yeah but then would still come down to the difference between trying to restrain him and the openly attacking him like the curries and customers were doing

courts could debate that hitting him with random objects is not part of detaining....
it aint guantanamo bay

I mean the wiring in an outlet in the back rooms
As in burn the building down
preferably a storage room people dont go in often

ummm idk what usa is like but here, citizens arrest doesnt mean people can physically stop people unless theyre under attack and need to restrain someone for their own safety

if some guys trying to run away you dont have the power to physically detain them

what im talking about is a shopkeeper has the right to detain a criminal. so since the guy was trying to steal the shopkeeper has a right to forcibly detain him for a reaonable amount of time (normally just enough for police to get there and such)

yeah but then would still come down to the difference between trying to restrain him and the openly attacking him like the curries and customers were doing

courts could debate that hitting him with random objects is not part of detaining....
it aint guantanamo bay

No video if there's no store Make it look like a wiring problem

lol true, but then people get suspicious and would prob look into wiring about it cause normally stores keep that stuff working so they can catch robbers/dissuade them

I mean the wiring in an outlet in the back rooms
As in burn the building down
preferably a storage room people dont go in often

well watching the gif a couple times... robber had no weapons, most likely just threatened cashier.... mop boy held up the mop and told him to gtfo, robber attacked, cashier dragged him off ... thats where defence ends

moppy charging in was the start of offence... moppy landed the first offensive hit... then slipped over... guy tries to run, cashier drags him back... moppy hits again, customer 1 tackles, cashier and moppy attack.. then customer 2 attacks

at face value for refusing to let him run, they could be all held up for kidnapping, and all 4 are up for excessive force

shopkeepers have aright to detain criminals for cops tho. also its not whether he had a weapon its whether they think he could have one. I think after he gets thrown to ground at end that possibility is done, but a court could say they were thinking he could pull it out at any time but wasnt so he didnt have to flash it on a camera or something.

ummm idk what usa is like but here, citizens arrest doesnt mean people can physically stop people unless theyre under attack and need to restrain someone for their own safety

if some guys trying to run away you dont have the power to physically detain them

what im talking about is a shopkeeper has the right to detain a criminal. so since the guy was trying to steal the shopkeeper has a right to forcibly detain him for a reaonable amount of time (normally just enough for police to get there and such)

yeah but then would still come down to the difference between trying to restrain him and the openly attacking him like the curries and customers were doing

courts could debate that hitting him with random objects is not part of detaining....
it aint guantanamo bay

Haha. That's cool.

I'd originally wanted to be a lawyer, but things work out in other-ways I guess. The other thing too was that I was 21 at the time and wanted a break from school. I also felt kind of young considering I had just become legal to drink like 3 months before and now we're getting served alcohol in school. XD

oh, not even close lol im in south florida.

lol. alls good. worth a try right?