Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 30
Date Signed Up:5/17/2013
Last Login:5/25/2014
Content Thumbs: 793 total,  863 ,  70
Comment Thumbs: 362 total,  376 ,  14
Content Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 79 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 80 Content: Srs Business
Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 136 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 137 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Content Views:39062
Times Content Favorited:509 times
Total Comments Made:68
FJ Points:1154

latest user's comments

#60 - I like this, but my opinion means **** because I am misanthrop…  [+] (1 reply) 08/14/2013 on Hypocrites +1
User avatar
#147 - fukkendragonite (08/14/2013) [-]
You are a horribleperson
#65 - I haven't ever looked into the whole WBC stuff very much, so I…  [+] (1 reply) 08/13/2013 on Boobs in the comment section 0
User avatar
#66 - nicolbolas (08/13/2013) [-]
Hate speech is legal, the WBC has to be careful with the words they use and they kind of are. They keep their signs broad and they refer to everyone of particular groups that they consider sinner or whatever. Say they were protesting a funeral and they used the person's name, this may not be protected because it is a direct assault on the person. Also by keeping it broad, they avoid "fighting words" which is pretty much what it sounds like, someone says something to get someone to fight them.

Free speech is hard to regulate because it is hard to determine the meaning behind the words. The WBC is constantly walking on the ice between hate speech and assault, but these things are often determined by successful lawyers.
#142 - I believe this is from the adult version of Ren & Stimpy. …  [+] (1 reply) 08/07/2013 on Talk about Ad placement. +1
User avatar
#160 - zenagirl (08/07/2013) [-]
It wasn't that show but the art looked similiar, the same guy invented the show i was thinking of, called the ripping friends. Thanks though!
#245 - Actually, population and birth rate is not the primary problem…  [+] (11 replies) 08/05/2013 on Protest fail 0
User avatar
#323 - cabbagemayhem (08/05/2013) [-]
Neither population nor consumption is a real problem. Consumption will never exceed the ability to produce, but will instead reward it. Population is far from approaching Earth's ever increasing capacity, but even if it was, living conditions might slowly diminish, but society won't collapse.
User avatar
#358 - wisdombranch (08/07/2013) [-]
"Consumption will never exceed the ability to produce" <---absolute bull feathers.

Have you ever heard of a "boom-BUST" cycle? Granted, we are by no means, as a planet, experiencing a bust, but from a sustainability standpoint, we are definitely setting ourselves up for one.

[in #245] As much as horribleperson is indeed a horrible person, their assertion that the actual issue is consumption remains accurate. But, cabbagemayhem, all that needs to happen is a change in either the consumption or the production.

An examination of the reality of fixed production can be found in "An Essay on the Principle of Population" by Thomas Robert Malthus.

For whatever reason, much of mankind cannot conceive of the possibility of increasing production; they are retarded nincompoops, but their leaders' collective, proper title is teh U.N.

Malthus would have been correct about his population limits, except for one small issue. Mankind learned to synthesize Ammonia, using the Haber–Bosch process making** nitrogen rich** fertilizer. Man could now inject fertilizer into the soil rather than having to collect the poop from anything and everything.

The population boom you can see in the 2nd url is due to this discovery whose history is detailed in the 1st url.


#360 - cabbagemayhem (08/07/2013) [-]
Consumption cannot, will not, or ever be capable of exceeding production, ever.
User avatar
#361 - wisdombranch (08/10/2013) [-]
how does your troll brain work?
User avatar
#362 - cabbagemayhem (08/10/2013) [-]
Hurr durr troll! Are you so mathematically disinclined that you can't perceive how it is impossible to consume more than is produced?
User avatar
#363 - wisdombranch (08/10/2013) [-]
are you referring to [rate of production and rate of consumption] or [sum of production and sum of consumption]?

I have been talking about rate.
User avatar
#364 - cabbagemayhem (08/10/2013) [-]
Trivial. Consumption rate can only exceed production rate for a very short time before it is forced down. High consumption rates are justifiable as a capitalistic reward for production. I, personally, like to live far under my means.
User avatar
#365 - wisdombranch (08/10/2013) [-]
"very short" is extremely relative. My earlier comments were in no way refering to an individual fiscal frame, but a global/continental existence frame.
User avatar
#366 - cabbagemayhem (08/10/2013) [-]
2 years, and the amount in excess is typically marginal, within a few percent. Consumption cannot exceed production. You cannot buy more than you are payed. You cannot acquire what has not been made. This applies more on a global scale than any other.
User avatar
#267 - roflcopterkklol (08/05/2013) [-]
Yeah AIDS is not working fast enough.
#29 - Picture  [+] (1 reply) 07/29/2013 on Whitty Title +2
#46 - biddo (07/30/2013) [-]
this picture makes me laugh everytime. if people cant laugh about a good funny 9/11 picture thats just sad