Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

hydraetis    

Rank #1994 on Comments
hydraetis Avatar Level 262 Comments: Pure Win
Offline
Send mail to hydraetis Block hydraetis Invite hydraetis to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Steam Profile: Hydraetis
X-box Gamertag: Azhaius
PSN: Hydraetis
Date Signed Up:12/07/2010
Last Login:11/28/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7561
Comment Ranking:#1994
Highest Content Rank:#4038
Highest Comment Rank:#1993
Content Thumbs: 588 total,  735 ,  147
Comment Thumbs: 6812 total,  9065 ,  2253
Content Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 51 Content: Sammich eater → Level 52 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 22% (22/100)
Level 262 Comments: Pure Win → Level 263 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:1
Content Views:65925
Times Content Favorited:39 times
Total Comments Made:4604
FJ Points:6842

latest user's comments

#144 - Really wish I hadn't searched up images of it.  [+] (2 new replies) 09/22/2014 on Hell sure is a funny place +4
User avatar #171 - dillwithit (09/22/2014) [-]
It's a fish
#167 - goldenbooster (09/22/2014) [-]
#37 - You sound like me on Halo 4 (when it was still a thing). 09/22/2014 on Only in Battlefield +1
#63 - To me when you use that ancestral history as a defens…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/22/2014 on White man keeping me down 0
#65 - billburr (09/22/2014) [-]
This is the last reply I'll make on this comment because there are too many of you to waste time arguing with.
It is not an excuse, it is a contextual factor that led to poor treatment of blacks well into the 1950's and in some places the poor treatment continues. As a result of slavery, black people didn't acquire any real wealth until the mid 1900's and even then they did not acquire that much. Upward mobility in the US is very low most people make about the same as their parents did, inflation-adjusted so the black people who already did not have wealth and could barely get a job had children who were in the same circumstances.
These children go to different schools than wealthy children and aren't given all of the advantages and second-chances that other kids might get. Thus the cycle continues
I'm not arguing for reparations, I'm just saying maybe the context is important and it's not just that "black people are lazy lol" as you all seem to think
#29 - Supcom2 Monkeylord OP Though not as OP as modded Univ…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/22/2014 on Has Science Gone too Far? +1
User avatar #209 - alexandrz (09/22/2014) [-]
I don't play supcom2, way too simplified.
Escort it close enough and watch your enemies' base turn to cinder. Megaliths are slow and inefficient in comparison to a good formation.
User avatar #232 - hydraetis (09/22/2014) [-]
Well last I remember a single monkeylord can take down 3 of the UEF's top experimental or 2 of the Illuminate's top experimental.
User avatar #235 - monkeylord (09/23/2014) [-]
I don't know what any of this means but it feels good to be mentioned
User avatar #233 - alexandrz (09/22/2014) [-]
That's why I love microwave lasers.
Armored like cardboard, though. Hence the need for good planning to use effectively.
User avatar #145 - monkeylord (09/22/2014) [-]
How am I OP I was never in this thread?
User avatar #208 - alexandrz (09/22/2014) [-]
Fucking scrubite, fuck off our argument.
#76 - Just because their ancient civilisation was pretty sweet doesn…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/22/2014 on This week in islam +1
#91 - kirkenseth (09/22/2014) [-]
i'm not denying that, but it's kind of fucked that not that long ago we used to be on par with the rest of the civilized world, and now we entered some sort of wierd dark age... gotta dmit i'm a bit sour
#75 - Well this would be after the islamic states passed their golde… 09/21/2014 on This week in islam +2
#74 - After the Ancient Roman/Greek empires dissolved, it was the is… 09/21/2014 on This week in islam +5
#56 - So it's okay for them to sit around and just bitch about slave…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/21/2014 on White man keeping me down +1
#61 - billburr (09/22/2014) [-]
Did I say that it was? Context matters though and that is the context
Related question: what racial group was subject to regular lynchings 60 years ago?
I'm not saying that Asians had it easy a hundred years ago, I'm just saying there's a difference between immigration and kidnapping. I thought that would be obvious to anyone
User avatar #63 - hydraetis (09/22/2014) [-]
To me when you use that ancestral history as a defensive point you're implying that they're entitled to moan about it and blame it for their lack of success.
#65 - billburr (09/22/2014) [-]
This is the last reply I'll make on this comment because there are too many of you to waste time arguing with.
It is not an excuse, it is a contextual factor that led to poor treatment of blacks well into the 1950's and in some places the poor treatment continues. As a result of slavery, black people didn't acquire any real wealth until the mid 1900's and even then they did not acquire that much. Upward mobility in the US is very low most people make about the same as their parents did, inflation-adjusted so the black people who already did not have wealth and could barely get a job had children who were in the same circumstances.
These children go to different schools than wealthy children and aren't given all of the advantages and second-chances that other kids might get. Thus the cycle continues
I'm not arguing for reparations, I'm just saying maybe the context is important and it's not just that "black people are lazy lol" as you all seem to think
#48 - And then get criticised by half the community for being an utt… 09/21/2014 on For the Gamegate +2
#46 - This gamergate **** is just as cancerous and anno…  [+] (24 new replies) 09/21/2014 on Mighty No. 9 to Mighty No.... -5
#62 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
yes it is. if not worse. because funnyjunk is now an advocate of this, its all gonna end up here, overflood with GG fags thumbing each other up, sites ruined goodbye goodnight.

