hydraetis

Rank #1938 on Comments
hydraetis Avatar Level 268 Comments: Pure Win
Offline
Send mail to hydraetis Block hydraetis Invite hydraetis to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Steam Profile: Hydraetis
X-box Gamertag: Azhaius
PSN: Hydraetis
Date Signed Up:12/07/2010
Last Login:1/27/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6859
Comment Ranking:#1938
Highest Content Rank:#4038
Highest Comment Rank:#1591
Content Thumbs: 652 total,  807 ,  155
Comment Thumbs: 7722 total,  10093 ,  2371
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 56 Content: Sammich eater → Level 57 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 76% (76/100)
Level 268 Comments: Pure Win → Level 269 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:1
Content Views:71679
Times Content Favorited:47 times
Total Comments Made:5158
FJ Points:7548

latest user's comments

#119 - let's see. My comment: "you have to find a balan… 01/23/2015 on Story behind the GiF 0
#115 - You're right, I skipped over most of your comment because appa…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/23/2015 on Story behind the GiF 0
#117 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
lets see, i mentioned your mention of a lack of context, i mentioned your big words, and i mentioned your last statement. try again.
#111 - You're ******* retarded because you are apparentl…  [+] (10 new replies) 01/23/2015 on Story behind the GiF 0
#113 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
so, we have zero context on this guy. and he is the bad guy for it. and you automatically jump an entire paragraph of my statement. use all the over sized words you want, but you still seem retarded doing that.

heres another excerpt.
Dont autmoatically assume that if i bust him with pot im gonna follow him around and record his movements then frisk him when he gets home. I'm gonna take away his phone, and his computer. If he can explain why he has the need to do those things, then we can talk about it, but i can allow freedoms, if he acts responsible.
User avatar #122 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Those large words were there because you seemed incapable of picking up on the fact that I was saying "balance", not "give them everything".
#123 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
well, the " less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2. " statement seems pretty hard line against listening, considering i said flat out my basic principle.
User avatar #125 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Let's go back to that.

"as in a reasonable middle ground between a free-for-all and less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2."

Re-worded:
"When raising kids a reasonable middle ground between having zero restriction and having no freedom is needed."

Tell me, where is the accusation in there?
#127 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
my comment focuses on if they act responsible, they get freedoms, if they act like a dick, they lose them. granted i suppose that being grounded for being a dumbass when they know better than to smoke pot means they have as much freedom as a holocaust survivor. some how. that i even state i will talk to them about why they need to smoke pot in the first place.
that it isnt that hard for someone fucked up to find a kid. and that i dont personally see an issue with keeping my kid safe.

so again. second verse same as the first.
User avatar #174 - aaauuuggghhh (01/23/2015) [-]
Well now you're drifting from the point. Data monitoring is the issue here, not punishments in general. This guy believes in absolutely no disruption of privacy, not absolutely punishment-free parenting.
#175 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
ah, that outside view helped clear that up.

though i find that just as negligent in parenting, considering a child could just as easily look up porn for someone closer to their age. i tried that when i just found masturbation, and tried to find porno for someone my own age. thats beside the point though.

a kid is for lack of a better word. kinda stupid with judgement, especially with complete access to the worlds information.
User avatar #119 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
let's see.

My comment: "you have to find a balance."
Your comment: "and let them have everything they want because "you dont trust me! whats wrong with you"

My comment: "Did I say let them have everything? Pretty sure I was saying something about a 'balance"
Your comment: "lets see, acts responsible, gets stuff. acts like a dick, loses stuff. yea, thats totally nazi tastic huh."

