Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #6568 on Comments
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
Send mail to ijieck
Invite ijieck to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
historic east aurora
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 162 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 163 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress:
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
My Little Pony (4)
Doctor Who (3)
fifty years (2)
Jay Naylor (2)
star wars (2)
after being an anon for about a year i decided to make the commitment and join funnyjunk in holy matrimony.
What people say about ijieck
latest user's comments
- 1. can i **** it 2. someone point out the holes in it
- quit wasting time and just write your essay
- 2:45 denies high five 8:45 karma
Man goes to berkeley...
Obama Shenanigans 2
- a bowtruckle from harry potter
Look at these!
I've never watched harry potter. Is it a series worth watching?
It's a new fantasy world to explore. The Harry Potter series is alright, much better if you grew up with it. However, the newest movie (which the picture is from) Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is great without needing to have read/watched any of the other material.
It recently came out on pirateb... I mean Blueray. Go check it out.
Great series, books are wonderful too.
No. It is one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series' only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it's certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
- **ijieck roll picture searched pokemon **
- leave the fridge door open
Now That's Dangerous
- **ijieck used "*roll 1, 0000001-1000000*"** **ijieck rolls …
If dubs I love you
**draagondix used "*roll 2, 01-99*"**
**draagondix rolls 69**
**draagondix rolls 07**
has deleted their comment.
Show Comments (0)