| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
herpderpaids
| Rank #41986 on Comments Offline Send mail to herpderpaids Block herpderpaids Invite herpderpaids to be your friend |
|
- Views: 585
20
5
Total: +15
Comments: 2
Favorites: 2
Uploaded: 01/02/12
creds
latest user's comments
| #47 - Picture | 02/28/2013 on Harry Potter Plot Twist | 0 |
| #41 - Never have I lol'd so hard | 02/24/2013 on I give up. You win internet. | +1 |
| #12 - Nigglet | 03/18/2012 on fiddyfell's profile | 0 |
| #217 - A. I'm Canadian. B. The majority of wars fought by Americs… [+] (9 new replies) | 01/22/2012 on How I imagine Europe... | 0 |
| #236
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] We needn't fight for oil, we already own the oil over there. It's the American reserve oil. We only even went near the oil because middle eastern fighting was destroying the oil. We didn't actually ever get to the reserve or have to fight anyway, because the soldiers were beginning to leave Iraq. Also, how the fuck would know what's up in the middle east? Were you fucking there? No, so shut your fucking mouth. I have not pinkieed you down. And i would say that our war for religion in the medieval times, is a way worse argument than the amerifats battle for oil. I would state that the amerifats fight for oil is true, and i'm pretty okay with that, but our battle for religion was just plain stupid. #228
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] Actually, the crusades and in general wars for religion during the medieval period were not as stupid as you thought. Medieval society valued religion far more than most (not all) of our society does today. Kings' powers supposedly came from God (THEIR Christian, Catholic/ Protestant) God. Very often religion dictated allegiances, and the best occupying tactic in Medieval times was converting people. I won't deny a certain amount of stupid religious fervour resulting in needless bloodshed, but it' more complex than that. (it's a shame I feel I have to post everything as anon cus I'm quite enjoying this : ) ) I'm well aware of that, but still. I can't help but feel bad about how we acted so many years back, and that we were so enraged by our religion. I remember reading the speech of Pope Urban II, and really dieing on the inside. It had everything from racism to sexism in it, and really expressed a lot of the points i feel are extremely dumb, in my humble opinion. But yes, putting yourself in a powerfull position as a king back in the days was of course the best way to act most of the time. Sadly it was often the people under the king that would suffer if something went wrong though :( #258
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] nice to see someone else who studied Medieval history :) And yes, the Crusades were symptomatic of ignorance, racism, greed and even just a thirst for blood as well as other more justifiable thinking of the period. I would argue that that is not a 'European' thing though, it's just a phase the world went through before civil rights and globalisation. | ||
| #199 - America has started wars much worse for worse reason [+] (23 new replies) | 01/22/2012 on How I imagine Europe... | -7 |
| #218
-
swagbot (01/22/2012) [-] WW1: ~40 MILLION KIA/MIA total ~21M wounded - military only WW2: 73 MILLION civilian/military deaths And guess the fuck what - The cruel reprisals that West Europe put on Germany after WW1 gave rise to the climate that Hitler came to power in, hence WW2. Thanks to Hitler, Russia and China (by the Japanese) underwent political revolution that started the spread of Communism and the Cold war. Europe's pride and fail-age is the source of ALL of those lost lives and this last bloody century. Learn some basic history you gigantic flaming fucktard. #251
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] America had a part in causing WW2, and did very little to stop it (sure it joined the war, but two years late after its home territory was attacked i.e. for selfish reasons). WW2 did not cause communism either. Communism in Russia started decades before WW2 started. You are right about the treaty of 1918, but it was ultimately the Great Depression in America which catalysed WW2. Most of the world is responsible for WW2. #807
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] Why the red pinkies here? He's damn fucking right, American fucking idiots. #340
-
xelihope (01/22/2012) [-] Sorry...it sounds like you're idiotically trying to blame WWII on America... We were an ocean away. The majority of any fighting started and occurred on your homefront. We weren't the only country who, at the beginning, stayed neutral and uninvolved. We weren't nearly as big a powerhouse back then, either. I'm sorry you think it was our job to fix your mistake. I'm also sorry that after saying that, you also get mad at us for trying to fix what we think are other's mistakes. #867
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] You have misunderstood what I said. I stated that America "had a part in causing WW2", not 'America was entirely responsible for WW2'. Read what I write more closely. britfat was a sea away from Europe and still felt it was its responsibility to fight; America delayed mostly because it was profiting from the war and wished to play the Nazis off on Russia, causing unneccessary casualties. And yes, other countries stayed uninvolved, but they each had their own reasons and that does not justify America's neutrality. As for you not being a powerhouse, yes you were, you a fantastically wealthy continent even back then, but admittedly it was only because of WW2 that America became truly prosperous. #334