Yea, nope. plenty of ignoring on your side as well there buddy
User avatar #115 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
You're right, I skipped over most of your comment because apparently you skipped over mine.
#117 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
lets see, i mentioned your mention of a lack of context, i mentioned your big words, and i mentioned your last statement. try again.
#106 - lol jesus you're ****** retarded.  [+] (1 new reply) 01/23/2015 on Story behind the GiF 0
#107 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
you arent exactly explaining why. its not like letting them know that bad people exists. mind you it must be awesome living like nothing bad ever happens. how is that?
#104 - Did I say let them have everything? Pretty sure I was saying s…  [+] (14 new replies) 01/23/2015 on Story behind the GiF +1
#105 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
lets see, acts responsible, gets stuff. acts like a dick, loses stuff. yea, thats totally nazi tastic huh.
User avatar #111 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
You're fucking retarded because you are apparently under the impression that my definition of a god damn BALANCE BETWEEN FREEDOMS AND RESTRICTIONS = 0 restriction.

What the guy in the post is doing is past that line of balance.

Then again it seems like you'd consider a parent that reads all of their kid's text messages & mail, has cameras in their room, and has a direct feed to their computer monitor so they can see exactly what they're doing on it (including being able to read all of their conversations on facebook and whatnot) a healthy parenting style.
#113 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
so, we have zero context on this guy. and he is the bad guy for it. and you automatically jump an entire paragraph of my statement. use all the over sized words you want, but you still seem retarded doing that.

heres another excerpt.
Dont autmoatically assume that if i bust him with pot im gonna follow him around and record his movements then frisk him when he gets home. I'm gonna take away his phone, and his computer. If he can explain why he has the need to do those things, then we can talk about it, but i can allow freedoms, if he acts responsible.
User avatar #122 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Those large words were there because you seemed incapable of picking up on the fact that I was saying "balance", not "give them everything".
#123 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
well, the " less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2. " statement seems pretty hard line against listening, considering i said flat out my basic principle.
User avatar #125 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Let's go back to that.

"as in a reasonable middle ground between a free-for-all and less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2."

Re-worded:
"When raising kids a reasonable middle ground between having zero restriction and having no freedom is needed."

Tell me, where is the accusation in there?
#127 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
my comment focuses on if they act responsible, they get freedoms, if they act like a dick, they lose them. granted i suppose that being grounded for being a dumbass when they know better than to smoke pot means they have as much freedom as a holocaust survivor. some how. that i even state i will talk to them about why they need to smoke pot in the first place.
that it isnt that hard for someone fucked up to find a kid. and that i dont personally see an issue with keeping my kid safe.

so again. second verse same as the first.
User avatar #174 - aaauuuggghhh (01/23/2015) [-]
Well now you're drifting from the point. Data monitoring is the issue here, not punishments in general. This guy believes in absolutely no disruption of privacy, not absolutely punishment-free parenting.
#175 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
ah, that outside view helped clear that up.

though i find that just as negligent in parenting, considering a child could just as easily look up porn for someone closer to their age. i tried that when i just found masturbation, and tried to find porno for someone my own age. thats beside the point though.

a kid is for lack of a better word. kinda stupid with judgement, especially with complete access to the worlds information.
User avatar #119 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
let's see.

My comment: "you have to find a balance."
Your comment: "and let them have everything they want because "you dont trust me! whats wrong with you"

My comment: "Did I say let them have everything? Pretty sure I was saying something about a 'balance"
Your comment: "lets see, acts responsible, gets stuff. acts like a dick, loses stuff. yea, thats totally nazi tastic huh."

Yea, nope. plenty of ignoring on your side as well there buddy
User avatar #115 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
You're right, I skipped over most of your comment because apparently you skipped over mine.
#117 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
lets see, i mentioned your mention of a lack of context, i mentioned your big words, and i mentioned your last statement. try again.
User avatar #106 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
lol jesus you're fuckin retarded.

#107 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
you arent exactly explaining why. its not like letting them know that bad people exists. mind you it must be awesome living like nothing bad ever happens. how is that?
#99 - Dude, in this day and age you have to find a balance. Go too o…  [+] (16 new replies) 01/23/2015 on Story behind the GiF +1
#101 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
and let them have everything they want because "you dont trust me! whats wrong with you" you end up with a self entitled fucking shit.


last few lines, along the whole "earning shit" because im not the kinda of person just give him everything just because i wanna be cool.

if he isnt a little shit, then yea, he can have his phone and shit. same with the real world, im not gonna give someone who is high or drunk everything they want. if they act like a responsible individual who isnt risking his ass for no reason, he can do what he needs, just follow basic rules. curfew, chores, no drugs, no booze, and respect your mother. i come from an abusive home, hell, everything i know about a relationship is basically not to do what my dad did.

