Upload
Login or register

holycrapimacupcake

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:8/06/2010
Stats
Content Ranking:#3273
Comment Ranking:#2622
Highest Content Rank:#3035
Highest Comment Rank:#1261
Content Thumbs: 858 total,  1106 ,  248
Comment Thumbs: 22494 total,  29102 ,  6608
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 68 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 69 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 64.6% (646/1000)
Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:5
Content Views:66189
Times Content Favorited:43 times
Total Comments Made:17740
FJ Points:21936

latest user's comments

#291 - I just have high hopes and so far it's looking good. I mean ye…  [+] (4 replies) 11/07/2015 on Fallout 4 DLC 0
#293 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Skyrim had a shitty 'story' though.


And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.

The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
User avatar
#294 - holycrapimacupcake (11/08/2015) [-]
Buddy, the graphics are fine for me. You may want to see pores, but frankly as long as everything looks nice, I'm fine.
#296 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
Also what pores are you even talking about, the game looks like it's from 2006 not even close to anything new. But that's besides the point
#295 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
I think you don't understand what a game engine does
#289 - You're a glass half empty kind of guy aren't you?  [+] (7 replies) 11/07/2015 on Fallout 4 DLC 0
#290 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
I'll enjoy the game a lot more if I don't expect anything when going in. And I just hate fanboyism, you literally have no evidence pointing to a good game, and yet you act as if It's game of the year already. So far, the info we have on the game points to a mediocre game. To be fair we have little information on it, but people act as if the trailer and the footage was a positive thing. The amount of negatives you can find in them is enormous, but fanboys act like its all good.





I ESPECIALLY hate the fuckers who always have the pcmasterrace attitude and then say, "oh, the graphics don't matter, it's fallout" kindly fuck off, graphics always matter, it 's your fucking medium of interaction.




And yes, I'd rather be skeptical than to be stupidly and baselessly optimistic.
User avatar
#292 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
Also I think the graphics look fine. Could be a tad better, but then again Bethesda likes to focus more on game play than making sure you can see your pores.
User avatar
#291 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
I just have high hopes and so far it's looking good. I mean yeah I am a little worried about a few things, like the story since we have no clue about anything. I mean with Skyrim we knew almost everything when it came out.
#293 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Skyrim had a shitty 'story' though.


And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.

The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
User avatar
#294 - holycrapimacupcake (11/08/2015) [-]
Buddy, the graphics are fine for me. You may want to see pores, but frankly as long as everything looks nice, I'm fine.
#296 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
Also what pores are you even talking about, the game looks like it's from 2006 not even close to anything new. But that's besides the point
#295 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
I think you don't understand what a game engine does
#284 - I'm evaluating it based on what I've seen. Densely populated a…  [+] (9 replies) 11/07/2015 on Fallout 4 DLC 0
#287 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
You've seen jack shit, you've only seen what they wanted you to see. Don't say a game is good until there are actual reviews or videos on it, is what I think. I understand why you'd expect it to be good, but that doesn't mean it will, having a bit of skepticism can help you a lot. Thinking it will be awesome will only make it that much shittier if it happens to not live up to your expectations. F3's saving graces were the mods, the game itself wasn't that good, it was average, and I dont expect F4 to be different.
User avatar
#289 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
You're a glass half empty kind of guy aren't you?
#290 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
I'll enjoy the game a lot more if I don't expect anything when going in. And I just hate fanboyism, you literally have no evidence pointing to a good game, and yet you act as if It's game of the year already. So far, the info we have on the game points to a mediocre game. To be fair we have little information on it, but people act as if the trailer and the footage was a positive thing. The amount of negatives you can find in them is enormous, but fanboys act like its all good.





I ESPECIALLY hate the fuckers who always have the pcmasterrace attitude and then say, "oh, the graphics don't matter, it's fallout" kindly fuck off, graphics always matter, it 's your fucking medium of interaction.




And yes, I'd rather be skeptical than to be stupidly and baselessly optimistic.
User avatar
#292 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
Also I think the graphics look fine. Could be a tad better, but then again Bethesda likes to focus more on game play than making sure you can see your pores.
User avatar
#291 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
I just have high hopes and so far it's looking good. I mean yeah I am a little worried about a few things, like the story since we have no clue about anything. I mean with Skyrim we knew almost everything when it came out.
#293 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Skyrim had a shitty 'story' though.


And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.

The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
User avatar
#294 - holycrapimacupcake (11/08/2015) [-]
Buddy, the graphics are fine for me. You may want to see pores, but frankly as long as everything looks nice, I'm fine.
#296 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
Also what pores are you even talking about, the game looks like it's from 2006 not even close to anything new. But that's besides the point
#295 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
I think you don't understand what a game engine does
#257 - Density>size. Look at Just Cause 2, massive map wi…  [+] (11 replies) 11/06/2015 on Fallout 4 DLC 0
#283 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Fallout 3 had meh density as well. Based on your way of evaluating F4 this should have shit density as well, since F3 did so as well. If that's the wrong way to look at it, why the fuck are people hyping up F4.



