficial ones, have resulted in a loss, not a gain, of information.

Look, I'm not asking you to convert to my point of view or anything. I'm simply stating that if you want to take a truly scientific stance on this, you need to consider all the evidence before you draw your own conclusions. You're dismissing my points out of hand instead of taking an honest look. Alternatively, you're pointing to ignorant people who share my beliefs and claiming that therefore I must be ignorant too. I'm simply asking you to consider the evidence put forth by educated, well-reasoned people before you write off my entire viewpoint.

And here's one final point to consider: your claim that "Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions" is simply incorrect. If the universe was indeed created, it has profound implications. It means we aren't the ultimate authority in the universe, that there may be a purpose to our world, it may even mean there are morals or a way of life we should hold to. At the very least, it leads us to the discomforting conclusion that there are beings (or a being) in this universe vastly more powerful than us. I would submit to you that, in a way, you are just as biased on this topic as I, because if it does turn out a god does exist, it throws your entire way of life into question.

TL;DR: All I'm asking you to do is look at some evidence. Heck, if you want me to, I'll buy the book and sent it to your door. You can agree with it or not, but if you refuse to even consider it I don't think you can claim to have an objective or scientific opinion.
#59 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
This is exactly what I'm talking about. The "God of Gaps" will close in a matter of time. Sure, we don't know exactly how life began-yet. But there was also a time we didn't know whether or milky way was the entire universe or actually just one galaxy in a universe full of galaxies. We do have theories, such as organic matter forming chemically, binding, it is thought that all life first began when RNA formed and could replicate itself. If that is the case it was only a matter of time before DNA and cells formed. Loss of information? Creatures evolve through natural selection, and as far as we can tell become increasingly complex. RNA, DNA, cells, branching off into fungi, plants, animals, etc. Did you know that humans have 46 pairs of chromosomes? The Ophioglossum (a fern) has 1,260 pairs. It's not even about the DNA itself, it's how it's used.

I did consider your viewpoint, when I was 12. The conclusion was the same as it was then as it is now. There is absolutely no evidence for creationism, even less for religion, and current evidence suggests the opposite. The complexity of the universe exists because it just happens to be somewhat complex. That's all their is to it. A random roll of the dice. In fact, theoretical physics suggest that our universe could have easily come from nothing, according to Stephen hawking, or it could have been a collision of two "planes" which created the universe, or the big bang model, there are several theories.

Do you even realize the big bang model is the most successful and evidence backed and proven theories around there? It successfully predicts the critical density of the universe, background radiation maps match up, even the ratio of hydrogen to helium, inflation, etc. In the beginning, the forces of nature are thought to have frozen out from each other, for example electromagnetism and the weak force were once one force, and as the model goes all forces, including gravity where once a part of a superforce. Things only got "complicated" because it split up into many pieces and moving parts. You don't need a god for that.

There statistically, are higher beings in this universe, other lifeforms, some just as stupid to think their gods are just as real as some of ours. Some perhaps, closer to being gods than anyone else.

You are not special. This planet is not unique. Life isn't anything you could attribute to human values-life just is. things just are. The universe is mostly dark, 99.99% space. According to theoretical physics I've learned about, it's highly likely that our universe only exists because we got lucky.

For example, if you think of it like a radio, reality that is, there are an endless sea of frequencies, lets say each frequency is a plane of existence, all are slightly different, but a few can support atoms and matter and shit like in our own universe. this means that we just got lucky. 1 out of 100 frequencies might support life.

This is logical. Our universe itself only has a handful of planets that can support life under the right conditions, it's just pure chance. When the universe is so big, even the rarest of events ought to occur. It doesn't mean or prove anything other than luck.

What I need you to realize is that you're utterly delusional and full of nonsense. There is even evidence for dark matter, it's literally based upon the fact that orbital velocities of stars are highly uniform throughout a galaxy, meaning that, there's actually 75% more matter than we can even detect. It's a big ass mystery, but only because evidence exist.

there's not even a lick of evidence for creationism, because it can be explained with several other hypothesizes or models, in reality, you could claim anything is proof of anything, but like philosophy concluding that "rains generate worms" you're probably just sorely mistaken. Worms after rain is not proof that rain creates worms, in reality, rain saturates the soil which makes worms come above ground.

faulty logic
#94 - The only way I'd ever except any form of "cuckery" w… 12/20/2015 on HD cucktales! -2
#2 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 12/20/2015 on Good night JunkParty +24
#67 - TheAwesomestKyle (12/20/2015) [-]
#89 - thedankmemer (12/21/2015) [-]
#2 - the sad thing is that he's a dime a dozen, a small time crimin…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/20/2015 on He`s with his shower daddy now +1
#7 - lollypopalopicus (12/20/2015) [-]
Yeah, but you gotta savour the small victories if you want to hold out for the day when things are accomplished on a larger scale.
#13 - ******* normies 12/20/2015 on oops +5
#16 - She was strong before the nerf yes. She had about half of Kiri… 12/20/2015 on hahaha +3
#50 - Christianity is not compatible with science however, there are…  [+] (7 new replies) 12/20/2015 on Tony Stark asks the right... -1
User avatar
#55 - defski (12/20/2015) [-]
Do yourself a favour, and watch this short documentary.

Is Christianity Evil?
User avatar
#51 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
I think your point here is that belief doesn't make you correct. And I would agree with you on that. But isn't it true that you, too, have faith?

For instance, consider the problem of the origin of life. Science has certainly demonstrated that it's possible for amino acids to form, but not proteins, which are necessary for life. That's not even getting into the problem of DNA spontaneously forming. The more we learn about "simple" single cell life, the more we discover it's enormously complex. If you're going to go with the spontaneous origin of life, you have to have faith that life literally created itself. This is a quick overview of the problem, if you care to see my more in-depth comment it's right here: /Complex/funny-pictures/5762791/78#78

Not only that, if you work within the confines of the scientific method you can only disprove the existence of something if you have complete and total knowledge of the system it was thought to exist in. Since we don't have complete and total knowledge of our universe, it's impossible to disprove the existence of a (or many) so-called supernatural beings. You're essentially making the same assumption as any of those ancient religions: namely, that no future discoveries will disprove your beliefs.

And finally, in opposition to your point that Christianity is not compatible with science: why not? I believe God created the world, sure, but it's not a blind faith (you can look here for some of my reasons: /Complex/funny-pictures/5762791/109#109 ). I also believe that he's a god of reason, and that he created this world for us to understand and enjoy logically. Establish dominion, if you will. And I'm not the only Christian that thinks like this, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz, and many others also share this view.