Dont autmoatically assume that if i bust him with pot im gonna follow him around and record his movements then frisk him when he gets home. I'm gonna take away his phone, and his computer. If he can explain why he has the need to do those things, then we can talk about it, but i can allow freedoms, if he acts responsible.
User avatar #104 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Did I say let them have everything? Pretty sure I was saying something about a 'balance', as in a reasonable middle ground between a free-for-all and less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2.
#105 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
lets see, acts responsible, gets stuff. acts like a dick, loses stuff. yea, thats totally nazi tastic huh.
User avatar #111 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
You're fucking retarded because you are apparently under the impression that my definition of a god damn BALANCE BETWEEN FREEDOMS AND RESTRICTIONS = 0 restriction.

What the guy in the post is doing is past that line of balance.

Then again it seems like you'd consider a parent that reads all of their kid's text messages & mail, has cameras in their room, and has a direct feed to their computer monitor so they can see exactly what they're doing on it (including being able to read all of their conversations on facebook and whatnot) a healthy parenting style.
#113 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
so, we have zero context on this guy. and he is the bad guy for it. and you automatically jump an entire paragraph of my statement. use all the over sized words you want, but you still seem retarded doing that.

heres another excerpt.
Dont autmoatically assume that if i bust him with pot im gonna follow him around and record his movements then frisk him when he gets home. I'm gonna take away his phone, and his computer. If he can explain why he has the need to do those things, then we can talk about it, but i can allow freedoms, if he acts responsible.
User avatar #122 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Those large words were there because you seemed incapable of picking up on the fact that I was saying "balance", not "give them everything".
#123 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
well, the " less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2. " statement seems pretty hard line against listening, considering i said flat out my basic principle.
User avatar #125 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Let's go back to that.

"as in a reasonable middle ground between a free-for-all and less freedom than a concentration camp prisoner in WW2."

Re-worded:
"When raising kids a reasonable middle ground between having zero restriction and having no freedom is needed."

Tell me, where is the accusation in there?
#127 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
my comment focuses on if they act responsible, they get freedoms, if they act like a dick, they lose them. granted i suppose that being grounded for being a dumbass when they know better than to smoke pot means they have as much freedom as a holocaust survivor. some how. that i even state i will talk to them about why they need to smoke pot in the first place.
that it isnt that hard for someone fucked up to find a kid. and that i dont personally see an issue with keeping my kid safe.

so again. second verse same as the first.
User avatar #174 - aaauuuggghhh (01/23/2015) [-]
Well now you're drifting from the point. Data monitoring is the issue here, not punishments in general. This guy believes in absolutely no disruption of privacy, not absolutely punishment-free parenting.
#175 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
ah, that outside view helped clear that up.

though i find that just as negligent in parenting, considering a child could just as easily look up porn for someone closer to their age. i tried that when i just found masturbation, and tried to find porno for someone my own age. thats beside the point though.

a kid is for lack of a better word. kinda stupid with judgement, especially with complete access to the worlds information.
User avatar #119 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
let's see.

My comment: "you have to find a balance."
Your comment: "and let them have everything they want because "you dont trust me! whats wrong with you"

My comment: "Did I say let them have everything? Pretty sure I was saying something about a 'balance"
Your comment: "lets see, acts responsible, gets stuff. acts like a dick, loses stuff. yea, thats totally nazi tastic huh."

Yea, nope. plenty of ignoring on your side as well there buddy
User avatar #115 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
You're right, I skipped over most of your comment because apparently you skipped over mine.
#117 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
lets see, i mentioned your mention of a lack of context, i mentioned your big words, and i mentioned your last statement. try again.
User avatar #106 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
lol jesus you're fuckin retarded.