Dragon Age 2 was shit, even though origins was great. Just because F3 was good doesn't mean F4 will be.
User avatar
#284 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
I'm evaluating it based on what I've seen. Densely populated areas, it's a more urban environment. So less mountains to climb around, don't say a game is shut before the game I even a thing.
#287 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
You've seen jack shit, you've only seen what they wanted you to see. Don't say a game is good until there are actual reviews or videos on it, is what I think. I understand why you'd expect it to be good, but that doesn't mean it will, having a bit of skepticism can help you a lot. Thinking it will be awesome will only make it that much shittier if it happens to not live up to your expectations. F3's saving graces were the mods, the game itself wasn't that good, it was average, and I dont expect F4 to be different.
User avatar
#289 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
You're a glass half empty kind of guy aren't you?
#290 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
I'll enjoy the game a lot more if I don't expect anything when going in. And I just hate fanboyism, you literally have no evidence pointing to a good game, and yet you act as if It's game of the year already. So far, the info we have on the game points to a mediocre game. To be fair we have little information on it, but people act as if the trailer and the footage was a positive thing. The amount of negatives you can find in them is enormous, but fanboys act like its all good.





I ESPECIALLY hate the fuckers who always have the pcmasterrace attitude and then say, "oh, the graphics don't matter, it's fallout" kindly fuck off, graphics always matter, it 's your fucking medium of interaction.




And yes, I'd rather be skeptical than to be stupidly and baselessly optimistic.
User avatar
#292 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
Also I think the graphics look fine. Could be a tad better, but then again Bethesda likes to focus more on game play than making sure you can see your pores.
User avatar
#291 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
I just have high hopes and so far it's looking good. I mean yeah I am a little worried about a few things, like the story since we have no clue about anything. I mean with Skyrim we knew almost everything when it came out.
#293 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Skyrim had a shitty 'story' though.


And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.

The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
User avatar
#294 - holycrapimacupcake (11/08/2015) [-]
Buddy, the graphics are fine for me. You may want to see pores, but frankly as long as everything looks nice, I'm fine.
#296 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
Also what pores are you even talking about, the game looks like it's from 2006 not even close to anything new. But that's besides the point
#295 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
I think you don't understand what a game engine does
#224 - Yes, but there's enough content in vanilla to justify it.  [+] (15 replies) 11/06/2015 on Fallout 4 DLC +1
#248 - McDc (11/06/2015) [-]
How would you know that.Actually, they already confirmed the map is a LOT smaller than fallout 3
User avatar
#257 - holycrapimacupcake (11/06/2015) [-]
Density>size.

Look at Just Cause 2, massive map with fuck all to do.
#283 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Fallout 3 had meh density as well. Based on your way of evaluating F4 this should have shit density as well, since F3 did so as well. If that's the wrong way to look at it, why the fuck are people hyping up F4.



Dragon Age 2 was shit, even though origins was great. Just because F3 was good doesn't mean F4 will be.
User avatar
#284 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
I'm evaluating it based on what I've seen. Densely populated areas, it's a more urban environment. So less mountains to climb around, don't say a game is shut before the game I even a thing.
#287 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
You've seen jack shit, you've only seen what they wanted you to see. Don't say a game is good until there are actual reviews or videos on it, is what I think. I understand why you'd expect it to be good, but that doesn't mean it will, having a bit of skepticism can help you a lot. Thinking it will be awesome will only make it that much shittier if it happens to not live up to your expectations. F3's saving graces were the mods, the game itself wasn't that good, it was average, and I dont expect F4 to be different.
User avatar
#289 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
You're a glass half empty kind of guy aren't you?
#290 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
I'll enjoy the game a lot more if I don't expect anything when going in. And I just hate fanboyism, you literally have no evidence pointing to a good game, and yet you act as if It's game of the year already. So far, the info we have on the game points to a mediocre game. To be fair we have little information on it, but people act as if the trailer and the footage was a positive thing. The amount of negatives you can find in them is enormous, but fanboys act like its all good.





I ESPECIALLY hate the fuckers who always have the pcmasterrace attitude and then say, "oh, the graphics don't matter, it's fallout" kindly fuck off, graphics always matter, it 's your fucking medium of interaction.




And yes, I'd rather be skeptical than to be stupidly and baselessly optimistic.
User avatar
#292 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
Also I think the graphics look fine. Could be a tad better, but then again Bethesda likes to focus more on game play than making sure you can see your pores.
User avatar
#291 - holycrapimacupcake (11/07/2015) [-]
I just have high hopes and so far it's looking good. I mean yeah I am a little worried about a few things, like the story since we have no clue about anything. I mean with Skyrim we knew almost everything when it came out.
#293 - McDc (11/07/2015) [-]
Skyrim had a shitty 'story' though.


And compare graphics to ANY new release game and you'll see what I'm talking about.The only hope I have is that they upped the textures at least somewhat from the footage we had before.

The fact they're using the same engine is a BIIIIIIIIIG red flag for me as well. If you can't even put enough resources into your brand game to up your engine, I can't expect anything substantial from other aspects of the game either.
User avatar
#294 - holycrapimacupcake (11/08/2015) [-]
Buddy, the graphics are fine for me. You may want to see pores, but frankly as long as everything looks nice, I'm fine.
#296 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
Also what pores are you even talking about, the game looks like it's from 2006 not even close to anything new. But that's besides the point
#295 - McDc (11/08/2015) [-]
I think you don't understand what a game engine does
#231 - anon (11/06/2015) [-]
And, how would you know that?
User avatar
#236 - holycrapimacupcake (11/06/2015) [-]
Based Howard man, Based Howard. Also mods on console version next year, I'm fins with a Season Pass form Bethesda.
#99 - As soon as she is home from work I will. Which will be in like…  [+] (2 replies) 11/05/2015 on Big sister or little sisters ? +1
User avatar
#100 - blueboysixnine (11/06/2015) [-]
its been 10 hours, hurry up bruh
User avatar
#103 - holycrapimacupcake (11/06/2015) [-]
Sorry man. No dice.