TL;DR: Christianity and science are not incompatible. We may differ in opinion from the scientific establishment on the origin of the universe, but our methods for scientific study are the same. And though you can try to claim the high ground of reason, just realize that even scientific stances require faith as well.
User avatar
#53 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
Science doesn't require faith; it requires evidence,
religion has no evidence

that's the difference, and as science progresses on, the god of gaps grows ever smaller
User avatar
#56 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
But that's exactly my point. From where I stand, it looks like the evidence is more in favor of a creator than life just spontaneously evolving. If you'd really like a good, honest look at the evidence, I'd strongly suggest the book "The Case for a Creator" by Lee Strobel. He used to be an atheist and a research journalist, but then decided to look at the evidence objectively as possible and ended up coming to the conclusion that the evidence points to the existence of God. It's not perfectly objective, but nothing ever is, and it's the most objective book I've seen on the topic.
User avatar
#57 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
That isn't evidence, it's false pattern recognition and wishful thinking. You people are so lost in your delusions you've lost the ability to make simple connections and that results in huge leaps of logic. Sorry, but all modern evidence points to no grand design, just the laws and forces of nature. Everything in science has at least some evidence, no newborn religion has even a lick. Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions. I suggest you think about that.
User avatar
#58 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
You accuse me of making huge leaps of logic, when science has no tenable explanation for how life began. Not only that, but all observed genetic mutations, even beneficial ones, have resulted in a loss, not a gain, of information.

Look, I'm not asking you to convert to my point of view or anything. I'm simply stating that if you want to take a truly scientific stance on this, you need to consider all the evidence before you draw your own conclusions. You're dismissing my points out of hand instead of taking an honest look. Alternatively, you're pointing to ignorant people who share my beliefs and claiming that therefore I must be ignorant too. I'm simply asking you to consider the evidence put forth by educated, well-reasoned people before you write off my entire viewpoint.

And here's one final point to consider: your claim that "Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions" is simply incorrect. If the universe was indeed created, it has profound implications. It means we aren't the ultimate authority in the universe, that there may be a purpose to our world, it may even mean there are morals or a way of life we should hold to. At the very least, it leads us to the discomforting conclusion that there are beings (or a being) in this universe vastly more powerful than us. I would submit to you that, in a way, you are just as biased on this topic as I, because if it does turn out a god does exist, it throws your entire way of life into question.

TL;DR: All I'm asking you to do is look at some evidence. Heck, if you want me to, I'll buy the book and sent it to your door. You can agree with it or not, but if you refuse to even consider it I don't think you can claim to have an objective or scientific opinion.
#59 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
This is exactly what I'm talking about. The "God of Gaps" will close in a matter of time. Sure, we don't know exactly how life began-yet. But there was also a time we didn't know whether or milky way was the entire universe or actually just one galaxy in a universe full of galaxies. We do have theories, such as organic matter forming chemically, binding, it is thought that all life first began when RNA formed and could replicate itself. If that is the case it was only a matter of time before DNA and cells formed. Loss of information? Creatures evolve through natural selection, and as far as we can tell become increasingly complex. RNA, DNA, cells, branching off into fungi, plants, animals, etc. Did you know that humans have 46 pairs of chromosomes? The Ophioglossum (a fern) has 1,260 pairs. It's not even about the DNA itself, it's how it's used.

I did consider your viewpoint, when I was 12. The conclusion was the same as it was then as it is now. There is absolutely no evidence for creationism, even less for religion, and current evidence suggests the opposite. The complexity of the universe exists because it just happens to be somewhat complex. That's all their is to it. A random roll of the dice. In fact, theoretical physics suggest that our universe could have easily come from nothing, according to Stephen hawking, or it could have been a collision of two "planes" which created the universe, or the big bang model, there are several theories.

Do you even realize the big bang model is the most successful and evidence backed and proven theories around there? It successfully predicts the critical density of the universe, background radiation maps match up, even the ratio of hydrogen to helium, inflation, etc. In the beginning, the forces of nature are thought to have frozen out from each other, for example electromagnetism and the weak force were once one force, and as the model goes all forces, including gravity where once a part of a superforce. Things only got "complicated" because it split up into many pieces and moving parts. You don't need a god for that.

There statistically, are higher beings in this universe, other lifeforms, some just as stupid to think their gods are just as real as some of ours. Some perhaps, closer to being gods than anyone else.

You are not special. This planet is not unique. Life isn't anything you could attribute to human values-life just is. things just are. The universe is mostly dark, 99.99% space. According to theoretical physics I've learned about, it's highly likely that our universe only exists because we got lucky.

For example, if you think of it like a radio, reality that is, there are an endless sea of frequencies, lets say each frequency is a plane of existence, all are slightly different, but a few can support atoms and matter and shit like in our own universe. this means that we just got lucky. 1 out of 100 frequencies might support life.

This is logical. Our universe itself only has a handful of planets that can support life under the right conditions, it's just pure chance. When the universe is so big, even the rarest of events ought to occur. It doesn't mean or prove anything other than luck.

What I need you to realize is that you're utterly delusional and full of nonsense. There is even evidence for dark matter, it's literally based upon the fact that orbital velocities of stars are highly uniform throughout a galaxy, meaning that, there's actually 75% more matter than we can even detect. It's a big ass mystery, but only because evidence exist.

there's not even a lick of evidence for creationism, because it can be explained with several other hypothesizes or models, in reality, you could claim anything is proof of anything, but like philosophy concluding that "rains generate worms" you're probably just sorely mistaken. Worms after rain is not proof that rain creates worms, in reality, rain saturates the soil which makes worms come above ground.

faulty logic
#49 - Yes it does you zealots  [+] (1 new reply) 12/20/2015 on Tony Stark asks the right... -2
#52 - lilRican (12/20/2015) [-]
>Disagreeing automatically makes you religious
#26 - FJ does that about a lot of **** , like pranks, FJ is a … 12/19/2015 on "did i mention i do... +3
#28 - Because religion itself isn't aggressive? Parents teach their …  [+] (13 new replies) 12/19/2015 on Tony Stark asks the right... -11
#48 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
I mean, my parents are among the most Christian people I know, and the main reason I'm getting a Ph.D in Materials Science is because they encouraged me to. Sure, there are some wackos that believe science is evil or some crap but most Christians see scientific advancement as a great thing.
User avatar
#50 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
Christianity is not compatible with science however, there are far older religions, everyone thought they were right, everyone thought their religions were true, their gods were real, this modern delusion is no different.

A christian supporting science doesn't make them not wrong.
User avatar
#55 - defski (12/20/2015) [-]
Do yourself a favour, and watch this short documentary.

