Upload
Login or register

idkwhatthatmeans

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:6/24/2013
Last Login:7/30/2016
Location:Corona CA
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13561
Highest Content Rank:#384
Highest Comment Rank:#1312
Content Thumbs: 6154 total,  6560 ,  406
Comment Thumbs: 2156 total,  2414 ,  258
Content Level Progress: 55% (55/100)
Level 161 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 162 Content: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Comment Level Progress: 29% (29/100)
Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:2
Content Views:258552
Times Content Favorited:533 times
Total Comments Made:367
FJ Points:2682
Favorite Tags: game (4) | the (3) | are (2) | what (2)
yolo420swagswagobeydiamondlifesnapbacks

  • Views: 67137
    Thumbs Up 2088 Thumbs Down 64 Total: +2024
    Comments: 94
    Favorites: 123
    Uploaded: 07/05/13
    Ultimate Photobomb Ultimate Photobomb
  • Views: 60680
    Thumbs Up 1941 Thumbs Down 65 Total: +1876
    Comments: 266
    Favorites: 156
    Uploaded: 07/14/13
    Asians Asians
  • Views: 46681
    Thumbs Up 1323 Thumbs Down 112 Total: +1211
    Comments: 67
    Favorites: 150
    Uploaded: 08/23/13
    Cody the Dog Cody the Dog
  • Views: 17869
    Thumbs Up 382 Thumbs Down 40 Total: +342
    Comments: 14
    Favorites: 40
    Uploaded: 06/26/13
    Difference between Boys and Girls Difference between Boys and Girls
  • Views: 11197
    Thumbs Up 213 Thumbs Down 23 Total: +190
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 06/25/13
    Pedobear Pedobear
  • Views: 14735
    Thumbs Up 207 Thumbs Down 24 Total: +183
    Comments: 15
    Favorites: 11
    Uploaded: 07/30/13
    It's All Coming Together... It's All Coming Together...
First2[ 12 ]

latest user's comments

#46 - Trump never said the thing you're quoting, he said a similar t…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/30/2016 on Deals -3
#65 - itistimetostop (07/30/2016) [-]
Donald Trump on ISIS You have to take out their families

Tell me what part of "you have to take out their families, they care about their lives, don't kid yourself" I misunderstood?

Also, the harm is that you are asking a very real potential threat (Russia) to do international espionage against a fellow American, who might have secrets as former Secretary of State that would lead to big danger. Also, in what world would the FBI willing take information stolen by Russia to incriminate their own damn citizens. Doesn't it seem like Russia would gain a whole lot more than we would? I wonder why they would do such a thing?

What bothers me most is the sheer uncaring nature of it and unwillingness to act like a responsible adult. "so what" "sarcastically" So basically, the leader of the free world, who must have the coolest head in times of international crisis, who is commander of all our armed forces, and holds the key to nuclear devastation that can cause endless tragedies is allowed to act like an loud mouth eleventh grader who can talk shit in the back of the class, but when is called out on it by the teacher, can lie and say the teacher misunderstood?

It baffles me how many things Trump is just allowed to brush off by his supporters. You understand that you can say these things as a private citizen, but IF he is in charge, he will be held accountable on the world stage (thus everything he says will make us accountable).
#41 - "*gulp* Trump" stop baiting 07/30/2016 on Vote for Hillary? +4
#83 - did you even read that article? that **** is not only more bi…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/30/2016 on Killery +4
#112 - anon (07/30/2016) [-]
>groping women far younger than him(if he were an immigrant, FJ would be up in arms about that)
>creating the scam that is Trump U and getting away with millions of dollars for it
>bullying people out of their homes to build more luxury hotels
>NOT PAYING PEOPLE FOR THE WORK THEY DID(Polish immigrants, the piano maker Michael Diehl, etc. etc. etc.)

Oh yeah, harmless stuff really. And that's not even all of the points in the article.

Am I saying Hillary getting away with what she did is ok? Of fucking course not, she's a cunt and should be in prison now. But that absolutely does not mean Trump is an innocent savior of America that the alt-right sees him as.
User avatar
#237 - Ruspanic (17 hours ago) [-]
also the Polish immigrants you mentioned were undocumented lol
#21 - considering he ******* dies at the end, you would think its qu…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/09/2016 on Anon tries Pokemon Go +7
User avatar
#29 - nsfwlurkmore (07/10/2016) [-]
Yeah, but the Celebi gives it away at the start.
#52 - you are a really smart guy arent ya 07/09/2016 on ha +1
#113 - I point out that Texas is the most underrepresented because th…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/13/2016 on Hiri Redsea Famysid 0
User avatar
#115 - elcreepo (06/13/2016) [-]
How many times have I pointed this out though... that one of my biggest problems with the college is that the electors are not represented correctly according to population.
#112 - The electors per each state is handled in the way you dislike … 06/13/2016 on Hiri Redsea Famysid 0
#111 - The fundamental and basic point here is that the "punitiv…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/13/2016 on Hiri Redsea Famysid 0
User avatar
#114 - elcreepo (06/13/2016) [-]
Calm the fuck down.