-
cmcghie (01/22/2012) [-] Are you serious? "America had a part in causing WW2, and did very little to stop it." America had no part in causing WW2. European logic - Get pissed of at America for going to war. Get pissed off at America for not going to war soon enough. No wonder America gave Europe the finger and kicked the shit out of you in the Revolution. You are retarded. #868
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] I am unaware of any wars that ever happened between America and Europe (perhaps you're thinking of America v.s. England?) and I refer you to my above response. I am not pissed at America for joining WW2, but it was irresponsible to wait for so long. I've already given several reasons why America was partly responsible for WW2, so I have nothing to add onat front. #811
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] Kicked the shit out of Europe in the revolution. Glad you took down a whole continent America... not really. I mean, Denmark Vs. Sweden? Seriously, we still own the international record for having the most wars fought against each other during the last couple of thousands years. And what about WWII? One persons epiphany/insanity that turned the whole world around. Think about our "holy" crusades back in the medieval times. The Vietnam war, the Iraq war and so on might seem pointless in some way or another, but we must not forget we ain't a tad better, or even worse, here in Europe. #217
-
herpderpaids (01/22/2012) [-] A. I'm Canadian. B. The majority of wars fought by Americs are fought for oil no matter what your government says it is true. Denie all you want. Every pinkie down is one more oblivious asshole #236
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] We needn't fight for oil, we already own the oil over there. It's the American reserve oil. We only even went near the oil because middle eastern fighting was destroying the oil. We didn't actually ever get to the reserve or have to fight anyway, because the soldiers were beginning to leave Iraq. Also, how the fuck would know what's up in the middle east? Were you fucking there? No, so shut your fucking mouth. I have not pinkieed you down. And i would say that our war for religion in the medieval times, is a way worse argument than the amerifats battle for oil. I would state that the amerifats fight for oil is true, and i'm pretty okay with that, but our battle for religion was just plain stupid. #228
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] Actually, the crusades and in general wars for religion during the medieval period were not as stupid as you thought. Medieval society valued religion far more than most (not all) of our society does today. Kings' powers supposedly came from God (THEIR Christian, Catholic/ Protestant) God. Very often religion dictated allegiances, and the best occupying tactic in Medieval times was converting people. I won't deny a certain amount of stupid religious fervour resulting in needless bloodshed, but it' more complex than that. (it's a shame I feel I have to post everything as anon cus I'm quite enjoying this : ) ) I'm well aware of that, but still. I can't help but feel bad about how we acted so many years back, and that we were so enraged by our religion. I remember reading the speech of Pope Urban II, and really dieing on the inside. It had everything from racism to sexism in it, and really expressed a lot of the points i feel are extremely dumb, in my humble opinion. But yes, putting yourself in a powerfull position as a king back in the days was of course the best way to act most of the time. Sadly it was often the people under the king that would suffer if something went wrong though :( #258
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] nice to see someone else who studied Medieval history :) And yes, the Crusades were symptomatic of ignorance, racism, greed and even just a thirst for blood as well as other more justifiable thinking of the period. I would argue that that is not a 'European' thing though, it's just a phase the world went through before civil rights and globalisation. #216
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] Germany alone did not start WW2. The Great Depression had a lot to do with it, and the recalling of debt owed to America made Germany desperate. America also acted poorly during WW2, and profited from the war quite well. And don't forget that a lot of Europe fought against Nazism (and Japan's imperialism), and that in turn much of the world was responsible for unreasonable terms which made Germany very pissed off after WW1, arguably causing WW2. the debt was for france and england, America didnt get much from the treaty of versailles #866
-
N. Korean citizen (01/22/2012) [-] Woodroy Wilson was present at the Treaty of Versailles. And while you are right that Europe had more to do with it, America's isolationism caused many unresolved issues. And furthermore, Germany did have a lot of debt to America. | ||
| #147 - **herpderpaids rolls 0** if i get it again i lose | 01/08/2012 on The Roll Game | 0 |
| #146 - *rol 1* if i get it again i lose | 01/08/2012 on The Roll Game | 0 |
| #144 - *roll1* if i get it again lose | 01/08/2012 on The Roll Game | 0 |
| #143 - **herpderpaids rolls 4** [+] (3 new replies) | 01/08/2012 on The Roll Game | 0 |
| | ||
| #142 - roll 1 | 01/08/2012 on The Roll Game | 0 |