#107 - kiaserzerg (01/23/2015) [-]
you arent exactly explaining why. its not like letting them know that bad people exists. mind you it must be awesome living like nothing bad ever happens. how is that?
#356 - Sure, in that case it's more just getting your **** … 01/23/2015 on no title 0
#208 - Lol way to pinpoint my exact character based off of an interne… 01/22/2015 on no title 0
#204 - Lol I don't even carry a gun, as I live in Canada. I'm just ar…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/22/2015 on no title 0
User avatar #289 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
Shooting a mugger in the back isn't "defending yourself".
User avatar #356 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Sure, in that case it's more just getting your shit back.

I'm still sticking to my point though.
User avatar #206 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
You act like every mugging is black and white, and happens the same way. As if holding your arms above your head isn't going to show a gun in any holster, unless you're wearing a trenchcoat (which I wouldn't be surprised from some edgy gun enthusiast).

And like I said, carrying the gun only makes any attack more dangerous. It doesn't make anyone safer. It's an excuse to get to shoot someone in the situation you described, a situation in which nobody had to be shot. It's a fucking power fantasy.
User avatar #208 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Lol way to pinpoint my exact character based off of an internet comment.

Like I said, carrying a simple handgun is no different to learning a martial art for self defence. But then again, sounds like you're one of the people that are against the idea of defending one's self.
#198 - Simple. throw him your wallet, he turns to run away, you shoot…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/22/2015 on no title 0
User avatar #201 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
That's retarded. You're assuming he doesn't notice your gun immediately and rush you/shoot you. If the gun is noticed, you're fucked. You're risking your life over, what, $100?

It sounds like the only reason you carry a gun is because you want to shoot someone. That's not normal.
#63 - In my grade 12 social class my teacher would often tell studen… 01/22/2015 on Wait, he just can do that? 0
#195 - Lol well I do not suffer from a bleeding heart conscience so i…  [+] (8 new replies) 01/22/2015 on no title 0
User avatar #197 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
That entire comment is douchy. Accept this, embrace this. You reflect my final comment on that thread perfectly.

Because if a mugger sees you have a gun, the likelihood of you dying goes up a lot. Think about that. You're carrying a device that, in the 0.0000001% likelihood event of an attack, makes it more likely that you will be killed. And you call it self defense.
User avatar #204 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Lol I don't even carry a gun, as I live in Canada. I'm just arguing with you because you seem to be of the mind that incessantly running away from conflict/being absolute shit-scared of it is better than having a balance between desire to avoid it and desire to create it.

I don't go around picking fights, but if some guy comes up and punches me in the face I'm going to fucking retaliate.

And as for the shoot in the back thing, so the mugger has eyes on the back of his head?

Wallet -> back pocket. Grab it from there, throw it to him, wait till he turns around to get moving. Now that he's turned around and not looking at you anymore, you are free to reach into your jacket or whatever and nail the fucker with a small piece of lead. Pick your wallet back up, call the cops if you feel like it, leave.
User avatar #289 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
Shooting a mugger in the back isn't "defending yourself".
User avatar #356 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Sure, in that case it's more just getting your shit back.

I'm still sticking to my point though.
User avatar #206 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
You act like every mugging is black and white, and happens the same way. As if holding your arms above your head isn't going to show a gun in any holster, unless you're wearing a trenchcoat (which I wouldn't be surprised from some edgy gun enthusiast).

And like I said, carrying the gun only makes any attack more dangerous. It doesn't make anyone safer. It's an excuse to get to shoot someone in the situation you described, a situation in which nobody had to be shot. It's a fucking power fantasy.
User avatar #208 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Lol way to pinpoint my exact character based off of an internet comment.

Like I said, carrying a simple handgun is no different to learning a martial art for self defence. But then again, sounds like you're one of the people that are against the idea of defending one's self.
User avatar #198 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Simple. throw him your wallet, he turns to run away, you shoot him in the back.