Texas IS, that's my problem. It is underrepresented and I kept trying to tell you that but you kept claiming "OH WHAT'S IT MATTER"

But you literally said this yourself:
There are more people in the coastal areas.

Tens of millions in the midwest vs HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS on the coastal areas.

In the system you keep screaming about up there until literally just now, everyone is fair and balanced and the system doesn't need change. So that would mean more people=more electoral votes=win by popular vote, which doesn't happen.

Also those barren areas are under represented. The more land, the less handicap. Yeah, fucked isn't it?
#108 - LETS SAY TEXAS MAJORITY VOTES FOR BUSH BUT ONLY 51% VOTED FOR …  [+] (7 new replies) 06/13/2016 on Hiri Redsea Famysid 0
User avatar
#110 - elcreepo (06/13/2016) [-]
So yes, I have a problem with how many electors each state gets, the fact that electors can change their vote, and 'winner takes all'
User avatar
#112 - idkwhatthatmeans (06/13/2016) [-]
The electors per each state is handled in the way you dislike so that all states have their voices heard. Electors can change their vote BUT NEVER FUCKING DO AND IT NEVER MATTERS IF THEY DO. I do understand having a problem with "winner takes all."
User avatar
#109 - elcreepo (06/13/2016) [-]
Goddamn. Let me put this in a way that's even MORE simple.

Texas= less electors, but MORE. PEOPLE.
New York= more electors, LESS. PEOPLE.

Texas wants Gore, but New York doesn't.
Gore loses.

That's not fair or balanced.

NEXT, we move on to electors.

Each state has electors to reflect its population, no? Smaller states, as mentioned, get more despite having less people, but let's set that aside for now.

In your sytem, you assume all is fair and balanced.

So if people in Nevada like gore, but people in New York don't, obviously gore loses both popular and electoral vote.

But if he's more popular in areas with MORE people, and not popular in areas with LESS people, why is this simple equation not being reflected in the electoral college?

Say the areas with MORE people want Gore. 85%. Shocking popular vote victory.

But in the punitive and barren center of the US, only 35% want gore.

But GORE STILL LOOSES.

That make sense to you at all in the system you keep claiming is 'fair ad according to popular vote'
User avatar
#113 - idkwhatthatmeans (06/13/2016) [-]
I point out that Texas is the most underrepresented because they voted for Bush obviously and he lost the popular vote but narrowly won the electoral vote. He would have won even more if that state was more fairly balanced.
User avatar
#115 - elcreepo (06/13/2016) [-]
How many times have I pointed this out though... that one of my biggest problems with the college is that the electors are not represented correctly according to population.
User avatar
#111 - idkwhatthatmeans (06/13/2016) [-]
The fundamental and basic point here is that the "punitive, barren" areas in the middle and southern areas of the USA do in fact hold MILLIONS OF PEOPLE who's opinions DO matter. If they weren't given a bit of a "handicap" as the electoral college gives them then they WOULD NEVER HAVE THEIR OPINION HEARD. Even then, these states dont make a MASSIVE difference in the election because their "handicap" isnt so severe. According to d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/fairvote/pages/199/attachments/original/1450119297/2008votersperelector.pdf?1450119297 Texas actually IS THE MOST UNDERREPRESENTED STATE.
User avatar
#114 - elcreepo (06/13/2016) [-]
Calm the fuck down.

Texas IS, that's my problem. It is underrepresented and I kept trying to tell you that but you kept claiming "OH WHAT'S IT MATTER"

But you literally said this yourself:
There are more people in the coastal areas.

Tens of millions in the midwest vs HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS on the coastal areas.

In the system you keep screaming about up there until literally just now, everyone is fair and balanced and the system doesn't need change. So that would mean more people=more electoral votes=win by popular vote, which doesn't happen.

Also those barren areas are under represented. The more land, the less handicap. Yeah, fucked isn't it?
#106 - Why should national popular vote be reflected? the majority o… 06/13/2016 on Hiri Redsea Famysid 0