Is Christianity Evil?
User avatar
#51 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
I think your point here is that belief doesn't make you correct. And I would agree with you on that. But isn't it true that you, too, have faith?

For instance, consider the problem of the origin of life. Science has certainly demonstrated that it's possible for amino acids to form, but not proteins, which are necessary for life. That's not even getting into the problem of DNA spontaneously forming. The more we learn about "simple" single cell life, the more we discover it's enormously complex. If you're going to go with the spontaneous origin of life, you have to have faith that life literally created itself. This is a quick overview of the problem, if you care to see my more in-depth comment it's right here: /Complex/funny-pictures/5762791/78#78

Not only that, if you work within the confines of the scientific method you can only disprove the existence of something if you have complete and total knowledge of the system it was thought to exist in. Since we don't have complete and total knowledge of our universe, it's impossible to disprove the existence of a (or many) so-called supernatural beings. You're essentially making the same assumption as any of those ancient religions: namely, that no future discoveries will disprove your beliefs.

And finally, in opposition to your point that Christianity is not compatible with science: why not? I believe God created the world, sure, but it's not a blind faith (you can look here for some of my reasons: /Complex/funny-pictures/5762791/109#109 ). I also believe that he's a god of reason, and that he created this world for us to understand and enjoy logically. Establish dominion, if you will. And I'm not the only Christian that thinks like this, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz, and many others also share this view.

TL;DR: Christianity and science are not incompatible. We may differ in opinion from the scientific establishment on the origin of the universe, but our methods for scientific study are the same. And though you can try to claim the high ground of reason, just realize that even scientific stances require faith as well.
User avatar
#53 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
Science doesn't require faith; it requires evidence,
religion has no evidence

that's the difference, and as science progresses on, the god of gaps grows ever smaller
User avatar
#56 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
But that's exactly my point. From where I stand, it looks like the evidence is more in favor of a creator than life just spontaneously evolving. If you'd really like a good, honest look at the evidence, I'd strongly suggest the book "The Case for a Creator" by Lee Strobel. He used to be an atheist and a research journalist, but then decided to look at the evidence objectively as possible and ended up coming to the conclusion that the evidence points to the existence of God. It's not perfectly objective, but nothing ever is, and it's the most objective book I've seen on the topic.
User avatar
#57 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
That isn't evidence, it's false pattern recognition and wishful thinking. You people are so lost in your delusions you've lost the ability to make simple connections and that results in huge leaps of logic. Sorry, but all modern evidence points to no grand design, just the laws and forces of nature. Everything in science has at least some evidence, no newborn religion has even a lick. Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions. I suggest you think about that.
User avatar
#58 - thepizzadevourer (12/20/2015) [-]
You accuse me of making huge leaps of logic, when science has no tenable explanation for how life began. Not only that, but all observed genetic mutations, even beneficial ones, have resulted in a loss, not a gain, of information.

Look, I'm not asking you to convert to my point of view or anything. I'm simply stating that if you want to take a truly scientific stance on this, you need to consider all the evidence before you draw your own conclusions. You're dismissing my points out of hand instead of taking an honest look. Alternatively, you're pointing to ignorant people who share my beliefs and claiming that therefore I must be ignorant too. I'm simply asking you to consider the evidence put forth by educated, well-reasoned people before you write off my entire viewpoint.

And here's one final point to consider: your claim that "Even if the universe was created, it would have absolutely nothing to do with men or their religions" is simply incorrect. If the universe was indeed created, it has profound implications. It means we aren't the ultimate authority in the universe, that there may be a purpose to our world, it may even mean there are morals or a way of life we should hold to. At the very least, it leads us to the discomforting conclusion that there are beings (or a being) in this universe vastly more powerful than us. I would submit to you that, in a way, you are just as biased on this topic as I, because if it does turn out a god does exist, it throws your entire way of life into question.

TL;DR: All I'm asking you to do is look at some evidence. Heck, if you want me to, I'll buy the book and sent it to your door. You can agree with it or not, but if you refuse to even consider it I don't think you can claim to have an objective or scientific opinion.
#59 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
This is exactly what I'm talking about. The "God of Gaps" will close in a matter of time. Sure, we don't know exactly how life began-yet. But there was also a time we didn't know whether or milky way was the entire universe or actually just one galaxy in a universe full of galaxies. We do have theories, such as organic matter forming chemically, binding, it is thought that all life first began when RNA formed and could replicate itself. If that is the case it was only a matter of time before DNA and cells formed. Loss of information? Creatures evolve through natural selection, and as far as we can tell become increasingly complex. RNA, DNA, cells, branching off into fungi, plants, animals, etc. Did you know that humans have 46 pairs of chromosomes? The Ophioglossum (a fern) has 1,260 pairs. It's not even about the DNA itself, it's how it's used.

I did consider your viewpoint, when I was 12. The conclusion was the same as it was then as it is now. There is absolutely no evidence for creationism, even less for religion, and current evidence suggests the opposite. The complexity of the universe exists because it just happens to be somewhat complex. That's all their is to it. A random roll of the dice. In fact, theoretical physics suggest that our universe could have easily come from nothing, according to Stephen hawking, or it could have been a collision of two "planes" which created the universe, or the big bang model, there are several theories.

Do you even realize the big bang model is the most successful and evidence backed and proven theories around there? It successfully predicts the critical density of the universe, background radiation maps match up, even the ratio of hydrogen to helium, inflation, etc. In the beginning, the forces of nature are thought to have frozen out from each other, for example electromagnetism and the weak force were once one force, and as the model goes all forces, including gravity where once a part of a superforce. Things only got "complicated" because it split up into many pieces and moving parts. You don't need a god for that.

There statistically, are higher beings in this universe, other lifeforms, some just as stupid to think their gods are just as real as some of ours. Some perhaps, closer to being gods than anyone else.

You are not special. This planet is not unique. Life isn't anything you could attribute to human values-life just is. things just are. The universe is mostly dark, 99.99% space. According to theoretical physics I've learned about, it's highly likely that our universe only exists because we got lucky.

For example, if you think of it like a radio, reality that is, there are an endless sea of frequencies, lets say each frequency is a plane of existence, all are slightly different, but a few can support atoms and matter and shit like in our own universe. this means that we just got lucky. 1 out of 100 frequencies might support life.

This is logical. Our universe itself only has a handful of planets that can support life under the right conditions, it's just pure chance. When the universe is so big, even the rarest of events ought to occur. It doesn't mean or prove anything other than luck.

