I will give you that one, but it's still irrelevant because the question is whether thor beats hulk, which he does.

hylebus pls... google it if you must.

The Living Tribunal possesses virtually unlimited power and absolute control over the Marvel Multiverse, and is only weaker than the The One-Above-All

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Tribunal

/thread

I will give you that one, but it's still irrelevant because the question is whether thor beats hulk, which he does.

That one is easily answered: Thor withholds his power when fighting on Earth unless absolutely necessary, so as not to cause lasting damage to the planet with his monumental power.

Oh, and cryingchicken's not wrong in later comments, Stan Lee did create Thor for the primary purpose of having a hero that was stronger than Hulk. Of all HEROES, not all Entities, by any means, Thor is obviously the strongest.

It has been sated by marvel that the whole point of creating thor was so that they could have a character who could finally be the undeniably most powerful being in the marvel universe and finally end all of the mail that they got asking who the most powerful was. I do not need to source as it encompasses the entire marvel franchise.

Most powerful being in Marvel Universe? LOL

Even Galactus would laugh at Thor, not mentioning Eternity, Living Tribunal or Thanos wielding the power of Heart of the Universe.

hylebus pls... google it if you must.

The Living Tribunal possesses virtually unlimited power and absolute control over the Marvel Multiverse, and is only weaker than the The One-Above-All

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Tribunal

/thread

I will give you that one, but it's still irrelevant because the question is whether thor beats hulk, which he does.

Kill him while he sleeps, like Deadpool does in "Deadpool Kills the Marvel Universe".

This isn't a debate, it's a published comic where thor beats hulk as well as all other challengers making him the most powerful in the marvel universe followed by sentry (who thor also defeats) and then the hulk in third place. please do some research next time.

different writers=different versions of the same character etc etc. Unless specified which version of characters, I don't really think its fair calling either one the strongest.

But of all the comics the only one with a definitive win (kill) is thor.

( outskirtsbattledome.wikispaces.com/Jobber+Aura )

Please source.

I'm referencing to Onslaught series, where even Thor wasn't able to stop Onslaught, as it had powers even of Franklin Richards, who is considered pretty much as human god with his cosmic powers. Hulk was able to overpower Onslaught, when Jean Grey shutted down unconscious barrier in Hulk's mind, thus "unlocking" his virtually limitless strength. Hulk was then able to break Onslaught's armor.

Learn to read comics please and do a proper research next time.

That one is easily answered: Thor withholds his power when fighting on Earth unless absolutely necessary, so as not to cause lasting damage to the planet with his monumental power.

Oh, and cryingchicken's not wrong in later comments, Stan Lee did create Thor for the primary purpose of having a hero that was stronger than Hulk. Of all HEROES, not all Entities, by any means, Thor is obviously the strongest.

It has been sated by marvel that the whole point of creating thor was so that they could have a character who could finally be the undeniably most powerful being in the marvel universe and finally end all of the mail that they got asking who the most powerful was. I do not need to source as it encompasses the entire marvel franchise.

Most powerful being in Marvel Universe? LOL

Even Galactus would laugh at Thor, not mentioning Eternity, Living Tribunal or Thanos wielding the power of Heart of the Universe.

hylebus pls... google it if you must.

The Living Tribunal possesses virtually unlimited power and absolute control over the Marvel Multiverse, and is only weaker than the The One-Above-All

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Tribunal

/thread

I will give you that one, but it's still irrelevant because the question is whether thor beats hulk, which he does.

thor kills the hulk with a simple snap of the neck, thor wins.

Not likely, as Hulk can withstand nuclear explosion easily. And also, the madder he gets, the stronger his invulnerability is.

Your argument is invalid.

Kill him while he sleeps, like Deadpool does in "Deadpool Kills the Marvel Universe".

This isn't a debate, it's a published comic where thor beats hulk as well as all other challengers making him the most powerful in the marvel universe followed by sentry (who thor also defeats) and then the hulk in third place. please do some research next time.

different writers=different versions of the same character etc etc. Unless specified which version of characters, I don't really think its fair calling either one the strongest.