at least until they all move on like these kinds of people do with everything they claim is super important.
#63 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
itt; living under a rock has never become so edgy, or the worms are crawling into my brain and i can't generate intellectual thought.
#64 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
i love how all you guys do is insult people who disagree with you and never seem to explain your cause or your argument, probably cuz you dont have either. and you wonder why everyones banning the cancerous crap you all post. just as bad as the bitches you hate, congrats.
#88 - psychosamurai (09/22/2014) [-]
User avatar #81 - houseofbrick (09/22/2014) [-]
except if you look absolutely anywhere, this is the scenario you see:

SJW: GamerGate is full of misogyny!
GamerGate: actually, for this, this, and this reason, it's not.
SJW: fuck MRAs BLOCKED lol

There is a whole tumblr page devoted to the shit that spews from the anti-GG people's mouths.
#67 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
Shit, this was almost too easy.

"tldr; gamergate is just a bunch of self important attention whores, just like the girls who do their lesbian phases, or the kids that join the army just to post about it on facebook all the time<phake as phuck"

I'll just take this snippet of your horrible thought process and explain why you're wrong in not only your comparisons but by your reasoning as well.

Gamergate, had you been paying attention instead of just whining like an incessant pissbaby, is an organizational stand calling for the destruction of bias and the development of transparency in game-orientated news and media. It's been brought to light after the corruption underneath sites like Kotaku, Cracked, and boards of /v/ has been exposed and intentionally targeting the gamer demographic in a broad effort to criminalize the entire populace and destroy their reputation for no other reason than 'lol feminism'.

Apparently you stand for a woman who's slept with individuals of these organizations for the sake of personal and financial gain for a shitty game that objectifies a serious mental condition which was, again, designed for no other reason than personal and financial gain. If a man did or could do any of this, SJW's and Feminazi's would have his ass fired at the drop of a hat, and nobody would bat an eye at it.

Whereas all these 'girls with lesban phases' or 'kids that join the army to post about it on facebook all the time' have no goal other than experimentation, Gamergate's goal is clearly stated as eliminating unfair bias and corruption in the industry while bringing about an age of transparency and ethics for gaming journalism.

Dull your edge, you might hurt yourself.
#75 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
how could you even say i must stand for them, when i say youre as bad as them? you know what please dont even reply youve proven yourself too stupid to argue with me just like the last ten gamergate fags ive spoken to. youre all delusional, you might as well be trying to get mountain dew to call themselves mountain sprinkles, even if you win, noones gonna give a fuck except you.
#74 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
i guess my reply was tl for you and you dr
#73 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
also youre MORE likely to hurt yourself with a dull edge so, even though you tried to be clever, you sound stupid as phuck.
#71 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
i dont stand for either side, i dont pretend that by being a faggot on the internet, ill make some sort of change.

if you had read my thought instead of quoting it and picking apart that quote with your own opinions, youd know that i didnt stand for either side,
i think youre fucking stupid because there is no respectable gaming media and every gamer knows this.
youre pathetic if you need someone to tell you whether or not a video game is fun, or enjoyable.


