No, that's a sociopath.

they're called sociopaths now, but they used to be called psychopaths by doctors.

Yeah, but now people realize the difference between lacking guilt and empathy, and being batshit insane.

SHUT THE FUCK UP! THAT BOX OF WHEAT FLAKES HAD A VERY COMPELLING ARGUMENT!

hail satan

I think you're thinking of a schizophrenic with that phrase.

[url deleted]

dumma ss anon

No, ilolzville was right the first time you retard.

atheism is not a religion. it is a sever lack or religion. it is a hypothesis based on facts and evidence. religion is childrens story we need to out grow.

Also, today's christianity isn't the same as christianity during the crusades and "Dark Ages", Nowadays christianity puts a hell of a lot more focus and emphasis on Christ and also to live life like him and to let our hands be his and our mouth be his, though there are those that misrepresent and blaspheme, but good thing the bible aslo tells us to watch out for false prophets, though some don't listen. (Big fat mother fucking frowning face)

what about science? Does science have also circle proofs?

I'm glad you asked that, yes there are some. Like with gravity, it falls to the ground so gravity must exist and we know gravity exists because it falls to the ground. Circle proofs don't always equate to falsehood.

Are you talking about newton's theory of gravity or just the word gravity, the first one means you're false, the latter one means it just a change of words.

You're not one for acceptance are you? That is the circle proof of gravity, period.

first of all, I'm all for acceptance, if it makes sence. second what you stated before was just a switch of words, it was not science.

You can show me how I'm wrong. You can show me how Newton's law of gravity isn't a circle proof. I'll let you do it, I promise.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every point mass in the universe attracts every other point mass with a force. So stating that gravity exist only because the balls to the ground is completely false. You can messure the force of gravity everywhere. The planets and stars even between two small weights closely together.
And circle proof always is a falsehood

You and I both know I wasn't talking about universal gravitation. How would a circle proof always result in falsehood? Regardless, that circle proof anonymous provided is not what christians say, it is what athiests say to try to show how ridiculous christians are and their attempt to debunk the existance of a God. The Bible was not written by God, but by man (The Old Testiment is a series of historical documents depicting the relationship between God and his people, The New Testiment depicts the life of Jesus and some events afterwards). Infact, I don't know of any circle proofs in relating to the bible or christianity.

Circle proof or petitio principii is a type of logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proven is assumed implicitly or explicitly in the premise.
The use of circle proof is an incorrect use of argumentation in reasoning. But why is the bible correct or right?

i zoomed in as far as i can go and i can still see your hand

Your point. I don't see it.

The start menu button on 7 doesn't stick out of the task bar. On vista it does.

Thank you. I appreaciate it. this is my first shitty OC

not this guys though

why would it have a full stop when it's in the middle of the sentence?

You didn't finish your sentence properly. Tut-tut.