What I need you to realize is that you're utterly delusional and full of nonsense. There is even evidence for dark matter, it's literally based upon the fact that orbital velocities of stars are highly uniform throughout a galaxy, meaning that, there's actually 75% more matter than we can even detect. It's a big ass mystery, but only because evidence exist.

there's not even a lick of evidence for creationism, because it can be explained with several other hypothesizes or models, in reality, you could claim anything is proof of anything, but like philosophy concluding that "rains generate worms" you're probably just sorely mistaken. Worms after rain is not proof that rain creates worms, in reality, rain saturates the soil which makes worms come above ground.

faulty logic
User avatar
#42 - defski (12/19/2015) [-]
Christianity doesn't mean anti-science, dumbass.
User avatar
#49 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
Yes it does you zealots
#52 - lilRican (12/20/2015) [-]
>Disagreeing automatically makes you religious
User avatar
#29 - assdoreponyfucker (12/19/2015) [-]
Protestant church yes. Protestant Christians makes us Orthodox/Catholic master race look like horse shit. Same thing with feminism, the outspoken minority (protestant) makes the normal majority look bad (St Peter originated denominations) I can talk a lot on the subject but I don't have the time at the moment.
#10 - yeah it's good, good for all the punk ass bitches 12/19/2015 on hahaha +2
#9 - SAO was not **** , good arc, after Sword Art Online ende…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/19/2015 on hahaha +12
User avatar
#13 - asotil (12/20/2015) [-]
>Asuna wasn't weak

She literally went from a strong independent character who relied on herself and skills to get by to absolutely nothing more than a harem trophy who can't beat a single fucking monster by herself. She had full on anti-development as a character. Normally characters walk forward on the development line, she did a fucking backflip and ran straight for Kuroinu without looking back
#33 - chronoeagle (12/20/2015) [-]
She becomes strong again at the end of season 2.
User avatar
#19 - epicalania (12/20/2015) [-]
She was trapped in a game, trapped by the guy who ran the servers and could alter player stats as he wished.
It makes perfect sense for her to get nerfed.
Then she has to get her stats back up because she can't cheat.
User avatar
#16 - infinitereaper (12/20/2015) [-]
She was strong before the nerf yes. She had about half of Kiritos strength stats but double his speed, and was one of the fastest character players.
#12 - anon (12/19/2015) [-]
You're forgetting the main reason SAO was shit: that disgusting, poorly-written, syrupy-sweet piece of shit program that Kirito and Asuna "adopted" because it called them "mommy" and "daddy"

The show was flat and generic, but I was still able to get some modicum of enjoyment out of it until they introduced that character.
#197 - lol same, can't tell you how many times I want to reply or pos…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/19/2015 on channel / user blocks,... 0
User avatar
#202 - OtisMcWonderful (12/19/2015) [-]
It's probably just because we can't leave. You can try, but it just isn't possible. It's already taken half of my life, and I don't see it stopping any time soon.

Comments(2112):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 2112 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
145 comments displayed.
#2000 - infinitereaper (04/16/2015) [+] (7 replies)
stickied by infinitereaper
Feel free to talk to me.
I accept all friend requests.
I'm interested in meeting more INTJ's.
If you wish to be unblocked simply state your username and that you want to be unblocked.
Remember to disable adblock.
Praise be to thy site.

My OC (series)

www.funnyjunk.com/channel/pokemon/Pokemon+Lore+1/MMtyGZZ/
www.funnyjunk.com/100+ways+to+die+comp+1/funny-pictures/5176548/
www.funnyjunk.com/The+Dragon+Guide/funny-pictures/5183895/

FJ Dicktionary
funnyjunk.com/The+fj+dicktionary/funny-pictures/5504789/
#1996 - infinitereaper (04/16/2015) [+] (7 replies)
stickied by infinitereaper
My full shroom trip, archived on FJ.
www.funnyjunk.com/Dirty+pentagons/funny-pictures/4960798/9
You will only walk on the shores of paradiso when you've consumed the flesh of god.
User avatar #2422 - capslockrage ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Can I buy your dupe weed for anything other than red weed
User avatar #2424 to #2422 - infinitereaper (01/07/2016) [-]
why do even want them? I'm reluctant.
User avatar #2426 to #2424 - capslockrage ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
It's a fair trade.
User avatar #2425 to #2424 - capslockrage ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Helping a friend out who collects them
User avatar #2423 to #2422 - infinitereaper (01/07/2016) [-]
currently a gem recipe whore slut of needing more
User avatar #2419 - SumoWamm (01/03/2016) [-]
Anything for you extra weed?
User avatar #2421 to #2420 - SumoWamm (01/03/2016) [-]
No can do.
Just telling you now, everything on my account is up for trade, everything.
User avatar #2414 - elsanna (12/25/2015) [-]
Merry Christmas! I know it's probably not a thing for you but still.
User avatar #2415 to #2414 - infinitereaper (12/25/2015) [-]
Merry Christmas, I like the holidays actually, they aren't much fun for me these days, but that doesn't meant they shouldn't be.
User avatar #2416 to #2415 - elsanna (12/25/2015) [-]
Good to know. I hope yours is peaceful and warm!
User avatar #2417 to #2416 - infinitereaper (12/25/2015) [-]
WINTER IS COMING!
#2407 - elsanna (12/16/2015) [-]
Hello. How're you doing?

I was wondering if you might be able to and be willing to help me with my research. It's about economics, and I know you're educated on the matter.
User avatar #2408 to #2407 - infinitereaper (12/16/2015) [-]
Barely, but I'll help if I can.
User avatar #2409 to #2408 - elsanna (12/16/2015) [-]
You didn't answer how you're doing. :/
User avatar #2410 to #2409 - infinitereaper (12/16/2015) [-]
I am "barely". As usual.
User avatar #2411 to #2410 - elsanna (12/16/2015) [-]
I see. I wish you the best.


I want to learn as much as I can about the differences between a capitalistic economy, and a socialistic one. I know the basic gist, capitalism favors private ownership and promotion of profit. While socialism favors state or public ownership, and a promotion of the wealth of the nation rather than personal wealth. But if there's more to be said about how they differ, I'd like to know.
#2412 to #2411 - infinitereaper (12/16/2015) [-]
Thanks. Don't worry about it tho, I'm just living my lot.
Anyways,
you probably already know this but,

Adam Smith wrote about the "Invisible hand" in the Wealth of Nations, this was basically the concept that a capitalistic society was self regulating. Kind of like supply and demand, which is the easiest example. If people all want to buy donuts, then the prices of donuts go up because increased demand means people will pay more for them. If nobody wants donuts the price of donuts goes down to attract more people to buy them. The "Invisible hand" is self regulating the market, all without governmental intervention.