look, i know you really, REALLY need a reason to live since your life is probably full of virginity and disappointment, but trying to cure your self esteem issues by pretending youre making some sort of difference that no one intelligent gives a shit about, is not the way.
#78 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
Mm yes, yes, let's say we support neither side yet openly and fully bash on one end of a spectrum. Tips on being edgy, if you're gonna do it, hate everyone equally for max super edginess. Also I love how you say

"i love how all you guys do is insult people who disagree with you and never seem to explain your cause or your argument, probably cuz you dont have either. and you wonder why everyones banning the cancerous crap you all post. just as bad as the bitches you hate, congrats. "

Then clearly go

"i think youre fucking stupid because there is no respectable gaming media and every gamer knows this.
youre pathetic if you need someone to tell you whether or not a video game is fun, or enjoyable. "

and actually think that you posted a rebuttal for your opinion whatsoever instead of being a whiny pissbaby. You said to explain my case and argument, and I did, because I have both. Now it's your turn, instead of laying on the ground thumping your fists and feet like a five year old not getting the edginess he wants and screaming,

"how could you even say i must stand for them, when i say youre as bad as them? you know what please dont even reply youve proven yourself too stupid to argue with me just like the last ten gamergate fags ive spoken to. youre all delusional, you might as well be trying to get mountain dew to call themselves mountain sprinkles, even if you win, noones gonna give a fuck except you. "

If this is the way you try and hold opinions to pass them off as logical, no wonder you're so angry and upset (Especially because you had to post about 4-5 times to respond to one of mine, mad much). You have nothing to stand for and just lay in the dirt like a discarded razorblade trying to cut anyone who's too stupid to see all of your edginess. So edgy. Very edgy. Damn edgy.

Personal attacks, misinformed opinions, ignorance and reluctance to hold a logical debate, strawman arguments. Lol, go back under your rock, you clearly know nothing.
#82 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
you keep using the word edgy, cant you come up with anything else, youre just proving that you didnt think about what i said by saying i havent stated my case, and you just keep looking stupider and more pathetic the more you try to insult me. grow a pair, and grow up, how old are you 13? and you call me edgy,

yet youre sitting there typing out some symphony of bullshit, whos mad here? me? no.

you need to grow up man, grow the fuck up, cuz in case you dont know, youre the one who spoke to me first, and then wouldnt listen to anything i said. now you strut around like youve won.
#86 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
"you keep using the word edgy, cant you come up with anything else"

Oh I could, if you were worth it, but you just keep saying any combination of 'Stupid' and 'Stupider' (Which by the way isn't a word you fucking moron) so why should I bother wasting my brain capacity on someone too stupid to vary their own sentence or word structure, let alone hold an argument after being proved wrong.

And you really shouldn't be trying to call out age, because if someone aged 13 can argue around you like this then you should probably go back to school (no seriously consider it).
#80 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
dude, youre fucking stupid. feminists are fucking stupid too. but youre stupider because you take them seriously, youre waging war on retards, and youre not even winning, so youre fucking retarded too.

deal with it, dont hate, and im sure youll stay in your denial and not think about a single word i say, so ill tell you again, youre too stupid to talk to me, go away now you sad sad person
#83 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
LOL PLEASE.

"but youre stupider"

For real dude? If you're going to call someone stupid, at least learn how to fucking say it. It's 'More stupid'. Say it with me! 'More stupid', you fucking inbred disgrace. Honestly, what word have you said that should be given a moment's thought? You've brought nothing to this debate at all, you've whined and bitched and called names and really that's about it. I've provided a concise argument on why gamergate is nothing like your imposed 'examples' of it, proving you're a fucking retard, and you further just exemplified my example by not only refusing the argument given, but also talking shit and slinging personal insults (which would be funny if they were creative, you gooch sniffing shit walnut) without a single word or phrase even related to the argument and beating up all the strawmen ever.