Done.
User avatar #201 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
That's retarded. You're assuming he doesn't notice your gun immediately and rush you/shoot you. If the gun is noticed, you're fucked. You're risking your life over, what, $100?

It sounds like the only reason you carry a gun is because you want to shoot someone. That's not normal.
#191 - Carrying a simple handgun for self defence is no more douchey … 01/22/2015 on no title 0
#187 - "Pocket knives are insanely useful." Too ba…  [+] (10 new replies) 01/22/2015 on no title 0
User avatar #194 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
I can't reply to your other message, end of the purple lines.

Anyway, yes it is. There is no reason to carry a gun around unless you live in Detroit or something. People never get attacked. A lot of attacks have happened, and there are a lot of people, but on average, it never happens. And in 9/10 attacks, it's better to just give up your wallet than turn a mugging into a murder.

Look at the Zimmerman case. Whatever you think happened in the situation, if it wasn't for Zimmerman carrying a gun, nobody would have died.
User avatar #195 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Lol well I do not suffer from a bleeding heart conscience so if I had to choose between losing my shit to some fuckhead or blasting him in the legs, I'd choose blasting him in the legs.
User avatar #197 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
That entire comment is douchy. Accept this, embrace this. You reflect my final comment on that thread perfectly.

Because if a mugger sees you have a gun, the likelihood of you dying goes up a lot. Think about that. You're carrying a device that, in the 0.0000001% likelihood event of an attack, makes it more likely that you will be killed. And you call it self defense.
User avatar #204 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Lol I don't even carry a gun, as I live in Canada. I'm just arguing with you because you seem to be of the mind that incessantly running away from conflict/being absolute shit-scared of it is better than having a balance between desire to avoid it and desire to create it.

I don't go around picking fights, but if some guy comes up and punches me in the face I'm going to fucking retaliate.

And as for the shoot in the back thing, so the mugger has eyes on the back of his head?

Wallet -> back pocket. Grab it from there, throw it to him, wait till he turns around to get moving. Now that he's turned around and not looking at you anymore, you are free to reach into your jacket or whatever and nail the fucker with a small piece of lead. Pick your wallet back up, call the cops if you feel like it, leave.
User avatar #289 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
Shooting a mugger in the back isn't "defending yourself".
User avatar #356 - hydraetis (01/23/2015) [-]
Sure, in that case it's more just getting your shit back.

I'm still sticking to my point though.
User avatar #206 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
You act like every mugging is black and white, and happens the same way. As if holding your arms above your head isn't going to show a gun in any holster, unless you're wearing a trenchcoat (which I wouldn't be surprised from some edgy gun enthusiast).

And like I said, carrying the gun only makes any attack more dangerous. It doesn't make anyone safer. It's an excuse to get to shoot someone in the situation you described, a situation in which nobody had to be shot. It's a fucking power fantasy.
User avatar #208 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Lol way to pinpoint my exact character based off of an internet comment.

Like I said, carrying a simple handgun is no different to learning a martial art for self defence. But then again, sounds like you're one of the people that are against the idea of defending one's self.
User avatar #198 - hydraetis (01/22/2015) [-]
Simple. throw him your wallet, he turns to run away, you shoot him in the back.

Done.
User avatar #201 - demandsgayversion (01/22/2015) [-]
That's retarded. You're assuming he doesn't notice your gun immediately and rush you/shoot you. If the gun is noticed, you're fucked. You're risking your life over, what, $100?