On the other hand, lel, socialism controls he market, with what I think is called "central planning". This means that the government regulates the market, and this usually has disastrous results. For example, lets say the government decides that factors should produce 1000 jackets and 200 cars. And sell them for a certain price. But in reality, nobody wants or needs ******* jackets and EVERYBODY needs cars. What happens? People go ******* trying to get cars that literally don't exist. It's a terrible and inefficient system, and why socialistic systems like communism are doomed to fail.

If for example, that society used the "Invisible hand" instead, the market would self regulate, because demand for cars would make the industries generate more cars for profit, and jacket businesses would go out of business. The market will correct itself.

I forgot where the story comes from, but its a great example of why socialism ends up being idealistic and unreasonable.

It goes something like this:
And there will be a great hall where all the builders, inventors, will create many copies of things like chairs, luxuries, etc. and anybody can have whatever they want for free.

Which brings us to the most important difference: Self interest.
In capitalistic societies self interest drives people to do stuff, because they have to compete and work hard to earn the fruit of their labor, to earn money and stuff.
In socialistic societies (because of the same self interest) there is little incentive to do anything or innovate, because at the end of the day you get paid even if don't do jack **** .

Small things like this. But these are basic so sorry if this is just review.
Basically tho, basically everything in modern economics rejects socialism.
How can one make money if we give away **** for free?

They call economics the dismal science for good reason.
The biggest difference is that socialism just doesn't work.

Though I am an advocate for socialized healthcare and education.
User avatar #2413 to #2412 - elsanna (12/16/2015) [-]
Thank you for your time. It's a good answer.
#2404 to #2403 - megpoidgumibear (12/12/2015) [-]
why did you get banned?
User avatar #2405 to #2404 - infinitereaper (12/12/2015) [-]
Just a dispute over one of my uploads. But it's fine now.
User avatar #2406 to #2405 - megpoidgumibear (12/12/2015) [-]
Good to hear.

#2400 - psychadelicace (12/11/2015) [-]
>using the word waifu
User avatar #2397 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
Your missing the honor badge, I could do that for 15K. Let me look some more
User avatar #2398 to #2397 - infinitereaper (12/11/2015) [-]
sounds good.
User avatar #2399 to #2398 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
Yes, it's a pretty one I'll send.
#2391 - luluwho has deleted their comment [-]
#2387 - luluwho has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #2388 to #2387 - infinitereaper (12/11/2015) [-]
I like them too much to sell them.
#2389 to #2388 - luluwho has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #2390 to #2389 - infinitereaper (12/11/2015) [-]
Do you realize how funny I had to be to get those badges?
I don't trade them on principle. There are two silver badges for aisle in auction tho.
User avatar #2394 to #2390 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
I offered him 10 K, that's the fair price on these things IMO.
User avatar #2395 to #2394 - infinitereaper (12/11/2015) [-]
I dont' really need more OC badges to be honest, I just bought those on a whim. I'd be willing to pay for big items I don't have yet if you have any dupes tho.
User avatar #2396 to #2395 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
OK, I thought you might want to be a solid 3rd place on those or liked them that much, worth a try Let me look.
User avatar #2393 to #2390 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
Still here bb ?
User avatar #2392 to #2390 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
ok and YES I DO, that is how I know for certain that I will never have one without the help of others.

There are ? Thanx
User avatar #2386 - luluwho (12/11/2015) [-]
Answer trade please ?
User avatar #2384 - postingloudly (12/09/2015) [-]
So, I unbanned you. You need to understand that the only reason I flagged that is because admin made a recent post to the mods to flag loli immediately and sort it out later, so I was just doing what I was told. I didnt even know it was you, I dont have anything against you. That dr pepper image is ok to post we decided, so you are fine there.

I dont have a vendetta against you cause you threw some buzzword insults at me, I do not care about you
#2385 to #2384 - infinitereaper (12/09/2015) [-]
Aw. I don't care about you either. Anyways got it.
As usual I'll be more mindful.

I understand, addy says in mass messages different things, like upload, so I upload but outside of that nobody tells me **** about specifics or whats new. So understand that much.

Anyways now that I have your attention, since we are on the subject, I would like to note that what loli actually refers to is prepubescent. The literal definition of pedophilia is before puberty. Puberty and above isn't loli. Jail bait, even young teen isn't technically loli. That hebe something Not to mention something like a vampire loli which is a gray area. Semantics wise. Generally speaking 13+ isn't loli, though it's interesting to note that girls are hitting puberty quicker these days. Some think it's all the growth hormones in the food and milk and others think it't all the fat. The **** if I know, but it makes enough since.

Not like anybody gives a **** but that's actually how it is. I mean biology adulthood is pretty much puberty, adolescence really only exists because if mammals grew too quickly the level of food they would need to fuel growth and survival would end up killing them. But I'm getting off on a tangent here.

Anyways, I got pissed because every other newish mod it's always some **** .
Also you know, I think part of the reason things are they way they are on this site is twofold, I think the oatmeal thing did a number on addy, both in public relations and image. imo oatmeal is a faggot, addy had a **** lawyer and it became a debacle,

Then there was the loss of google or wherever, that was the end of the age of porn and lewd posting. I think that also did a number on the site.

The only thing I'm not sure of is how addy really feels about things. Maybe he's just trying to keep his head low and stay out of trouble legally, maybe it's just foresight, maybe it's face value. I dunno,

but my overall conclusion is the same.
This site should really be more popular it's a good site.

And you should know at least this much, I've always been loyal to this site,
I'm here to contribute a little and here to stay, I don't have all OC badges for nothing either. This isn't my first account, but it is the last.

So if there's an issue just talk to me, or let me know whats up, don't make me sort out these issues myself.
I may be no mod or ever want to be, but I deserve that much I think.
Addy probably doesn't really care about me, I mean I hope he does even a little,
but I don't expect it, and I don't need it, because I like this site

In that respect I'm on your team here.
I'm a site patriot.
And I've seen many a user come and go.

But I'm still here.
User avatar #2364 - adplum ONLINE (12/07/2015) [-]
the ****** an intj
User avatar #2365 to #2364 - infinitereaper (12/07/2015) [-]
personality type, the king of the rational branch, and also one of the personalities the others tend to dislike
User avatar #2366 to #2365 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
but you are not a rational person
#2367 to #2366 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
The nickname of the INTJ is the Mastermind
From your view what you is irrelevant, but the reality of what I "see" is....
User avatar #2369 to #2367 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
what
that made no sense
User avatar #2370 to #2369 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
Typo, what I had meant to say was that from your point of view what you see is irrelevant, but what I "see" paints a very different reality than you might perceive.
Pic related
User avatar #2371 to #2370 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
from my point of view?
im still not understanding this, ive been up for like 30 hours and am not very lucid.
explain it to me like im 5.
User avatar #2372 to #2371 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
I'm very rational. You probably mistake things for morality or ethics as "rational" when in reality people like me are the rational ones. I see things for what they are, and use that knowledge to manipulate the world around me. A Mastermind, masterminds.