Here's a link,

www.thesaurus.com

try and expand your vocabulary for 'stupid' so you don't look as stupid as you are.
#85 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
i like how you chose to focus on the way i said it, rather than what i said, you keep proving to me that youre just a dumb jackass that really thinks hes supersmart.
#84 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
wow man, how pissed are you that you had to google stupider, to try to make your point, grammer is less important than getting my point across.

like i care that some neckbeard virg thinks hes smarter than me because he knows the proper way to say someone if more of a fool than someone else.
#87 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
Didn't even have to google 'stupider' because that's something you learn in grade four English, you dipshit. And there you go with more personal insults without even knowing anything about me, yet you're trying to say you're more 'grown up' and intelligent?

Lmfao, even though you're not worth it, I'll respond to your little strawman over starting a war with feminazi's and not even winning.

If we weren't winning or gaining ground, why would they be so apt to block or ban, abuse positions of power, to silence or remove criticism and exposure against them? Hint; because we're right, and if they let the real facts leak out against them then they lose all that money they've been illegitimately gaining along with their pedestal they're standing on.
#93 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
this was a really pointless argument though, not much rage, but just a little rage over an internet argument is too much rage. my bad
#92 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
ok, listen, i will concede to that point, because yes, you are gaining support, and numbers very quickly, im all for that congrats, but the fact is, there is no winning, it will go on forever if neither side will concede, much like this argument,

and let me say, for your benefit and awareness, that arguing with you, feels exactly like the countless arguments ive had with egotistical feminists, and if thats the case, and if this will go on forever, instead of having the one giant group of annoying feminists, trying to spew shit on everyone, we have two giant groups of spewers, spewing shit all over each other and getting it all over wverything else.

especially websites, like funnyjunk, or 4chan, or... well i dont go on any other websites, or youtube i guess, either way, i guess what im really saying is, you wanna fight, take it outside, dont be rude and ruin everyone elses good time when they dont care about whatever youre fighting about,

and thats the best, most polite way i can phrase my argument, which does not support either side.
#97 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
And if going outside and having fisticuffs was a way to resolve the issue, it very well might've been taken by now. The problem is that one side of the conflict has a goal, and one other does not. Femin(azi)ism has no clearcut purpose other than attempting to overthrow every male structure in any industry they can get a hold of, the most recently being the gaming industry. Not just the news outlets, not just the review sources, but the entire industry beginning -at- those points.

Gamergate's goal is clear and concise, we want proper ethics in reporting and the removal of power abuse/corruption that's been growing and running rampant ever since the Zoe Quinn incident. Once that's achieved, Gamergate's purpose has been met, and will likely disband and cease to exist.

While I'm not saying you should choose a side or die, I am saying that Gamergate's purpose actually has a means to an end and actually exists for the benefits of any and all gamers of any origin, any sex, any gender. Because at the end of the day, all we want to do is game and not be subject to corruption and power-abuse that makes us look like bottom of the barrel scum for being male gamers while female gamers are glorified and held on a higher standard. Every gamer is equal.
#100 - theydontlikeu (09/22/2014) [-]
ok, on an semi-unrelated note, why couldnt groups like this form for cheaper games, more in depth story lines, less linear handholding, and just better games in general.


back on point,
alright you out logicd me, and this day is yours, you may have changed my mind, but of course id need to see more compelling reasons for myself instead of second hand,

but, im not gonna get any less annoyed and fed up when every other post on funnyjunk is either making fun of feminism, talking shit on specific feminists, and saying that GG is crazy important and we all need to support it

and thats mostly because this is funnyjunk the coontent is supposed to be a joke, or at least something funny or entertaining. there are forums here, it doesnt need to be in peoples faces..
#107 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
Unfortunately those topics are neutralized debates held firm to individual potentials and economics.

How well a game is written is dictated by the studio and game devs, which is a skill they possess and translate into game ratings and sales (Which is why bias is so important, because we don't need a shitty game with friends in the industry triumphing over a fantastic game from an unknown dev that won't get looked at without the same connections). Same goes with storylines, handholding, better games, etc.

Game costs (More expensive, less expensive) are dictated by the studio producers and are communicated in fair competition with every other game marketer out there. Very rarely will a new blockbuster game, or new game in general, sell below the universal pricepoint of around 59-69 dollars(cdn/us), and likewise will they very rarely sell higher as well. Sort of a universal law with games.