But of all the comics the only one with a definitive win (kill) is thor.

( outskirtsbattledome.wikispaces.com/Jobber+Aura )

Please source.

I'm referencing to Onslaught series, where even Thor wasn't able to stop Onslaught, as it had powers even of Franklin Richards, who is considered pretty much as human god with his cosmic powers. Hulk was able to overpower Onslaught, when Jean Grey shutted down unconscious barrier in Hulk's mind, thus "unlocking" his virtually limitless strength. Hulk was then able to break Onslaught's armor.

Learn to read comics please and do a proper research next time.

That one is easily answered: Thor withholds his power when fighting on Earth unless absolutely necessary, so as not to cause lasting damage to the planet with his monumental power.

Oh, and cryingchicken's not wrong in later comments, Stan Lee did create Thor for the primary purpose of having a hero that was stronger than Hulk. Of all HEROES, not all Entities, by any means, Thor is obviously the strongest.

It has been sated by marvel that the whole point of creating thor was so that they could have a character who could finally be the undeniably most powerful being in the marvel universe and finally end all of the mail that they got asking who the most powerful was. I do not need to source as it encompasses the entire marvel franchise.

Most powerful being in Marvel Universe? LOL

Even Galactus would laugh at Thor, not mentioning Eternity, Living Tribunal or Thanos wielding the power of Heart of the Universe.

hylebus pls... google it if you must.

The Living Tribunal possesses virtually unlimited power and absolute control over the Marvel Multiverse, and is only weaker than the The One-Above-All

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Tribunal

/thread

I will give you that one, but it's still irrelevant because the question is whether thor beats hulk, which he does.

in other words if we have a bit compassion in ourself we should not buy those products
but we don't have that

Yes. If you don't want to hurt nobody, you could just die. Because you wouldn't be able to eat meat, use shampoo, buy electronics, pretty much anything.

every product have it's story
for example some sort of metal they use for pc's, phones and other electronic equipment can only be found in Africa
in africa there is a shitload of corruption we all know that
now in those mines there are shit load of slaves and even children at work as regularly people being beaten up till death if they don't bring enough metal to the surface
just saying

That's what I am referring to. You just can't buy anything without supporting dictatorship or slavery in some for. E.G. If you buy almost any phone, you're supporting child workers in China and African slavery, as Tantalum is mostly found there and it's used in most electronics.

in other words if we have a bit compassion in ourself we should not buy those products
but we don't have that

Yes. If you don't want to hurt nobody, you could just die. Because you wouldn't be able to eat meat, use shampoo, buy electronics, pretty much anything.

Source:Star Wars

teleportation of sub-atomic particles has been achieved.

discovermagazine.com/2004/oct/one-step-closer-to-teleportation

And you can't simply ignore market share when it is obviously part of the problem. What i am trying to say, is that the people who participated in this survey, did not answer
"Firefox OS" or "Google Chrome OS"
they answered
"Firefox" and "Google Chrome". They did NOT mean the operating systems, which you can tell by the market share, because it would be impossible to get the results that this survey did according to the market share.
They meant web browser, and it is a sad fact that people today do not know the difference between an OS and a Web Browser and a Web site, hence, all 3 should have been underlined.

Firefox is NOT yet an OS, it is an OS in development. There IS a difference. Saying Firefox is an OS is like saying that Teleportation is possible because it is being studied.
And market share DOES come into play here. The fact that windows (the leading OS) and Mac (sadly, the one in second) are NOT up there, while Google Chrome is coming up first, which falls short of 5% in use, tells me, as it should tell you, that it is highly unlikely that those answering are actually using Google Chrome OS, and when you see that Firefox is up there, which isn't even possible seeing as the question is which operating system do you USE MOST, you can assume, in fact SHOULD assume if you are an intelligent human being, that people think that the words Operating System and Web Browser are synonymous, and so should obviously be underlined in the picture because they contribute to the EPIC FACEPALM that it deserves.