I'm quite rational. The reality is that I may be too rational.
User avatar #2373 to #2372 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
rational people dont call themselves rational. They also dont sit and have arguments with people online, because the rational thing to do when someone argues with you online is to ignore them.
youre just narcissistic.
#2374 to #2373 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
Okay now you're being irrational.
Rational people are self aware.
Most people--are not.

I can understand who you are,
but you? Will never understand me.
So you have no power over me.
The opposite is true. "Mastermind"

We aren't very popular because of all of this.
Unlock more social (and irrational) personality types.
User avatar #2376 to #2374 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
youre right, i am being irrational.
but that doesnt make sense, all humans are self aware. If you really think youre the only kind of person who's self aware youre just being an elitist.
are you popular? do you get all the girls and have the coolest friends?
do you hang with the chads and nancys and smoke your fags with your big boy chaps?
#2377 to #2376 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
"All humans are self aware"
Sure they are, while they live out their meaningless lives thinking of nothing other then themselves, their own problems, not seeing the world or it's corruption or even understanding how they are being lied to and manipulated by corporations the media and the government .

People understand nothing, not about themselves or the world they live. They are like mindless drones, mulling along their pointless existences while the world goes to **** . It's also why religion is so widespread.

Most people are utterly clueless,
because ignorance is bliss
User avatar #2378 to #2377 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
first point, most people are not unaware of the previously stated things, they just dont care because thats their life. They dont have any reason not to be "manipulated" by corporations and media and government because it does not benefit them to resist it and does not change their life if they are not. What youre saying right now is not rational, because you have just summed up every single person as stupid and ignorant, which is obviously a very irrational statement. Any time anyone talks to you or tries to influence you, you turn their ideas aside and simply repeat your nonsense about being better than everyone. Please tell me how that's rational, because a large part of being rational is being able to see the points to every side of an argument and to not look down on either side for their views.
Second point, ignorance is bliss. Why do you think most people are so fond of their childhood memories? Are you saying that you would rather know life is **** and be unhappy about it than not realize it and be happy? The argument that ignorance is something that people do not deserve is the same as wanting to be right just to be right. Think about it like this. Two people get a **** sandwich. It's been seasoned and flavored so it doesnt taste like **** , but if you really try hard enough, you can tell its **** . If you do not eat this sandwich you will starve. One person realizes it's **** , but has to eat it anyway or die. They are unhappy because they know they are being fed **** .
The other person doesnt know, doesnt care, and continues to eat **** for their entire life. Happily. Both people are eating the **** , but only one of them is happy.
#2379 to #2378 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
You're contradicting yourself, and no--they don't.
That's why people can't name names, who controls the food supply? Who owns the news? Is modern medicine really medicine? Do we actually have representation in government? Is global warming real? What's wrong with our food? What's wrong with our chemicals? On and on and on. The average American and average person is utterly clueless, and usually believes whatever they see on the news, which is almost a lie brought to you by one of their six megacorporate owners.

People don't have a clue.
And neither do you.

Everything you just said is a perfect example of the delusion.
It's classic doublethink my friend. Trust me.
User avatar #2380 to #2379 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
are you really quoting 1984
kill yourself please
remove yourself from the gene pool
User avatar #2381 to #2380 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
Its you who needs to kill yourself. George Orwell understood better than anybody how manipulation is used to control and fool the populace, read his essay on English and politics: www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/Politics_and_the_English_Language-1.pdf

You through a hissy fit and insult me all you want.
You'll still be wrong, and still be just as clueless.

Because unlike you all I care is about the truth.
#2382 to #2381 - adplum ONLINE (12/08/2015) [-]
I didnt insult you, I gave you a friendly suggestion
if all you care about is the truth, gib me all your items pls and ill tell you a truth
ty
#2383 to #2382 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
HOW DARE YOU POST CUTE KITTEN GIRLS AT ME
and lol no

but seriously, read that essay when you are rested
that might be your first clue as to what I'm talking about when I say that "the people" are mostly clueless about everything
User avatar #2368 to #2367 - infinitereaper (12/08/2015) [-]
what you see*
User avatar #2363 - countmerchant (12/06/2015) [-]
Hey dude i sent you a trade
You're my favorite reaper
User avatar #2356 - mrsnowballs (11/29/2015) [-]
What's with Shaft and amazing soundtracks? Like they have great sound guys
User avatar #2357 to #2356 - infinitereaper (11/30/2015) [-]
They do a lot of original songs with the voice actors too. Shaft is just based.
User avatar #2358 to #2357 - mrsnowballs (11/30/2015) [-]
when are you gonna watch katanagatari? The story and the characters are great but I heard the ending was sad so I'm not looking forward to that bit
User avatar #2359 to #2358 - infinitereaper (11/30/2015) [-]
idk, tests and finals to worry about, 2busy
User avatar #2360 to #2359 - mrsnowballs (11/30/2015) [-]
hmm same. I watched like 2 episodes this past week. Gonna have nothing to do during the start of the winter break though. Gonna binge so much ****
User avatar #2361 to #2360 - infinitereaper (11/30/2015) [-]
I may binge on drugs but idk what I'll do. Prolly just relax in general. I need it.
User avatar #2362 to #2361 - mrsnowballs (11/30/2015) [-]
sounds like fun times
User avatar #2352 - luluwho (11/29/2015) [-]
willling to sell a spirel or pulse badge ?
User avatar #2353 to #2352 - infinitereaper (11/29/2015) [-]
is items up again? perhaps but for what? I'm not exactly churning out OC these days
User avatar #2355 to #2353 - luluwho (11/29/2015) [-]
How about just the blue Spiral Badge, it's BLUE
User avatar #2354 to #2353 - luluwho (11/29/2015) [-]
IDK, what do you like ? Check my dups
User avatar #2342 - mrsnowballs (11/20/2015) [-]
So I decided not to listen to you and watch Kyokai no Kanata movie...

I'll listen to you next time
#2343 to #2342 - infinitereaper (11/20/2015) [-]
One exception to the movie rule is the Gintama movie, but you pretty much have to be caught up prior to it's release date, if you ever get into Gintama at all. Beyond that I usually never recommend anime series-movies. And there is a pretty good reason for that.
User avatar #2345 to #2343 - mrsnowballs (11/20/2015) [-]
Ignore anon comment Yeah I'm 12 episodes deep into Gintama. I sort of stopped watching it after Fallout came out and when I was done with that I wanted to watch something else. Watched the Kyokai movie cause an AMV about it came out and I sort of got inspired. Bad decision.