I can see why this stuff can be frustrating to read about all the time as well, especially if you don't find the content funny or in it's rightful place at funnyjunk, but take solace in the fact that the quicker we get rid of the ethics corruption in the industry, the faster that these posts will go back to legitimate humor unrelated to either.

But for the time being you're likely going to have to bear with it for a while yet, as Funnyjunk has also become one of the largest and last standing bastions that hasn't fallen victim to the SJW's that took over /v/ and the like.
#68 - KBD (09/22/2014) [-]
*For intentionally targetting
#27 - Look, I think that the whole argument is a joke. There is no l…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/21/2014 on It was a Bat-clogging 0
User avatar #31 - nikentakadisker (09/22/2014) [-]
Oh i agree as well. The chances of them even atually full out fighting is so miniamal it legit only happened once.
#35 - To me, religion is just a way of controlling people. And hones…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/21/2014 on Top kek +3
#37 - billburr (09/21/2014) [-]
I don't think that's how or why it was made It seems like a natural thing for us to try to explain the world but it's certainly how it's used.
It's the same way communism was used to control people in the USSR but some of communism's ideals were used to make the progressive nations of today including the US, not that they'd admit it
The same ideas can be use to help people, or manipulate them. It's scary
User avatar #115 - ciacheczko (09/22/2014) [-]
I unno. When you look at the Indian concept of castes, it's hard not to thing that it was invented as a way of telling people "it's a divine will that you were born as human trash, so don't you ever try to progress in our society" because some other people higher up would have much trouble off their heads this way.

Every religion was invented at some time. They did not exist since forever. Old palaeolithic divinities, greek gods, current religions. They all had a start. A start given by the people. And by looking at what they have in common, there's a very high probability that their very role is and always has been that: to control masses.

It's like political parties, crushing out the smaller ones, gathering supporters of certain mindset, expanding and conquering. Gaining more and more control. Individuals may be really spiritual, believe and act accordingly - but they are all following directions in the end. Directions that someone made. Divine entities that someone came up with, - whether they acknowledge it or not.
User avatar #116 - ciacheczko (09/22/2014) [-]
not to think*
sorry.
#25 - So, like every BvS argument, Batman wins on a technicality inv…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/21/2014 on It was a Bat-clogging 0
User avatar #26 - nikentakadisker (09/21/2014) [-]
Not at all superman has onlyused his full strength once in one punch. the earth literally shooke and earth quakes were global. Superman in his character just almost never goes all out. except in a few cases.
User avatar #27 - hydraetis (09/21/2014) [-]
Look, I think that the whole argument is a joke. There is no logical way that Batman could actually win in a fight, but Batman supporters are 200% adamant that due to his omniscience he has a plan for each one of the infinite number of possibilities, and in the case that he doesn't, Superman's decision not to kill him is the reason why Batman wins.

The argument is completely fucking retarded, and even though I don't even read comics it annoys the fuck out of me.
User avatar #31 - nikentakadisker (09/22/2014) [-]
Oh i agree as well. The chances of them even atually full out fighting is so miniamal it legit only happened once.
#243 - I prefer the Twitch Pokemon type of stories to this cringey … 09/21/2014 on (untitled) 0
#239 - These people seem to believe that people like Anita, who has b… 09/21/2014 on (untitled) 0
#236 - I also think it's pretty sad how big of a deal everyone's maki…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/21/2014 on (untitled) -2
#276 - pitifulsoul (09/22/2014) [-]
It's a snowball.
It always starts small, then it gets bigger and badder until you have an entire avalanche
#233 - Ha. "Let us all play our games". How bout let us be … 09/21/2014 on (untitled) 0
#57 - Lol yea they used to **** me up big time, but tha… 09/21/2014 on How many takes do you think... 0
#100 - Well what do you expect from a game reliant on target locking?… 09/21/2014 on Steam 0
#38 - She must be Canadian. 09/21/2014 on oh dear -1
#88 - You were saying "it worked for skyrim why doesn't it work…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/21/2014 on Steam 0
User avatar #91 - mhden (09/21/2014) [-]
What 4 attacks ? Isnt it just Light Attack Heavy Attack ?Or are you counting Blocks aswell ? All the other stuff can be EASILY be added to the keyboard , like item switching 1-4 num
consume q , 2 handed tab etc etc . And my real problem is the movement (wasd) and Camera on mouse and keyboard NOT the placement of the rest of the keys .Its fucking HORIFYING .
#156 - dontread (09/21/2014) [-]
dual wielding weapons...
User avatar #100 - hydraetis (09/21/2014) [-]
Well what do you expect from a game reliant on target locking? While you're not fighting the camera works like a regular camera but once you enter combat the 4 directions on the right stick function like buttons, which can't be very pleasantly done on a mouse.

