|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #6787 on CommentsLevel 182 Comments: Anon Annihilator
OfflineSend mail to ilovedickbuttxd Block ilovedickbuttxd Invite ilovedickbuttxd to be your friend flag avatar
latest user's comments
|#7560 - **ilovedickbuttxd rolls 942,642,567**||11/14/2014 on $25 Visa Card Give-Away||0|
|#500 - He even made a post about, I can't find it tho, (got deleted?)…||11/13/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||+1|
|#497 - That's what im saying. Sure, if admin says it wrong, then fine… [+] (2 new replies)||11/13/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||+1|
|#494 - Vivian posted a r34 pic (of vivian ofc), which made her look … [+] (4 new replies)||11/13/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||+1|
|#493 - ****||11/13/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||0|
|#4 - I had to try :I||11/12/2014 on ilovedickbuttxd's profile||0|
|#168 - I'm not saying he didn't do something wrong, you make the rule…||11/12/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||0|
|#70 - **** , I forgot to separate in paragraphs||11/11/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||0|
|#67 - Well we can't deny what you're saying, admin But I think m… [+] (49 new replies)||11/11/2014 on twitter bans you EASILY||-73|
#86 - Womens Study Major (11/11/2014) [-]
Anytime someone gets a lifetime ban for some minor rulebreach, your doing something wrong. I do not understand these ruthless types who think they rule everything and ban anyone who breaks their rules with no sense of mercy or decency. It's pathetic.
#95 - Womens Study Major (11/11/2014) [-]
Actually my comment here was more to Vivian getting banned for a single pic, which regardless of context is still ruthlessness and pretty unacceptable in this man's book. But again, my whole morality is based on mercy and compassion to even the worst of people so...
#333 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
No, I'm calling you out for insta-bans you called out based on your own perception. I'm actually ignoring the incredible offense that "cartoon" has. Animation and cartoons are not the same. And to many people who love the artform, using that word so blanketly, it kind of bad. But that aside.
Second, you don't seem to understand what child porn is. The way your talking you seem to be insinuating that any character under the age of 18, or anyone who "looks" childish is child porn. That....is incredibly hurtful to many types of at who put people well under our age brackets into very real situations. Yusuke urimeshi and Issei Hyoudou being my notations here.
third...again, my issue is not the content. I have no issue with it being removed. But instant bans over -any- rule breach, especially of the permanent nature, are just unacceptable to me, period. Your actions were indefensible, and your words insulting.
you're a great admin, I just felt that set of actions was hurtful and just wrong
#268 - cliffordlover (11/12/2014) [-]
I actually agree with ilovedickbuttxd. You obviously can't let people post that stuff, but I feel a lifetime ban is a little harsh unless he posted it multiple times or something. That guy even made this huge apology to you on this post.
I hate to sound this pathetic about it, but I don't think you understand how important this site is to most of us.
I'm not on quite as much as I used to be, but, when I literally had nothing going for me in my life, this is where I came every moment of free time I had. The community is pretty good. There are people here who constantly rustle my Cliffords, but you meet so many good people. It also has the best layout on any site on the web. It's easier to keep up with people, and it's a super simple site. There's no website that I would rather go to than here, and I bet at least 90% of the users agree, especially the ones who get banned because you don't realize how important it is to you until you blow it.
#83 - admin (11/11/2014) [-]
That guy posted a six year old looking naked girl masturbating. Nice job trying to make me sound like the bad guy because he posted cartoon child porn.
And nice job trying to give me more trouble and fuck over everyone else on the site by making me waste my time having to deal with cartoon child porn posters and their bullshit claims of it being legal and acceptable.
Now grow the fuck up and stop obsessing over children.
#464 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
I actually agree with a lifetime ban, he should have known the rules/not been a pig
#443 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
it was pretty disgusting to be honest
#364 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
so anytime it looks like something you don't find comforting, you want ti banned? Sounds pretty SJW to me.
Look, you don't have to like the art style, but calling it "cartoon child porn" is hurtful, bigoted, and incredibly selfish to both lovers of animation, and lovers of artistic expression. your comfort with a particular form fo animation when you don't understand its symbols is not a reason for banning
#433 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
No, its not. If your referring to specific adult material you'd have an excuse. Yes, lolita is abused to no end, badly, and I've turned such works into site admins. But "loli" is just a representation of the human form using details we could call childish and innocent, in order to use those symbols to present something.
Again, do I think adult material on FJ is good? Absolutely not. But does it deserve this kind of hatred and flat out insulting remarks to animation? Not one bit.
Let me make something clear. I do not like lolita. I don't, not one bit. But I still understand it's symbolism and how it can be used to present meaning. It's all terrible because it has aspects of what we deem childish. You cannot make some insane sweeping generalization on an entire art form.
Given how the person in question explained it, and how admin has reacted so violently to this, and his bigoted choice of words toward animation, I don't think taking his word on this is wise.
#247 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
#104 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
Legal think. Lots of governments go crazy when they see it. Sadly a lot of places freak out even when it's not actual "children." Even 420chan apparently got some 'messages' form authorities about it.
While I will always agree with instant banning, especially perma-bans, a suspension and removal of the pic is something I am 100% understand of, -especially- if it's played as actual children and not jsut visually.
#196 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
I think you misunderstand something. I agree with the removal of the post ASAP. I have no problem with the post being removed and the account suspended temporarily as a punishment, or bans in the case of repeated situations.
I will however always attack ruthlessness and malice. When you choose permanent bans as a first reaction, you are doing wrong. It is a moral stance I take on any situation. I may be frank and a bit pretencious but I'm not an idiot.