Also I'm currently watching Katanagatari. 4 episodes in. SHAFT does not dissapoint
User avatar #2346 to #2345 - infinitereaper (11/20/2015) [-]
Oh yeah? I'm looking out for that one as well, haven't started yet though. You seen Teacher of Despair yet? That's also quality shaft.
User avatar #2347 to #2346 - mrsnowballs (11/21/2015) [-]
You should. It's good.

No I haven't. If I'm gonna watch another shaft anime next it's probably gonna be arakawa under the bridge
#2344 to #2343 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
Yeah I\m 12 episodes deep into Gintama. I sort of stopped watching it after Fallout came out and when I was done with that I wanted to watch something else. Watched the Kyokai movie cause an AMV about it came out and I sort of got inspired. Bad decision.

Also I'm currently watching Katanagatari. 4 episodes in. SHAFT does not dissapoint
User avatar #2337 - keltainenlumi (11/16/2015) [-]
Did you have to poke tiddies?
User avatar #2339 to #2338 - keltainenlumi (11/16/2015) [-]
Can I have the poke tiddies?
User avatar #2341 to #2340 - keltainenlumi (11/16/2015) [-]
Thanks...
#2324 - shekelnator (11/14/2015) [-]
is it true that you are going to rape your daughter because it'd make her not a whore or something like that?
#2325 to #2324 - infinitereaper (11/14/2015) [-]
That's more of an inside joke with myself but in honesty I have no moral boundaries and there is no telling what I'll do.
But one thing remains true.

Regardless of age, affiliation, species, living, non living, alien, monster, supernatural, sex, relation, etc. If it moves (or even if it doesn't)
I will **** it.
#2348 to #2325 - elricross (11/23/2015) [-]
>I'd rape my daughter
I'm glad you won't breed.
User avatar #2349 to #2348 - infinitereaper (11/23/2015) [-]
I'd rape you.
#2350 to #2349 - elricross (11/23/2015) [-]
you'd get a bullet to the face before you could lay a hand on me you eurasian faggot
User avatar #2351 to #2350 - infinitereaper (11/23/2015) [-]
Eurasian? The **** . And yeah? 1v1 me bro.
User avatar #2327 to #2325 - shekelnator (11/14/2015) [-]
btw, whats the source of your pic?
User avatar #2328 to #2327 - infinitereaper (11/14/2015) [-]
Artist is Russel you can find some translated scans on the internet on a couple of sites.
User avatar #2329 to #2328 - shekelnator (11/14/2015) [-]
***** i wanted the source of the pic you replied with.
User avatar #2330 to #2329 - infinitereaper (11/14/2015) [-]
A Russel work. Not sure which.
User avatar #2332 to #2331 - infinitereaper (11/14/2015) [-]
my bad, it's Rustle here are some: You need to login to view this link
User avatar #2334 to #2332 - rokkarokkaali (11/14/2015) [-]
saved fam
#2333 to #2332 - shekelnator (11/14/2015) [-]
H A R A M - DETECTED
A
R
A
M

Beheading in process
#2335 to #2333 - infinitereaper (11/14/2015) [-]
>hentai sites are banned in your country
>gg for freedom

Here, this site might work for you, but you'll have to download them:
You need to login to view this link
You need to login to view this link

If not you'll just have to find them yourself, use some sort of proxy or give up.
#2336 to #2335 - shekelnator (11/14/2015) [-]
u on behead list jk
User avatar #2323 - admin (11/03/2015) [-]
hey man, I wanted to thank you for posting content. I looked over your profile. Although this is a copy and paste message, I wanted to say I appreciate you contributing to FJ.

FJ got hit hard with a lot of downtime recently. I'm working hard to improve the site, adding new features (mp4s, webms, and GIFs in comments, new comment features, etc) and trying to make the site better for mobile.

Can you keep posting on the site? That would mean a lot to me. Thanks.
User avatar #2297 - mrsnowballs (10/23/2015) [-]
What the **** was that ending though?
User avatar #2299 to #2297 - infinitereaper (10/24/2015) [-]
It's been a few years, refresh my memory?
User avatar #2321 to #2299 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
**** why do you always convince me. Fine after this Ushio anime I'll give Gintama another shot. I tend to binge anime and Gintama is really ******* long. Not sure how that will work out
User avatar #2322 to #2321 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
gg no re, lol, as always I merely hope you enjoy
There's always been a lot to appreciate, which is why when someone says "there's no anime to watch" I know their Normie, casual faggots who don't know nothin at all about anime. This is a ****** golden age of glorious anime and I'm loving every second of it. I just ignore and avoid the bad stuff like I do with glorious Western Cinema.

Well, I've got a lot of school work and studying I've been putting off so, later
User avatar #2300 to #2299 - mrsnowballs (10/24/2015) [-]
It would be a 8/10 anime if it wasn't for the last 4 episodes, they REALLY dragged it down. There were lots of plotholes and a lot of new stuff was introduced yet not properly explained. We saw Ryner's father appearing for the first time and killing Ryner, or wait maybe not because he's alive again. We see Ryner's mother too who told him to touch a door so he would wake up.

Sion's double personalities are never explained. One wants to kill Ryner the other wants to let him live and offer him as a sacrifice? I didn't ******* get that part.

Miran's (the raven shadow guy) personality changed drastically. He went from a cold and calculated to smiling, planning Sion's birthday with his friends dude. Didn't like that.

The whole alpha stigma thing was never explained. We don't know why Ryner is a special kind of alpha stigma, I'm guessing because of his parents sealing something into him but that is just my guess, wasn't in the anime.

Overall it was extremely open, something that you hate. The kingdoms are going to war, Ryner and dango girl are gonna try and stop Sion I guess? The alpha stigma kids and Tiir were also abandoned even though they stated that they'd definitely come back for Ryner. Good anime, bad ending. It all points to season 2 yet as I understand that will not be the case

User avatar #2301 to #2300 - infinitereaper (10/24/2015) [-]
Ending is actually adequate imo. Sure, we'll never get S2 but we get the general gist of what's going to happen. This anime was adapted from a light novel that won a contest, it rose and fell just as quickly. As far as I recall, basically the Kings corruption/possession is basically eating away at him, so as he goes he and on his crusade or whatever, EVENTUALLY he and Ryner are going to be enemies. Also, Ryner will eventually have to deal with the god inside him, which is probably linked to the source of alpha stigma, a powerful dark magic like the one the king is dealing with, perhaps even the same. Ryner is stuck in the internal battle caused by alpha stimga, because if you recall, everyone who has it eventually goes insane.