It sounds like the only reason you carry a gun is because you want to shoot someone. That's not normal.
#62 - 1. Reload last save 2. Pull out sniper rifle 3. Shoot … 01/22/2015 on WWTLLD +1
#91 - She looks familiar for some reason.  [+] (2 new replies) 01/22/2015 on Skype call gone wrong +2
User avatar #100 - beffen (01/22/2015) [-]
I'm pretty sure this is from a movie, I think it's one of the Paranormal Activities
User avatar #93 - udo (01/22/2015) [-]
I was thinking the same
#149 - Having a highly ineffective weapon isn't that different to jus…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/22/2015 on Why are we not funding this +1
User avatar #151 - kinginyellow (01/22/2015) [-]
It doesn't have to be highly ineffective, you just can't make it too good. The thing with any game is that players will get better as they play, whether it's stealth or combat, and it will drop a lot of fear in the game. Give the player a decent weapon and some easier enemies, but also add in harder enemies that have a lot of health or have to be stunned.

Look at pyramid head, he's slow but he stalks you like crazy, same with Nemesis. You just have to have something to make the player feel like they're just another low-level enemy compared to other characters. But be sure not to overdo it and completely underpower them.
#194 - What I use for my phone 01/22/2015 on Wallpaper Comp 4 0
#58 - Postingloudly is pretty entertaining 01/22/2015 on Jackie Chan Adventures +1
#35 - You should be receiving a call from my lawyers within the next… 01/22/2015 on Stank 0
#48 - It is still probably off, but the squares occupied by the US a…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/22/2015 on Damn You Big Africa! 0
User avatar #57 - frenzyhero (01/22/2015) [-]
9,161,966.0 - United States total land mass
9,569,901.0 - China total land mass

those two alone are 18,731,867 total km, as opposed to Africa's total 18,829,000. I don't even need to finish with the rest of the countries, as once you consider India and Eastern Europe, there is absolutely no way you could fit all the listed countries into Africa the way the graph depicts.
User avatar #66 - damping (01/22/2015) [-]
They didn't include Alaska in the content dude which is by far the biggest state.
User avatar #67 - frenzyhero (01/22/2015) [-]
k chill I know I made a mistake
dont use bing for anything other than quick porn, I get it now
fucking south africa bullshit
#32 - Posted for relevance and god damn hilarious pokemon naming 01/22/2015 on Pokemon comp 0
#168 - I wouldn't really call mutton a "game" meat. …  [+] (2 new replies) 01/22/2015 on Eat Fresh 0
User avatar #171 - Elk (01/22/2015) [-]
You judgmental mother fucker...
User avatar #169 - psykobear (01/22/2015) [-]
Well, ye, that's what I was talking about originally, didn't notice mutton. But ye, that's another easily accessible meat. So, Limited to pork, mutton, and fish, really, unless they hunt. Kinda shitty, albeit doable.
#324 - I believe they're referring to things like how the Opium wars …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/22/2015 on Texas -1
User avatar #328 - lolzordz (01/22/2015) [-]
On an international scale, when has any imperialist ever been ethical? you think people at the top care about families and puppies? End of the day, this is life. when it comes to matters on such a high scale, those are the kinds of things that happen. This is a race for world domination. If it aint the jews its communist china. Or would you rather a muslim activist with no real plan of what to do once in power..? Let me know.
#323 - True. Honestly I think the NATO countries should just…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/22/2015 on Texas 0
#395 - anonybrony (01/22/2015) [-]
Why people should have any stable beliefs, when it's more beneficial for ruling class to just trigger society into certain behaviour whenever they like it.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 700

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - revengeforfreeze (03/30/2014) [-]
are you from denmark or norway?
User avatar #10 - lolollo (01/14/2014) [-]
So were you hoping to get in on the conversation where you just went through a thumbed down all my comments or are you just looking for a petty victory? I'm not having much luck with the other guy, and seeing as how it's obvious you disagree with what I said. I just wanted to pinpoint which part it was.
User avatar #9 - revengeforfreeze (10/10/2013) [-]
ijustwanttobecool
User avatar #3 - someponynew (04/12/2013) [-]
Thanks for your help with that dude last night, he was probably the worst troll I've ever seen.
#1 - uGoTpWnD (11/03/2011) [-]
Hello, it's just your friendly neighbourhood spiderman. Dropping bye to steal your comment virginity!!!! EH!
 Friends (0)