|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #1800 on CommentsLevel 269 Comments: Pure Win
OnlineSend mail to huntertde Block huntertde Invite huntertde to be your friend flag avatar
Everything has humor in it, everyone has flaws, you are not always right, your opinions are opinions because not everyone views things your way, do not go on the internet looking for friends, and fuck you.
latest user's comments
|#36 - Damnit, that makes me mad as **** . Just, *… [+] (1 new reply)||03/31/2013 on feels||+10|
|#7 - Yah rite [+] (3 new replies)||03/21/2013 on Krillin's wish||+5|
|#5 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||03/04/2013 on too much||+309|
|#37 - Yep, because when the tanks start rolling, your 9mm is going t… [+] (13 new replies)||02/13/2013 on 2nd amendment||+6|
#99 - anonymous (02/14/2013) [-]
Driven by volunteer soldiers? Good luck motivating those volunteer troops to blow up their family homes, retard.
#66 - snickerstheif (02/14/2013) [-]
Something tells me you have not heard of a place called Vietnam. Also YOU CANNOT CONTROL AN ENTIRE COUNTRY AND IT'S PEOPLE WITH TANKS OR JETS OR BATTLESHIPS OR ANY OF THAT SHIT.
A FIGHTER JET CANNOT STAND ON STREET CORNERS AND ENFORCE NO-ASSEMBLY EDICTS. A FIGHTER JET CANNOT KICK DOWN YOUR DOOR AT 3AM AND SEARCH YOUR HOUSE FOR CONTRABAND.
POLICE ARE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A POLICE STATE.
AND NO MATTER HOW MANY POLICE YOU HAVE, THEY ARE ALWAYSE OUT-NUMBERED BY THE PEOPLE, WHICH IS WHY IT'S VITAL FOR YOUR POLICE TO HAVE AUTOMATIC WEAPONS AND YOUR PEOPLE TO HAVE NOTHING BUT THEIR LIMP DICKS.
#92 - anonymous (02/14/2013) [-]
Tanks worked quite well for the Chinese until everybody found out about it
#117 - novus (02/15/2013) [-]
Anti personnel armor is quite efficient at eliminating infantry, and homes would offer no protection.
And I agree with you that the military would never be able to control a country the size of the US, there are simply too many people. That being said, a semiautomatic AR15 is not going to be any more effective than a non-AR semiautomatic rifle. In fact, for home invasions as you mention, a shotgun will be the best weapon.
The whole argument is meaningless, because you're arguing that guns like AR15's would somehow give commando groups a tactical edge, when in reality the type of gun used is almost a non-issue; the military would never be able to control the country.
#43 - patrickmiller (02/13/2013) [-]
No one if we're lucky it's just to keep the government mindful that we will protect our rights if we need to so that it never comes to anything like that
If they're to scared of us to pass laws that hurt our freedoms then we will never have reason to fight anyone.
|#17 - Why?||02/13/2013 on Monster feels||+1|
|#19 - FINALLY ******* FOUND IT. [+] (11 new replies)||02/11/2013 on .||+28|
|#53 - Actually, it was on /ic/ I was on the thread. [+] (1 new reply)||02/11/2013 on 4foot||0|
|#48 - MFW I see the comments, and realize that I didn't even have to… [+] (1 new reply)||02/11/2013 on 4foot||+5|
|#5 - What a slut- only needed someone to touch her crotch to go down.||02/03/2013 on Too much power in crotch grab||0|
|#20 - Lilly's path: I got so ******* mad at the game wh… [+] (5 new replies)||01/28/2013 on Music||+13|
|#110 - MFW I finished Lilly's good ending.||01/27/2013 on MFW I don't play this game||-1|
|#25 - You had a good run, soldier.||01/25/2013 on The End||+15|
|#8 - How many meth binges did this guy go through? [+] (1 new reply)||01/20/2013 on Raisor||+8|
|#60 - Picture||01/14/2013 on Holy hell||0|
|#345 - I hated it two years ago, too.||01/04/2013 on That High Comp 1||+7|
|#181 - "That's one smoking piece of ass."||12/29/2012 on Jostling with other...||-3|
|#2 - Comment deleted||12/24/2012 on Life is an Art Form||0|
|#66 - NO EXCUSES. DO EEEEEEEIT.||12/24/2012 on A Feel||0|
|#41 - DO IT. NOW. [+] (2 new replies)||12/23/2012 on A Feel||+2|
|#58 - The Love Boat, baby. [+] (1 new reply)||12/21/2012 on no for you||+1|
|#9 - Well, we don't even go by a bump system on Funnyjunk, but okay.||12/21/2012 on Bumpgirl||0|
|#11 - I'm kind of curious as to why it's in Home & Garden.||12/20/2012 on Just found this||0|
|#20 - Aw, hell naw. You log in and take yo ass whuppin like the bitc…||12/20/2012 on How did i not notice this yet?||+4|
|#15 - Picture [+] (3 new replies)||12/20/2012 on no for you||+9|
|#24 - Democracy V2- Everyone can vote, but your vote's power is your… [+] (6 new replies)||12/20/2012 on Idiocracy||+20|
#25 - anonymous (12/20/2012) [-]
Why not just have a test on the subject being voted on? Nothing oppinion based, just covering what the topic is, who the parties are and what their basic stances are.
Using IQ scores would be terrible - not only is the system barely valid even for it's 'ideal' age range of around 20 - 35 (male skewed) it's easy to improve your score each time you take a test. That's before you factor in that it only takes into account a very narrow band of skills which you would consider a sign of 'intelligence.'
With the IQ system you get 3 bands of people: The lower one's that are ridiculed; The middle ones that think the system works; and the higher ones, that probably realise it's nonsense anyway.
#37 - cabbagemayhem (12/20/2012) [-]
@Your first statement: That's dependent on the tests that are passed out. For example, for a vote to legalize marijuana, they could pass around a test requiring education in the medical field, which would mute the votes of the people it mattered to. You might be interested in Meritocracy, though.
In the end, as long as people have differing views on the right way to live, the only way to accommodate us is to have separate governing bodies. A single government can't appease everyone, no matter what kind it is.