Wasn't Miran the guy who had the homo father who was after his ass (literally)? He probably was relaxed after he killed his father. It was implied his father molested him and whatnot. It makes sense. I mean he's bent out for revenge.

imo it was worth the watch. the only open end I can stand are the ones that give foreshadow to the future. Because at least then I have something to go off of.
User avatar #2302 to #2301 - mrsnowballs (10/25/2015) [-]
Yeah this definitely needed a season 2 to make it good. Awesome 20 first episodes, then it turned to meh at best. I gave it a 6/10.

Most likely gonna watch psycho-pass next
User avatar #2303 to #2302 - infinitereaper (10/26/2015) [-]
If LoLH pissed you off I'd avoid psycho pass.
User avatar #2305 to #2304 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
First of all it's too western on the influence, second of all it's got an ending that's utterly unsatisfying.
User avatar #2306 to #2305 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
What do you mean too western?
User avatar #2307 to #2306 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
It borrows a lot of elements. I mean it's an interesting premise and all, but good god will you hate it by the end. Fine go ahead and watch it. Let me know what you think when you finish.
User avatar #2308 to #2307 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
Alright.

What about Guilty Crown? Is that good?
User avatar #2309 to #2308 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
You are like the lottery of terrible endings right now. Absolutely not. You gotta avoid some anime. the worse of which is one called Valvrave.
User avatar #2310 to #2309 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
Lol yeah I kinda am. But like was the Psycho Pass ending that bad? I'm kinda in the mood for dark, violent anime. Preferably with an OP MC.
User avatar #2311 to #2310 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
It's kinda like "hilter did nothing wrong" except unlike real life it's not a good meaning.
Dark and violent is hard to come by without the edge. You might like Tokyo Ghoul but it's kinda open ended and idk if we'll ever see more seasons. Not many names come to mind. You seen Another? That's a well rounded complete anime.
User avatar #2312 to #2311 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
Well is the "hitler" in that anime the MC? Is he likable at all?

And I heard mixed things about Tokya Ghoul. Like they didn't follow the manga properly and ****** it up or some **** .

And yes I've seen Another. It was pretty good
User avatar #2313 to #2312 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
Yeah, it's a mixed bag.
I can't give you spoilers to explain why it's bad, but the MC is inconsequential.
But it IS a pretty good example of why Modern Japan is completely headed down the wrong road, and imo, probably a good prediction of Japans dystopian future.

Any who, it may not be what you're looking for but if you wanna go down the dystonia route and lose some seriousness, Desert Punk is a quality choice.
User avatar #2314 to #2313 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
What do you mean heading down the wrong road? Are you talking about anime or Japan itself?

How would you rate Tokyo Ghoul?
User avatar #2315 to #2314 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
Japan man.
6.5 out of 10. idk how much it ****** up from the manga, but the main problem with it was the low animation budget, bds might be watchable tho
User avatar #2316 to #2315 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
Could you explain? Why is it on the wrong path?

Yeah I'd rather not then. Man it's just that after watching Parasite I can't get enough of that sort of anime
#2320 to #2316 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
I strongly recommend you give Gintama another shot. At least until you make it to one of the serious arcs. Gintama is strange, sure, and the humor is advanced, so advanced in fact it's a little known fact that even the Japanese have trouble keeping up with the references and the like, BUT

By the the time you've mulled through a few seasons Gintama is like that irreplaceable best friend, you both speak your own language and have a ton of inside jokes only you understand.

It's utterly top tier like Jojo's Bizzare Adventure, just a different genre.
Minus the quality arcs when **** gets real.
but w/e

Any who, it does in fact affect us. Japan right now is on that teeter totter so we still get some good **** , should be okay as long as the scales don't give out in one direction so to speak. Japan also has the 3rd largest GDP in the world, so who knows how that will play out geopolitically in the global stage.
#2317 to #2316 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
Isn't it obvious? Japan is a repressed country, always has been, even though things have kind of been lightening up in some areas due to western culture, Japan is basically still an empty, career driven, low pay, drone, Asian culture. Part of the reason why Japanese media is so exciting is because the Japanese work harder and play hard so to speak. Then just look at the industry itself. Censorship laws, decency laws, laws about lolis, the fact that anime after anime has society reaffirming ******** like "Oh I'm underage" or "respect your elders no matter what even if they're evil cunts" and so and so forth.

Suicide rate is pretty high in japan, though they cover up a lot with cold related deaths. It's because it's ******* repressed. I mean the West, namely America is pretty repressed to but Japan is a land of extremes.

One of the reasons I'm envious of Japan is the solidarity. It's kind of in it's own little world. And that is just another reason Japan is probably headed toward the dystonia future where the government controls everything regulates human emotion and "decency". And I fear this problem is far more likely than in the U.S. for example. U.S. dystonia is pretty obvious, because we're basically already living in it. Just a matter of time as the ******** keeps piling up.

You've discovered one of the discernible qualities of good anime, I call it, "Alpha MC" and it's extreeeeemely rare in anime. Since so much anime does that cookie cutter "self insert" ******** .

Thats why I love anime like LoLH and something like NGNL even more. Also why I like Attack on Titan even though the hipsters and normies all go on about how it's to popular. I was literally as hype as I was for monogatari.

As time goes on your taste will sharpen, you'll realize/learn more about Japan and it'll allllll start to make much more sense.

Btw you watch Gintama? Hilarious, best comedy anime around, and the series arcs are among the most quality that the industry has to offer.

OH! Something does come to mind.
Though it's kinda old school and the MC is a bleeding heart, Ushio to Tora is totally recommendable. It's got an MC who powers up by feeding his soul to a demon slaying spear and generally violent.
User avatar #2319 to #2317 - mrsnowballs (10/27/2015) [-]
It's a shame. But what can I say? It doesn't really affect me or anybody living outside of Japan. Yes the anime reflects their state but not all. There is still at least one gem like NGNL and Overlord coming out every season (well almost).

And yeah the whole I'm underage thing I hate. Like even in ******* Jojo they say "Oh I can't drink I'm still in school".

And yeah I liked AoT too. The weebs nowadays hate it because it got mainstream but what can you do about hipsters?

I tried Gintama and the whole over the top alien humor didn't really appeal to me. I know it's good but it's just not my cup of tea I don't think.

And yeah Ushio to Tora looks interesting. I'll add it to my list. Maybe even watch it next
User avatar #2318 to #2317 - infinitereaper (10/27/2015) [-]
ushio to tora is my official recommendation to you, its currently airing at episode 17 atm
[ 2112 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)