#92 - Womens Study Major (11/11/2014) [-]
Let's ignore the situation with "caroton child porn". I will remind you though, that in digimon, these 10 years olds are put in mortal peril, have deep interpersonal relationships, often with people who tried to kill them. And fight with the entire world on their shoulders. I think people mature enough to face death and the fate of the world itself, are mature enough to face sex. It's not as simple as applying some number to it based on -our- worlds culture.
But let's ignore that, You are -still- the bad guy in this situation if it is true. Regardless of your reason, instant permanent ban is a last resort, to someone who you cannot stop any other way. Taking someone away from your service for good is an act of desperation, and using ti as a first option is an act of emotional violence and ruthlessness.
As I have said hundreds of times. Violence is not strength, and compassion is not weakness. You can ramble about his actions all you want, it doesn't justify an instant perma-ban.
#201 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
You know, In my own writing I created a nation where one's age does not actually define adulthood. In fact within that culture, its possible to be a 25 year old child legally. While the usual ages for adulthood in that culture were 16-18, it could in theory be low. I did not write any of that case, but that's how it goes. It's not some attempt to press people to think about stagitory laws, its simply how the culture developed.
What right to you have to deny another culture and emotions based on -math-? Each culture has it's own rules and ideas. The reason we have these age limitation is because of the sociology around it. the people in worlds outside are own live differently than us, and applying our own math in some absolutism, is just presumptuous at best.
I admit it's a bit of a ramble on my part, but to just tell me to "kill yourself" because you disagree? You cannot apply -this- worlds ideals to another world entirely, it doesn't work.
#342 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
Well, in that world people get the title of adulthood based on their capacity to live in the world independently. And seeing as most real independent trades are not learned to a proficient degree to allow independent living until he age of 16-18(on average) so....no, not that I can see.
So far my minimum has been 15, and he is the first one -ever- in over 300 years, and there is another limiting factor.
In theory, yeah I suppose possible, but that 12 year old would have to be amazingly mature and already head emotionally close relationships between peers, not to mention levels of trade skill are also a limiting factor for social relationships in that nation's culture just adds to the issue. So again.....no not really. and in fact it would be punishable given enough of a social difference.
It's just an example where our age brackets do not apply to world outside our own. And yes, my cultures are incredibly in depth. thanks for helping me develop it for the better.
#228 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
Sigh, you're being and incredibly presumptuous jerk. The character was entirely competent and actually a very intelligent person. He simply did not fit with the cultures ideas of adulthood, specifically the inability to care for himself financially due to a lack of technical skills and a focus on philosophy. In fact he was running for government and had passed government examinations that only a few hundred(out of over a million) pass every year.
Again, you are applying YOUR culture to someone else's entire existence. But hey, you go look up Isseu Hyoudou's crippling inability to handle intimacy due to being murdered, and tell me "hes under 18, automatic ban for child porn"
I do not support child porn, what I want is an understand that animation makes worlds outside our own. And labeling it 'cartoon' and treating it the same as our world, it outright foolish.
#204 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
(I ran out of room)
Do I agree with Admin removing the offending picture immediately? Sure, it's not an adult site anyway so it makes sense. Do I think that removing porn and temporarily suspending the account JIC is a good idea? Yes, a thousand times.
Do I agree with this line of logic of "It's 'cartoon' loli" allowing instant and ruthless emotional violence? No. The medium at which it's presented in does matter, as the world and culture the item is in changes. What I'm saying is no admin, funnyjunk or otherwise, should use instant, and especially perma-bans in this violent reaction to something deemed "wrong".
I want to make this clear. I am not defending posting porn, especially child porn. What I am saying is this one-sided violence reaction to the concept, missed a key part of the art, and is outright hateful, especially when you turn it into "kill yourself"
#265 - godzillagate (11/12/2014) [-]
You sound like an SJWfag... I'm not saying you don't have any points, but when you throw around phrases like "violent reaction" and absolutisms like "no admin ever" make it hard to take you seriously. If you think someone's going to cry themselves to sleep because admin blocked them, then they're not the kind of people we want here anyway. If you don't agree with the policies then either A) Get a following and petition earnestly and un-anonymously to admin; B) Use a different website; C) Use this website and just put up with it.
Taking to the comment section as an anon and throwing around stupid doublethink and rhetoric is dumb and makes you sound pretentious. And if I sound derisive or "violently reactionary" then it's how I prefer to sound
#334 - Womens Study Major (11/12/2014) [-]
I do agree on many points, I certainly don't deny Admin the right to run his site as he sees fit. I simply do not defend his actions, and find his words hurtful. I love animation and what it brings, and to jump to using "cartoon" and referring implicitly to it being child porn because it looked similar to our concept of a child, is just not ok to me.
I'll probably forget the argument tomorrow as I usually do. But for now, I can't stay silent in the face of such hurtful things to the wonderful art form that is animation. And yes, an instant-ban to someone regardless of situation, is a very "violent" reaction. Admittedly it was a poor choice of words, and for that I do apologize. It was unfitting of me to use them.
With that said, I'm out.
#100 - Womens Study Major (11/11/2014) [-]
Oh, as an additional(lack of room). I will call out authority figures on this kind of stuff. I've had some extremely horrible experiences with this kind of stuff before, so I'm very sensitive about it. I'm just a very nosy and frank person. Why I don't have my own account here I don't yet know.
|#20 - Picture||11/03/2014 on He knows.||+2|