I really find it hilarious how you people in the pc gaming community are so fucking stuck-up that you'd rather bitch than apply some logic and use a damn controller.
#40 - Those are pursuers, they are far easier to parry than hollows …  [+] (2 new replies) 09/21/2014 on How many takes do you think... 0
User avatar #51 - TarnRazor (09/21/2014) [-]
I had so much trouble fighting just one pursuer though..
User avatar #57 - hydraetis (09/21/2014) [-]
Lol yea they used to fuck me up big time, but that's really the key to killing them. All you gotta do is parry, hit him 3 times, run back, parry, hit him 3 times, etc.

Just like I said, if you have a buckler, just press parry once they dash at you and you'll get them pretty much every time. So long as you keep your distance you'll have nothing to worry about, even their special attack (sword starts glowing) won't matter.
#75 - I wouldn't consider no online to be that bad. 09/21/2014 on Steam 0
#74 - Because Skyrim combat is kindergarten in comparison to Dark Souls.  [+] (5 new replies) 09/21/2014 on Steam 0
User avatar #76 - mhden (09/21/2014) [-]
What does that have anything to do with the fact that the mouse+keyboard of DS sucks ?
User avatar #88 - hydraetis (09/21/2014) [-]
You were saying "it worked for skyrim why doesn't it work for DS?"

Because Skyrim controls are simple as piss. All you need are standard movement/camera, two buttons for attacking, and menu. Dark Souls needs 4 buttons for attacks, standard movement/camera plus lock-on, full D-Pad, and two more buttons for item consumption and switching to two-hand hold.

That makes
Skyrim: 5 buttons (sprint, jump, crouch, left and right attack)

Dark Souls: 13 buttons (4 attacks, 4 item switching, sprint, jump, lock-on, consume item, two-hand mode)
User avatar #91 - mhden (09/21/2014) [-]
What 4 attacks ? Isnt it just Light Attack Heavy Attack ?Or are you counting Blocks aswell ? All the other stuff can be EASILY be added to the keyboard , like item switching 1-4 num
consume q , 2 handed tab etc etc . And my real problem is the movement (wasd) and Camera on mouse and keyboard NOT the placement of the rest of the keys .Its fucking HORIFYING .
#156 - dontread (09/21/2014) [-]
dual wielding weapons...
User avatar #100 - hydraetis (09/21/2014) [-]
Well what do you expect from a game reliant on target locking? While you're not fighting the camera works like a regular camera but once you enter combat the 4 directions on the right stick function like buttons, which can't be very pleasantly done on a mouse.

I really find it hilarious how you people in the pc gaming community are so fucking stuck-up that you'd rather bitch than apply some logic and use a damn controller.
#104 - That's new to me. 09/21/2014 on guns don't kill 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 700

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - revengeforfreeze (03/30/2014) [-]
are you from denmark or norway?
User avatar #10 - lolollo ONLINE (01/14/2014) [-]
So were you hoping to get in on the conversation where you just went through a thumbed down all my comments or are you just looking for a petty victory? I'm not having much luck with the other guy, and seeing as how it's obvious you disagree with what I said. I just wanted to pinpoint which part it was.
User avatar #9 - revengeforfreeze (10/10/2013) [-]
ijustwanttobecool
User avatar #3 - someponynew (04/12/2013) [-]
Thanks for your help with that dude last night, he was probably the worst troll I've ever seen.
#1 - uGoTpWnD (11/03/2011) [-]
Hello, it's just your friendly neighbourhood spiderman. Dropping bye to steal your comment virginity!!!! EH!
 Friends (0)