First, this comparison is absolutely wrong. Teleportation is absolutely hypothetical in means of present science, the closest thing to it is description of Einstein-Rosen bridge. As opposed to Firefox OS, which was announced months ago and is under active development. I don't see any way teleportation would be released next year.
And again, I'm not talking about market share or the content whatsoever. I'm talking about your first comment. Don't change the topic, otherwise I'll refuse to discuss anything with you.

teleportation of sub-atomic particles has been achieved.

discovermagazine.com/2004/oct/one-step-closer-to-teleportation

And you can't simply ignore market share when it is obviously part of the problem. What i am trying to say, is that the people who participated in this survey, did not answer
"Firefox OS" or "Google Chrome OS"
they answered
"Firefox" and "Google Chrome". They did NOT mean the operating systems, which you can tell by the market share, because it would be impossible to get the results that this survey did according to the market share.
They meant web browser, and it is a sad fact that people today do not know the difference between an OS and a Web Browser and a Web site, hence, all 3 should have been underlined.

I'll give you Google Chrome good sir, but you shall not have Firefox OS...
From the page you linked
"Firefox OS (project name: Boot to Gecko also known as B2G)[2] is an open source operating system for smartphones and tablet computers being developed by Mozilla."

NOTE: "being developed" aka in development, or, not out yet, meaning no one has it yet and should not be on the survey.
Not to mention, chances are there arent more people using Google Chrome OS than Windows which you can obviously tell trough the following chart

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems

makes up 66.26% of OS in usage today, where Google OS lands under the Other section meaning that total usage is UNDER 5.41% (this category is shared with other OSs)
and so you can tell that those who DID answer google chrome were not thinking of the OS, but of the web browser.

The point is, you said in your previous comment that Chrome and Firefox aren't OS, which in fact they are. I'm not discussing about the matter of market share.

Firefox is NOT yet an OS, it is an OS in development. There IS a difference. Saying Firefox is an OS is like saying that Teleportation is possible because it is being studied.
And market share DOES come into play here. The fact that windows (the leading OS) and Mac (sadly, the one in second) are NOT up there, while Google Chrome is coming up first, which falls short of 5% in use, tells me, as it should tell you, that it is highly unlikely that those answering are actually using Google Chrome OS, and when you see that Firefox is up there, which isn't even possible seeing as the question is which operating system do you USE MOST, you can assume, in fact SHOULD assume if you are an intelligent human being, that people think that the words Operating System and Web Browser are synonymous, and so should obviously be underlined in the picture because they contribute to the EPIC FACEPALM that it deserves.

First, this comparison is absolutely wrong. Teleportation is absolutely hypothetical in means of present science, the closest thing to it is description of Einstein-Rosen bridge. As opposed to Firefox OS, which was announced months ago and is under active development. I don't see any way teleportation would be released next year.
And again, I'm not talking about market share or the content whatsoever. I'm talking about your first comment. Don't change the topic, otherwise I'll refuse to discuss anything with you.

teleportation of sub-atomic particles has been achieved.

discovermagazine.com/2004/oct/one-step-closer-to-teleportation

And you can't simply ignore market share when it is obviously part of the problem. What i am trying to say, is that the people who participated in this survey, did not answer
"Firefox OS" or "Google Chrome OS"
they answered
"Firefox" and "Google Chrome". They did NOT mean the operating systems, which you can tell by the market share, because it would be impossible to get the results that this survey did according to the market share.
They meant web browser, and it is a sad fact that people today do not know the difference between an OS and a Web Browser and a Web site, hence, all 3 should have been underlined.

Granted that Firefox one says it's not out until 2013, meaning it still doesn't make any sense.

Rickrolls, rickrolls everywhere.

HALP!

Rickrolls, rickrolls everywhere.

And some super secret plans.

HALP!

Rickrolls, rickrolls everywhere.